Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences
BG
Articles | Volume 22, issue 18
Articles | Volume 22, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4969-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4969-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22, issue 18
Research article
 | 
25 Sep 2025
Research article |  | 25 Sep 2025

Grassland yield estimations – potentials and limitations of remote sensing in comparison to process-based modeling and field measurements

Sophie Reinermann, Carolin Boos, Andrea Kaim, Anne Schucknecht, Sarah Asam, Ursula Gessner, Sylvia H. Annuth, Thomas M. Schmitt, Thomas Koellner, and Ralf Kiese

Viewed

Total article views: 1,073 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
903 149 21 1,073 24 34
  • HTML: 903
  • PDF: 149
  • XML: 21
  • Total: 1,073
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,073 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,073 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 29 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Grasslands shape the landscape in many parts of the world and serve as the main source of fodder for livestock. There is a lack of comprehensive data on grassland yield, although these data are highly valuable for authorities and research. By applying three approaches to estimate grassland yields, namely, a satellite data model, a biogeochemical model and a field measurements approach, we provide annual grassland yield maps for the Ammer region in 2019 and highlight the potentials and limitations of the approaches.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint