Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 23, issue 13
Articles | Volume 23, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-4843-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-4843-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 23, issue 13
Research article
 | 
14 Jul 2026
Research article |  | 14 Jul 2026

Root turnover and soil indicators capture belowground recovery following saltmarsh restoration

Sabrina K. B. Olsson, Anirban Akhand, Peter I. Macreadie, Joeri Kaal, Siegmund Nuyts, Paul E. Carnell, and Stacey M. Trevathan-Tackett

Viewed

Total article views: 1,162 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
737 355 70 1,162 142 62 110
  • HTML: 737
  • PDF: 355
  • XML: 70
  • Total: 1,162
  • Supplement: 142
  • BibTeX: 62
  • EndNote: 110
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,162 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,100 with geography defined and 62 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
The recovery of saltmarsh ecosystems after restoration is poorly understood. We studied saltmarsh soils in Victoria, Australia, 25 years after fencing was installed to exclude livestock. Fenced and natural areas had more plant cover, softer soils and more organic carbon in the surface soils than grazed areas. Our results show that assessing restoration outcomes should go beyond measuring carbon stocks alone.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint