Articles | Volume 22, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-8013-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-8013-2025
Research article
 | 
16 Dec 2025
Research article |  | 16 Dec 2025

Organic iron-binding ligands mediate dissolved-particulate exchange in hydrothermal vent plumes along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Travis Mellett, Justine B. Albers, Alyson E. Santoro, Pascal Salaun, Joseph Resing, Wenhao Wang, Alastair J. M. Lough, Alessandro Tagliabue, Maeve Lohan, Randelle M. Bundy, and Kristen N. Buck
Abstract

Hydrothermal vents are important contributors to the dissolved iron (Fe) inventory in the ocean. Investigating the processes underlying Fe behavior in hydrothermal plumes is challenging, but important for constraining deep ocean Fe cycling. Field studies suggest that the retention of hydrothermal Fe in the deep ocean is primarily supported by two mechanisms: the formation of colloidal nanoparticles and the stabilization of Fe by organic ligands. Here we present a novel dataset from shipboard incubation experiments designed to investigate the interplay between these two processes and how they contribute to the stabilization of Fe away from ridge axes. Filtered and unfiltered water collected from the hydrothermal plumes of three vent fields along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge as part of GEOTRACES cruise GA13 was incubated in the dark and regularly sampled over time (up to 3 weeks) for concentrations of size-fractionated Fe and Fe-binding ligands, for dissolved Fe isotopic composition, and for microbial community composition. We observed rapid exchange of Fe between physicochemical phases that appeared to be mediated in part by organic Fe-binding ligands at each stage of plume evolution. Weaker Fe-binding ligands sources from the vents were largely lost to the particulate phase with colloidal Fe phases via aggregation early in plume development, similar to the loss of Fe and organic matter commonly observed in estuarine systems. Soluble organic ligand production was observed in later stages of all unfiltered incubations followed by mobilization of particulate and colloidal Fe into the soluble phase in the longer incubations, revealing a potentially important mechanism for generating the persistent Fe observed in long-range plumes.

Share
1 Introduction

Iron (Fe) is a globally important micronutrient in marine biogeochemical systems, limiting primary production and the microbial loop over large areas of the surface ocean (Martin and Fitzwater, 1988; Moore et al., 2013, 2001; Li et al., 2024; Manck et al., 2024). Delivery of Fe to the remote surface ocean is achieved through atmospheric transport of dust aerosols (Johnson et al., 1997), but also via long-range transport and subsequent upwelling of subsurface Fe sources from the continental margin (Lam et al., 2006) and from hydrothermal vents (Tagliabue et al., 2014; Resing et al., 2015). Hydrothermal vents in particular, are a more recently recognized important contributor to the overall dissolved Fe inventory in seawater, with observations from the GEOTRACES program reporting long-distance dispersion of vent sourced Fe; in some cases, hundreds to thousands of kilometers away from the ridge axis (Wu et al., 2011; Klunder et al., 2011; Kondo et al., 2012; Nishioka et al., 2013; Resing et al., 2015; Fitzsimmons et al., 2017), and have been estimated to contribute up to 9 % of the Fe in the deep ocean (Sander and Koschinsky, 2011). Depending on the location and longevity of the Fe from the vent source, it could also influence surface Fe biogeochemistry and impact primary productivity and carbon export (Resing et al., 2015). However, hydrothermal systems are highly variable and notoriously difficult to study, so quantifying the global impact of Fe sourced from vents remains an important research question.

Hydrothermal plumes represent a stark physical and chemical boundary system in the deep ocean water column. When hot ( 350 °C), acidic, and reduced hydrothermal fluids are expelled at the base of a cool ( 2–4 °C), stratified water-column, a buoyant plume is formed. As the plume mixes with surrounding deep ocean waters it eventually becomes a neutrally buoyant plume (Lupton et al., 1985) and may be transported laterally along isopycnals from the vent site via local currents. During this transition from a buoyant to neutrally buoyant plume, the majority of Fe (40 %–90 %) present in the vent fluid is lost to precipitation as large sulfide and Fe-(oxyhydr)oxide particles (Campbell et al., 1988; German et al., 1991; Mottl and McConachy, 1990; Rudnicki and Elderfield, 1993; Lough et al., 2019), and any remaining Fe can be transported away from the vent site.

In oxygenated seawater, the solubility of inorganic Fe is exceedingly low (Liu and Millero, 2002) and should preclude long-range transport of Fe from vent systems. Field studies have identified two primary mechanisms that can support the observed far-field dispersion of Fe: (1) the formation of small inorganic nanoparticulate pyrites that are resistant to oxidation and sink more slowly than larger particulate forms (Hochella et al., 2008; Yücel et al., 2011; Gartman et al., 2014; Gartman and Luther, 2014), and (2) the stabilization of dissolved Fe by Fe-binding organic ligands. Several studies have also shown that hydrothermal vents are a source of natural Fe-binding ligands above background deep ocean concentrations (Bennett et al., 2008; Sander and Koschinsky, 2011; Hawkes et al., 2013b; Kleint et al., 2016) and the upregulation of siderophore uptake and biosynthesis genes within a hydrothermal plume suggests this organic complexation may stabilize Fe in the dissolved phase (Li et al., 2014). These two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and their interplay may explain the low-density organic matrices of particles observed far-field of vent systems (Fitzsimmons et al., 2017; Hoffman et al., 2020).

Thus, there is compelling evidence from previous studies for both inorganic and organic mechanisms for the stabilization of Fe emitted from hydrothermal vents, with both probably playing an important role in the evolution of dissolved Fe in hydrothermal plumes. However, most field studies are limited to sampling vent plumes at a single snapshot in time, limiting our understanding of how inorganic nanoparticles and/or organic ligands contribute to stabilizing Fe over time during the different physical (buoyant/neutrally buoyant) and chemical (reducing/oxidized) stages of plume evolution and advection far-field. To date, only one study has attempted to observe the temporal evolution of dissolved Fe in plume waters through a 24 h incubation of a Niskin bottle (Lough et al., 2017).

Here we present the results from four incubation experiments aimed at examining processes underpinning Fe cycling during hydrothermal plume formation and evolution. Plume water was incubated filtered (< 0.2 µm) and unfiltered in the dark for time scales ranging from 6–22 d. Experiments were sampled for three different physicochemical size-fractions (dissolved, soluble, total particulate) for Fe concentrations, Fe-binding organic ligands, dissolved Fe isotopes, and 16S microbial community composition. The results from these experiments revealed how both newly produced and ambient organic ligands are involved in the exchange of Fe between dissolved and particulate phases in plume waters over different time scales. Together, these data provide novel insights into the mechanisms that support long-range dispersal of hydrothermal Fe in the deep sea.

2 Methods

2.1 Incubation locations, set-up, and sampling

Hydrothermal plumes from three vent systems (Lucky Strike, Rainbow, and TAG) along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) were sampled on the RSS James Cook (JC156, UK GEOTRACES voyage GA13) between 20 December 2017 and 1 February 2018 (Fig. 1) using a titanium frame 24-bottle rosette (SeaBird Scientific) equipped with trace metal clean Teflon-coated 10 L x-Niskin samplers (Ocean Test Equipment, Inc.). Hydrothermal plumes were identified using a CTD-mounted light scatter sensor (LSS) as an optical proxy for particles and an oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) sensor for detection of reduced species contributed from vent fluid end members. Once on board, the x-Niskins were drained into acid-cleaned, Milli-Q (MQ) conditioned, and seawater-rinsed 20 L polycarbonate (PC) carboys in a class-1000 clean air van. Each incubation carboy was filled from two x-Niskin bottles, closed in succession during the upcast of the plume sampling casts. In addition to unfiltered water for the incubations, we also incorporated filtered (< 0.2 µm, Acropak) plume waters as additional treatments for the TAG and Rainbow near-field incubations (Fig. 1). Thus, the filtered treatment represents the water that was filtered prior to the start of the incubation, whereas unfiltered treatment refers to incubations of hydrothermal plume water still containing ambient particles and microbial communities. All incubation carboys were kept in the dark in a controlled temperature room (14 ± 1 °C) aboard the ship.

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/8013/2025/bg-22-8013-2025-f01

Figure 1Overview map and flowchart of incubation set-up. Left panel: map of GA13 cruise stations; red circles denote locations of incubation water collection (Lucky Strike, Rainbow, and TAG). Right panel: flowchart of the incubation set-up and sampling. Below the incubation carboys is a list of vent sites the treatment was applied (TAG, Lucky Strike, Rainbow near-field (NF) and far-field (FF)). The samples taken include total dissolvable trace metals (TDTMs), Fe isotopes (Iso), 16S (DNA), dissolved (d) and soluble (s) trace metals (TMs) and Fe speciation (L) described in further detail in Sect. 2.1. * Indicates samples that were not sampled each time point.

Subsampling of the incubation carboys was conducted in a laminar-flow clean hood. Each incubation carboy was gently inverted at least three times to homogenize any settled particles before distributing an aliquot into 2.5 L PC bottles that were cleaned, conditioned, and sample rinsed prior to filling. At the time of subsampling, total dissolvable (“TD”) trace metal samples were collected directly from the carboy. Contents of the 2.5 L bulk aliquot for were sequentially filtered through 3 and 0.4 µm acid-cleaned PC track etched (PCTE) filters in 47 mm Teflon filter holders (Savillex) on a two-stage custom-built filtration rig for dissolved (“d”) trace metal and Fe speciation samples. The remaining unfiltered subsample was filtered through a 0.02 µm Anodisc filter to collect soluble (“s”) samples. For selected incubations (Rainbow near-field, Rainbow far-field, Lucky Strike), microbial community subsamples were taken at the start of the incubation and again after 1 week (Rainbow near-field) or 2 weeks into the incubation for longer experiments (Rainbow far-field, Lucky Strike).

2.2 Quantification of total dissolvable (unfiltered), dissolved (< 0.4 µm) and soluble (< 0.02 µm) trace metals

All samples for trace metal concentration analysis were collected in 125 mL low-density polyethylene (LDPE; Nalgene) bottles and acidified with ultrapure hydrochloric acid (HCl, Romil-UpA; final 0.024 M HCl, pH  1.7–1.8) and stored for at least 6 months prior to analysis. Concentrations of both total dissolvable and dissolved Fe and Mn in all samples were determined first by direct injection high-resolution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (HR-ICP-MS; Thermo Scientific Element XR) at the University of South Florida after diluting 50-fold with 1 N quartz-distilled nitric acid (HNO3). Samples with concentrations < 25 nM Fe required preconcentration for accurate quantification. A seaFAST-pico system was used to buffer the samples to pH 6.2 ± 0.2 with a 5.4 M ammonium acetate buffer before preconcentration of the trace metals in the samples on a Nobias PA1 resin. The preconcentrated sample was then eluted from the resin with 1 N quartz-distilled nitric acid, and the concentrations of Fe, Mn, and vanadium (V) analyzed on an Element XR HR-ICP-MS (Hollister et al., 2020). Quantification of trace metals by standard addition following normalization of counts to internal standards of indium and rhodium were used for all HR-ICP-MS analyses. Accuracy was verified by analysis of the certified reference materials CASS-6, NASS-7 (National Research Council of Canada), and SAFe D2 (Johnson et al., 2007). A comparison of our results with consensus values are listed in the Supplement (Table S1).

2.3 Fe isotope measurements

For the two high-Fe incubations conducted at Rainbow and TAG, the dissolved trace metal samples were subsampled and analyzed for dissolved Fe isotopes (δ56dFe) following the methods described in Wang et al. (2021) using distilled UpA grade reagents at the National Oceanography Centre in Southampton UK. The isotopic composition of Fe was determined by multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS; Thermo Fisher Neptune Plus) at the University of Southampton. The raw data were corrected for instrumental mass bias using an iterative deconvolving procedure (Albarede and Beard, 2004). The final Fe isotope value of the samples is reported in delta notation relative to the IRMM Fe isotope standard and expressed as:

(1) δ 56 Fe ( ) = 56 Fe / 54 Fe sample / 56 Fe / 54 Fe IRMM - 14 - 1 × 1000 .

Long-term analyses of the ETH Fe isotope standard gave δ56Fe = 0.51 ± 0.09 ‰ (2 SD, n= 45), in agreement with the consensus value (+0.52 ± 0.08 ‰; Lacan et al., 2010). The accuracy of the method was further validated through the analysis of trace metal free seawater doped with the hematite Fe isotope standard, yielding an average δ56Fe value of +0.22 ± 0.10 ‰ (2 SD, n= 5), consistent with previously published hematite values (δ56Fe =+0.24 ± 0.05 ‰; Klar et al., 2017).

2.4 Fe-binding ligands by forward and reverse titration

Filtered (< 0.2 µm, < 0.02  µm) samples were collected for Fe-binding organic ligands (LFe) in acid-cleaned, MQ conditioned, and sample-rinsed 500 mL fluorinated polyethylene (FPE) bottles (Nalgene) and stored frozen (20 °C) until analysis at the University of South Florida. Two different methods of competitive ligand exchange-adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry (CLE-AdCSV) were employed for measuring Fe-binding organic ligands in our samples: forward titrations (Rue and Bruland, 1995; Buck et al., 2018; Mahieu et al., 2024) and reverse titrations (Hawkes et al., 2013a). When dFe concentrations exceeded ligand concentrations, we used “reverse titrations” to allow quantification of Fe-binding ligands bound to ambient Fe by progressively increasing the concentration of an electroactive ligand until all exchangeable Fe is removed from the natural ligands (Hawkes et al., 2013a). We applied both methods for the Rainbow far-field and Lucky Strike incubations since we were unsure of the extent of ligand saturation in the samples prior to analyses. We report forward titration results for samples with excess ligands observed in the titrations, and results from reverse titrations when initial titration points in the forward titrations indicated ligands were already saturated with Fe.

For the forward titrations, we used the competitive ligand salicylaldoxime (SA; Buck et al., 2012, 2007; Mahieu et al., 2024), which was previously used for the North Atlantic GEOTRACES (GA03) samples collected at TAG (Buck et al., 2015). This method has been successfully intercalibrated (Buck et al., 2012, 2016) and allows for an assessment of stronger Fe-binding organic ligands (Rue and Bruland, 1995; Buck et al., 2010; Bundy et al., 2018; Mahieu et al., 2024). For this approach, samples were aliquoted into carefully conditioned (Mahieu et al., 2024) flat-bottom Teflon vials (Savillex), buffered with 50 µL of 1.5 M borate buffer (7.5 mM final concentration) to a pH of 8.2 (total scale), and any excess ligands in the samples were titrated with 15 additions of 0–10 nM FeCl3. The Fe additions were allowed to equilibrate overnight before adding 25 µM SA to each vial, and SA additions were then equilibrated at least 1 h before analysis. The measurements were made on a BioAnalytical Systems (BASi) controlled growth mercury electrode interfaced with an Epsilon E2 analyzer (BASi), using a deposition time of 120 s. A post-titration spike was used to verify vial conditioning and the linearity of the final titration points (Mahieu et al., 2024). Titration data were processed using ECDsoft and ProMCC software (Omanović et al., 2015; Pižeta et al., 2015). We used the complete complexation fitting method, which fits the data using multiple regression models and allows a visual verification of results against the titration data.

Reverse titrations were carried out using the competitive ligand 1-nitroso-2-naphthol (NN) to compete against natural ligands, as has been previously applied to hydrothermal plumes (Hawkes et al., 2013a). Briefly, 500 µL of 1.5 M trace metal clean borate buffer was added to 150 mL of sample in an acid-cleaned 250 mL LDPE bottle (final concentration of 5 mM) to achieve a pH of 8.2 (total scale). The buffered sample was pipetted into the preconditioned vials, and 0.5–40 µM NN was added to compete against natural LFe complexes. The samples were equilibrated overnight and the concentration of Fe(NN)3 in each vial was measured by AdCSV after purging with nitrogen for 300 s using a 797VA Computrace (Metrohm) at the University of South Florida. For samples with high Fe concentrations (> 100 nM) a fivefold dilution with MQ was conducted to ensure adequate excess NN (Hawkes et al., 2013a, b; Kleint et al., 2016), and salinity corrected side reaction coefficients were applied (Gledhill and Van Den Berg, 1994). Previous work has shown that a fivefold dilution does not impact the KFeL,Fecond but may lead to a slight overestimation of LFe (Hawkes et al., 2013b). No dilutions were performed on forward titrations. The reverse titration data were processed in the software package ECDsoft, and the data were modeled using a previously published R package (Hawkes et al., 2013a). Values of [LFe] and KFeL,Fecond were fit to the experimental data where 80 % of ipmax was reached using the R package with values of αFe= 109.8 and αFeNN3=βFeNN3[NN]3 with a βFeNN3 value of 5.12 × 1026 (Hawkes et al., 2013a).

2.5 Microbial community composition using 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Samples for microbial community composition were taken directly from the carboy for each incubation. Two liters of water was sampled in a 4 L high-density polyethylene (HPDE) bottle. Cells were harvested by pressure filtration onto 25 mm diameter sequential 3 and 0.2 µm pore-size polyethersulfone membrane filters (Supor-200, Pall Corporation) housed in polypropylene filter holders (Whatman SwinLok) using a peristaltic pump and silicone tubing. Pump tubing was acid washed with 10 % HCl and flushed with ultrapure water between each sample. The filters were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen in 2 mL gasketed bead beating tubes (Fisher Scientific). Nucleic acids (DNA) were extracted as using a modified method from Santoro et al. (2010).

The 16S rRNA gene was amplified in all samples using V4 primers (515F-Y and 806RB, Apprill et al., 2015; Parada et al., 2016) following the protocol outlined in Stephens et al. (2020) and amplicons were sequenced via a 2 × 250 bp MiSeq 500 run at the UC Davis Genome Center. Resulting sequences were filtered and trimmed with DADA2 (Callahan et al., 2016) and taxonomy was assigned with the SILVA SSU database (v 138.1; Quast et al., 2012) Read counts were transformed from absolute to relative abundance and taxa were aggregated to the family level. The five most abundant families present in each sample were visualized using the “ggplot2” package (v. 3.3.5). In order to assess the potential of the observed prokaryotic taxa to produce siderophores, we downloaded all siderophore biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in the antismash secondary metabolite database (n= 7909) and used text-string matching to compare genera containing these BGCs to the genera found in our 16S rRNA gene dataset (Blin et al., 2021).

3 Results

3.1 Experimental context

The incubations presented here captured distinct physical (buoyant/neutrally buoyant) and chemical (reducing/oxidized) stages of the hydrothermal plumes (Gartman and Findlay, 2020) across a range of systems with high and low Fe vent fluids (Table 1). We used the concentration of Mn as a quasi-conservative tracer (Field and Sherrell, 2000) of mixing between vent fluid endmembers (Table 1) and background deep ocean concentrations in the region ( 0.1 nM; Hatta et al., 2015). The concentration of Mn was stable over the days to weeks of incubation time in all experiments, with all Mn observed in the soluble fraction (Figs. S2–S5 in the Supplement). In field measurements from GA13, Mn was shown to behave similarly to helium-3 (3He), indicating that over the spatial and temporal scope of these experiments it is a valid proxy for dilution (Lough et al., 2023). We used a dilution factor of 10 000 to define the threshold between the buoyant plume and the neutrally buoyant plume (Lupton et al., 1985), but also report the potential density anomaly (σ0) from each cast (Fig. S1). The concentrations of TDFe were considered representative of the sum of dissolved and particulate Fe in each incubation, following previous work in near-field hydrothermal systems (Revels et al., 2015; Lough et al., 2017). We present the incubation results in order from the closest to the vent source (high Fe, reducing, near-field) to the furthest away from the vent source (lower Fe, oxidized, far-field).

Table 1Data from Douville et al., (2002) of vent fluid end member chemical characteristics for the three vent systems studied in these incubation experiments. Presented are the dissolved Mn, Fe, H2S concentrations, the maximum temperature, and pH of the vent fluid endmembers.

N/A: The deep Atlantic end-member for comparison.
a Lucky Strike end member data was compiled from Pester et al. (2012) using averages of the vent sites US4 and IsabelMeSH, determined to be the closest systems to the location in which the incubation was initiated.
b The concentration of Mn observed in each incubation, used to calculation the dilution factor for each experiment.
c The plume stage is indicated as buoyant plume (BP) or neutrally buoyant plume (NBP) using a threshold dilution factor of 10 000:1 based on Lupton et al. (1985).

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

3.2 Rainbow near-field incubation – a high Fe, reduced, buoyant plume

The Rainbow vent system has the highest vent fluid Fe concentrations of any documented system in the global ocean (German et al., 2025). This incubation was conducted directly at the vent site (near-field), and incubated both unfiltered and filtered (< 0.2 µm) plume water for 7 d. The dilution factor estimated from published endmember data was approximately 4500 (Table 1; Douville et al., 2002). A positive temperature ( 0.2 °C) anomaly, negative density anomaly ( 0.02 kg m−3), and ORP anomaly observed at the depth of sampling confirmed that this incubation was initiated from water within a reducing buoyant plume (Fig. S1c, d). The unfiltered incubation at Rainbow had high TDFe concentrations of 5094 ± 93 nM (1 SD, n= 5; Fig. 2a) and initial dFe concentrations of 361.3 ± 0.5 nM (Fig. 2c); Fe(II) concentrations ranged from 40 to  70 nM within the plume (González-Santana et al., 2023). The filtered incubation had TDFe concentrations of 356 ± 9 nM (1 SD, n= 5; Fig. 2b) with an initial dFe concentration of 311.5 ± 6.1 nM (Fig. 2d). High sFe concentrations of 70.9 ± 4.6 and 94.1 ± 5.9 nM were also observed at the onset of the unfiltered and filtered incubation, respectively, but the dissolved phase was still dominated by colloids in the unfiltered (80 %) and filtered (70 %) incubations (Table S2). The δ56dFe of the initial plume samples were distinct between the unfiltered and filtered incubations, with values of 7.35 ‰ and 0.76 ‰, respectively (Fig. 2c, d; Table S6).

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/8013/2025/bg-22-8013-2025-f02

Figure 2Rainbow near-field incubation overview for unfiltered (left column) and filtered (< 0.2 µm, right column) treatments. (a, b) Particle phase composition for each time point displaying dissolved (“d”), soluble (“s”), and total dissolvable (“TD”), reporting the average TDFe of the incubation (1 SD, n= 5, *n= 5, one sample removed; Table S2). (c, d) sFe (light blue circles) and dFe (dark blue circles), and the average TDFe concentrations of the incubation (blue line); the TDFe concentration for panel (c) is off the scale. The δ56dFe composition for selected samples (red diamonds) is plotted on the secondary axis. (e, f) Concentration of dLFe (dark blue triangles) and sLFe (light blue triangles) and the respective logKFeL,Fecond (diamonds, dashed lines) are plotted on the secondary axis.

Download

Rapid changes in the physicochemical partitioning of Fe were observed in the first 24 h of the incubation. Broadly, dFe concentrations declined by 33 % and 70 % in the unfiltered and filtered treatments over the 6 d of incubation, respectively (Fig. 2c, d; Table S2), but this decline was punctuated with deviations from this trend in the early hours of incubation. In the unfiltered incubation, sFe concentrations more than doubled in the first 12 h, increasing from 70.9 ± 4.6 to concentrations as high as 196.8 ± 10.1 nM (Fig. 2c; Table S2), coinciding with large increases in H2S (Fig. S7; Sect. S1). By 24 h, sFe concentrations had declined 85 % from its peak to 29.7 ± 3.8 nM concomitant with an increase in dFe to 415.8 ± 3.1 nM (Fig. 2c). In the filtered incubation, sFe concentrations showed high variability over the first 24 h, before declining to 1.91 ± 0.12 by the end of the incubation (Fig. 2d). After the first 24 hours of the incubation the colloidal fraction of the dFe pool in both the filtered and unfiltered treatments stabilized at approximately 90 %–97 % (Fig. 2c, d; Table S2). The isotopic composition of the dFe pool also changed over the course of the incubation. During the first 12 h, the δ56dFe in the unfiltered incubation decreased from 0.73 ‰ to 0.16 ‰ along with the large changes observed in the particulate and dFe phases. The final measurement taken on day 5 showed an enrichment of δ56dFe to 1.17 ‰ (Fig. 2c; Table S6). The δ56dFe in the filtered incubation remained relatively stable throughout, with an average value of 7.31 ± 0.31 ‰ (2 SD, n= 3).

Dissolved and soluble Fe-binding organic ligand concentrations were elevated at the onset of the Rainbow incubation experiment, with different dynamics in filtered and unfiltered treatments. The dLFe measured initially were 64.4 ± 1.4 and 45.8 ± 0.8 nM in the unfiltered and filtered treatments, respectively, with conditional stability constants (KFeL,Fecond) ranging from 11 to 12.5. The initial concentration of sLFe were 5.37 ± 0.53 and 3.57 ± 0.40 in the unfiltered and filtered treatments, respectively, with weaker KFeL,Fecond than those observed for dLFe (KFeL,Fecond= 10.0–10.8; t test, p= 0.06 and 0.02, respectively; Fig. 2e, f; Table S2). The concentration of dLFe declined 42 % and 25 % over 7 d in the unfiltered and filtered incubations, respectively (Fig. 2e, f). In contrast, concentrations of sLFe in the unfiltered treatment increased by nearly threefold during the first 24 h of the incubation concomitant with the increases of sFe. The sLFe subsequently declined close to initial concentrations of 5.23 ± 0.16 nM by day 2, where they remained relatively stable until the final sample taken on day 7 where a twofold increase to 8.57 ± 0.49 nM was observed independent of sFe (Fig. 2c, e). In the filtered treatment, sLFe similarly increased nearly threefold from their initial concentrations of 3.57 ± 0.49 to 9.27 ± 0.13 nM by day 2, decreasing to 5.64 ± 0.35 nM for the remainder of the incubation (Fig. 2d, f). The conditional stability constants sLFe sampled in the first 24 h of both treatments were typically weaker (KFeL,Fecond= 10.0–10.8; Fig. 2e, f; Table S2) than the ligands measured during the remainder of the incubation (KFeL,Fecond= 11.0–12.2).

The microbial community composition was sampled in the initial (day 0) and final (day 7) time points of the incubation for the unfiltered treatment for two separate size fractions (0.2 and 3 µm). Overall, both size classes displayed a similar community composition and response throughout the incubation. Both size-fractions on day 0 and day 7 samples were dominated by the sulfur-oxidizing bacteria Sulfurimonas (family Sulfurimonadaceae). This family comprised approximately 75 % of the microbial community in both size fractions (Fig. S8). The SUP05 cluster (Gammaproteobacteria belonging to the Thioglobaceae family; Fig. S8) are also known sulfur-oxidizers that were abundant to a lesser degree (Shah et al., 2017). The ammonia-oxidizing archaea Nitrosopumilaceae (Könneke et al., 2005) were also observed at the start of the incubation but decreased in relative abundance by the end of the experiment (Fig. S8).

3.3 TAG incubation – a high Fe, reduced, neutrally buoyant plume

The TAG vent field sits approximately 1300 m deeper than Rainbow at 3620 m water depth (Tivey, 2007), and is one of the most studied vent systems along the MAR. This was a 6 d incubation that contained filtered and unfiltered treatments. The dMn concentrations at the onset of the incubation were 38.5 ± 1.4 and 31.8 ± 0.3 nM in the unfiltered and filtered incubations, respectively, resulting in an estimated dilution factor between  19 000–22 500 from the published endmember data (Table 1). Across the approximately 100 m depth range of the plume, there was an LSS and ORP anomaly and a small ( 0.1 °C) negative temperature anomaly consistent with a reducing neutrally buoyant plume (Fig. S1e, f). The initial dFe concentrations at the start of the incubation were 188 ± 2.3 and 82.4 ± 0.6 nM dFe in the unfiltered and filtered treatments, respectively (Fig. 3b, c; Table S3). The Fe(II) concentrations from within the plume ranged from 4–10 nM (González-Santana et al., 2023). The average TDFe at TAG (unfiltered treatment) was 211 ± 9 nM (1 SD, n= 2), suggesting approximately 80 % of the vent end-member was present at the start of the incubation, based on the dilution factor calculated from dMn. Approximately 90 % of the total TDFe was within the dissolved phase (Fig. 3a, b). Soluble Fe concentrations were 61.5 ± 8.2 and 19.1 ± 2.3 nM in the unfiltered and filtered incubations, resulting in a colloidal fraction of 67 % and 77 %, respectively. The δ56dFe at the start of the incubation in the unfiltered and filtered treatments were 0.58 ‰ and 1.43 ‰, respectively. The low δ56dFe value as observed in the filtered treatment is consistent with previously reported δ56dFe value in the water column from the TAG hydrothermal plume (1.35 ‰; Conway and John, 2014).

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/8013/2025/bg-22-8013-2025-f03

Figure 3TAG incubation overview for unfiltered (left column) and filtered (< 0.2 µm, right column) treatments. (a, b) Particle phase composition for each time point displaying dissolved (“d”), soluble (“s”), and total dissolvable (“TD”), reporting the average TDFe of the incubation (1 SD, n= 2). (c, d) sFe (light blue circles) and dFe (dark blue circles), and the average TDFe concentration (blue line) of the incubation. δ56dFe composition for selected samples (red diamonds) is plotted on the secondary axis. (e, f) Concentration of dLFe (dark blue triangles) and sLFe (light blue triangles) and the respective logKFeL,Fecond for each measurement (diamonds, dashed lines) is plotted on the secondary axis.

Download

The high concentrations of dFe declined over the 6 d of the incubation and the particulate fraction increased (Fig. 3a, b). By the end of the incubation, dFe concentrations in both unfiltered and filtered treatments had declined by 67 % and 83 %, respectively (Fig. 3c, d). The high sFe concentrations observed at the start of the incubation declined in parallel to the dFe, decreasing by 77 % and 67 % in the unfiltered and filtered treatments, respectively. The observations of δ56dFe in the unfiltered and filtered treatments for this incubation showed similar patterns to those in the Rainbow near-field experiment. In the unfiltered treatment, the δ56dFe decreased to 0.09 ‰ in the first 24 h, but in the final sample taken on day 6 showed a significant enrichment to 3.57 ‰ (Fig. 3c; Table S6). Similarly, the δ56dFe values of the filtered treatment remained constant (1.37 ± 0.10 ‰, 2 SD, n= 3) over the 6 d incubation.

The Fe-binding ligands observed at TAG displayed similar characteristics to those in the Rainbow near-field incubation. The dLFe concentrations at the onset of the incubation were 18.4 ± 1.1 and 5.97 ± 0.25 nM in the unfiltered and filtered treatments, respectively (Fig. 3e, f). Over the 6 d incubation, dLFe concentrations declined by 64 % in the unfiltered treatment. In contrast, the dLFe concentrations in the filtered treatment increased to a maximum of 11.80 ± 0.40 nM in the first 24 h and then declined to a final concentration of 7.03 ± 0.39 nM, resulting in an overall increase of approximately 15 % over the 6 d. In the unfiltered treatment, sLFe concentrations decreased from 8.27 ± 0.76 to 4.48 ± 0.27 nM in the first 24 h, remained constant until day 3 and then increased to a final concentration of 7.68 ± 0.09 nM, close to initial concentrations (Fig. 3e). In the filtered treatment on the other hand, sLFe concentrations declined by 63 % during the 6 d incubation. The conditional stability constants of both dLFe and sLFe pools were relatively weak throughout the incubation, with average logKFeL,Fecond= 10.76 ± 0.70 (1 SD, n= 7) and 10.87 ± 0.79 (1 SD, n= 9) in the unfiltered and filtered treatments, respectively. Stronger ligands were observed on average in the sLFe pool of the unfiltered (11.20 ± 0.74 (1 SD, n= 8) and filtered treatments (11.51 ± 0.53 (1 SD, n= 7), respectively (Fig. 3e, f; Table S3). Although on average the sLFe had larger stability constants relative to those in the dissolved phase, no significant differences were observed between the two size fractions in the unfiltered (t test, p= 0.28) and filtered (t test, p= 0.08) treatments.

3.4 Lucky Strike incubation – a low Fe, reduced, neutrally buoyant plume

The Lucky Strike vent field is located atop a seamount over the Azores hotspot at relatively shallow depths (1600–1700 m; Pester et al., 2012). Only an unfiltered treatment was incubated from Lucky Strike and the experiment lasted 22 d. An estimated dilution factor of approximately 15 000 was calculated from dMn endmember concentrations (Table 1) and the bottles were closed within a small LSS and ORP anomaly with stable density, indicating the incubation was started in a reducing neutrally buoyant plume (Fig. S1a, b). The average TDFe concentration of the Lucky Strike incubation was 20.1 ± 1.8 nM (1 SD, n= 4), with initial dFe concentrations of 15.1 ± 1.17 nM and sFe of 4.42 ± 0.05 nM, resulting in approximately 80 % of the Fe within the dissolved phase and 71 % of the dFe in colloidal form (Fig. 4b; Table S4). The Fe(II) concentrations from this plume ranged from 0.4–0.8 nM (González-Santana et al., 2023). The Fe-binding ligand concentrations at the start of the incubation were relatively elevated, with initial dLFe concentrations of 5.40 ± 0.12 nM. These ligands appeared to be entirely within the soluble phase, with sLFe concentrations equal to 6.00 ± 0.60 nM at the onset of the incubation (Fig. 4c; Table S4).

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/8013/2025/bg-22-8013-2025-f04

Figure 4Lucky Strike incubation overview. (a) Particle phase composition of each time point in the incubation with dissolved (`d”), soluble (“s”), and total dissolvable (“TD”) data, reporting the average TDFe concentration of the incubation (1 SD, n= 4). (b) sFe (light blue circles) and dFe (dark blue circles) concentrations and the average TDFe (blue line). (c) Concentration of dLFe (dark blue triangles) and sLFe (light blue triangles) and the respective logKFeL,Fecond displayed on the secondary axis (diamonds, dashed lines).

Download

Lucky Strike was the longest incubation experiment, and enabled observations of both early and long-term particle formation dynamics. Initially, dFe concentrations declined approximately 30 % over the first week and particulate Fe concentrations increased, with the lowest concentration of dFe (10.4 ± 0.81 nM) observed on day 7 (Fig. 5b). The soluble and dissolved Fe-binding ligands also declined in the first 48 h of the incubation but then increased from days 3 to 7, with the sLFe representing 100 % of the dissolved ligand pool by day 7 (Fig. 4c). In subsequent weeks, dLFe and dFe continued to increase, while particulate Fe decreased. The final dFe concentration observed at 22 d was 18.3 ± 1.4 nM, roughly 20 % higher than the initial dFe concentrations, and sFe increased to concentrations observed at the start of the incubation of 4.55 ± 0.32 nM. By the end of the incubation nearly all the TDFe was in the dissolved fraction and dominated by colloids (Fig. 4a). Across this incubation the Fe-binding ligands in the soluble fraction were significantly stronger than those observed in the dissolved fraction (t test, p= 0.005, n= 7).

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/8013/2025/bg-22-8013-2025-f05

Figure 5Rainbow far-field incubation overview. (a) Particle phase composition of each time point in the incubation with dissolved (“d”), soluble (“s”), and total dissolvable (“TD”) data, and reporting the average TDFe concentration of the incubation (1 SD, n= 4). (b) sFe (light blue circles) and dFe (dark blue circles) concentrations. (c) Concentration (left axis) of dLFe (dark blue triangles) and sLFe (light blue triangles) and the respective log KFeL,Fecond for each measurement (right axis; diamonds, dashed lines).

Download

The Lucky Strike incubation showed a more dramatic shift in the microbial community composition compared to the Rainbow near-field incubation, and a distinct difference in the community composition between the two size-fractions. The larger 3 µm size fraction was dominated by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria Sulfurimonas (Sulfurimonadaceae) and SUP-05 (Thioglobaceae), as in the Rainbow near-field incubation (Fig. S9). However, the smaller size-fraction (0.2 µm), contained both sulfur-oxidizers, and the ammonia-oxidizer Nitrosopumilaceae. After 14 d, the 3 µm community became dominated by bacterial families Alcanivoracaceae, Oleiphilaceae, and Sphingomonadaceae, typically associated with hydrocarbon degradation (Fig. S9). No data were available for the smaller size fraction at this time point.

3.5 Rainbow far-field incubation – an oxidized neutrally buoyant plume

A second incubation was conducted near Rainbow but far-field of the vent, approximately 10 km southwest of the location of the near-field incubation. This experiment consisted of only an unfiltered treatment and was incubated for 19 d. The dMn concentration at the incubation onset was 2.5 ± 0.1 nM, resulting in a calculated dilution factor of approximately 9.0 × 105 based on vent fluid end-member data (Table 1). There was a small LSS signal but no ORP anomaly indicating the incubation was started within an oxidized neutrally buoyant plume (Fig. S1g, S1h). The initial dFe and sFe concentrations were 3.42 ± 0.26 nM and 0.88 ± 0.04 sFe, respectively, and 74 % of the dFe was colloidal (Table S5). The average TDFe concentration of the incubation was 25.5 ± 5.6 nM (1 SD, n= 3), indicating approximately 10 % of the Fe was in the dissolved phase at the start of the incubation (Fig. 5a). Fe-binding ligand concentrations at the start of the incubation were also low relative to the other experiments, with 1.55 ± 0.12 nM in the dissolved phase and soluble ligands were below the limit of detection (Table S5).

Twenty-four hours into the experiment, soluble ligand concentrations began to increase and continued to do so over the next 2 d, appearing to modify the Fe particulate pool (Fig. 5c). The dFe increased from 2.96 ± 0.23 to 8.52 ± 0.65 nM between day 1 and day 7, and dLFe increased from 2.90 ± 0.11 to 5.41 ± 0.17 nM. Little change was observed in sFe concentrations over this period (Fig. 5b; Table S5). Over the subsequent week, the sFe concentrations increased to 7.95 ± 0.53 nM by day 14, encompassing the entirety of the dFe pool (Fig. 5a). For the remainder of the incubation the colloidal fraction remained low, comprising 20 % of the dFe pool in the final sample at day 19 (Fig. 5b; Table S5). Throughout this incubation there was no significant difference observed in the binding strength of ligands between the dissolved and soluble pools (t test, p= 0.21, n= 7).

The microbial community composition was sampled initially and again on day 15. The community shifted substantially over this period, similar to the observations at Lucky Strike. At the onset of the incubation, the 3 µm size-fraction was again dominated by sulfur-oxidizers Sulfurimonadaceae and Thioglobaceae (Fig. S10). The smaller 0.2 µm size-fraction contained sulfur-oxidizers, but also substantial fractions of Nitrosopumilaceae and nitrite-oxidizers Nitrospinaceae. Two weeks into the incubation, following the observed ligand production and particulate Fe mobilization, the microbial community in both 3 and 0.2 µm size-fractions shifted toward dominance by the hydrocarbon degraders Oleiphilus, Sphingorhabdus, and Alcanivorax (Figs. S8, S10).

4 Discussion

4.1 Sources and sinks of Fe-binding ligands within early plume systems

The three near-field incubations of this study show that hydrothermal vents along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge are a local source of LFe. Dissolved Fe-binding ligand concentrations at the onset of each near-field incubation were observed to be well above the background concentrations of approximately 2–3 nM observed throughout the water column of the deep Atlantic (Buck et al., 2015; Gerringa et al., 2015). Vent systems are known to host vibrant communities of chemoautotrophs (Sander and Koschinsky, 2011; Sylvan et al., 2012) and the diffusive flow regions surrounding the vents have been identified as a potential source of DOC and Fe-binding ligands in other studies (Lang et al., 2006; Bennett et al., 2008; Hawkes et al., 2013b; Kleint et al., 2016). The high concentration and low conditional stability constants (logKFeL,Fecond= 10–11) observed in the early samples of many of the near-field incubations suggest that this ligand pool may be dominated by non-specific Fe-binding ligands such as exopolysaccharides (Hassler et al., 2011; Zykwinska et al., 2019) or other organic acids (Konn et al., 2009). The ligands could be a product of the serpentinization reactions within the vent system (organic acids; soluble fraction) or the biological communities surrounding them (EPS; colloidal fraction) that are entrained in the forming plume (Bennett et al., 2008; Hawkes et al., 2013b; Sander and Koschinsky, 2011).

Although these experiments show these vents are a large source of ligands, our observations show early particle formation in the vent plumes may also be a major ligand sink. In both near-field incubations, at TAG and Rainbow, initial dFe concentrations were much higher than dLFe, and yet dLFe declined along with dFe in a nearly 1:1 ratio as the experiments became progressively more particle enriched (Figs. 2c–f, 3c–f). This suggests that as Fe particles form over time, the dissolved ligand pool is scavenged or aggregated along with dFe. The constant δ56dFe in these week-long incubations, despite 71 %–77 % declines in dFe, is inconsistent with isotopic fractionation expected by Fe(II) oxidation and precipitation alone (Figs. 2d, 3d; Sect. 4.2). Thus, the loss of dFe and formation of particulate Fe over time may instead represent the coagulation of colloidal ligand-bound Fe and/or Fe-(oxyhydr)oxides, analogous to observed flocculation of Fe with organic matter during estuarine mixing (Boyle et al., 1977; Buck et al., 2007; Bundy et al., 2015), which does not substantially fractionate dFe isotopes (Escoube et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2015).

Another consistent observation from these experiments was the production of soluble Fe-binding ligands in the unfiltered treatments of each incubation. Soluble Fe-binding ligands were more resistant to aggregation and losses than ligands in the colloidal fraction. In the two near-field and high-Fe reducing incubations conducted at Rainbow and TAG, the unfiltered treatments showed a 42 % and 64 % decrease in dLFe between the first and final measurements. In comparison there was a 60 % increase in sLFe in the near-field Rainbow experiment and a 15 % decrease in the TAG experiment (Figs. 2e, 4e; Tables S2, S3). Whereas aggregation appeared to dominate dLFe in the early days of the reducing plume incubations of Rainbow, TAG, and Lucky Strike, sLFe concentrations increased within days of experiment initiation in all cases. Evidence of siderophore production has been inferred in hydrothermal plumes in the Guaymas Basin through the upregulation of siderophore biosynthesis and transporter genes (Li et al., 2014) and siderophores have been identified in field samples from the same plumes along the GA13 cruise (Hoffman et al., 2024). Siderophores should fall within the soluble fraction of dFe when bound to Fe (Vraspir and Butler, 2009), and are known to solubilize Fe from larger size fractions (Borer et al., 2005; Fishwick et al., 2014). Production of sLFe coincided with a large shift in the microbial community from one dominated by sulfur-oxidizers (Sulfurimonadaceae and Thioglobaceae), ammonia-oxidizers (Nitrosopumilaceae), and nitrite oxidizers (Nitrospinaceae, Figs. S8, S9, S10) to a community dominated by families associated with hydrocarbon degradation (Alcanivoracaceae, Oleiphilaceae, and Sphingomonadaceae; Yakimov et al., 1998; Golyshin et al., 2002; Kertesz et al., 2019). Most of the families that increased their share of total 16S rRNA gene amplicons by the end of these two incubations with microbial data had putative microbial community members capable of producing siderophores, although the 16S data alone cannot resolve whether siderophore producing members were present. A heavier δ56dFe isotopic signature in the final samples of the unfiltered treatments at Rainbow near-field and TAG is also consistent with the possibility of siderophore production, as the complexation of dFe by siderophores would be expected to impart a heavier fractionation signature on the dFe pool (Dideriksen et al., 2008).

Together, the observations from these experiments and from a complementary water column study (Hoffman et al., 2024) provide compelling evidence for microbial ligand production as a mechanism for the stabilization of Fe in these hydrothermal plumes. Experiments that were initiated closer to the vent source initially had higher concentrations of weaker ligands, predominantly in the colloidal fraction, that aggregated into the particulate phase as dFe declined in the first hours of the experiment. In the experiments further from the vent source and over the time scale of days to weeks, the ligand pool became stronger overall and stronger ligands were produced over time in the soluble fraction in the unfiltered treatments. In general, our experiments demonstrated that there is a transition in the Fe-binding ligand pool in both time and space with distance from the vent source. We postulate the temporal transition from a hydrothermal plume that contains reduced substrates and Fe(II) to one that is oxidized and dominated by Fe(III) may result in a microbial community response that promotes ligand (e.g., siderophore) production and increases the residence time of dFe in the plume.

4.2 Particle-dissolved exchange in hydrothermal plumes

Hydrothermal plumes are regions of extreme chemical disequilibria, and the mixing of cold deep ocean waters and hot metal-rich hydrothermal fluid results in huge changes in Fe solubility that results in rapid particle formation. Our near-field experiments conducted at Rainbow, TAG, and Lucky Strike, all had initially high-Fe and reducing conditions that resulted in the rapid formation of colloids and particles. There was evidence of physicochemical exchange between newly formed particles and the dissolved phase within hours in the high-Fe reducing plumes of TAG and Rainbow, and over days to weeks in the Rainbow far-field and Lucky Strike incubations, potentially mediated by ligand production (see Sect. 4.1). The physicochemical partitioning of Fe in combination with dFe isotope provides additional context into the possible mechanisms responsible for the temporal transformations of Fe within early plumes.

Initial conditions in both TAG and Rainbow near-field plumes showed large differences in dFe fractionation between the filtered and unfiltered treatments, with the filtered treatments having significantly lighter (1.43 ‰, TAG; 7.34 ‰, Rainbow) values than published vent fluid endmembers of TAG and Rainbow (0.15 ‰ and 0.14 ‰, respectively; Severmann et al., 2004). These depleted δ56dFe values in both experiments are probably a result of the partial oxidation of Fe(II) and precipitation of Fe-(oxyhydr)oxide particles at the start of the incubations that was interrupted by the filtering process (Lough et al., 2017; Klar et al., 2017; González-Santana et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). The light isotopic values observed in the Rainbow near-field experiment probably reflect its proximity to the vent source, the very high Fe / H2S ratio of the vent fluids (Table 1, Severmann et al., 2004), and high Fe(II) oxidation rates (0.29 h; Field and Sherrell, 2000; González-Santana et al., 2021) relative to other vent sites (e.g., Klar et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021). Laboratory experiments show the preferential incorporation of heavy Fe isotopes into Fe-(oxyhydr)oxides, which leaves the remaining dFe isotopically light (Welch et al., 2003). For example, analyses of hydrothermal particles by Revels et al. (2015) and Severmann et al. (2004) showed δ56Fe enrichment of particles of approximately 0.20 ‰ in the TAG plume and 0.24 ‰–1.29 ‰ (average  0.90 ‰) in the Rainbow buoyant plume. These observations were attributed to the partial oxidation of Fe(II) and precipitation of the Fe(III) that formed as the plume was physically transported. Initial δ56dFe values in the unfiltered treatment (collected within  3 h) showed a similar enrichment of +0.58 ‰ for TAG and +0.76 ‰ for Rainbow, significantly heavier than in the companion filtered treatments and probably reflect the contribution of suspended colloids to the dFe pool.

The evolution of δ56dFe over the week-long incubations at both TAG and Rainbow near-field were also suggestive of the influence of organic ligands on the dFe pool. In the filtered treatments for both experiments, the initial conditions suggested Fe(II) was present and was partially oxidized, but the continued oxidation of Fe(II) was not supported by the isotopic evidence and instead a fairly static isotopic ratio was maintained despite large declines in dFe concentrations (Figs. 2d, 3d). These observations are distinct from the only other temporal studies on hydrothermal plume water, which observed a negative δ56dFe signal (5 ‰) over a 24 h period from subsamples of a Niskin bottle (Lough et al., 2017) that was interpreted as continued oxidation of Fe(II) over that time period. Our observations from the filtered treatments, however, indicated dFe was in a form resistant to further fractionation, such as being complexed to organic ligands (see Sect. 4.1). The first 12–24 h of the unfiltered treatment did show some initial negative fractionation (TAG: 0.49 ‰; Rainbow: 0.92 ‰; Table S6), which could be suggestive of oxidative fractionation at these short time points, but this trend reversed dramatically towards the end of the incubations.

The final time point of both unfiltered treatments showed substantial enrichment (up to +3.57 ‰ at TAG and +1.17 ‰ at Rainbow) of the δ56dFe by the end of the incubation (Fig. 2a, 3a). Simple (abiotic) dissolution of Fe-(oxyhydr)oxide particles has a relatively small isotope effect (< 0.1 ‰; Skulan et al., 2002) and ligand-controlled dissolution of Fe-(oxyhydr)oxides is thought to enrich dFe isotopes by up to  0.5 ‰–0.6 ‰ in solution (Wiederhold et al., 2006; Dideriksen et al., 2008). Although continuous inorganic scavenging could also contribute to δ56dFe enrichment by up to  0.3 ‰ (John and Adkins, 2012), soluble ligand production observed over this same period (Fig. 3e, f; Sect. 4.2) supports ligand-mediated dissolution. Similar enrichments of δ56dFe have been observed in surface waters of the Southern Ocean (Ellwood et al., 2020; Sieber et al., 2021). These heavy isotopic signatures have been interpreted as resulting from rapid recycling of Fe between the dissolved and cellular particulate pools beyond what might be modeled by simple uptake or organic complexation alone. Siderophores or other strong ligands can provide a mechanism for rapid recycling of Fe between dissolved and cellular Fe pools (Tortell et al., 1999). Although there is very little experimental data on the fractionation of Fe by microbial communities, the heavier fractionation observed in the unfiltered treatments support the organic complexation of the dFe pool, which may have been amplified by uptake of Fe by the bacteria community and/or rapid recycling of dFe. Together, the data from these experiments suggest that Fe-binding ligands play an important role in the particle exchange occurring in early plumes, and that active production of ligands is a key mechanism for stabilizing a portion of hydrothermal Fe in the far-field plume.

5 Summary and conclusions

This study presents four incubation experiments at three separate vent systems along the MAR to document the temporal evolution of physicochemical forms of Fe and Fe-binding ligands to gain insights into the processes affecting Fe early on in hydrothermal plumes. The four incubations captured the range of physical and chemical stages of hydrothermal plume development in the buoyant and neutrally buoyant plumes and the reducing and oxidized plumes. Exchange between the physicochemical fractions of Fe was observed in each of the incubations with Fe-binding ligands participating in exchange at all stages of plume evolution.

The elevated Fe-binding ligand concentrations observed at the onset of each of the near-field experiments suggests the vent systems along the MAR are a local source of ligands relative to the deep Atlantic. The concentration and binding strength indicate a large concentration of weak ligands characteristic of a pool composed of non-specific organic ligands, produced in serpentinization reactions or by microbial communities at the vent source. These high ligand concentrations declined concurrently with dFe on the time scales of hours via aggregation onto particles, suggesting that most of these sourced Fe-binding ligands may not escape the near-field. The stability of dissolved Fe isotopic composition during this decline in the filtered treatments suggests the complexation and aggregation with Fe was analogous to the flocculation observed with organic matter in estuarine systems. This lends observational support to the low-density organic matrix observed in far-field particles from hydrothermal vents (Fitzsimmons et al., 2017; Hoffman et al., 2020). However, in later stages of these experiments, we observed production of soluble and dissolved Fe-binding ligands all unfiltered treatments as the plumes approached on oxidized state and free Fe(II) was diminished. This promoted particle exchange, driving the enrichment of δ56dFe over a week in the unfiltered treatments TAG and Rainbow near-field experiments. Over longer time scales, ligand production strongly influenced the physicochemical form of Fe, resulting in the solubilization of particles into the colloidal and soluble phases on a time scale of days to weeks in the Lucky Strike and Rainbow far-field experiments. This exchange was associated with a shift in the microbial community from predominantly sulfur and nitrogen oxidizing bacteria to communities dominated by hydrocarbon degraders. We postulate that the transition of hydrothermal plumes from a reducing to oxidized state in its early evolution fosters conditions that promote ligand production from the microbial community and can contribute to the enhanced longevity of hydrothermal Fe in the water column. These experiments suggest that the presence of organic Fe-binding ligands and the formation of inorganic colloids are mutually intertwined in the early evolution of dFe in hydrothermal plume systems.

Data availability

The full dataset is published on Zenodo under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15214583 (Mellett, 2025).

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-8013-2025-supplement.

Author contributions

TM and KNB designed the experiment. TM carried out the experiments at sea and processed and analyzed the trace metal and speciation data. AJML, WW, and ML contributed to the set-up, sampling, and analysis and interpretation of Fe isotope data. AES and JBA processed, analyzed, and aided in interpretation of the 16S rRNA community composition data. PS measured H 2 S data for select incubations presented in the supplemental data. KNB, AT, ML, JR, and RMB contributed to the conceptualization and interpretation of the broader study, and supervision of the preparation of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Korinna Kunde for assisting in the preparation of these experiments, David Gonzalez-Santana for initial Fe(II) measurements on subsamples, and Noah Gluschankoff for assistance with DNA collection at sea. Nathan Youlton assisted with DNA extractions. Sharon Walker of the NOAA-Pacific Environmental Laboratory provided the LSS and ORP sensors used for plume identification on this project. We would also like to acknowledge the captain and crew of the RSS James Cook, who were integral in the collection of the samples for this work.

Financial support

Travis Mellett was partially supported by the Sanibel-Captiva Shell Club/Mary & Al Bridell Memorial Fellowship. Kristen N. Buck was supported in part by U.S. National Science Foundation awards OCE-1333566 and OCE-2300915. Alastair J. M. Lough and Maeve Lohan were supported by NE/N010396/1. Wenhao Wang's PhD studentship was funded by the Chinese Scholarship Council and the Graduate School of National Oceanography Center Southampton. DNA sequencing was funded by a University California Santa Barbara Faculty Senate Award to Alyson E. Santoro. The International GEOTRACES Program is possible in part thanks to the support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (gr7ant OCE-1840868) and to the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR). Joseph Resing was funded by NOAA Ocean Exploration and Earth-Ocean Interactions programs through the Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies; this is CICOES contribution #2023-1273 and PMEL contribution #5519. Publication costs were covered by grant no. OCE-2300915.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Tina Treude and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Albarede, F. and Beard, B.: Analytical Methods for Non-Traditional Isotopes, Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 55, 113–152, https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.55.1.113, 2004. 

Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R., and Weber, L.: Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 75, 129–137, https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01753, 2015. 

Bennett, S. A., Achterberg, E. P., Connelly, D. P., Statham, P. J., Fones, G. R., and German, C. R.: The distribution and stabilisation of dissolved Fe in deep-sea hydrothermal plumes, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 270, 157–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.01.048, 2008. 

Blin, K., Shaw, S., Kautsar, S. A., Medema, M. H., and Weber, T.: The antiSMASH database version 3: increased taxonomic coverage and new query features for modular enzymes, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, D639–D643, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa978, 2021. 

Borer, P. M., Sulzberger, B., Reichard, P., and Kraemer, S. M.: Effect of siderophores on the light-induced dissolution of colloidal iron(III) (hydr)oxides, Mar. Chem., 93, 179–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2004.08.006, 2005. 

Boyle, E. A., Edmond, J. M., and Sholkovitz, E. R.: The mechanism of iron removal in estuaries, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 41, 1313–1324, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(77)90075-8, 1977. 

Buck, K. N., Lohan, M. C., Berger, C. J. M., and Bruland, K. W.: Dissolved iron speciation in two distinct river plumes and an estuary: Implications for riverine iron supply, Limnol. Oceanogr., 52, 843–855, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0843, 2007. 

Buck, K. N., Selph, K. E., and Barbeau, K. A.: Iron-binding ligand production and copper speciation in an incubation experiment of Antarctic Peninsula shelf waters from the Bransfield Strait, Southern Ocean, Mar. Chem., 122, 148–159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2010.06.002, 2010. 

Buck, K. N., Moffett, J., Barbeau, K. A., Bundy, R. M., Kondo, Y., and Wu, J.: The organic complexation of iron and copper: an intercomparison of competitive ligand exchange-adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry (CLE-ACSV) techniques, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 10, 496–515, https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.496, 2012. 

Buck, K. N., Sohst, B., and Sedwick, P. N.: The organic complexation of dissolved iron along the U.S. GEOTRACES (GA03) North Atlantic Section, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 116, 152–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.11.016, 2015. 

Buck, K. N., Gerringa, L. J. A., and Rijkenberg, M. J. A.: An Intercomparison of Dissolved Iron Speciation at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) Site: Results from GEOTRACES Crossover Station A, Front. Mar. Sci., 3, 262, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00262, 2016. 

Buck, K. N., Sedwick, P. N., Sohst, B., and Carlson, C. A.: Organic complexation of iron in the eastern tropical South Pacific: Results from US GEOTRACES Eastern Pacific Zonal Transect (GEOTRACES cruise GP16), Mar. Chem., 201, 229–241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.11.007, 2018. 

Bundy, R. M., Abdulla, H. A. N., Hatcher, P. G., Biller, D. V., Buck, K. N., and Barbeau, K. A.: Iron-binding ligands and humic substances in the San Francisco Bay estuary and estuarine-influenced shelf regions of coastal California, Mar. Chem., 173, 183–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2014.11.005, 2015. 

Bundy, R. M., Boiteau, R. M., McLean, C., Turk-Kubo, K. A., McIlvin, M. R., Saito, M. A., Van Mooy, B. A. S., and Repeta, D. J.: Distinct Siderophores Contribute to Iron Cycling in the Mesopelagic at Station ALOHA, Front. Mar. Sci., 5, 61, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00061, 2018. 

Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., and Holmes, S. P.: DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data, Nat. Methods, 13, 581–583, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869, 2016. 

Campbell, A. C., Palmer, M. R., Klinkhammer, G. P., Bowers, T. S., Edmond, J. M., Lawrence, J. R., Casey, J. F., Thompson, G., Humphris, S., Rona, P., and Karson, J. A.: Chemistry of hot springs on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Nature, 335, 514–519, https://doi.org/10.1038/335514a0, 1988. 

Conway, T. M. and John, S. G.: Quantification of dissolved iron sources to the North Atlantic Ocean, Nature, 511, 212–215, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13482, 2014. 

Dideriksen, Baker, J. A., and Stipp, S. L. S.: Fe isotope fractionation between inorganic aqueous Fe(III) and a Fe siderophore complex, Mineral. Mag., 72, 313–316, https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.313, 2008. 

Douville, E., Charlou, J. L., Oelkers, E. H., Bienvenu, P., Jove Colon, C. F., Donval, J. P., Fouquet, Y., Prieur, D., and Appriou, P.: The rainbow vent fluids (36°14 N, MAR): the influence of ultramafic rocks and phase separation on trace metal content in Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal fluids, Chem. Geol., 184, 37–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00351-5, 2002. 

Ellwood, M. J., Strzepek, R. F., Strutton, P. G., Trull, T. W., Fourquez, M., and Boyd, P. W.: Distinct iron cycling in a Southern Ocean eddy, Nat. Commun., 11, 825, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14464-0, 2020. 

Escoube, R., Rouxel, O. J., Sholkovitz, E., and Donard, O. F. X.: Iron isotope systematics in estuaries: The case of North River, Massachusetts (USA), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 73, 4045–4059, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.04.026, 2009. 

Field, M. P. and Sherrell, R. M.: Dissolved and particulate Fe in a hydrothermal plume at 9°45 N, East Pacific Rise:: Slow Fe (II) oxidation kinetics in Pacific plumes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 619–628, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00333-6, 2000. 

Fishwick, M. P., Sedwick, P. N., Lohan, M. C., Worsfold, P. J., Buck, K. N., Church, T. M., and Ussher, S. J.: The impact of changing surface ocean conditions on the dissolution of aerosol iron, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28, 1235–1250, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004921, 2014. 

Fitzsimmons, J. N., John, S. G., Marsay, C. M., Hoffman, C. L., Nicholas, S. L., Toner, B. M., German, C. R., and Sherrell, R. M.: Iron persistence in a distal hydrothermal plume supported by dissolved–particulate exchange, Nat. Geosci., 10, 195–201, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2900, 2017. 

Gartman, A. and Findlay, A. J.: Publisher Correction: Impacts of hydrothermal plume processes on oceanic metal cycles and transport, Nat. Geosci., 13, 654–654, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0625-y, 2020. 

Gartman, A. and Luther, G. W.: Oxidation of synthesized sub-micron pyrite (FeS2) in seawater, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 144, 96–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.08.022, 2014. 

Gartman, A., Findlay, A. J., and Luther, G. W.: Nanoparticulate pyrite and other nanoparticles are a widespread component of hydrothermal vent black smoker emissions, Chem. Geol., 366, 32–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.12.013, 2014. 

German, C. R., Campbell, A. C., and Edmond, J. M.: Hydrothermal scavenging at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: Modification of trace element dissolved fluxes, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 107, 101–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(91)90047-L, 1991. 

German, C. R., Lang, S. Q., and Fitzsimmons, J. N.: Marine Hydrothermal processes, in: Treatise on Geochemistry, Elsevier, 145–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00048-6, 2025. 

Gerringa, L. J. A., Rijkenberg, M. J. A., Schoemann, V., Laan, P., and De Baar, H. J. W.: Organic complexation of iron in the West Atlantic Ocean, Mar. Chem., 177, 434–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2015.04.007, 2015. 

Gledhill, M. and Van Den Berg, C. M. G.: Determination of complexation of iron(III) with natural organic complexing ligands in seawater using cathodic stripping voltammetry, Mar. Chem., 47, 41–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(94)90012-4, 1994. 

Golyshin, P. N., Chernikova, T. N., Abraham, W.-R., Lünsdorf, H., Timmis, K. N., and Yakimov, M. M.: Oleiphilaceae fam. nov., to include Oleiphilus messinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine bacterium that obligately utilizes hydrocarbons, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr., 52, 901–911, https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-3-901, 2002. 

González-Santana, D., González-Dávila, M., Lohan, M. C., Artigue, L., Planquette, H., Sarthou, G., Tagliabue, A., and Santana-Casiano, J. M.: Variability in iron (II) oxidation kinetics across diverse hydrothermal sites on the northern Mid Atlantic Ridge, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 297, 143–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.01.013, 2021. 

González-Santana, D., Lough, A. J. M., Planquette, H., Sarthou, G., Tagliabue, A., and Lohan, M. C.: The unaccounted dissolved iron (II) sink: Insights from dFe(II) concentrations in the deep Atlantic Ocean, Sci. Total Environ., 862, 161179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161179, 2023. 

Hassler, C. S., Alasonati, E., Mancuso Nichols, C. A., and Slaveykova, V. I.: Exopolysaccharides produced by bacteria isolated from the pelagic Southern Ocean – Role in Fe binding, chemical reactivity, and bioavailability, Mar. Chem., 123, 88–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2010.10.003, 2011. 

Hatta, M., Measures, C. I., Wu, J., Roshan, S., Fitzsimmons, J. N., Sedwick, P., and Morton, P.: An overview of dissolved Fe and Mn distributions during the 2010–2011 U.S. GEOTRACES north Atlantic cruises: GEOTRACES GA03, Deep-Sea Res. Pt II, 116, 117–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.07.005, 2015. 

Hawkes, J. A., Gledhill, M., Connelly, D. P., and Achterberg, E. P.: Characterisation of iron binding ligands in seawater by reverse titration, Anal. Chim. Acta, 766, 53–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.12.048, 2013a. 

Hawkes, J. A., Connelly, D. P., Gledhill, M., and Achterberg, E. P.: The stabilisation and transportation of dissolved iron from high temperature hydrothermal vent systems, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 375, 280–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.05.047, 2013b. 

Hochella, M. F., Lower, S. K., Maurice, P. A., Penn, R. L., Sahai, N., Sparks, D. L., and Twining, B. S.: Nanominerals, Mineral Nanoparticles, and Earth Systems, Science, 319, 1631–1635, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141134, 2008. 

Hoffman, C. L., Schladweiler, C. S., Seaton, N. C. A., Nicholas, S. L., Fitzsimmons, J. N., Sherrell, R. M., German, C. R., Lam, P. J., and Toner, B. M.: Diagnostic Morphology and Solid-State Chemical Speciation of Hydrothermally Derived Particulate Fe in a Long-Range Dispersing Plume, ACS Earth Space Chem., 4, 1831–1842, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00067, 2020. 

Hoffman, C. L., Monreal, P. J., Albers, J. B., Lough, A. J. M., Santoro, A. E., Mellett, T., Buck, K. N., Tagliabue, A., Lohan, M. C., Resing, J. A., and Bundy, R. M.: Microbial strong organic-ligand production is tightly coupled to iron in hydrothermal plumes, Biogeosciences, 21, 5233–5246, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5233-2024, 2024. 

Hollister, A. P., Kerr, M., Malki, K., Muhlbach, E., Robert, M., Tilney, C. L., Breitbart, M., Hubbard, K. A., and Buck, K. N.: Regeneration of macronutrients and trace metals during phytoplankton decay: An experimental study, Limnol. Oceanogr., 65, 1936–1960, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11429, 2020. 

John, S. G. and Adkins, J.: The vertical distribution of iron stable isotopes in the North Atlantic near Bermuda, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, 2011GB004043, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004043, 2012. 

Johnson, K. S., Gordon, R. M., and Coale, K. H.: What controls dissolved iron concentrations in the world ocean?, Mar. Chem., 57, 137–161, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(97)00043-1, 1997. 

Johnson, K. S., Elrod, V., Fitzwater, S., Plant, J., Boyle, E., Bergquist, B., Bruland, K., Aguilar-Islas, A., Buck, K., Lohan, M., Smith, G. J., Sohst, B., Coale, K., Gordon, M., Tanner, S., Measures, C., Moffett, J., Barbeau, K., King, A., Bowie, A., Chase, Z., Cullen, J., Laan, P., Landing, W., Mendez, J., Milne, A., Obata, H., Doi, T., Ossiander, L., Sarthou, G., Sedwick, P., Van Den Berg, S., Laglera-Baquer, L., Wu, J., and Cai, Y.: Developing standards for dissolved iron in seawater, Eos Transactions, 88, 131–132, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007EO110003, 2007. 

Kertesz, M. A., Kawasaki, A., and Stolz, A.: Aerobic Hydrocarbon-Degrading Alphaproteobacteria: Sphingomonadales, in: Taxonomy, Genomics and Ecophysiology of Hydrocarbon-Degrading Microbes, edited by: McGenity, T. J., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 105–124, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14796-9_9, 2019. 

Klar, J. K., James, R. H., Gibbs, D., Lough, A., Parkinson, I., Milton, J. A., Hawkes, J. A., and Connelly, D. P.: Isotopic signature of dissolved iron delivered to the Southern Ocean from hydrothermal vents in the East Scotia Sea, Geology, 45, 351–354, https://doi.org/10.1130/G38432.1, 2017. 

Kleint, C., Hawkes, J. A., Sander, S. G., and Koschinsky, A.: Voltammetric Investigation of Hydrothermal Iron Speciation, Front. Mar. Sci., 3, 75, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00075, 2016. 

Klunder, M. B., Laan, P., Middag, R., De Baar, H. J. W., and Van Ooijen, J. C.: Dissolved iron in the Southern Ocean (Atlantic sector), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 58, 2678–2694, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.042, 2011. 

Kondo, Y., Takeda, S., and Furuya, K.: Distinct trends in dissolved Fe speciation between shallow and deep waters in the Pacific Ocean, Mar. Chem., 134–135, 18–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2012.03.002, 2012. 

Konn, C., Charlou, J. L., Donval, J. P., Holm, N. G., Dehairs, F., and Bouillon, S.: Hydrocarbons and oxidized organic compounds in hydrothermal fluids from Rainbow and Lost City ultramafic-hosted vents, Chem. Geol., 258, 299–314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.034, 2009. 

Könneke, M., Bernhard, A. E., de la Torre, J. R., Walker, C. B., Waterbury, J. B. and Stahl D. A.: Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon, Nature, 437, 543–546, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03911, 2005. 

Lacan, F., Radic, A., Labatut, M., Jeandel, C., Poitrasson, F., Sarthou, G., Pradoux, C., Chmeleff, J., and Freydier, R.: High-Precision Determination of the Isotopic Composition of Dissolved Iron in Iron Depleted Seawater by Double Spike Multicollector-ICPMS, Anal. Chem., 82, 7103–7111, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac1002504, 2010. 

Lam, P. J., Bishop, J. K. B., Henning, C. C., Marcus, M. A., Waychunas, G. A., and Fung, I. Y.: Wintertime phytoplankton bloom in the subarctic Pacific supported by continental margin iron, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, 2005GB002557, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002557, 2006. 

Lang, S. Q., Butterfield, D. A., Lilley, M. D., Paul Johnson, H., and Hedges, J. I.: Dissolved organic carbon in ridge-axis and ridge-flank hydrothermal systems, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 70, 3830–3842, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.04.031, 2006. 

Li, J., Babcock-Adams, L., Boiteau, R. M., McIlvin, M. R., Manck, L. E., Sieber, M., Lanning, N. T., Bundy, R. M., Bian, X., ?treangă, I.-M., Granzow, B. N., Church, M. J., Fitzsimmons, J. N., John, S. G., Conway, T. M., and Repeta, D. J.: Microbial iron limitation in the ocean's twilight zone, Nature, 633, 823–827, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07905-z, 2024. 

Li, M., Toner, B. M., Baker, B. J., Breier, J. A., Sheik, C. S., and Dick, G. J.: Microbial iron uptake as a mechanism for dispersing iron from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, Nat. Commun., 5, 3192, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4192, 2014. 

Liu, X. and Millero, F. J.: The solubility of iron in seawater, Mar. Chem., 77, 43–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(01)00074-3, 2002. 

Lough, A. J. M., Klar, J. K., Homoky, W. B., Comer-Warner, S. A., Milton, J. A., Connelly, D. P., James, R. H., and Mills, R. A.: Opposing authigenic controls on the isotopic signature of dissolved iron in hydrothermal plumes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 202, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.12.022, 2017. 

Lough, A. J. M., Homoky, W. B., Connelly, D. P., Comer-Warner, S. A., Nakamura, K., Abyaneh, M. K., Kaulich, B., and Mills, R. A.: Soluble iron conservation and colloidal iron dynamics in a hydrothermal plume, Chem. Geol., 511, 225–237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.01.001, 2019. 

Lough, A. J. M., Tagliabue, A., Demasy, C., Resing, J. A., Mellett, T., Wyatt, N. J., and Lohan, M. C.: Tracing differences in iron supply to the Mid-Atlantic Ridge valley between hydrothermal vent sites: implications for the addition of iron to the deep ocean, Biogeosciences, 20, 405–420, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-405-2023, 2023. 

Lupton, J. E., Delaney, J. R., Johnson, H. P., and Tivey, M. K.: Entrainment and vertical transport of deep-ocean water by buoyant hydrothermal plumes, Nature, 316, 621–623, https://doi.org/10.1038/316621a0, 1985. 

Mahieu, L., Whitby, H., Dulaquais, G., Tilliette, C., Guigue, C., Tedetti, M., Lefevre, D., Fourrier, P., Bressac, M., Sarthou, G., Bonnet, S., Guieu, C., and Salaün, P.: Iron-binding by dissolved organic matter in the Western Tropical South Pacific Ocean (GEOTRACES TONGA cruise GPpr14), Front. Mar. Sci., 11, 1304118, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1304118, 2024. 

Manck, L. E., Coale, T. H., Stephens, B. M., Forsch, K. O., Aluwihare, L. I., Dupont, C. L., Allen, A. E., and Barbeau, K. A.: Iron limitation of heterotrophic bacteria in the California Current System tracks relative availability of organic carbon and iron, The ISME Journal, 18, wrae061, https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae061, 2024. 

Martin, J. H. and Fitzwater, S. E.: Iron deficiency limits phytoplankton growth in the north-east Pacific subarctic, Nature, 331, 341–343, https://doi.org/10.1038/331341a0, 1988. 

Mellett, T.: GA13 Hydrothermal Plume Incubations, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15214583, 2025. 

Moore, C. M., Mills, M. M., Arrigo, K. R., Berman-Frank, I., Bopp, L., Boyd, P. W., Galbraith, E. D., Geider, R. J., Guieu, C., Jaccard, S. L., Jickells, T. D., La Roche, J., Lenton, T. M., Mahowald, N. M., Marañón, E., Marinov, I., Moore, J. K., Nakatsuka, T., Oschlies, A., Saito, M. A., Thingstad, T. F., Tsuda, A., and Ulloa, O.: Processes and patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation, Nat. Geosci., 6, 701–710, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1765, 2013. 

Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., Glover, D. M., and Fung, I. Y.: Iron cycling and nutrient-limitation patterns in surface waters of the World Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49, 463–507, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00109-6, 2001. 

Mottl, M. J. and McConachy, T. F.: Chemical processes in buoyant hydrothermal plumes on the East Pacific Rise near 21° N, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 54, 1911–1927, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(90)90261-I, 1990. 

Nishioka, J., Obata, H., and Tsumune, D.: Evidence of an extensive spread of hydrothermal dissolved iron in the Indian Ocean, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 361, 26–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.11.040, 2013. 

Omanović, D., Garnier, C., and Pižeta, I.: ProMCC: An all-in-one tool for trace metal complexation studies, Mar. Chem., 173, 25–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2014.10.011, 2015. 

Parada, A. E., Needham, D. M., and Fuhrman, J. A.: Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples, Environ. Microbiol., 18, 1403–1414, https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13023, 2016. 

Pester, N. J., Reeves, E. P., Rough, M. E., Ding, K., Seewald, J. S., and Seyfried, W. E.: Subseafloor phase equilibria in high-temperature hydrothermal fluids of the Lucky Strike Seamount (Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 37°17 N), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 90, 303–322, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.05.018, 2012. 

Pižeta, I., Sander, S. G., Hudson, R. J. M., Omanović, D., Baars, O., Barbeau, K. A., Buck, K. N., Bundy, R. M., Carrasco, G., Croot, P. L., Garnier, C., Gerringa, L. J. A., Gledhill, M., Hirose, K., Kondo, Y., Laglera, L. M., Nuester, J., Rijkenberg, M. J. A., Takeda, S., Twining, B. S., and Wells, M.: Interpretation of complexometric titration data: An intercomparison of methods for estimating models of trace metal complexation by natural organic ligands, Mar. Chem., 173, 3–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2015.03.006, 2015. 

Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., and Glöckner, F. O.: The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools, Nucleic Acids Research, 41, D590–D596, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219, 2012. 

Resing, J. A., Sedwick, P. N., German, C. R., Jenkins, W. J., Moffett, J. W., Sohst, B. M., and Tagliabue, A.: Basin-scale transport of hydrothermal dissolved metals across the South Pacific Ocean, Nature, 523, 200–203, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14577, 2015. 

Revels, B. N., Ohnemus, D. C., Lam, P. J., Conway, T. M., and John, S. G.: The isotopic signature and distribution of particulate iron in the North Atlantic Ocean, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 116, 321–331, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.12.004, 2015. 

Rudnicki, M. D. and Elderfield, H.: A chemical model of the buoyant and neutrally buoyant plume above the TAG vent field, 26 degrees N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 57, 2939–2957, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90285-5, 1993. 

Rue, E. L. and Bruland, K. W.: Complexation of iron(III) by natural organic ligands in the Central North Pacific as determined by a new competitive ligand equilibration/adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetric method, Mar. Chem., 50, 117–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00031-L, 1995. 

Sander, S. G. and Koschinsky, A.: Metal flux from hydrothermal vents increased by organic complexation, Nat. Geosci., 4, 145–150, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1088, 2011. 

Santoro, A. E., Casciotti, K. L., and Francis, C. A.: Activity, abundance and diversity of nitrifying archaea and bacteria in the central California Current, Environ. Microbiol., 12, 1989–2006, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02205.x, 2010. 

Severmann, S., Johnson, C. M., Beard, B. L., German, C. R., Edmonds, H. N., Chiba, H., and Green, D. R. H.: The effect of plume processes on the Fe isotope composition of hydrothermally derived Fe in the deep ocean as inferred from the Rainbow vent site, Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 36°14 N, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 225, 63–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.06.001, 2004. 

Shah, V., Chang, B. X., and Morris R. M.: Cultivation of a chemoautotroph from the SUP05 clade of marine bacteria that produces nitrite and consumes ammonium, The ISME Journal, 11, 263–271, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.87, 2016. 

Sieber, M., Conway, T. M., De Souza, G. F., Hassler, C. S., Ellwood, M. J., and Vance, D.: Isotopic fingerprinting of biogeochemical processes and iron sources in the iron-limited surface Southern Ocean, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 567, 116967, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116967, 2021. 

Skulan, J. L., Beard, B. L., and Johnson, C. M.: Kinetic and equilibrium Fe isotope fractionation between aqueous Fe(III) and hematite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66, 2995–3015, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00902-X, 2002. 

Stephens, B. M., Opalk, K., Petras, D., Liu, S., Comstock, J., Aluwihare, L. I., Hansell, D. A., and Carlson, C. A.: Organic Matter Composition at Ocean Station Papa Affects Its Bioavailability, Bacterioplankton Growth Efficiency and the Responding Taxa, Front. Mar. Sci., 7, 590273, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.590273, 2020. 

Sylvan, J. B., Pyenson, B. C., Rouxel, O., German, C. R., and Edwards, K. J.: Time-series analysis of two hydrothermal plumes at 9°50 N East Pacific Rise reveals distinct, heterogeneous bacterial populations, Geobiology, 10, 178–192, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4669.2011.00315.x, 2012. 

Tagliabue, A., Aumont, O., and Bopp, L.: The impact of different external sources of iron on the global carbon cycle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 920–926, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059059, 2014. 

Tivey, M.: Generation of Seafloor Hydrothermal Vent Fluids and Associated Mineral Deposits, Oceanography, 20, 50–65, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.80, 2007. 

Tortell, P. D., Maldonado, M. T., Granger, J., and Price, N. M.: Marine bacteria and biogeochemical cycling of iron in the oceans, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 29, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1999.tb00593.x, 1999. 

Vraspir, J. M. and Butler, A.: Chemistry of Marine Ligands and Siderophores, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 43–63, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163712, 2009. 

Wang, W., Lough, A., Lohan, M. C., Connelly, D. P., Cooper, M., Milton, J. A., Chavagnac, V., Castillo, A., and James, R. H.: Behavior of iron isotopes in hydrothermal systems: Beebe and Von Damm vent fields on the Mid-Cayman ultraslow-spreading ridge, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 575, 117200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117200, 2021. 

Welch, S. A., Beard, B. L., Johnson, C. M., and Braterman, P. S.: Kinetic and equilibrium Fe isotope fractionation between aqueous Fe(II) and Fe(III), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 67, 4231–4250, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00266-7, 2003. 

Wiederhold, J. G., Kraemer, S. M., Teutsch, N., Borer, P. M., Halliday, A. N., and Kretzschmar, R.: Iron Isotope Fractionation during Proton-Promoted, Ligand-Controlled, and Reductive Dissolution of Goethite, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3787–3793, https://doi.org/10.1021/es052228y, 2006. 

Wu, J., Wells, M. L., and Rember, R.: Dissolved iron anomaly in the deep tropical–subtropical Pacific: Evidence for long-range transport of hydrothermal iron, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 460–468, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.10.024, 2011. 

Yakimov, M. M., Golyshin, P. N., Lang, S., Moore, E. R. B., Abraham, W.-R., Lunsdorf, H., and Timmis, K. N.: Alcanivorax borkumensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new, hydrocarbon-degrading and surfactant-producing marine bacterium, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 48, 339–348, https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-48-2-339, 1998. 

Yücel, M., Gartman, A., Chan, C. S., and Luther, G. W.: Hydrothermal vents as a kinetically stable source of iron-sulphide-bearing nanoparticles to the ocean, Nat. Geosci., 4, 367–371, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1148, 2011. 

Zhang, R., John, S. G., Zhang, J., Ren, J., Wu, Y., Zhu, Z., Liu, S., Zhu, X., Marsay, C. M., and Wenger, F.: Transport and reaction of iron and iron stable isotopes in glacial meltwaters on Svalbard near Kongsfjorden: From rivers to estuary to ocean, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 424, 201–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.05.031, 2015. 

Zykwinska, A., Marchand, L., Bonnetot, S., Sinquin, C., Colliec-Jouault, S., and Delbarre-Ladrat, C.: Deep-sea Hydrothermal Vent Bacteria as a Source of Glycosaminoglycan-Mimetic Exopolysaccharides, Molecules, 24, 1703, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091703, 2019. 

Download
Short summary
Hydrothermal plumes of iron (Fe) have been observed to persist in the deep ocean, but the exact mechanisms that contribute to the long-range transport of Fe are not well defined. We collected plume waters from three different vent systems along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and monitored the temporal evolution of the physical and chemical forms of iron and its interaction with organic matter over time to learn about the mechanisms that control its dispersion.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint