Articles | Volume 23, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7067-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7067-2026
Technical note
 | 
08 Oct 2026
Technical note |  | 08 Oct 2026

Technical note: How well do evapotranspiration partitioning approaches perform in moss-covered wetlands?

Yi Wang, Richard M. Petrone, and Lei Zhang

Cited articles

Admiral, S. W. and Lafleur, P. M.: Partitioning of latent heat flux at a northern peatland, Aquat. Bot., 86, 107–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.09.006, 2007. 
Albert-Saiz, M., Stróżecki, M., Rastogi, A., and Juszczak, R.: A Multi-Model Gap-Filling Strategy Increases the Accuracy of GPP Estimation from Periodic Chamber-Based Flux Measurements on Sphagnum-Dominated Peatland, Sustainability, 17, 393, https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020393, 2025. 
Allen, S. T., Reba, M. L., Edwards, B. L., and Keim, R. F.: Evaporation and the subcanopy energy environment in a flooded forest, Hydrol. Process., 31, 2860–2871, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11227, 2017. 
Aro, E.-M. and Gerbaud, A.: Photosynthesis and Photorespiration in Mosses, in: Advances in Photosynthesis Research, edited by: Sybesma, C., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 867–870, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4973-2_198, 1984. 
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis, Springer Science & Business Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1, 2012. 
Download
Short summary
Wetlands lose water through evaporation and plant transpiration, but separating these processes remains challenging. We compared ten methods across four Canadian moss-covered wetlands and found that no single method or methodological group consistently performed best. Performance also depended on the reference data used for evaluation. Our findings suggest comparing multiple methods to identify uncertainty and highlight the need for wetland-specific evapotranspiration partitioning approaches.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint