Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 20, issue 13
Articles | Volume 20, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2707-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2707-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 20, issue 13
Research article
 | 
12 Jul 2023
Research article |  | 12 Jul 2023

Assessing carbon storage capacity and saturation across six central US grasslands using data–model integration

Kevin R. Wilcox, Scott L. Collins, Alan K. Knapp, William Pockman, Zheng Shi, Melinda D. Smith, and Yiqi Luo

Viewed

Total article views: 1,778 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,245 469 64 1,778 61 35 47
  • HTML: 1,245
  • PDF: 469
  • XML: 64
  • Total: 1,778
  • Supplement: 61
  • BibTeX: 35
  • EndNote: 47
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,778 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,678 with geography defined and 100 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The capacity for carbon storage (C capacity) is an attribute that determines how ecosystems store carbon in the future. Here, we employ novel data–model integration techniques to identify the carbon capacity of six grassland sites spanning the US Great Plains. Hot and dry sites had low C capacity due to less plant growth and high turnover of soil C, so they may be a C source in the future. Alternately, cooler and wetter ecosystems had high C capacity, so these systems may be a future C sink.
Read more
Special issue
Ecosystem experiments as a window to future carbon, water,...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint