Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1613-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1613-2024
Research article
 | 
28 Mar 2024
Research article |  | 28 Mar 2024

Diurnal versus spatial variability of greenhouse gas emissions from an anthropogenically modified lowland river in Germany

Matthias Koschorreck, Norbert Kamjunke, Uta Koedel, Michael Rode, Claudia Schuetze, and Ingeborg Bussmann

Related authors

Temporal patterns and drivers of CO2 emission from dry sediments in a groyne field of a large river
Matthias Koschorreck, Klaus Holger Knorr, and Lelaina Teichert
Biogeosciences, 19, 5221–5236, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5221-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Technical note: CO2 is not like CH4 – limits of and corrections to the headspace method to analyse pCO2 in fresh water
Matthias Koschorreck, Yves T. Prairie, Jihyeon Kim, and Rafael Marcé
Biogeosciences, 18, 1619–1627, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1619-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1619-2021, 2021
Short summary
A closed-chamber method to measure greenhouse gas fluxes from dry aquatic sediments
Lukas Lesmeister and Matthias Koschorreck
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2377–2382, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2377-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2377-2017, 2017
Short summary
CO2 emissions from German drinking water reservoirs estimated from routine monitoring data
H. Saidi and M. Koschorreck
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2015-648,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2015-648, 2016
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Technical note: drifting versus anchored flux chambers for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from running waters
A. Lorke, P. Bodmer, C. Noss, Z. Alshboul, M. Koschorreck, C. Somlai-Haase, D. Bastviken, S. Flury, D. F. McGinnis, A. Maeck, D. Müller, and K. Premke
Biogeosciences, 12, 7013–7024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7013-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7013-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Greenhouse Gases
Assessing improvements in global ocean pCO2 machine learning reconstructions with Southern Ocean autonomous sampling
Thea H. Heimdal, Galen A. McKinley, Adrienne J. Sutton, Amanda R. Fay, and Lucas Gloege
Biogeosciences, 21, 2159–2176, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2159-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2159-2024, 2024
Short summary
Timescale dependence of airborne fraction and underlying climate–carbon-cycle feedbacks for weak perturbations in CMIP5 models
Guilherme L. Torres Mendonça, Julia Pongratz, and Christian H. Reick
Biogeosciences, 21, 1923–1960, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1923-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1923-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: Preventing CO2 overestimation from mercuric or copper(II) chloride preservation of dissolved greenhouse gases in freshwater samples
François Clayer, Jan Erik Thrane, Kuria Ndungu, Andrew King, Peter Dörsch, and Thomas Rohrlack
Biogeosciences, 21, 1903–1921, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1903-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring temporal and spatial variation of nitrous oxide flux using several years of peatland forest automatic chamber data
Helena Rautakoski, Mika Korkiakoski, Jarmo Mäkelä, Markku Koskinen, Kari Minkkinen, Mika Aurela, Paavo Ojanen, and Annalea Lohila
Biogeosciences, 21, 1867–1886, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Regional assessment and uncertainty analysis of carbon and nitrogen balances at cropland scale using the ecosystem model LandscapeDNDC
Odysseas Sifounakis, Edwin Haas, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, and Maria P. Papadopoulou
Biogeosciences, 21, 1563–1581, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1563-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1563-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Barbosa, P. M., Melack, J. M., Amaral, J. H. F., Linkhorst, A., and Forsberg, B. R.: Large Seasonal and Habitat Differences in Methane Ebullition on the Amazon Floodplain, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo, 126, e2020JG005911, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005911, 2021. 
Bartoscheck, T., Fehrenbach, D., and Fehrenbach, J.: Das Sensebook-Buch – 12 Projekte rund um Sensoren, Dpunkt Verlag, Heidelberg, ISBN: 978-3-86490-684-8, 2019. 
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S.: Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 67, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01, 2015. 
Battin, T. J., Lauerwald, R., Bernhardt, E. S., Bertuzzo, E., Gener, L. G., Hall, R. O., Hotchkiss, E. R., Maavara, T., Pavelsky, T. M., Ran, L., Raymond, P., Rosentreter, J. A., and Regnier, P.: River ecosystem metabolism and carbon biogeochemistry in a changing world, Nature, 613, 449–459, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05500-8, 2023. 
Download
Short summary
We measured the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) from different sites at the river Elbe in Germany over 3 days to find out what is more important for quantification: small-scale spatial variability or diurnal temporal variability. We found that CO2 emissions were very different between day and night, while CH4 emissions were more different between sites. Dried out river sediments contributed to CO2 emissions, while the side areas of the river were important CH4 sources.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint