Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6247-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6247-2020
Research article
 | 
10 Dec 2020
Research article |  | 10 Dec 2020

Water flow controls the spatial variability of methane emissions in a northern valley fen ecosystem

Hui Zhang, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Aino Korrensalo, Aleksi Räsänen, Tarmo Virtanen, Mika Aurela, Timo Penttilä, Tuomas Laurila, Stephanie Gerin, Viivi Lindholm, and Annalea Lohila

Related authors

Exploring temporal and spatial variation of nitrous oxide flux using several years of peatland forest automatic chamber data
Helena Rautakoski, Mika Korkiakoski, Jarmo Mäkelä, Markku Koskinen, Kari Minkkinen, Mika Aurela, Paavo Ojanen, and Annalea Lohila
Biogeosciences, 21, 1867–1886, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1867-2024, 2024
Short summary
WetCH4: A Machine Learning-based Upscaling of Methane Fluxes of Northern Wetlands during 2016–2022
Qing Ying, Benjamin Poulter, Jennifer D. Watts, Kyle A. Arndt, Anna-Maria Virkkala, Lori Bruhwiler, Youmi Oh, Brendan M. Rogers, Susan M. Natali, Hilary Sullivan, Luke D. Schiferl, Clayton Elder, Olli Peltola, Annett Bartsch, Amanda Armstrong, Ankur R. Desai, Eugénie Euskirchen, Mathias Göckede, Bernhard Lehner, Mats B. Nilsson, Matthias Peichl, Oliver Sonnentag, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Torsten Sachs, Aram Kalhori, Masahito Ueyama, and Zhen Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-84,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-84, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Multi-scale soil moisture data and process-based modeling reveal the importance of lateral groundwater flow in a subarctic catchment
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Kersti Leppä, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-aho, Giulia Mazzotti, Terhikki Manninen, Mika Korkiakoski, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, and Samuli Launiainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-81,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-81, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Comparison of shortwave radiation dynamics between boreal forest and open peatland pairs in southern and northern Finland
Otso Peräkylä, Erkka Rinne, Ekaterina Ezhova, Anna Lintunen, Annalea Lohila, Juho Aalto, Mika Aurela, Pasi Kolari, and Markku Kulmala
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-712,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-712, 2024
Short summary
Interannual and seasonal variability of the air-sea CO2 exchange at Utö in the coastal region of the Baltic Sea
Martti Honkanen, Mika Aurela, Juha Hatakka, Lumi Haraguchi, Sami Kielosto, Timo Mäkelä, Jukka Seppälä, Simo-Matti Siiriä, Ken Stenbäck, Juha-Pekka Tuovinen, Pasi Ylöstalo, and Lauri Laakso
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-628,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-628, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Greenhouse Gases
Modelling CO2 and N2O emissions from soils in silvopastoral systems of the West African Sahelian band
Yélognissè Agbohessou, Claire Delon, Manuela Grippa, Eric Mougin, Daouda Ngom, Espoir Koudjo Gaglo, Ousmane Ndiaye, Paulo Salgado, and Olivier Roupsard
Biogeosciences, 21, 2811–2837, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2811-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2811-2024, 2024
Short summary
A case study on topsoil removal and rewetting for paludiculture: effect on biogeochemistry and greenhouse gas emissions from Typha latifolia, Typha angustifolia, and Azolla filiculoides
Merit van den Berg, Thomas M. Gremmen, Renske J. E. Vroom, Jacobus van Huissteden, Jim Boonman, Corine J. A. van Huissteden, Ype van der Velde, Alfons J. P. Smolders, and Bas P. van de Riet
Biogeosciences, 21, 2669–2690, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2669-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2669-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing improvements in global ocean pCO2 machine learning reconstructions with Southern Ocean autonomous sampling
Thea H. Heimdal, Galen A. McKinley, Adrienne J. Sutton, Amanda R. Fay, and Lucas Gloege
Biogeosciences, 21, 2159–2176, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2159-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2159-2024, 2024
Short summary
Timescale dependence of airborne fraction and underlying climate–carbon-cycle feedbacks for weak perturbations in CMIP5 models
Guilherme L. Torres Mendonça, Julia Pongratz, and Christian H. Reick
Biogeosciences, 21, 1923–1960, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1923-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1923-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: Preventing CO2 overestimation from mercuric or copper(II) chloride preservation of dissolved greenhouse gases in freshwater samples
François Clayer, Jan Erik Thrane, Kuria Ndungu, Andrew King, Peter Dörsch, and Thomas Rohrlack
Biogeosciences, 21, 1903–1921, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1903-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1903-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Truu, J., Espenberg, M., Mander, U., and Smith, P.: Emissions of methane from northern peatlands: a review of management impacts and implications for future management options, Ecol. Evol., 6, 7080–7102, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2469, 2016. 
Aerts, R., Verhoeven, J. T. A., and Whigham, D. F.: Plant-mediated controls on nutrient cycling in temperate fens and bogs, Ecology, 80, 2170–2181, https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2170:Pmconc]2.0.Co;2, 1999. 
Alm, J., Shurpali, N. J., Tuittila, E.-S., Laurila, T., Maljanen, M., Saarnio, S., and Minkkinen, K.: Methods for determining emission factors for the use of peat and peatlands – flux measurements and modelling, Boreal Environ. Res., 12, 85–100, 2007. 
Andersen, R., Poulin, M., Borcard, D., Laiho, R., Laine, J., Vasander, H., and Tuittila, E.-T.: Environmental control and spatial structures in peatland vegetation, J. Veg. Sci., 22, 878–890, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01295.x, 2011. 
Aurela, M., Lohila, A., Tuovinen, J. P., Hatakka, J., Riutta, T., and Laurila, T.: Carbon dioxide exchange on a northern boreal fen, Boreal Environ. Res., 14, 699–710, 2009.  
Download
Short summary
We studied the impact of a stream on peatland microhabitats and CH4 emissions in a northern boreal fen. We found that there were higher water levels, lower peat temperatures, and greater oxygen concentrations close to the stream; these supported the highest biomass production but resulted in the lowest CH4 emissions. Further from the stream, the conditions were drier and CH4 emissions were also low. CH4 emissions were highest at an intermediate distance from the stream.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint