Articles | Volume 22, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-7687-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-7687-2025
Research article
 | 
08 Dec 2025
Research article |  | 08 Dec 2025

Utilizing probability estimates from machine learning and pollen to understand the depositional influences on branched GDGT in wetlands, peatlands, and lakes

Amy Cromartie, Cindy De Jonge, Guillemette Ménot, Mary Robles, Lucas Dugerdil, Odile Peyron, Marta Rodrigo-Gámiz, Jon Camuera, Maria Jose Ramos-Roman, Gonzalo Jiménez-Moreno, Claude Colombié, Lilit Sahakyan, and Sébastien Joannin

Viewed

Total article views: 1,124 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
985 109 30 1,124 56 35 47
  • HTML: 985
  • PDF: 109
  • XML: 30
  • Total: 1,124
  • Supplement: 56
  • BibTeX: 35
  • EndNote: 47
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,124 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,124 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
BrGDGT (branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers) are a molecular biomarker utilized for paleotemperature reconstructions. One issue, however, with utilizing brGDGTs is that the distribution differs in relation to sediment environments (i.e., peat, lake, soil). We utilize the probability estimate outputs from five machine learning algorithms and a new modern brGDGT database to track provenance change and apply these models to two downcore records utilizing pollen, non-pollen polymorphs, and XRF (X-ray fluorescence) to confirm the models’ accuracy.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint