Articles | Volume 14, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2571-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.Modelling Holocene peatland dynamics with an individual-based dynamic vegetation model
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 19 May 2017)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 01 Dec 2016)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf08e/cf08e471eb31ab8e7fafb1d845a6e182c8661e07" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f973d/f973d72f1cc61c03a6db358cea8eb74314226c0c" alt="Supplement"
-
SC1: 'Discrepancies of simulated vs. reconstructed climate data', Sebastian Luening, 28 Dec 2016
-
AC1: 'Response', Nitin Chaudhary, 25 Jan 2017
-
AC2: 'References', Nitin Chaudhary, 26 Jan 2017
-
SC2: 'Holocene climate models', Sebastian Luening, 27 Jan 2017
-
SC2: 'Holocene climate models', Sebastian Luening, 27 Jan 2017
-
AC2: 'References', Nitin Chaudhary, 26 Jan 2017
-
AC1: 'Response', Nitin Chaudhary, 25 Jan 2017
-
RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #3, 21 Feb 2017
-
AC3: 'Response', Nitin Chaudhary, 21 Mar 2017
-
AC3: 'Response', Nitin Chaudhary, 21 Mar 2017
-
RC2: 'Referee comment', Andrew Baird, 21 Feb 2017
-
AC4: 'Response', Nitin Chaudhary, 21 Mar 2017
-
AC4: 'Response', Nitin Chaudhary, 21 Mar 2017
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (25 Feb 2017) by Steffen M. Noe
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30b4e/30b4efcc1ec1bffd6c893a1459f7e04fd3816df8" alt=""
AR by Nitin Chaudhary on behalf of the Authors (21 Mar 2017)
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (14 Apr 2017) by Steffen M. Noe
AR by Nitin Chaudhary on behalf of the Authors (15 Apr 2017)