Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 19, issue 16
Articles | Volume 19, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3935-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3935-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 19, issue 16
Research article
 | 
30 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 30 Aug 2022

Modeling the effects of alternative crop–livestock management scenarios on important ecosystem services for smallholder farming from a landscape perspective

Mirjam Pfeiffer, Munir P. Hoffmann, Simon Scheiter, William Nelson, Johannes Isselstein, Kingsley Ayisi, Jude J. Odhiambo, and Reimund Rötter

Viewed

Total article views: 2,147 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,545 543 59 2,147 145 40 38
  • HTML: 1,545
  • PDF: 543
  • XML: 59
  • Total: 2,147
  • Supplement: 145
  • BibTeX: 40
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Apr 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Apr 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,147 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,052 with geography defined and 95 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Smallholder farmers face challenges due to poor land management and climate change. We linked the APSIM crop model and the aDGVM2 vegetation model to investigate integrated management options that enhance ecosystem functions and services. Sustainable intensification moderately increased yields. Crop residue grazing reduced feed gaps but not for dry-to-wet season transitions. Measures to improve soil water and nutrient status are recommended. Landscape-level ecosystem management is essential.
Read more
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint