10 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Nutrient‐dependent thermal response in growth and stoichiometry of Antarctic phytoplankton M. Smykala et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70045
2. Limitation by Fe, Zn, Co, and B12 Results in Similar Physiological Responses in Two Antarctic Phytoplankton Species F. Koch & S. Trimborn https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00514
3. The combined effect of pH and dissolved inorganic carbon concentrations on the physiology of plastidic ciliate Mesodinium rubrum and its cryptophyte prey C. Eriksen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2023.102509
4. Antarctic lake phytoplankton and bacteria from near‐surface waters exhibit high sensitivity to climate‐driven disturbance S. Sherwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16113
5. Physiological response of an Antarctic cryptophyte to increasing temperature, CO2, and irradiance M. Camoying & S. Trimborn https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12392
6. Photoacclimation of cryptophytes and diatoms to light variability in the Western Antarctic Peninsula A. Ferreira et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.70158
7. Mineral Microbiomes Entombed in Great Salt Lake Gypsum: Considerations for Martian Evaporites P. Martinez-Koury et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/15311074251365204
8. Sentinel protist taxa of the McMurdo Dry Valley lakes, Antarctica: a review R. Morgan-Kiss et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1323472
9. In contrast to diatoms, cryptophytes are susceptible to iron limitation, but not to ocean acidification M. Camoying et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13614
10. Ocean acidification and high irradiance stimulate the photo-physiological fitness, growth and carbon production of the Antarctic cryptophyte Geminigera cryophila S. Trimborn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2997-2019