Articles | Volume 17, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6441-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6441-2020
Research article
 | 
21 Dec 2020
Research article |  | 21 Dec 2020

A bottom-up quantification of foliar mercury uptake fluxes across Europe

Lena Wohlgemuth, Stefan Osterwalder, Carl Joseph, Ansgar Kahmen, Günter Hoch, Christine Alewell, and Martin Jiskra

Related authors

Physiological and climate controls on foliar mercury uptake by European tree species
Lena Wohlgemuth, Pasi Rautio, Bernd Ahrends, Alexander Russ, Lars Vesterdal, Peter Waldner, Volkmar Timmermann, Nadine Eickenscheidt, Alfred Fürst, Martin Greve, Peter Roskams, Anne Thimonier, Manuel Nicolas, Anna Kowalska, Morten Ingerslev, Päivi Merilä, Sue Benham, Carmen Iacoban, Günter Hoch, Christine Alewell, and Martin Jiskra
Biogeosciences, 19, 1335–1353, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1335-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1335-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Land
Precipitation–fire functional interactions control biomass stocks and carbon exchanges across the world's largest savanna
Mathew Williams, David T. Milodowski, T. Luke Smallman, Kyle G. Dexter, Gabi C. Hegerl, Iain M. McNicol, Michael O'Sullivan, Carla M. Roesch, Casey M. Ryan, Stephen Sitch, and Aude Valade
Biogeosciences, 22, 1597–1614, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1597-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1597-2025, 2025
Short summary
Nitrogen concentrations in boreal and temperate tree tissues vary with tree age/size, growth rate, and climate
Martin Thurner, Kailiang Yu, Stefano Manzoni, Anatoly Prokushkin, Melanie A. Thurner, Zhiqiang Wang, and Thomas Hickler
Biogeosciences, 22, 1475–1493, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1475-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1475-2025, 2025
Short summary
Comparison of shortwave radiation dynamics between boreal forest and open peatland pairs in southern and northern Finland
Otso Peräkylä, Erkka Rinne, Ekaterina Ezhova, Anna Lintunen, Annalea Lohila, Juho Aalto, Mika Aurela, Pasi Kolari, and Markku Kulmala
Biogeosciences, 22, 153–179, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-153-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-153-2025, 2025
Short summary
Cropland expansion drives vegetation greenness decline in Southeast Asia
Ruiying Zhao, Xiangzhong Luo, Yuheng Yang, Luri Nurlaila Syahid, Chi Chen, and Janice Ser Huay Lee
Biogeosciences, 21, 5393–5406, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5393-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5393-2024, 2024
Short summary
How to measure the efficiency of bioenergy crops compared to forestation
Sabine Egerer, Stefanie Falk, Dorothea Mayer, Tobias Nützel, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, and Julia Pongratz
Biogeosciences, 21, 5005–5025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ariya, P. A., Amyot, M., Dastoor, A., Deeds, D., Feinberg, A., Kos, G., Poulain, A., Ryjkov, A., Semeniuk, K., Subir, M., and Toyota, K.: Mercury physicochemical and biogeochemical transformation in the atmosphere and at atmospheric interfaces: a review and future directions, Chem. Rev., 115, 3760–3802, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500667e, 2015. 
Assad, M., Parelle, J., Cazaux, D., Gimbert, F., Chalot, M., and Tatin-Froux, F.: Mercury uptake into poplar leaves, Chemosphere, 146, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.103, 2016. 
Bishop, K., Shanley, J. B., Riscassi, A., de Wit, H. A., Eklöf, K., Meng, B., Mitchell, C., Osterwalder, S., Schuster, P. F., Webster, J., and Zhu, W.: Recent advances in understanding and measurement of mercury in the environment: Terrestrial Hg cycling, Sci. Total Environ., 721, 137647, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137647, 2020. 
Blackwell, B. D. and Driscoll, C. T.: Using foliar and forest floor mercury concentrations to assess spatial patterns of mercury deposition, Environ. Pollut., 202, 126–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.036, 2015. 
Blackwell, B. D., Driscoll, C. T., Maxwell, J. A., and Holsen, T. M.: Changing climate alters inputs and pathways of mercury deposition to forested ecosystems, Biogeochemistry, 119, 215–228, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-9961-6, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
Mercury uptake by trees from the air represents an important but poorly quantified pathway in the global mercury cycle. We determined mercury uptake fluxes by leaves and needles at 10 European forests which were 4 times larger than mercury deposition via rainfall. The amount of mercury taken up by leaves and needles depends on their age and growing height on the tree. Scaling up our measurements to the forest area of Europe, we estimate that each year 20 t of mercury is taken up by trees.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint