Articles | Volume 16, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3319-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3319-2019
Technical note
 | 
04 Sep 2019
Technical note |  | 04 Sep 2019

Technical note: Interferences of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on methane concentration measurements

Lukas Kohl, Markku Koskinen, Kaisa Rissanen, Iikka Haikarainen, Tatu Polvinen, Heidi Hellén, and Mari Pihlatie

Related authors

Pore network modeling as a new tool for determining gas diffusivity in peat
Petri Kiuru, Marjo Palviainen, Arianna Marchionne, Tiia Grönholm, Maarit Raivonen, Lukas Kohl, and Annamari Laurén
Biogeosciences, 19, 5041–5058, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5041-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5041-2022, 2022
Short summary
Peat macropore networks – new insights into episodic and hotspot methane emission
Petri Kiuru, Marjo Palviainen, Tiia Grönholm, Maarit Raivonen, Lukas Kohl, Vincent Gauci, Iñaki Urzainki, and Annamari Laurén
Biogeosciences, 19, 1959–1977, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1959-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1959-2022, 2022
Short summary
Clear, transparent, and timely communication for fair authorship decisions: a practical guide
Shahzad Gani, Lukas Kohl, Rima Baalbaki, Federico Bianchi, Taina M. Ruuskanen, Olli-Pekka Siira, Pauli Paasonen, and Hanna Vehkamäki
Geosci. Commun., 4, 507–516, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-507-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-507-2021, 2021
Short summary
An automated system for trace gas flux measurements from plant foliage and other plant compartments
Lukas Kohl, Markku Koskinen, Tatu Polvinen, Salla Tenhovirta, Kaisa Rissanen, Marjo Patama, Alessandro Zanetti, and Mari Pihlatie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4445–4460, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4445-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4445-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Greenhouse Gases
Exploring temporal and spatial variation of nitrous oxide flux using several years of peatland forest automatic chamber data
Helena Rautakoski, Mika Korkiakoski, Jarmo Mäkelä, Markku Koskinen, Kari Minkkinen, Mika Aurela, Paavo Ojanen, and Annalea Lohila
Biogeosciences, 21, 1867–1886, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Diurnal versus spatial variability of greenhouse gas emissions from an anthropogenically modified lowland river in Germany
Matthias Koschorreck, Norbert Kamjunke, Uta Koedel, Michael Rode, Claudia Schuetze, and Ingeborg Bussmann
Biogeosciences, 21, 1613–1628, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1613-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Regional assessment and uncertainty analysis of carbon and nitrogen balances at cropland scale using the ecosystem model LandscapeDNDC
Odysseas Sifounakis, Edwin Haas, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, and Maria P. Papadopoulou
Biogeosciences, 21, 1563–1581, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1563-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1563-2024, 2024
Short summary
Resolving heterogeneous fluxes from tundra halves the growing season carbon budget
Sarah M. Ludwig, Luke Schiferl, Jacqueline Hung, Susan M. Natali, and Roisin Commane
Biogeosciences, 21, 1301–1321, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1301-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1301-2024, 2024
Short summary
Lawns and meadows in urban green space – a comparison from perspectives of greenhouse gases, drought resilience and plant functional types
Justine Trémeau, Beñat Olascoaga, Leif Backman, Esko Karvinen, Henriikka Vekuri, and Liisa Kulmala
Biogeosciences, 21, 949–972, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-949-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-949-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aaltonen, H., Aalto, J., Kolari, P., Pihlatie, M., Pumpanen, J., Kulmala, M., Nikinmaa, E., Vesala, T., and Bäck, J.: Continuous VOC flux measurements on boreal forest floor, Plant Soil, 369, 241–256, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1553-4, 2013. a
Assan, S., Baudic, A., Guemri, A., Ciais, P., Gros, V., and Vogel, F. R.: Characterization of interferences to in situ observations of δ13CH4 and C2H6 when using a cavity ring-down spectrometer at industrial sites, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2077–2091, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2077-2017, 2017. a
Carmichael, M. J., Bernhardt, E. S., Bräuer, S. L., and Smith, W. K.: The role of vegetation in methane flux to the atmosphere: Should vegetation be included as a distinct category in the global methane budget?, Biogeochemistry, 119, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-9974-1, 2014. a
Covey, K. R. and Megonigal, J. P.: Methane production and emissions in trees and forests, New Phytologist, 222, 35–51, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15624, 2019. a
Etiope, G.: Detecting and Measuring Gas Seepage, in: Natural Gas Seepage, pp. 63–84, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14601-0_4, 2015. a
Download
Short summary
Plants emit small amounts of methane and large amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Measurements of plant methane emissions therefore require analysers that can provide accurate measurements of CH4 concentrations in the presence of changing amounts of VOCs. We therefore quantified to which degree various VOCs bias methane concentration measurements on different analysers. Our results show that some analysers are more sensitive to the presence of VOCs than others.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint