Articles | Volume 23, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-5313-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-5313-2026
Reviews and syntheses
 | Highlight paper
 | 
03 Aug 2026
Reviews and syntheses | Highlight paper |  | 03 Aug 2026

Reviews and syntheses: Eddy covariance-based evapotranspiration partitioning

Emma G. Cochran, Claudia Wagner-Riddle, and Elke Eichelmann

Related authors

Process-based upgrades to the WRF multi-layer green-roof scheme (WRF-MLGR v2.0) and evaluation against field observations
Alireza Saeedi, Maria Martinez Mendoza, Eric Scott Krayenhoff, James Voogt, Andrea Zonato, Sylvie Leroyer, and Claudia Wagner-Riddle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-984,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-984, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary

Cited articles

A, Y., Wang, G., Hu, P., Wang, L., Xue, B., and Shrestha, S.: Modification and upscaling of S–W model based on vertical distributions of soil moisture and vegetation root biomass, Environ. Res., 208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112765, 2022. 
Addington, R. N., Mitchell, R. J., Oren, R., and Donovan, L. A.: Stomatal sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit and its relationship to hydraulic conductance in Pinus palustris, Tree Physiol., 24, 561–569, 2004. 
Amaro Medina, D., Clark, M. G., and Carey, S. K.: Multi-Year Evapotranspiration and Energy Dynamics of a Reclaimed Fen in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Hydrol. Process., 39, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70247, 2025. 
Anderson, M., Gao, F., Knipper, K., Hain, C., Dulaney, W., Baldocchi, D., Eichelmann, E., Hemes, K., Yang, Y., Medellin-Azuara, J., and Kustas, W.: Field-scale assessment of land and water use change over the California delta using remote sensing, Remote Sens., 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060889, 2018. 
Anupoju, V., Kambhammettu, B. V. N. P., and Peddinti, S. R.: Comparative analysis of FAO dual Kc, Priestley-Taylor and flux variance similarity methods in partitioning evapotranspiration from flood-irrigated rice fields, Irrigation and Drainage, https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.3039, 2024. 
Download
Editorial statement
Distinction between transpiration and other sources for the evaporation of liquid water from vegetated land surfaces is important for understanding the control mechanisms of evaporation, for plant physiological interpretation, and for testing hydrological models. A number of approaches to partition eddy covariance total evaporation measurements into transpiration and other water vapour fluxes have recently been published. This review gives a timely overview over current partitioning approaches, examines where these approaches were applied and how results comply with independent information. Important conclusions on the robustness of the approaches in relation to the ecosystem types are provided, which is an excellent basis for choosing between existing approaches and for new developments.
Short summary
It is important to understand how much water is lost from plant processes to better understand ecosystem dynamics and the global water cycle. This review summarizes methods developed to partition plant water loss from total ecosystem water loss measurements. Eleven independent methods were identified, each reliant on various ecosystem assumptions. The methods were applied across 129 independent studies, reporting that globally, plant water loss accounts for 57 % of total ecosystem water loss.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint