Articles | Volume 20, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1529-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1529-2023
Technical note
 | 
17 Apr 2023
Technical note |  | 17 Apr 2023

Technical note: The recovery rate of free particulate organic matter from soil samples is strongly affected by the method of density fractionation

Frederick Büks

Related authors

The incubation history of soil samples strongly affects the occlusion of particulate organic matter
Frederick Büks, Sabine Dumke, and Julia König
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-771,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-771, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
What comes after the Sun? On the integration of soil biogeochemical pre-weathering into microplastic experiments
Frederick Büks and Martin Kaupenjohann
SOIL, 8, 373–380, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-373-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Particles under stress: ultrasonication causes size and recovery rate artifacts with soil-derived POM but not with microplastics
Frederick Büks, Gilles Kayser, Antonia Zieger, Friederike Lang, and Martin Kaupenjohann
Biogeosciences, 18, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-159-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Global concentrations of microplastics in soils – a review
Frederick Büks and Martin Kaupenjohann
SOIL, 6, 649–662, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-649-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-649-2020, 2020
Short summary
What do we know about how the terrestrial multicellular soil fauna reacts to microplastic?
Frederick Büks, Nicolette Loes van Schaik, and Martin Kaupenjohann
SOIL, 6, 245–267, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-245-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-245-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Soils
Modelling the effect of climate–substrate interactions on soil organic matter decomposition with the Jena Soil Model
Marleen Pallandt, Marion Schrumpf, Holger Lange, Markus Reichstein, Lin Yu, and Bernhard Ahrens
Biogeosciences, 22, 1907–1928, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1907-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1907-2025, 2025
Short summary
Solubility characteristics of soil humic substances as a function of pH: mechanisms and biogeochemical perspectives
Xuemei Yang, Jie Zhang, Khan M. G. Mostofa, Mohammad Mohinuzzaman, H. Henry Teng, Nicola Senesi, Giorgio S. Senesi, Jie Yuan, Yu Liu, Si-Liang Li, Xiaodong Li, Baoli Wang, and Cong-Qiang Liu
Biogeosciences, 22, 1745–1765, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1745-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1745-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring microscale heterogeneity as a driver of biogeochemical transformations and gas transport in peat
Lukas Kohl, Petri Kiuru, Marjo Palviainen, Maarit Raivonen, Markku Koskinen, Mari Pihlatie, and Annamari Laurén
Biogeosciences, 22, 1711–1727, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1711-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1711-2025, 2025
Short summary
Dissolved organic matter fosters core mercury-methylating microbiomes for methylmercury production in paddy soils
Qiang Pu, Bo Meng, Jen-How Huang, Kun Zhang, Jiang Liu, Yurong Liu, Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz, and Xinbin Feng
Biogeosciences, 22, 1543–1556, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1543-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1543-2025, 2025
Short summary
A microbially driven and depth-explicit soil organic carbon model constrained by carbon isotopes to reduce parameter equifinality
Marijn Van de Broek, Gerard Govers, Marion Schrumpf, and Johan Six
Biogeosciences, 22, 1427–1446, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1427-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1427-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bronick, C. J. and Lal, R.: Soil structure and management: a review, Geoderma, 124, 3–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005, 2005. 
Büks, F. and Kaupenjohann, M.: Enzymatic biofilm digestion in soil aggregates facilitates the release of particulate organic matter by sonication, SOIL, 2, 499–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2-499-2016, 2016. 
Büks, F., Kayser, G., Zieger, A., Lang, F., and Kaupenjohann, M.: Particles under stress: ultrasonication causes size and recovery rate artifacts with soil-derived POM but not with microplastics, Biogeosciences, 18, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-159-2021, 2021. 
Cerli, C., Celi, L., Kalbitz, K., Guggenberger, G., and Kaiser, K.: Separation of light and heavy organic matter fractions in soil – Testing for proper density cut-off and dispersion level, Geoderma, 170, 403–416, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.009, 2012. 
Don, A., Scholten, T., and Schulze, E. D.: Conversion of cropland into grassland: Implications for soil organic-carbon stocks in two soils with different texture, J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci., 172, 53–62, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200700158, 2009. 
Download
Short summary
Ultrasonication with density fractionation of soils is a commonly used method to separate soil organic matter pools, which is, e.g., important to calculate carbon turnover in landscapes. It is shown that the approach that merges soil and dense solution without mixing has a low recovery rate and causes co-extraction of parts of the retained labile pool along with the intermediate pool. An alternative method with high recovery rates and no cross-contamination was recommended.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint