Sensitivity of biomass burning emissions estimates to land surface information

Saito, Makoto; Shiraishi, Tomohiro; Hirata, Ryuichi; Niwa, Yosuke; Saito, Kazuyuki; Steinbacher, Martin; Worthy, Doug; Matsunaga, Tsuneo

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2059-2022

Articles | Volume 19, issue 7

https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2059-2022

© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2059-2022

© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 19, issue 7

Research article

|

14 Apr 2022

Research article |

| 14 Apr 2022

Sensitivity of biomass burning emissions estimates to land surface information

Makoto Saito, Tomohiro Shiraishi, Ryuichi Hirata, Yosuke Niwa, Kazuyuki Saito, Martin Steinbacher, Doug Worthy, and Tsuneo Matsunaga

Download

Final revised paper (published on 14 Apr 2022)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 10 Jun 2021)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

RC1:
'Comment on bg-2021-130', Anonymous Referee #1, 28 Jun 2021

The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-130/bg-2021-130-RC1-supplement.pdf

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-130-RC1
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Makoto Saito, 08 Aug 2021
  
  The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-130/bg-2021-130-AC2-supplement.pdf
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-130-AC2
RC2:
'Comment on bg-2021-130', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Jul 2021

In the manuscript entitled “Sensitivity of biomass burning emissions estimates to land surface information”, authors explored the sensitivity of biomass burning emission estimates to land surface information under four scenarios, based on land use and aboveground biomass. This paper just provided the results of different scenarios. It seems not a sensitivity analysis. The quantification results of sensitivity indicators are not outstanding. The sensitivity of quantified single parameter could be considered. Specific comment is as following:

1ãHow to explain the meaning of equation 2?

2ãWhich variable of the formula can LCC and ACB provide data for? Please explain the relationship between LCC/ACB and emission estimation in detail.

3ãWhat is the difference between providing data by MCD12Q1 and MOD14A1?

4ãPlease supplement the discussion of the proportion of various types of biomass emissions (e.g., crop, forest, etc.) under different scenario for different LCC and AGB, and compare them with other studies.

6ãIn this paper, the different types of crops straws were not considered in the emission factors and activity data. There is comparable difference in emission factors of various crops straw, such as corn, rice, wheat, etc.

7ãIn this paper, MNM is set as the background station, whether it is similar to other pollution sources of the other two stations.

8ãLine 105-106, why the concentration of CH4 is fixed and what is the basis for setting it?

9ãLine 194-195, the data is not well expressed.

10ãFig.4: Incomplete display of broken line chart.

Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-130-RC2
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Makoto Saito, 08 Aug 2021
  
  The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://bg.copernicus.org/preprints/bg-2021-130/bg-2021-130-AC1-supplement.pdf
  
  Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-130-AC1

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Reconsider after major revisions (24 Aug 2021) by Kirsten Thonicke

AR by Makoto Saito on behalf of the Authors (15 Nov 2021) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (02 Dec 2021) by Kirsten Thonicke

RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (14 Dec 2021)

RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (14 Dec 2021)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (07 Jan 2022) by Kirsten Thonicke

AR by Makoto Saito on behalf of the Authors (10 Jan 2022) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (08 Mar 2022) by Kirsten Thonicke

Download

Article (6781 KB)
Full-text XML

Short summary

This study tested combinations of two sources of AGB data and two sources of LCC data and used the same burned area satellite data to estimate BB CO emissions. Our analysis showed large discrepancies in annual mean CO emissions and explicit differences in the simulated CO concentrations among the BB emissions estimates. This study has confirmed that BB emissions estimates are sensitive to the land surface information on which they are based.