Articles | Volume 20, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1529-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Technical note: The recovery rate of free particulate organic matter from soil samples is strongly affected by the method of density fractionation
Related authors
Cited articles
Bronick, C. J. and Lal, R.: Soil structure and management: a review,
Geoderma, 124, 3–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005,
2005.
Büks, F. and Kaupenjohann, M.: Enzymatic biofilm digestion in soil aggregates facilitates the release of particulate organic matter by sonication, SOIL, 2, 499–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-499-2016, 2016.
Büks, F., Kayser, G., Zieger, A., Lang, F., and Kaupenjohann, M.: Particles under stress: ultrasonication causes size and recovery rate artifacts with soil-derived POM but not with microplastics, Biogeosciences, 18, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-159-2021, 2021.
Cerli, C., Celi, L., Kalbitz, K., Guggenberger, G., and Kaiser, K.:
Separation of light and heavy organic matter fractions in soil – Testing
for proper density cut-off and dispersion level, Geoderma, 170, 403–416,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.009, 2012.
Don, A., Scholten, T., and Schulze, E. D.: Conversion of cropland into
grassland: Implications for soil organic-carbon stocks in two soils with
different texture, J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci., 172, 53–62,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200700158, 2009.