Articles | Volume 23, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1181-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1181-2026
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
10 Feb 2026
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 10 Feb 2026

An unpredictable body size response to the Permo-Triassic climate crisis

William J. Foster, Herwig Prinoth, Evelyn Kustatscher, and Michael Hautmann

Viewed

Total article views: 1,359 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
966 332 61 1,359 48 32 35
  • HTML: 966
  • PDF: 332
  • XML: 61
  • Total: 1,359
  • Supplement: 48
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Aug 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Aug 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,359 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,359 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Apr 2026
Download
Editorial statement
This study provides an exceptional, high-resolution, specimen-level record of marine bivalve body-size dynamics across the Permian–Triassic mass extinction, one of the most extreme climate crises in Earth’s history. By distinguishing species- from genus-level responses, the authors show that post-extinction size reductions are driven mainly by faunal turnover and the emergence of smaller species, rather than by universal dwarfism within surviving taxa, thereby refining interpretations of the “Lilliput effect.” The identification of two distinct recovery phases highlights the complex interplay of evolutionary and environmental controls during prolonged climate stress and offers valuable context for understanding biological responses to rapid warming in the past and future.
Short summary
Analysis of Permian–Triassic bivalve fossils from the Dolomites reveals that apparent size reductions reflect faunal turnover, not within-species dwarfing. The extinction eliminated most species, with smaller new species dominating the recovery. Whereas survivors showed no size body change. The subsequent size rebound occurred in two pulses: growth within survivors (late Griesbachian) and evolution of larger taxa (early Spathian), refining interpretations of the “Lilliput effect.”
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint