Articles | Volume 23, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-263-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-263-2026
Research article
 | 
09 Jan 2026
Research article |  | 09 Jan 2026

Land surface model underperformance tied to specific meteorological conditions

Jon Cranko Page, Martin G. De Kauwe, Andy J. Pitman, Isaac R. Towers, Gabriele Arduini, Martin J. Best, Craig R. Ferguson, Jürgen Knauer, Hyungjun Kim, David M. Lawrence, Tomoko Nitta, Keith W. Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Anna Ukkola, Nicholas Vuichard, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, and Gab Abramowitz

Viewed

Total article views: 2,806 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,507 240 59 2,806 67 54 44
  • HTML: 2,507
  • PDF: 240
  • XML: 59
  • Total: 2,806
  • Supplement: 67
  • BibTeX: 54
  • EndNote: 44
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,806 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,806 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 29 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
This paper used a large dataset of observations, machine learning predictions, and computer model simulations to test how well land surface models represent the water, energy, and carbon cycles. We found that the models work well under "normal" weather but do not meet performance expectations during coinciding extreme conditions. Since these extremes are relatively rare, targeted model improvements could deliver major performance gains.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint