Articles | Volume 21, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1355-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1355-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
18 Mar 2024
Research article |
| 18 Mar 2024
| 18 Mar 2024
Frost matters: incorporating late-spring frost into a dynamic vegetation model regulates regional productivity dynamics in European beech forests
Land Surface–Atmosphere Interactions, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
Allan Buras
Land Surface–Atmosphere Interactions, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
Konstantin Gregor
Land Surface–Atmosphere Interactions, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
Lucia S. Layritz
Land Surface–Atmosphere Interactions, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
Adriana Principe
Centre for Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Changes, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa (cE3c-FCUL),Campo Grande, Lisbon, Portugal
Jürgen Kreyling
Experimental Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
Anja Rammig
Land Surface–Atmosphere Interactions, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
Christian S. Zang
Institute for Ecology and Landscape, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising, Germany
Related authors
Benjamin F. Meyer, João P. Darela-Filho, Konstantin Gregor, Allan Buras, Qiao-Lin Gu, Andreas Krause, Daijun Liu, Phillip Papastefanou, Sijeh Asuk, Thorsten E. E. Grams, Christian S. Zang, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change has increased the likelihood of drought events across Europe, potentially threatening the European forest carbon sink. Dynamic vegetation models with mechanistic plant hydraulic architecture are needed to model these developments. We evaluate the plant hydraulic architecture version of LPJ-GUESS and show its ability to capture species-specific evapotranspiration responses to drought and to reproduce flux observations of both gross primary production and evapotranspiration.
Lucia S. Layritz, Konstantin Gregor, Andreas Krause, Stefan Kruse, Benjamin F. Meyer, Thomas A. M. Pugh, and Anja Rammig
Biogeosciences, 22, 3635–3660, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3635-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Disturbances, such as fire, can change which vegetation grows in a forest, affecting water and carbon flows and, thus, the climate. Disturbances are expected to increase with climate change, but it is uncertain by how much. Using a simulation model, we studied how future climate, disturbances, and their combined effect impact northern (high-latitude) forest ecosystems. Our findings highlight the importance of considering these factors and the need to better understand how disturbances will change in the future.
Konstantin Gregor, Benjamin F. Meyer, Tillmann Gaida, Victor Justo Vasquez, Karina Bett-Williams, Matthew Forrest, João P. Darela-Filho, Sam Rabin, Marcos Longo, Joe R. Melton, Johan Nord, Peter Anthoni, Vladislav Bastrikov, Thomas Colligan, Christine Delire, Michael C. Dietze, George Hurtt, Akihiko Ito, Lasse T. Keetz, Jürgen Knauer, Johannes Köster, Tzu-Shun Lin, Lei Ma, Marie Minvielle, Stefan Olin, Sebastian Ostberg, Hao Shi, Reiner Schnur, Urs Schönenberger, Qing Sun, Peter E. Thornton, and Anja Rammig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1733, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1733, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientific models are crucial for understanding Earth’s processes. However, they sometimes do not adhere to highest software quality standards, and scientific results are often hard to reproduce due to the complexity of the workflows. Here we gather the expertise of 20 modeling groups and software engineers to define best practices for making geoscientific models maintainable, usable, and reproducible. We conclude with an open-source example serving as a reference for modeling communities.
Benjamin F. Meyer, João P. Darela-Filho, Konstantin Gregor, Allan Buras, Qiao-Lin Gu, Andreas Krause, Daijun Liu, Phillip Papastefanou, Sijeh Asuk, Thorsten E. E. Grams, Christian S. Zang, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change has increased the likelihood of drought events across Europe, potentially threatening the European forest carbon sink. Dynamic vegetation models with mechanistic plant hydraulic architecture are needed to model these developments. We evaluate the plant hydraulic architecture version of LPJ-GUESS and show its ability to capture species-specific evapotranspiration responses to drought and to reproduce flux observations of both gross primary production and evapotranspiration.
Lucia S. Layritz, Konstantin Gregor, Andreas Krause, Stefan Kruse, Benjamin F. Meyer, Thomas A. M. Pugh, and Anja Rammig
Biogeosciences, 22, 3635–3660, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3635-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Disturbances, such as fire, can change which vegetation grows in a forest, affecting water and carbon flows and, thus, the climate. Disturbances are expected to increase with climate change, but it is uncertain by how much. Using a simulation model, we studied how future climate, disturbances, and their combined effect impact northern (high-latitude) forest ecosystems. Our findings highlight the importance of considering these factors and the need to better understand how disturbances will change in the future.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Tatiana Reichert, Laynara F. Lugli, Erica McGale, Kerstin Pierick, João Paulo Darela-Filho, Liam Langan, Jürgen Homeier, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Biogeosciences, 22, 2707–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2707-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2707-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how plant roots with different forms and functions rely on fungal partnerships for nutrient uptake. This relationship was integrated into a vegetation model and was tested in a tropical forest in Ecuador. The model accurately predicted root traits and showed that without fungi, biomass decreased by up to 80 %. The findings highlight the critical role of fungi in ecosystem processes and suggest that root–fungal interactions should be considered in vegetation models.
Konstantin Gregor, Benjamin F. Meyer, Tillmann Gaida, Victor Justo Vasquez, Karina Bett-Williams, Matthew Forrest, João P. Darela-Filho, Sam Rabin, Marcos Longo, Joe R. Melton, Johan Nord, Peter Anthoni, Vladislav Bastrikov, Thomas Colligan, Christine Delire, Michael C. Dietze, George Hurtt, Akihiko Ito, Lasse T. Keetz, Jürgen Knauer, Johannes Köster, Tzu-Shun Lin, Lei Ma, Marie Minvielle, Stefan Olin, Sebastian Ostberg, Hao Shi, Reiner Schnur, Urs Schönenberger, Qing Sun, Peter E. Thornton, and Anja Rammig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1733, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1733, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientific models are crucial for understanding Earth’s processes. However, they sometimes do not adhere to highest software quality standards, and scientific results are often hard to reproduce due to the complexity of the workflows. Here we gather the expertise of 20 modeling groups and software engineers to define best practices for making geoscientific models maintainable, usable, and reproducible. We conclude with an open-source example serving as a reference for modeling communities.
Friedrich J. Bohn, Ana Bastos, Romina Martin, Anja Rammig, Niak Sian Koh, Giles B. Sioen, Bram Buscher, Louise Carver, Fabrice DeClerck, Moritz Drupp, Robert Fletcher, Matthew Forrest, Alexandros Gasparatos, Alex Godoy-Faúndez, Gregor Hagedorn, Martin C. Hänsel, Jessica Hetzer, Thomas Hickler, Cornelia B. Krug, Stasja Koot, Xiuzhen Li, Amy Luers, Shelby Matevich, H. Damon Matthews, Ina C. Meier, Mirco Migliavacca, Awaz Mohamed, Sungmin O, David Obura, Ben Orlove, Rene Orth, Laura Pereira, Markus Reichstein, Lerato Thakholi, Peter H. Verburg, and Yuki Yoshida
Biogeosciences, 22, 2425–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2425-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2425-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
An interdisciplinary collaboration of 36 international researchers from 35 institutions highlights recent findings in biosphere research. Within eight themes, they discuss issues arising from climate change and other anthropogenic stressors and highlight the co-benefits of nature-based solutions and ecosystem services. Based on an analysis of these eight topics, we have synthesized four overarching insights.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Matthew Forrest, David Warlind, João Paulo Darela Filho, Katrin Fleischer, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2249–2274, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study maps global nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability and how they changed from 1901 to 2018. We find that tropical regions are mostly P-limited, while temperate and boreal areas face N limitations. Over time, P limitation increased, especially in the tropics, while N limitation decreased. These shifts are key to understanding global plant growth and carbon storage, highlighting the importance of including P dynamics in ecosystem models.
Olivier Bouriaud, Ernst-Detlef Schulze, Konstantin Gregor, Issam Bourkhris, Peter Högberg, Roland Irslinger, Phillip Papastefanou, Julia Pongratz, Anja Rammig, Riccardo Valentini, and Christian Körner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3092, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3092, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of harvesting on forests' carbon sink capacities is debated. One view is that their sink strength is resilient to harvesting, the other that it disrupts these capacities. Our work shows that leaf area index (LAI) has been overlooked in this discussion. We found that temperate forests' carbon uptake is largely insensitive to variations in LAI beyond about 4 m² m-², but that forests operate at higher levels.
Melanie A. Thurner, Silvia Caldararu, Jan Engel, Anja Rammig, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 21, 1391–1410, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1391-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1391-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Due to their crucial role in terrestrial ecosystems, we implemented mycorrhizal fungi into the QUINCY terrestrial biosphere model. Fungi interact with mineral and organic soil to support plant N uptake and, thus, plant growth. Our results suggest that the effect of mycorrhizal interactions on simulated ecosystem dynamics is minor under constant environmental conditions but necessary to reproduce and understand observed patterns under changing conditions, such as rising atmospheric CO2.
João Paulo Darela-Filho, Anja Rammig, Katrin Fleischer, Tatiana Reichert, Laynara Figueiredo Lugli, Carlos Alberto Quesada, Luis Carlos Colocho Hurtarte, Mateus Dantas de Paula, and David M. Lapola
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 715–729, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-715-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-715-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Phosphorus (P) is crucial for plant growth, and scientists have created models to study how it interacts with carbon cycle in ecosystems. To apply these models, it is important to know the distribution of phosphorus in soil. In this study we estimated the distribution of phosphorus in the Amazon region. The results showed a clear gradient of soil development and P content. These maps can help improve ecosystem models and generate new hypotheses about phosphorus availability in the Amazon.
Jennifer A. Holm, David M. Medvigy, Benjamin Smith, Jeffrey S. Dukes, Claus Beier, Mikhail Mishurov, Xiangtao Xu, Jeremy W. Lichstein, Craig D. Allen, Klaus S. Larsen, Yiqi Luo, Cari Ficken, William T. Pockman, William R. L. Anderegg, and Anja Rammig
Biogeosciences, 20, 2117–2142, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Unprecedented climate extremes (UCEs) are expected to have dramatic impacts on ecosystems. We present a road map of how dynamic vegetation models can explore extreme drought and climate change and assess ecological processes to measure and reduce model uncertainties. The models predict strong nonlinear responses to UCEs. Due to different model representations, the models differ in magnitude and trajectory of forest loss. Therefore, we explore specific plant responses that reflect knowledge gaps.
Johannes Oberpriller, Christine Herschlein, Peter Anthoni, Almut Arneth, Andreas Krause, Anja Rammig, Mats Lindeskog, Stefan Olin, and Florian Hartig
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6495–6519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding uncertainties of projected ecosystem dynamics under environmental change is of immense value for research and climate change policy. Here, we analyzed these across European forests. We find that uncertainties are dominantly induced by parameters related to water, mortality, and climate, with an increasing importance of climate from north to south. These results highlight that climate not only contributes uncertainty but also modifies uncertainties in other ecosystem processes.
Phillip Papastefanou, Christian S. Zang, Zlatan Angelov, Aline Anderson de Castro, Juan Carlos Jimenez, Luiz Felipe Campos De Rezende, Romina C. Ruscica, Boris Sakschewski, Anna A. Sörensson, Kirsten Thonicke, Carolina Vera, Nicolas Viovy, Celso Von Randow, and Anja Rammig
Biogeosciences, 19, 3843–3861, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3843-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3843-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Amazon rainforest has been hit by multiple severe drought events. In this study, we assess the severity and spatial extent of the extreme drought years 2005, 2010 and 2015/16 in the Amazon. Using nine different precipitation datasets and three drought indicators we find large differences in drought stress across the Amazon region. We conclude that future studies should use multiple rainfall datasets and drought indicators when estimating the impact of drought stress in the Amazon region.
Mats Lindeskog, Benjamin Smith, Fredrik Lagergren, Ekaterina Sycheva, Andrej Ficko, Hans Pretzsch, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6071–6112, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Forests play an important role in the global carbon cycle and for carbon storage. In Europe, forests are intensively managed. To understand how management influences carbon storage in European forests, we implement detailed forest management into the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS. We test the model by comparing model output to typical forestry measures, such as growing stock and harvest data, for different countries in Europe.
Gilvan Sampaio, Marília H. Shimizu, Carlos A. Guimarães-Júnior, Felipe Alexandre, Marcelo Guatura, Manoel Cardoso, Tomas F. Domingues, Anja Rammig, Celso von Randow, Luiz F. C. Rezende, and David M. Lapola
Biogeosciences, 18, 2511–2525, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2511-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2511-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of large-scale deforestation and the physiological effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on Amazon rainfall are systematically compared in this study. Our results are remarkable in showing that the two disturbances cause equivalent rainfall decrease, though through different causal mechanisms. These results highlight the importance of not only curbing regional deforestation but also reducing global CO2 emissions to avoid climatic changes in the Amazon.
Cited articles
Anderegg, W. R. L., Trugman, A. T., Badgley, G., Konings, A. G., and Shaw, J.: Divergent Forest Sensitivity to Repeated Extreme Droughts, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 1091–1095, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00919-1, 2020. a
Arnold, J. B.: ggthemes: Extra themes, scales and geoms for “ggplot2”, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggthemes (last access: 3 March 2023), 2021. a
Arya, S., Mount, D., Kemp, S. E., and Jefferis, G.: RANN: Fast nearest neighbour search (wraps ANN library) using L2 metric, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RANN (last access: 3 March 2023), 2019. a
Augspurger, C. K.: Spring 2007 Warmth and Frost: Phenology, Damage and Refoliation in a Temperate Deciduous Forest, Funct. Ecol., 23, 1031–1039, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01587.x, 2009. a
Bauer, D. F.: Constructing Confidence Sets Using Rank Statistics, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 67, 687–690, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481279, 1972. a
Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt [Hrsg.]: Bayerische Klimadaten – Beobachtungsdaten, Klima – Projektionsensemble Und Klimakennwerte Für Bayern, https://www.lfu.bayern.de/publikationen/get_pdf.htm?art_nr=lfu_klima_00170 (last access: 7 May 2022), 2020. a
Bhuyan, U., Zang, C., and Menzel, A.: Different Responses of Multispecies Tree Ring Growth to Various Drought Indices across Europe, Dendrochronologia, 44, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2017.02.002, 2017. a
Bohn, U. and Welß, W.: Die Potenzielle Natürliche Vegetation, Klima, Pflanzen-Und Tierwelt, in: Leibnitz-Institut für Länderkunde, Nationalatlas Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 3, 84–87, 2003. a
Bolte, A., Ammer, C., Löf, M., Madsen, P., Nabuurs, G.-J., Schall, P., Spathelf, P., and Rock, J.: Adaptive Forest Management in Central Europe: Climate Change Impacts, Strategies and Integrative Concept, Scand. J. Forest Res., 24, 473–482, https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580903418224, 2009. a
Bonan, G. B.: Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests, Science, 320, 1444–1449, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155121, 2008. a
Bunn, A., Korpela, M., Biondi, F., Campelo, F., Mérian, P., Qeadan, F., and Zang, C.: dplR: Dendrochronology Program Library in R, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplR, (last access: 24 January 2024), 2022. a
Chamberlain, C. J. and Wolkovich, E. M.: Late Spring Freezes Coupled with Warming Winters Alter Temperate Tree Phenology and Growth, New Phytol., 231, 987–995, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17416, 2021. a
Chamberlain, C. J., Cook, B. I., García de Cortázar-Atauri, I., and Wolkovich, E. M.: Rethinking False Spring Risk, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 2209–2220, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14642, 2019. a
Chen, L., Keski-Saari, S., Kontunen-Soppela, S., Zhu, X., Zhou, X., Hänninen, H., Pumpanen, J., Mola-Yudego, B., Wu, D., and Berninger, F.: Immediate and Carry-over Effects of Late-Spring Frost and Growing Season Drought on Forest Gross Primary Productivity Capacity in the Northern Hemisphere, Glob. Change Biol., 29, 3924–3940, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16751, 2023. a, b, c
Cook, E. R.: The Decomposition of Tree-Ring Series for Environmental Studies, Tree-Ring Bull., 47, 37–59, 1987. a
Cook, E. R. and Peters, K.: Calculating Unbiased Tree-Ring Indices for the Study of Climatic and Environmental Change, Holocene, 7, 361–370, https://doi.org/10.1177/095968369700700314, 1997. a
D'Andrea, E., Rezaie, N., Battistelli, A., Gavrichkova, O., Kuhlmann, I., Matteucci, G., Moscatello, S., Proietti, S., Scartazza, A., Trumbore, S., and Muhr, J.: Winter's Bite: Beech Trees Survive Complete Defoliation Due to Spring Late-Frost Damage by Mobilizing Old c Reserves, New Phytol., 224, 625–631, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16047, 2019. a, b
Dittmar, C., Fricke, W., and Elling, W.: Impact of Late Frost Events on Radial Growth of Common Beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.) in Southern Germany, Europ. J. Forest Res., 125, 249–259, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-005-0098-y, 2006. a, b, c, d
Nychka, D., Furrer, R., Paige, J., and Sain, S.: Fields: Tools for Spatial Data, https://github.com/dnychka/fieldsRPackage (last access: 7 March 2023), 2021. a
Dulamsuren, C., Hauck, M., Kopp, G., Ruff, M., and Leuschner, C.: European Beech Responds to Climate Change with Growth Decline at Lower, and Growth Increase at Higher Elevations in the Center of Its Distribution Range (SW Germany), Trees, 31, 673–686, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1499-x, 2017. a
Duveneck, M. J. and Thompson, J. R.: Climate Change Imposes Phenological Trade-Offs on Forest Net Primary Productivity, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122, 2298–2313, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004025, 2017. a
Ellenberg, H., Leuschner, C., and Dierschke, H.: Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen: in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht; 203 Tabellen, no. 8104 in UTB Botanik, Ökologie, Agrar- und Forstwissenschaften, Geographie, Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 6., vollständig neu bearbeitete und stark erweiterte auflage, ISBN 978-3-8252-8104-5, ISBN 978-3-8001-2824-2, 2010. a
European Space Agency: Copernicus DEM, https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-c5d3d65, 2024. a
Firke, S.: janitor: Simple tools for examining and cleaning dirty data, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=janitor (last access: 3 March 2023), 2021. a
Gampe, D., Zscheischler, J., Reichstein, M., O'Sullivan, M., Smith, W. K., Sitch, S., and Buermann, W.: Increasing Impact of Warm Droughts on Northern Ecosystem Productivity over Recent Decades, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 772–779, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01112-8, 2021. a
Gazol, A., Camarero, J. J., Colangelo, M., de Luis, M., Martínez del Castillo, E., and Serra-Maluquer, X.: Summer Drought and Spring Frost, but Not Their Interaction, Constrain European Beech and Silver Fir Growth in Their Southern Distribution Limits, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 278, 107695, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107695, 2019. a
Graves, S., Piepho, H.-P., and Dorai-Raj, L. S. with help from S.: multcompView: Visualizations of paired comparisons, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=multcompView (last access: 7 February 2020), 2019. a
Grossman, J. J.: Phenological Physiology: Seasonal Patterns of Plant Stress Tolerance in a Changing Climate, New Phytol., 237, 1508–1524, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18617, 2023. a
Hickler, T., Smith, B., Sykes, M. T., Davis, M. B., Sugita, S., and Walker, K.: Using a Generalized Vegetation Model to Simulate Vegetation Dynamics in Northeastern USA, Ecology, 85, 519–530, https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0344, 2004. a
Hickler, T., Vohland, K., Feehan, J., Miller, P. A., Smith, B., Costa, L., Giesecke, T., Fronzek, S., Carter, T. R., Cramer, W., Kühn, I., and Sykes, M. T.: Projecting the Future Distribution of European Potential Natural Vegetation Zones with a Generalized, Tree Species-Based Dynamic Vegetation Model: Future Changes in European Vegetation Zones, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 21, 50–63, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x, 2012. a, b, c
Hijmans, R. J.: terra: Spatial data analysis, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra (last access: 3 March 2023), 2022. a
Inouye, D.: The Ecological and Evolutionary Significance of Frost in the Context of Climate Change, Ecol. Lett., 3, 457–463, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00165.x, 2000. a, b
Jevšenak, J.: Daily Climate Data Reveal Stronger Climate-Growth Relationships for an Extended European Tree-Ring Network, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 221, 105868, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105868, 2019. a
Keenan, T. F., Gray, J., Friedl, M. A., Toomey, M., Bohrer, G., Hollinger, D. Y., Munger, J. W., O'Keefe, J., Schmid, H. P., Wing, I. S., Yang, B., and Richardson, A. D.: Net Carbon Uptake Has Increased through Warming-Induced Changes in Temperate Forest Phenology, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 598–604, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2253, 2014. a
Kenk, G. and Guehne, S.: Management of Transformation in Central Europe, Forest Ecol. Manag., 151, 107–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00701-5, 2001. a, b, c
Kollas, C., Körner, C., and Randin, C. F.: Spring Frost and Growing Season Length Co-Control the Cold Range Limits of Broad-Leaved Trees, J. Biogeogr., 41, 773–783, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12238, 2014a. a, b
Kollas, C., Randin, C. F., Vitasse, Y., and Körner, C.: How Accurately Can Minimum Temperatures at the Cold Limits of Tree Species Be Extrapolated from Weather Station Data?, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 184, 257–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.10.001, 2014b. a
Körner, C., Basler, D., Hoch, G., Kollas, C., Lenz, A., Randin, C. F., Vitasse, Y., and Zimmermann, N. E.: Where, Why and How? Explaining the Low-Temperature Range Limits of Temperate Tree Species, J. Ecol., 104, 1076–1088, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12574, 2016. a
Kramer, K., Ducousso, A., Gömöry, D., Hansen, J. K., Ionita, L., Liesebach, M., Lorenţ, A., Schüler, S., Sulkowska, M., de Vries, S., and von Wühlisch, G.: Chilling and Forcing Requirements for Foliage Bud Burst of European Beech ( Fagus Sylvatica L.) Differ between Provenances and Are Phenotypically Plastic, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 234/235, 172–181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.12.002, 2017. a, b, c
Lenz, A., Hoch, G., Vitasse, Y., and Körner, C.: European Deciduous Trees Exhibit Similar Safety Margins against Damage by Spring Freeze Events along Elevational Gradients, New Phytol., 200, 1166–1175, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12452, 2013. a
Lenz, A., Hoch, G., Körner, C., and Vitasse, Y.: Convergence of Leaf-out towards Minimum Risk of Freezing Damage in Temperate Trees, Funct. Ecol., 30, 1480–1490, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12623, 2016. a
Lindeskog, M., Arneth, A., Miller, P., Nord, J., Mischurov, M., Olin, S., Schurgers, G., Smith, B., Wårlind, D., and past LPJ-GUESS contributors: LPJ-GUESS Release v4.0.1 model code (4.0.1), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8070582, 2017. a, b
Lindeskog, M., Smith, B., Lagergren, F., Sycheva, E., Ficko, A., Pretzsch, H., and Rammig, A.: Accounting for forest management in the estimation of forest carbon balance using the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS (v4.0, r9710): implementation and evaluation of simulations for Europe, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6071–6112, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021, 2021. a
Liu, Q., Piao, S., Janssens, I. A., Fu, Y., Peng, S., Lian, X., Ciais, P., Myneni, R. B., Peñuelas, J., and Wang, T.: Extension of the Growing Season Increases Vegetation Exposure to Frost, Nat. Commun., 9, 426, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02690-y, 2018. a
Lloret, F., Keeling, E. G., and Sala, A.: Components of Tree Resilience: Effects of Successive Low-Growth Episodes in Old Ponderosa Pine Forests, Oikos, 120, 1909–1920, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19372.x, 2011. a, b
Ma, Q., Huang, J.-G., Hänninen, H., and Berninger, F.: Divergent Trends in the Risk of Spring Frost Damage to Trees in Europe with Recent Warming, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 351–360, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14479, 2019. a, b, c, d
Massicotte, P. and South, A.: rnaturalearth: World map data from natural earth, Tech. Rep., https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rnaturalearth (last access: 25 January 2024), 2023. a
Matsui, T., Eguchi, H., and Mori, K.: Control of Dew and Frost Formations on Leaf by Radiative Cooling, Environ. Con. Biol., 19, 51–57, https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb1963.19.51, 1981. a
Medlyn, B. E., Duursma, R. A., and Zeppel, M. J. B.: Forest Productivity under Climate Change: A Checklist for Evaluating Model Studies, WIREs Climate Change, 2, 332–355, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.108, 2011. a
Menzel, A., Estrella, N., and Fabian, P.: Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Phenological Seasons in Germany from 1951 to 1996, Glob. Change Biol., 7, 657–666, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2001.00430.x, 2001. a
Menzel, A., Helm, R., and Zang, C.: Patterns of Late Spring Frost Leaf Damage and Recovery in a European Beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.) Stand in South-Eastern Germany Based on Repeated Digital Photographs, Front. Plant Sci., 6, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00110, 2015. a, b, c, d
Meyer, B. F.: LPJ-GUESS Model code for “Frost matters: Incorporating late-spring frost in a dynamic vegetation model regulates regional productivity dynamics in European beech forests”, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10562598, 2024a. a
Meyer, B. F.: Reproducible analysis pipeline for “Frost matters: Incorporating late-spring frost in a dynamic vegetation model regulates regional productivity dynamics in European beech forests”, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10564747, 2024b. a
Meyer, B. F.: Data needed to reproduce analysis from “Frost matters: Incorporating late-spring frost in a dynamic vegetation model regulates regional productivity dynamics in European beech forests”, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10562679, 2024c. a
Meyer, B. F., Buras, A., Rammig, A., and Zang, C. S.: Higher Susceptibility of Beech to Drought in Comparison to Oak, Dendrochronologia, 64, 125780, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2020.125780, 2020. a
Morin, X., Lechowicz, M. J., Augspurger, C., O'keefe, J., Viner, D., and Chuine, I.: Leaf Phenology in 22 North American Tree Species during the 21st Century, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 961–975, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01735.x, 2009. a
Müller, K.: here: A simpler way to find your files, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=here (last access: 3 March 2023), 2020. a
Neuner, G.: Frost Resistance in Alpine Woody Plants, Front. Plant Sci., 5, 654, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00654, 2014. a
Nolè, A., Rita, A., Ferrara, A. M. S., and Borghetti, M.: Effects of a Large-Scale Late Spring Frost on a Beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.) Dominated Mediterranean Mountain Forest Derived from the Spatio-Temporal Variations of NDVI, Ann. Forest Sci., 75, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0763-1, 2018. a, b
Pebesma, E.: Simple Features for R: Standardized Support for Spatial Vector Data, The R Journal, 10, 439–446, https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009, 2018. a
Pedersen, T. L.: patchwork: The composer of plots, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=patchwork (last access: 3 March 2023), 2020. a
Pedersen, T. L. and Crameri, F.: scico: Colour palettes based on the scientific colour-maps, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=scico (last access: 3 March 2023), 2022. a
Pierce, D.: ncdf4: Interface to unidata netCDF (version 4 or earlier) format data files, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ncdf4 (last access: 3 March 2023), 2022. a
Pretzsch, H., Schütze, G., and Uhl, E.: Resistance of European Tree Species to Drought Stress in Mixed versus Pure Forests: Evidence of Stress Release by Inter-Specific Facilitation, Plant Biol., 15, 483–495, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00670.x, 2013. a
Príncipe, A., van der Maaten, E., van der Maaten-Theunissen, M., Struwe, T., Wilmking, M., and Kreyling, J.: Low Resistance but High Resilience in Growth of a Major Deciduous Forest Tree (Fagus Sylvatica L.) in Response to Late Spring Frost in Southern Germany, Trees, 31, 743–751, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1505-3, 2017. a, b, c, d
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 31 October 2023), 2022. a
Rammig, A., Jönsson, A., Hickler, T., Smith, B., Bärring, L., and Sykes, M.: Impacts of Changing Frost Regimes on Swedish Forests: Incorporating Cold Hardiness in a Regional Ecosystem Model, Ecol. Model., 221, 303–313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.05.014, 2010. a
Rubio-Cuadrado, Á., Gómez, C., Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., Perea, R., Gordaliza, G. G., Camarero, J. J., Montes, F., and Gil, L.: Differential Response of Oak and Beech to Late Frost Damage: An Integrated Analysis from Organ to Forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 297, 108243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108243, 2021. a, b, c
Sangüesa-Barreda, G., Di Filippo, A., Piovesan, G., Rozas, V., Di Fiore, L., García-Hidalgo, M., García-Cervigón, A. I., Muñoz-Garachana, D., Baliva, M., and Olano, J. M.: Warmer Springs Have Increased the Frequency and Extension of Late-Frost Defoliations in Southern European Beech Forests, Sci. Total Environ., 775, 145860, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145860, 2021. a
Scharnweber, T., Manthey, M., Criegee, C., Bauwe, A., Schröder, C., and Wilmking, M.: Drought Matters – Declining Precipitation Influences Growth of Fagus Sylvatica L. and Quercus Robur L. in North-Eastern Germany, Forest Ecol. Manag., 262, 947–961, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.026, 2011. a
Schütz, J. P.: Close-to-Nature Silviculture: Is This Concept Compatible with Species Diversity?, Forestry, 72, 359–366, https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/72.4.359, 1999. a, b
Schwartz, M. D.: Assessing the Onset of Spring: A Climatological Perspective, Phys. Geogr., 14, 536–550, https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1993.10642496, 1993. a, b
Schwartz, M. D., Ahas, R., and Aasa, A.: Onset of Spring Starting Earlier across the Northern Hemisphere, Glob. Change Biol., 12, 343–351, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01097.x, 2006. a
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., Thonicke, K., and Venevsky, S.: Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the LPJ Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 161–185, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x, 2003. a
Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., and Sykes, M. T.: Representation of Vegetation Dynamics in the Modelling of Terrestrial Ecosystems: Comparing Two Contrasting Approaches within European Climate Space: Vegetation Dynamics in Ecosystem Models, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 10, 621–637, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.t01-1-00256.x, 2001. a, b
Smith, B., Wårlind, D., Arneth, A., Hickler, T., Leadley, P., Siltberg, J., and Zaehle, S.: Implications of Incorporating N Cycling and N Limitations on Primary Production in an Individual-Based Dynamic Vegetation Model, Biogeosciences, 11, 2027–2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2027-2014, 2014. a, b, c
South, A., Michael, S., and Massicotte, P.: rnaturalearthhires: High resolution world vector map data from natural earth used in rnaturalearth, Tech. Rep., 2024. a
Sullivan, P. F., Pattison, R. R., Brownlee, A. H., Cahoon, S. M. P., and Hollingsworth, T. N.: Effect of Tree-Ring Detrending Method on Apparent Growth Trends of Black and White Spruce in Interior Alaska, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 114007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114007, 2016. a
Sykes, M. and Prentice, I.: Climate Change, Tree Species Distributions and Forest Dynamics: A Case Study in the Mixed Conifer/Northern Hardwoods Zone of Northern Europe, Climatic Change, 34, 161–177, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00224628, 1996. a
Urbanski, S., Barford, C., Wofsy, S., Kucharik, C., Pyle, E., Budney, J., McKain, K., Fitzjarrald, D., Czikowsky, M., and Munger, J. W.: Factors Controlling CO2 Exchange on Timescales from Hourly to Decadal at Harvard Forest, J. Geophys. Res., 112, G02020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000293, 2007. a, b
Vitasse, Y., Lenz, A., Hoch, G., and Körner, C.: Earlier leaf-out rather than difference in freezing resistance puts juvenile trees at greater risk of damage than adult trees, J. Ecol., 102, 981–988, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12251, 2014. a
Vitra, A., Lenz, A., and Vitasse, Y.: Frost Hardening and Dehardening Potential in Temperate Trees from Winter to Budburst, New Phytol., 216, 113–123, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14698, 2017. a
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K., Vaughan, D., Wilke, C., Woo, K., and Yutani, H.: Welcome to the tidyverse, J. Open Sour. Softw., 4, 1686, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686, 2019. a
Wilmking, M., van der Maaten-Theunissen, M., van der Maaten, E., Scharnweber, T., Buras, A., Biermann, C., Gurskaya, M., Hallinger, M., Lange, J., Shetti, R., Smiljanic, M., and Trouillier, M.: Global Assessment of Relationships between Climate and Tree Growth, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 3212–3220, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15057, 2020. a
Xu, K., Wang, X., Liang, P., An, H., Sun, H., Han, W., and Li, Q.: Tree-Ring Widths Are Good Proxies of Annual Variation in Forest Productivity in Temperate Forests, Sci. Rep., 7, 1945, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02022-6, 2017. a, b
Yao, Y., Joetzjer, E., Ciais, P., Viovy, N., Cresto Aleina, F., Chave, J., Sack, L., Bartlett, M., Meir, P., Fisher, R., and Luyssaert, S.: Forest fluxes and mortality response to drought: model description (ORCHIDEE-CAN-NHA r7236) and evaluation at the Caxiuanã drought experiment, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7809–7833, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7809-2022, 2022. a
Yousefpour, R., Augustynczik, A. L. D., Reyer, C. P. O., Lasch-Born, P., Suckow, F., and Hanewinkel, M.: Realizing Mitigation Efficiency of European Commercial Forests by Climate Smart Forestry, Sci. Rep., 8, 345, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18778-w, 2018. a
Zang, C., Hartl-Meier, C., Dittmar, C., Rothe, A., and Menzel, A.: Patterns of Drought Tolerance in Major European Temperate Forest Trees: Climatic Drivers and Levels of Variability, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 3767–3779, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12637, 2014. a
Zeileis, A. and Grothendieck, G.: Zoo: S3 Infrastructure for Regular and Irregular Time Series, J. Stat. Softw., 14, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v014.i06, 2005. a
Zimmermann, J., Hauck, M., Dulamsuren, C., and Leuschner, C.: Climate Warming-Related Growth Decline Affects Fagus Sylvatica, But Not Other Broad-Leaved Tree Species in Central European Mixed Forests, Ecosystems, 18, 560–572, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9849-x, 2015. a
Zohner, C. M., Mo, L., Renner, S. S., Svenning, J.-C., Vitasse, Y., Benito, B. M., Ordonez, A., Baumgarten, F., Bastin, J.-F., Sebald, V., Reich, P. B., Liang, J., Nabuurs, G.-J., De-Miguel, S., Alberti, G., Antón-Fernández, C., Balazy, R., Brändli, U.-B., Chen, H. Y. H., Chisholm, C., Cienciala, E., Dayanandan, S., Fayle, T. M., Frizzera, L., Gianelle, D., Jagodzinski, A. M., Jaroszewicz, B., Jucker, T., Kepfer-Rojas, S., Khan, M. L., Kim, H. S., Korjus, H., Johannsen, V. K., Laarmann, D., Lang, M., Zawila-Niedzwiecki, T., Niklaus, P. A., Paquette, A., Pretzsch, H., Saikia, P., Schall, P., Šebeň, V., Svoboda, M., Tikhonova, E., Viana, H., Zhang, C., Zhao, X., and Crowther, T. W.: Late-Spring Frost Risk between 1959 and 2017 Decreased in North America but Increased in Europe and Asia, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 12192–12200, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920816117, 2020. a
Short summary
Late-spring frost (LSF), critically low temperatures when trees have already flushed their leaves, results in freezing damage leaving trees with reduced ability to perform photosynthesis. Forests with a high proportion of susceptible species like European beech are particularly vulnerable. However, this process is rarely included in dynamic vegetation models (DVMs). We show that the effect on simulated productivity and biomass is substantial, warranting more widespread inclusion of LSF in DVMs.
Late-spring frost (LSF), critically low temperatures when trees have already flushed their...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint