Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 21, issue 19
Articles | Volume 21, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4453-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4453-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 21, issue 19
Research article
 | 
14 Oct 2024
Research article |  | 14 Oct 2024

Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) climatologies, fluxes, and trends – Part 2: Sea–air fluxes

Sankirna D. Joge, Anoop S. Mahajan, Shrivardhan Hulswar, Christa A. Marandino, Martí Galí, Thomas G. Bell, Mingxi Yang, and Rafel Simó

Viewed

Total article views: 1,118 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
896 177 45 1,118 64 27 30
  • HTML: 896
  • PDF: 177
  • XML: 45
  • Total: 1,118
  • Supplement: 64
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 30
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,118 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,135 with geography defined and -17 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is the largest natural source of sulfur in the atmosphere and leads to the formation of cloud condensation nuclei. DMS emissions and quantification of their impacts have large uncertainties, but a detailed study on the range of emissions and drivers of their uncertainty is missing to date. The emissions are calculated from the seawater DMS concentrations and a flux parameterization. Here we quantify the differences in the effect of flux parameterizations used in models.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint