Articles | Volume 19, issue 9
Biogeosciences, 19, 2427–2463, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
Biogeosciences, 19, 2427–2463, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
Research article
11 May 2022
Research article | 11 May 2022

Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges

Camille Abadie et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on bg-2021-281', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Dec 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on bg-2021-281', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Feb 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (21 Mar 2022) by Sönke Zaehle
AR by Camille Abadie on behalf of the Authors (01 Apr 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (01 Apr 2022) by Sönke Zaehle

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Camille Abadie on behalf of the Authors (09 May 2022)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (09 May 2022) by Sönke Zaehle
Download
Short summary
A better constraint of the components of the carbonyl sulfide (COS) global budget is needed to exploit its potential as a proxy of gross primary productivity. In this study, we compare two representations of oxic soil COS fluxes, and we develop an approach to represent anoxic soil COS fluxes in a land surface model. We show the importance of atmospheric COS concentration variations on oxic soil COS fluxes and provide new estimates for oxic and anoxic soil contributions to the COS global budget.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint