The revisions appear quite extensive and responsive to the comments of both referees. Given the nature of the comments of reviewer 1, I will consider asking that reviewer to comment on a revised version as to how well it addressed their major comments.

The revision has been evaluated by Reviewer 1 and myself. I also examined the revisions relative to the specific comments of Reviewer 2. I determined that you have adequately addressed the comments of both reviewers, except for a few minor comments offered by Reviewer 1 on the revised version. Please address the comments from Reviewer 1 that were made based on their evaluation of the revised version. Once this done, I will reconsider your next version for a final decision. If you address the comments, the next version should be ready for a positive decision.

The authors have addressed the comments on the revised version of the manuscript. I recommend that this third version (second revision), which was minor revision after a major revision, is acceptable for publication.