Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 15, issue 17
Articles | Volume 15, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5473-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5473-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 17
Research article
 | 
14 Sep 2018
Research article |  | 14 Sep 2018

Eddy covariance flux errors due to random and systematic timing errors during data acquisition

Gerardo Fratini, Simone Sabbatini, Kevin Ediger, Brad Riensche, George Burba, Giacomo Nicolini, Domenico Vitale, and Dario Papale

Viewed

Total article views: 3,137 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,032 1,052 53 3,137 57 73
  • HTML: 2,032
  • PDF: 1,052
  • XML: 53
  • Total: 3,137
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 73
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Apr 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,137 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,960 with geography defined and 177 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 23 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Using a simulation study and field data, we quantify the biases that can be introduced in fluxes measured by eddy covariance (EC) if the raw high-frequency data are affected by random and systematic timing misalignments. Our study was motivated by the increasingly widespread adoption of fully digital EC systems potentially subject to such timing errors. We found biases as large as 10 %. We further propose a test to evaluate EC data logging systems for their time synchronization capabilities.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint