Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1199-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
Research article
 | 
03 Mar 2020
Research article |  | 03 Mar 2020

Simulation of factors affecting Emiliania huxleyi blooms in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas by CMIP5 climate models: model validation and selection

Natalia Gnatiuk, Iuliia Radchenko, Richard Davy, Evgeny Morozov, and Leonid Bobylev

Viewed

Total article views: 5,668 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,560 996 112 5,668 118 130
  • HTML: 4,560
  • PDF: 996
  • XML: 112
  • Total: 5,668
  • BibTeX: 118
  • EndNote: 130
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,668 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,099 with geography defined and 569 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 29 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We analysed the ability of 34 climate models to reproduce main factors affecting the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi blooms in six Arctic and sub-Arctic seas. Furthermore, we proposed a procedure of ranking and selecting these models based on the model’s skill in reproducing 10 important oceanographic, meteorological, and biochemical variables in comparison with observation data and demonstrated that the proposed methodology shows a better result than commonly used all-model averaging.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint