Articles | Volume 18, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2221-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2221-2021
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
01 Apr 2021
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 01 Apr 2021

Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21st century co-driven by anthropogenic carbon increases and freshening in the CMIP6 model ensemble

Jens Terhaar, Olivier Torres, Timothée Bourgeois, and Lester Kwiatkowski

Related authors

Drivers of decadal trends in the ocean carbon sink in the past, present, and future in Earth system models
Jens Terhaar
Biogeosciences, 21, 3903–3926, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3903-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hybrid model estimate of the ocean carbon sink from 1959 to 2022
Jens Terhaar
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2171,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2171, 2024
Short summary
Southern Ocean phytoplankton under climate change: a shifting balance of bottom-up and top-down control
Tianfei Xue, Jens Terhaar, A. E. Friederike Prowe, Thomas L. Frölicher, Andreas Oschlies, and Ivy Frenger
Biogeosciences, 21, 2473–2491, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2473-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2473-2024, 2024
Short summary
AERA-MIP: Emission pathways, remaining budgets and carbon cycle dynamics compatible with 1.5 ºC and 2 ºC global warming stabilization
Yona Silvy, Thomas L. Frölicher, Jens Terhaar, Fortunat Joos, Friedrich A. Burger, Fabrice Lacroix, Myles Allen, Raffaele Bernadello, Laurent Bopp, Victor Brovkin, Jonathan R. Buzan, Patricia Cadule, Martin Dix, John Dunne, Pierre Friedlingstein, Goran Georgievski, Tomohiro Hajima, Stuart Jenkins, Michio Kawamiya, Nancy Y. Kiang, Vladimir Lapin, Donghyun Lee, Paul Lerner, Nadine Mengis, Estela A. Monteiro, David Paynter, Glen P. Peters, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Sarah Sparrow, Eric Stofferahn, Jerry Tjiputra, Etienne Tourigny, and Tilo Ziehn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-488,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-488, 2024
Short summary
Observation-constrained estimates of the global ocean carbon sink from Earth system models
Jens Terhaar, Thomas L. Frölicher, and Fortunat Joos
Biogeosciences, 19, 4431–4457, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4431-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4431-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Aquatic
Changes in Arctic Ocean plankton community structure and trophic dynamics on seasonal to interannual timescales
Gabriela Negrete-García, Jessica Y. Luo, Colleen M. Petrik, Manfredi Manizza, and Andrew D. Barton
Biogeosciences, 21, 4951–4973, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4951-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4951-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global impact of benthic denitrification on marine N2 fixation and primary production simulated by a variable-stoichiometry Earth system model
Na Li, Christopher J. Somes, Angela Landolfi, Chia-Te Chien, Markus Pahlow, and Andreas Oschlies
Biogeosciences, 21, 4361–4380, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4361-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4361-2024, 2024
Short summary
Efficiency metrics for ocean alkalinity enhancement under responsive and prescribed atmosphere conditions
Michael Dominik Tyka
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2150,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2150, 2024
Short summary
Killing the predator: impacts of highest-predator mortality on the global-ocean ecosystem structure
David Talmy, Eric Carr, Harshana Rajakaruna, Selina Våge, and Anne Willem Omta
Biogeosciences, 21, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hydrodynamic and biochemical impacts on the development of hypoxia in the Louisiana–Texas shelf – Part 1: roles of nutrient limitation and plankton community
Yanda Ou and Z. George Xue
Biogeosciences, 21, 2385–2424, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2385-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, M. R. and Ingram, W. J.: Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle, Nature, 419, 228–232, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01092, 2002. a
AMAP: AMAP Assessment 2018: Arctic Ocean Acidification, Tech. Rep., Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Tromsø, Norway, 2018. a, b, c, d
Anderson, L., Tanhua, T., Björk, G., Hjalmarsson, S., Jones, E., Jutterström, S., Rudels, B., Swift, J., and Wåhlstöm, I.: Arctic ocean shelf–basin interaction: An active continental shelf CO2 pump and its impact on the degree of calcium carbonate solubility, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 57, 869–879, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.012, 2010. a, b, c
Armstrong, J. L., Boldt, J. L., Cross, A. D., Moss, J. H., Davis, N. D., Myers, K. W., Walker, R. V., Beauchamp, D. A., and Haldorson, L. J.: Distribution, size, and interannual, seasonal and diel food habits of northern Gulf of Alaska juvenile pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 52, 247–265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.09.019, 2005. a, b, c
Bates, N. R. and Mathis, J. T.: The Arctic Ocean marine carbon cycle: evaluation of air-sea CO2 exchanges, ocean acidification impacts and potential feedbacks, Biogeosciences, 6, 2433–2459, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2433-2009, 2009. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
The uptake of carbon, emitted as a result of human activities, results in ocean acidification. We analyse 21st-century projections of acidification in the Arctic Ocean, a region of particular vulnerability, using the latest generation of Earth system models. In this new generation of models there is a large decrease in the uncertainty associated with projections of Arctic Ocean acidification, with freshening playing a greater role in driving acidification than previously simulated.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint