Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE-IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Viewed
Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.
Total article views: 1,431 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,410
0
21
1,431
0
0
HTML: 1,410
PDF: 0
XML: 21
Total: 1,431
BibTeX: 0
EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Dec 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Dec 2025)
Total article views: 1,431 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,410
0
21
1,431
0
0
HTML: 1,410
PDF: 0
XML: 21
Total: 1,431
BibTeX: 0
EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Dec 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Dec 2025)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.
Total article views: 1,431 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,410 with geography defined
and 21 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,431 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,410 with geography defined
and 21 with unknown origin.
Estimates of ocean CO2 uptake based on atmospheric and oceanic observations typically rely on monthly averages, except for wind speed. Thus they neglect effects of shorter-term events such as storms, which are included in models. Here we account for the effect of this shorter-term variability on ocean carbon uptake and find that it is reduced, mainly because storms lower atmospheric pressure. This refinement closes the gap between data-based and model-based estimates by 25 %.
Estimates of ocean CO2 uptake based on atmospheric and oceanic observations typically rely on...