Articles | Volume 19, issue 9
Biogeosciences, 19, 2427–2463, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
Biogeosciences, 19, 2427–2463, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022
Research article
11 May 2022
Research article | 11 May 2022

Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges

Camille Abadie et al.

Related authors

Evaluating the vegetation-atmosphere coupling strength of ORCHIDEE land surface model (v7266)
Yuan Zhang, Devaraju Narayanappa, Philippe Ciais, Wei Li, Daniel Goll, Nicolas Vuichard, Martin G. De Kauwe, Laurent Li, and Fabienne Maignan
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-149,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-149, 2022
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
The Climate Impact of Hypersonic Transport
Johannes Friedrich Pletzer, Didier Hauglustaine, Yann Cohen, Patrick Jöckel, and Volker Grewe
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-285,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-285, 2022
Short summary
Interannual variability of terpenoid emissions in an alpine city
Lisa Kaser, Arianna Peron, Martin Graus, Marcus Striednig, Georg Wohlfahrt, Stanislav Juráň, and Thomas Karl
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5603–5618, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5603-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5603-2022, 2022
Short summary
Impact of present and future aircraft NOx and aerosol emissions on atmospheric composition and associated direct radiative forcing of climate
Etienne Terrenoire, Didier Hauglustaine, Yann Cohen, Anne Cozic, Richard Valorso, Franck Lefèvre, and Sigrun Matthes
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-222,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-222, 2022
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Assessing methane emissions for northern peatlands in ORCHIDEE-PEAT revision 7020
Elodie Salmon, Fabrice Jégou, Bertrand Guenet, Line Jourdain, Chunjing Qiu, Vladislav Bastrikov, Christophe Guimbaud, Dan Zhu, Philippe Ciais, Philippe Peylin, Sébastien Gogo, Fatima Laggoun-Défarge, Mika Aurela, M. Syndonia Bret-Harte, Jiquan Chen, Bogdan H. Chojnicki, Housen Chu, Colin W. Edgar, Eugenie S. Euskirchen, Lawrence B. Flanagan, Krzysztof Fortuniak, David Holl, Janina Klatt, Olaf Kolle, Natalia Kowalska, Lars Kutzbach, Annalea Lohila, Lutz Merbold, Włodzimierz Pawlak, Torsten Sachs, and Klaudia Ziemblińska
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2813–2838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Terrestrial
Assimilation of passive microwave vegetation optical depth in LDAS-Monde: a case study over the continental USA
Anthony Mucia, Bertrand Bonan, Clément Albergel, Yongjun Zheng, and Jean-Christophe Calvet
Biogeosciences, 19, 2557–2581, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2557-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2557-2022, 2022
Short summary
Assessing the impacts of agricultural managements on soil carbon stocks, nitrogen loss, and crop production – a modelling study in eastern Africa
Jianyong Ma, Sam S. Rabin, Peter Anthoni, Anita D. Bayer, Sylvia S. Nyawira, Stefan Olin, Longlong Xia, and Almut Arneth
Biogeosciences, 19, 2145–2169, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2145-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2145-2022, 2022
Short summary
The effects of varying drought-heat signatures on terrestrial carbon dynamics and vegetation composition
Elisabeth Tschumi, Sebastian Lienert, Karin van der Wiel, Fortunat Joos, and Jakob Zscheischler
Biogeosciences, 19, 1979–1993, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1979-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1979-2022, 2022
Short summary
Accounting for non-rainfall moisture and temperature improves litter decay model performance in a fog-dominated dryland system
J. Robert Logan, Kathe E. Todd-Brown, Kathryn M. Jacobson, Peter J. Jacobson, Roland Vogt, and Sarah E. Evans
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2022-16,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2022-16, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for BG
Short summary
Resolving temperature limitation on spring productivity in an evergreen conifer forest using a model–data fusion framework
Stephanie G. Stettz, Nicholas C. Parazoo, A. Anthony Bloom, Peter D. Blanken, David R. Bowling, Sean P. Burns, Cédric Bacour, Fabienne Maignan, Brett Raczka, Alexander J. Norton, Ian Baker, Mathew Williams, Mingjie Shi, Yongguang Zhang, and Bo Qiu
Biogeosciences, 19, 541–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-541-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-541-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Aneja, V. P., Overton, J. H., and Aneja, A. P.: Emission survey of biogenic sulfur flux from terrestrial surfaces, JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma., 31, 256–258, https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1981.10465218, 1981. 
Bastrikov, V., MacBean, N., Bacour, C., Santaren, D., Kuppel, S., and Peylin, P.: Land surface model parameter optimisation using in situ flux data: comparison of gradient-based versus random search algorithms (a case study using ORCHIDEE v1.9.5.2), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4739–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4739-2018, 2018. 
Belviso, S., Schmidt, M., Yver, C., Ramonet, M., Gros, V., and Launois, T.: Strong similarities between night-time deposition velocities of carbonyl sulphide and molecular hydrogen inferred from semi-continuous atmospheric observations in Gif-sur-Yvette, Paris region, Tellus B, 65, 20719, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20719, 2013. 
Belviso, S., Lebegue, B., Ramonet, M., Kazan, V., Pison, I., Berchet, A., Delmotte, M., Yver-Kwok, C., Montagne, D., and Ciais, P.: A top-down approach of sources and non-photosynthetic sinks of carbonyl sulfide from atmospheric measurements over multiple years in the Paris region (France), PLOS ONE, 15, e0228419, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228419, 2020. 
Berkelhammer, M., Asaf, D., Still, C., Montzka, S., Noone, D., Gupta, M., Provencal, R., Chen, H., and Yakir, D.: Constraining surface carbon fluxes using in situ measurements of carbonyl sulfide and carbon dioxide, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28, 161–179, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004644, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
A better constraint of the components of the carbonyl sulfide (COS) global budget is needed to exploit its potential as a proxy of gross primary productivity. In this study, we compare two representations of oxic soil COS fluxes, and we develop an approach to represent anoxic soil COS fluxes in a land surface model. We show the importance of atmospheric COS concentration variations on oxic soil COS fluxes and provide new estimates for oxic and anoxic soil contributions to the COS global budget.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint