Thank you for your detailed author replies and revised version of your manuscript, which adequately addresses the comments and suggestions by both reviewers. I am pleased to accept the revised version of your manuscript pending a few minor textual corrections, and I also have one suggestion for Figure 1 – but I leave it up to the authors to decide whether or not to modify the latter.

Line 30: “Thus reflecting…”: this sentence does not have a verb, integrate this with previous sentence.
Line 36: enrichments  enrichment
Line 89: seagrasses beds  seagrass beds
Line 126: enough  sufficient
Line 545: enrichments  enrichment
Figure 1: I would reorganize the panels so that the same parameters on the left and right hand correspond to each other. Thus:
-panel (b) could have what is now panel (j) just next to it
-panel (c) could have what is now panel (h) just next to it
-panel (d) could have what is now panel (i) just next to it.
This would allow an easier and more direct comparison of these responses in both low- and high-nutrient meadows. The lower 2 panels in each column can then be used for those parameters which do not have a match.

With best regards
Steven Bouillon