Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 22, issue 11
Articles | Volume 22, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2691-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2691-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22, issue 11
Research article
 | 
13 Jun 2025
Research article |  | 13 Jun 2025

Validating laboratory predictions of soil rewetting respiration pulses using field data

Xiankun Li, Marleen Pallandt, Dilip Naidu, Johannes Rousk, Gustaf Hugelius, and Stefano Manzoni

Viewed

Total article views: 4,036 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,638 878 520 4,036 173 149 230
  • HTML: 2,638
  • PDF: 878
  • XML: 520
  • Total: 4,036
  • Supplement: 173
  • BibTeX: 149
  • EndNote: 230
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Nov 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Nov 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,036 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,034 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 14 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
While laboratory studies have identified many drivers and their effects on the carbon emission pulse after rewetting of dry soils, a validation with field data is still missing. Here, we show that the carbon emission pulse in the laboratory and in the field increases with soil organic carbon and temperature, but their trends with pre-rewetting dryness and moisture increment at rewetting differ. We conclude that the laboratory findings can be partially validated.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint