Articles | Volume 23, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1341-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1341-2026
Research article
 | 
19 Feb 2026
Research article |  | 19 Feb 2026

Understanding drivers and biases of simulated CO emissions from the INFERNO fire model over South America

Maria P. Velásquez-García, Richard J. Pope, Steven T. Turnock, Chetan Deva, David P. Moore, Guilherme Mataveli, Steve R. Arnold, Ruth M. Doherty, and Martyn P. Chipperfield

Viewed

Total article views: 2,671 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,252 369 50 2,671 132 58 68
  • HTML: 2,252
  • PDF: 369
  • XML: 50
  • Total: 2,671
  • Supplement: 132
  • BibTeX: 58
  • EndNote: 68
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,671 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,633 with geography defined and 38 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Incorporating fire simulation into climate models is crucial for accurately representing interactions between fires, ecosystems, and climate, thereby enhancing climate projections. In South America, the INFERNO (Interactive Fires and Emissions algorithm for Natural Environments) fire model broadly captures CO emissions in active fire zones, e.g., the Amazon Arc of Deforestation. Still, it tends to overestimate emissions in tree-rich ecosystems, where INFERNO is too sensitive to low soil moisture, and to underestimate emissions in less tree-abundant ecosystems.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint