Articles | Volume 19, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
Research article
 | 
11 May 2022
Research article |  | 11 May 2022

Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges

Camille Abadie, Fabienne Maignan, Marine Remaud, Jérôme Ogée, J. Elliott Campbell, Mary E. Whelan, Florian Kitz, Felix M. Spielmann, Georg Wohlfahrt, Richard Wehr, Wu Sun, Nina Raoult, Ulli Seibt, Didier Hauglustaine, Sinikka T. Lennartz, Sauveur Belviso, David Montagne, and Philippe Peylin

Viewed

Total article views: 3,127 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,269 763 95 3,127 186 78 69
  • HTML: 2,269
  • PDF: 763
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 3,127
  • Supplement: 186
  • BibTeX: 78
  • EndNote: 69
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Nov 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Nov 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,127 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,012 with geography defined and 115 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Feb 2025
Download
Short summary
A better constraint of the components of the carbonyl sulfide (COS) global budget is needed to exploit its potential as a proxy of gross primary productivity. In this study, we compare two representations of oxic soil COS fluxes, and we develop an approach to represent anoxic soil COS fluxes in a land surface model. We show the importance of atmospheric COS concentration variations on oxic soil COS fluxes and provide new estimates for oxic and anoxic soil contributions to the COS global budget.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint