Articles | Volume 21, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4951-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4951-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
14 Nov 2024
Research article |
| 14 Nov 2024
| 14 Nov 2024
Changes in Arctic Ocean plankton community structure and trophic dynamics on seasonal to interannual timescales
Gabriela Negrete-García
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
Jessica Y. Luo
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
Colleen M. Petrik
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
Manfredi Manizza
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
Andrew D. Barton
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
Department of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
Related authors
No articles found.
Mara Y. McPartland, Tomas Lovato, Charles D. Koven, Jamie D. Wilson, Briony Turner, Colleen M. Petrik, José Licón-Saláiz, Fang Li, Fanny Lhardy, Jaclyn Clement Kinney, Michio Kawamiya, Birgit Hassler, Nathan P. Gillett, Cheikh Modou Noreyni Fall, Christopher Danek, Chris M. Brierley, Ana Bastos, and Oliver Andrews
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3246, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3246, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) is an international consortium of climate modeling groups that produce coordinated experiments in order to evaluate human influence on the climate and test knowledge of Earth systems. This paper describes the data requested for Earth systems research in CMIP7. We detail the request for model output of the carbon cycle, the flows of energy among the atmosphere, land and the oceans, and interactions between these and the global climate.
Samantha Siedlecki, Stanley Nmor, Gennadi Lessin, Kelly Kearney, Subhadeep Rakshit, Colleen Petrik, Jessica Luo, Cristina Schultz, Dalton Sasaki, Kayla Gillen, Anh Pham, Christopher Somes, Damian Brady, Jeremy Testa, Christophe Rabouille, Isa Elegbede, and Olivier Sulpis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1846, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1846, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Benthic biogeochemical models are essential for simulating seafloor carbon cycling and climate feedbacks, yet vary widely in structure and assumptions. This paper introduces SedBGC_MIP, a community initiative to compare existing models, refine key processes, and assess uncertainty. We highlight discrepancies through case studies and introduce needs including observational benchmarks. Ultimately, we seek to improve climate and resource projections.
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, Simon Treu, Christian Otto, Jan Volkholz, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Stefanie Heinicke, Colin Jones, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Ryan Heneghan, Derek P. Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Dánnell Quesada Chacón, Kerry Emanuel, Chia-Ying Lee, Suzana J. Camargo, Jonas Jägermeyr, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Lisa Novak, Inga J. Sauer, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, Michel Bechtold, Robert Reinecke, Inge de Graaf, Jed O. Kaplan, Alexander Koch, and Matthieu Lengaigne
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the experiments and data sets necessary to run historic and future impact projections, and the underlying assumptions of future climate change as defined by the 3rd round of the ISIMIP Project (Inter-sectoral Impactmodel Intercomparison Project, isimip.org). ISIMIP provides a framework for cross-sectorally consistent climate impact simulations to contribute to a comprehensive and consistent picture of the world under different climate-change scenarios.
Mathieu A. Poupon, Laure Resplandy, Jessica Garwood, Charles Stock, Niki Zadeh, and Jessica Y. Luo
Ocean Sci., 21, 851–875, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-851-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-851-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Zooplankton diel vertical migration (DVM) shapes ocean biogeochemical cycles. We present a new DVM model that reproduces migration depths observed in the North Atlantic Ocean. We show that chlorophyll shading contributes to reducing zooplankton migration depth and mainly controls its spatial and temporal variability. Thus, high chlorophyll concentrations may limit carbon sequestration caused by zooplankton migration despite the general abundance of zooplankton migration in these environments.
Robert Lampe, Ariel Rabines, Steffaney Wood, Anne Schulberg, Ralf Goericke, Pratap Venepally, Hong Zheng, Michael Stukel, Michael Landry, Andrew Barton, and Andrew Allen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3285, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3285, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
With the likely emergence of satellite-based phytoplankton pigment data, it is increasingly important to examine relationships between phytoplankton pigments and other metrics of phytoplankton community composition. By using quantitative approaches, we show that phytoplankton pigments correlate with DNA- and RNA-based abundances, and examine how integration of these data addresses ecological questions relating to diversity patterns, harmful algal blooms, and inferring cellular activity.
Mathilde Dugenne, Marco Corrales-Ugalde, Jessica Y. Luo, Rainer Kiko, Todd D. O'Brien, Jean-Olivier Irisson, Fabien Lombard, Lars Stemmann, Charles Stock, Clarissa R. Anderson, Marcel Babin, Nagib Bhairy, Sophie Bonnet, Francois Carlotti, Astrid Cornils, E. Taylor Crockford, Patrick Daniel, Corinne Desnos, Laetitia Drago, Amanda Elineau, Alexis Fischer, Nina Grandrémy, Pierre-Luc Grondin, Lionel Guidi, Cecile Guieu, Helena Hauss, Kendra Hayashi, Jenny A. Huggett, Laetitia Jalabert, Lee Karp-Boss, Kasia M. Kenitz, Raphael M. Kudela, Magali Lescot, Claudie Marec, Andrew McDonnell, Zoe Mériguet, Barbara Niehoff, Margaux Noyon, Thelma Panaïotis, Emily Peacock, Marc Picheral, Emilie Riquier, Collin Roesler, Jean-Baptiste Romagnan, Heidi M. Sosik, Gretchen Spencer, Jan Taucher, Chloé Tilliette, and Marion Vilain
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2971–2999, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2971-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2971-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Plankton and particles influence carbon cycling and energy flow in marine ecosystems. We used three types of novel plankton imaging systems to obtain size measurements from a range of plankton and particle sizes and across all major oceans. Data were compiled and cross-calibrated from many thousands of images, showing seasonal and spatial changes in particle size structure in different ocean basins. These datasets form the first release of the Pelagic Size Structure database (PSSdb).
Hanqin Tian, Naiqing Pan, Rona L. Thompson, Josep G. Canadell, Parvadha Suntharalingam, Pierre Regnier, Eric A. Davidson, Michael Prather, Philippe Ciais, Marilena Muntean, Shufen Pan, Wilfried Winiwarter, Sönke Zaehle, Feng Zhou, Robert B. Jackson, Hermann W. Bange, Sarah Berthet, Zihao Bian, Daniele Bianchi, Alexander F. Bouwman, Erik T. Buitenhuis, Geoffrey Dutton, Minpeng Hu, Akihiko Ito, Atul K. Jain, Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes, Fortunat Joos, Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Paul B. Krummel, Xin Lan, Angela Landolfi, Ronny Lauerwald, Ya Li, Chaoqun Lu, Taylor Maavara, Manfredi Manizza, Dylan B. Millet, Jens Mühle, Prabir K. Patra, Glen P. Peters, Xiaoyu Qin, Peter Raymond, Laure Resplandy, Judith A. Rosentreter, Hao Shi, Qing Sun, Daniele Tonina, Francesco N. Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Junjie Wang, Kelley C. Wells, Luke M. Western, Chris Wilson, Jia Yang, Yuanzhi Yao, Yongfa You, and Qing Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2543–2604, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas 273 times more potent than carbon dioxide, have increased by 25 % since the preindustrial period, with the highest observed growth rate in 2020 and 2021. This rapid growth rate has primarily been due to a 40 % increase in anthropogenic emissions since 1980. Observed atmospheric N2O concentrations in recent years have exceeded the worst-case climate scenario, underscoring the importance of reducing anthropogenic N2O emissions.
Benjamin Post, Esteban Acevedo-Trejos, Andrew D. Barton, and Agostino Merico
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1175–1195, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1175-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1175-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Creating computational models of how phytoplankton grows in the ocean is a technical challenge. We developed a new tool set (Xarray-simlab-ODE) for building such models using the programming language Python. We demonstrate the tool set in a library of plankton models (Phydra). Our goal was to allow scientists to develop models quickly, while also allowing the model structures to be changed easily. This allows us to test many different structures of our models to find the most appropriate one.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Jérôme Pinti, Tim DeVries, Tommy Norin, Camila Serra-Pompei, Roland Proud, David A. Siegel, Thomas Kiørboe, Colleen M. Petrik, Ken H. Andersen, Andrew S. Brierley, and André W. Visser
Biogeosciences, 20, 997–1009, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-997-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-997-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Large numbers of marine organisms such as zooplankton and fish perform daily vertical migration between the surface (at night) and the depths (in the daytime). This fascinating migration is important for the carbon cycle, as these organisms actively bring carbon to depths where it is stored away from the atmosphere for a long time. Here, we quantify the contributions of different animals to this carbon drawdown and storage and show that fish are important to the biological carbon pump.
Angharad C. Stell, Michael Bertolacci, Andrew Zammit-Mangion, Matthew Rigby, Paul J. Fraser, Christina M. Harth, Paul B. Krummel, Xin Lan, Manfredi Manizza, Jens Mühle, Simon O'Doherty, Ronald G. Prinn, Ray F. Weiss, Dickon Young, and Anita L. Ganesan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12945–12960, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12945-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12945-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas and ozone-depleting substance, whose atmospheric abundance has risen throughout the contemporary record. In this work, we carry out the first global hierarchical Bayesian inversion to solve for nitrous oxide emissions. We derive increasing global nitrous oxide emissions over 2011–2020, which are mainly driven by emissions between 0° and 30°N, with the highest emissions recorded in 2020.
Cited articles
Andersen, K. H., Berge, T., Gonçalves, R. J., Hartvig, M., Heuschele, J., Hylander, S., Jacobsen, N. S., Lindemann, C., Martens, E. A., Neuheimer, A. B., Olsson, K., Palacz, A., Prowe, A., Sainmont, J., Traving, S., Visser, A., Wadhwa, N., and Kiørboe, T.: Characteristic Sizes of Life in the Oceans, from Bacteria to Whales, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 8, 217–241, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-034144, 2016. a
Ardyna, M., Gosselin, M., Michel, C., Poulin, M., and Tremblay, J.-É.: Environmental forcing of phytoplankton community structure and function in the Canadian High Arctic: contrasting oligotrophic and eutrophic regions, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 442, 37–57, 2011. a
Ardyna, M., Babin, M., Devred, E., Forest, A., Gosselin, M., Raimbault, P., and Tremblay, J.-É.: Shelf-basin gradients shape ecological phytoplankton niches and community composition in the coastal Arctic Ocean (Beaufort Sea), Limnol. Oceanogr., 62, 2113–2132, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10554, 2017. a
Arrhenius, S.: Quantitative laws in biological chemistry, Vol. 1915, G. Bell, https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4661, 1915. a
Arrigo, K. R. and van Dijken, G. L.: Secular trends in Arctic Ocean net primary production, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007151, 2011. a, b
Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G., and Pabi, S.: Impact of a shrinking Arctic ice cover on marine primary production, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L19603, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035028, 2008. a, b
Arrigo, K. R., Perovich, D. K., Pickart, R. S., Brown, Z. W., van Dijken, G. L., Lowry, K. E., Mills, M. M., Palmer, M. A., Balch, W. M., Bates, N. R. B., Benitez-Nelson, C. R., Brownlee, E., Frey, K. E., Laney, S. R., Mathis, J., Matsuoka, A., Greg Mitchell, B., Moore, G., Reynolds, R. A., Sosik, H. M., and Swift, J. H.: Phytoplankton blooms beneath the sea ice in the Chukchi Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 105, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.03.018, 2014. a
Balazy, K., Trudnowska, E., Wichorowski, M., and Błachowiak-Samołyk, K.: Large versus small zooplankton in relation to temperature in the Arctic shelf region, Polar Res., 37, 1427409, https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2018.1427409, 2018. a
Berge, J., Renaud, P. E., Darnis, G., Cottier, F., Last, K., Gabrielsen, T. M., Johnsen, G., Seuthe, L., Weslawski, J. M., Leu, E., Moline, M., Nahrgang, J., Søreide, J. E., Øystein Varpe, Lønne, O. J., Daase, M., and Falk-Petersen, S.: In the dark: a review of ecosystem processes during the Arctic polar night, Prog. Oceanogr., 139, 258–271, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.08.005, 2015. a
Bethke, I., Furevik, T., and Drange, H.: Towards a more saline North Atlantic and a fresher Arctic under global warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 258–271, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027264, 2006. a
Beusen, A. H. W., Van Beek, L. P. H., Bouwman, A. F., Mogollón, J. M., and Middelburg, J. J.: Coupling global models for hydrology and nutrient loading to simulate nitrogen and phosphorus retention in surface water – description of IMAGE–GNM and analysis of performance, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 4045–4067, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-4045-2015, 2015. a
Beusen, A. H. W., Bouwman, A. F., Van Beek, L. P. H., Mogollón, J. M., and Middelburg, J. J.: Global riverine N and P transport to ocean increased during the 20th century despite increased retention along the aquatic continuum, Biogeosciences, 13, 2441–2451, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2441-2016, 2016. a
Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M., Halloran, P., Heinze, C., Ilyina, T., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., and Vichi, M.: Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6225–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013, 2013. a
Carmack, E. and McLaughlin, F.: Towards recognition of physical and geochemical change in Subarctic and Arctic Seas, Prog. Oceanogr., 90, 90–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.007, 2011. a
Carmack, E. and Wassmann, P.: Food webs and physical–biological coupling on pan-Arctic shelves: unifying concepts and comprehensive perspectives, Prog. Oceanogr., 71, 446–477, 2006. a
Carmack, E. C., Macdonald, R. W., and Jasper, S.: Phytoplankton productivity on the Canadian Shelf of the Beaufort Sea, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 277, 37–50, 2004. a
Castellani, G., Veyssiere, G., Karcher, M., Stroeve, J., Banas, S. N., Bouman, A. H., Brierley, S. A., Connan, S., Cottier, F., Große, F., Hobbs, L., Katlein, C., Light, B., McKee, D., Orkney, A., Proud, R., and Schourup-Kristensen, V.: Shine a light: Under-ice light and its ecological implications in a changing Arctic Ocean, Ambio, 51, 307–317, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01662-3, 2022. a
Cermeño, P., Marañón, E., Harbour, D., and Harris, R. P.: Invariant scaling of phytoplankton abundance and cell size in contrasting marine environments, Ecol. Lett., 9, 1210–1215, 2006. a
Chamberlain, E. J., Rokitta, S., Björn, R., D'Angelo, A., Creamean, J., Loose, B., Ulfsbo, A., Fong, A. A., Hoppe, C. J., Droste, E., Nomura, D., Schulz, K., and Bowman, J.: Microbial predictors of net heterotrophic conditions in the pelagic Arctic Ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., in preparation, 2024. a
Chen, B., Liu, H., Huang, B., and Wang, J.: Temperature effects on the growth rate of marine picoplankton, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 505, 37–47, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10773, 2014. a
Choi, H., Ha, S.-Y., Lee, S., Kim, J.-H., and Shin, K.-H.: Trophic dynamics of zooplankton before and after polar night in the Kongsfjorden (Svalbard): Evidence of trophic position estimated by δ15N analysis of amino acids, Front. Mar. Sci., 7, 489, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00489, 2020. a
Comiso, J. C.: Large decadal decline of the Arctic multiyear ice cover, J. Climate, 25, 1176–1193, 2012. a
Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J.-F., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., DuVivier, A. K., Edwards, J., Emmons, L. K., Fasullo, J., Garcia, R., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Holland, M. M., Large, W. G., Lauritzen, P. H., Lawrence, D. M., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W. H., Mills, M. J., Neale, R., Oleson, K. W., Otto-Bliesner, B., Phillips, A. S., Sacks, W., Tilmes, S., Kampenhout, L., Vertenstein, M., Bertini, A., Dennis, J., Deser, C., Fischer, C., Fox-Kemper, B., Kay, J. E., Kinnison, D., Kushner, P. J., Larson, V. E., Long, M. C., Mickelson, S., Moore, J. K., Nienhouse, E., Polvani, L., Rasch, P. J., and Strand, W. G.: The community earth system model version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001916, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916, 2020. a
Danielson, S. L., Eisner, L., Ladd, C., Mordy, C., Sousa, L., and Weingartner, T. J.: A comparison between late summer 2012 and 2013 water masses, macronutrients, and phytoplankton standing crops in the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 135, 7–26, 2017. a
Duerksen, S. W., Thiemann, G. W., Budge, S. M., Poulin, M., Niemi, A., and Michel, C.: Large, omega-3 rich, pelagic diatoms under Arctic sea ice: sources and implications for food webs, PloS one, 9, e114070, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114070, 2014. a
Edwards, K. F., Thomas, M. K., Klausmeier, C. A., and Litchman, E.: Allometric scaling and taxonomic variation in nutrient utilization traits and maximum growth rate of phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 57, 554–566, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.2.0554, 2012. a, b, c, d
Edwards, M. and Richardson, A. J.: Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch, Nature, 430, 881–884, 2004. a
Eppley, R. W.: Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea, Fish. Bull., 70, 1063–1085, 1972. a
Freyria, N. J., Joli, N., and Lovejoy, C.: A decadal perspective on north water microbial eukaryotes as Arctic Ocean sentinels, Sci. Rep., 11, 1–14, 2021. a
Fujiwara, A., Nishino, S., Matsuno, K., Onodera, J., Kawaguchi, Y., Hirawake, T., Suzuki, K., Inoue, J., and Kikuchi, T.: Changes in phytoplankton community structure during wind-induced fall bloom on the central Chukchi shelf, Polar Biol., 41, 1279–1295, 2018. a
Gentleman, W. C. and Neuheimer, A. B.: Functional responses and ecosystem dynamics: how clearance rates explain the influence of satiation, food-limitation and acclimation, J. Plankton Res., 30, 1215–1231, 2008. a
Graham, C., Oxtoby, L., Wang, S. W., Budge, S. M., and Wooller, M. J.: Sourcing fatty acids to juvenile polar cod (Boreogadus saida) in the Beaufort Sea using compound-specific stable carbon isotope analyses, Polar Biol., 37, 697–705, 2014. a
Grebmeier, J. M., McRoy, C. P., and Feder, H. M.: Pelagic-benthic coupling on the shelf of the northern Bering and Chukchi seas. 1. Food supply source and benthic biomass, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 48, 57–67, 1988. a
Grebmeier, J. M., Feder, H. M., and McRoy, C. P.: Pelagic-benthic coupling on the shelf of the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. 11. Benthic community structure, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 51, 253–68, 1989. a
Gregg, W. W. and Casey, N. W.: Sampling biases in MODIS and SeaWiFS ocean chlorophyll data, Remote Sens. Environ., 111, 25–35, 2007. a
Griffies, S. M., Biastoch, A., Böning, C., Bryan, F., Danabasoglu, G., Chassignet, E. P., England, M. H., Gerdes, R., Haak, H., Hallberg, R. W., Hazeleger, W., Jungclaus, J., Large, W. G., Madec, G., Pirani, A., Samuels, B. L., Scheinert, M., Gupta, A. S., Severijns, C. A., Simmons, H. L., Treguier, A. M., Winton, M., Yeager, S., and Yin, J.: Coordinated ocean-ice reference experiments (COREs), Ocean Model., 26, 1–46, 2009. a, b
Griffies, S. M., Danabasoglu, G., Durack, P. J., Adcroft, A. J., Balaji, V., Böning, C. W., Chassignet, E. P., Curchitser, E., Deshayes, J., Drange, H., Fox-Kemper, B., Gleckler, P. J., Gregory, J. M., Haak, H., Hallberg, R. W., Heimbach, P., Hewitt, H. T., Holland, D. M., Ilyina, T., Jungclaus, J. H., Komuro, Y., Krasting, J. P., Large, W. G., Marsland, S. J., Masina, S., McDougall, T. J., Nurser, A. J. G., Orr, J. C., Pirani, A., Qiao, F., Stouffer, R. J., Taylor, K. E., Treguier, A. M., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Valdivieso, M., Wang, Q., Winton, M., and Yeager, S. G.: OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3231–3296, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3231-2016, 2016. a
Hansen, B., Bjornsen, P. K., and Hansen, P. J.: The size ratio between planktonic predators and their prey, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 395–403, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.2.0395, 1994. a
Hansen, P. J., Bjørnsen, P. K., and Hansen, B. W.: Zooplankton grazing and growth: Scaling within the 2-2,-µm body size range, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 687–704, 1997. a
Hayashida, H., Jin, M., Steiner, N. S., Swart, N. C., Watanabe, E., Fiedler, R., Hogg, A. McC., Kiss, A. E., Matear, R. J., and Strutton, P. G.: Ice Algae Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (IAMIP2), Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6847–6861, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6847-2021, 2021. a
Huete-Ortega, M., Marañón, E., Varela, M., and Bode, A.: General patterns in the size scaling of phytoplankton abundance in coastal waters during a 10-year time series, J. Plankton Res., 32, 1–14, 2010. a
Ikeda, T.: Metabolic rates of epipelagic marine zooplankton as a function of body mass and temperature, Mar. Biol., 85, 1–11, 1985. a
Ilıcak, M., Drange, H., Wang, Q., Gerdes, R., Aksenov, Y., Bailey, D., Bentsen, M., Biastoch, A., Bozec, A., Böning, C., Cassou, C., Chassignet, E., Coward, A., Curry, B., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S., Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Yosuke, F., and Yeager, S.: An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part III: Hydrography and fluxes, Ocean Model., 100, 141–161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.02.004, 2016. a
Jennings, S. and Van Der Molen, J.: Trophic levels of marine consumers from nitrogen stable isotope analysis: estimation and uncertainty, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 72, 2289–2300, 2015. a
Kiørboe, T. and Hirst, A. G.: Shifts in mass scaling of respiration, feeding, and growth rates across life-form transitions in marine pelagic organisms, Am. Nat., 183, E118–E130, https://doi.org/10.1086/675241, 2014. a
Kohlbach, D., Schaafsma, F. L., Graeve, M., Lebreton, B., Lange, B. A., David, C., Vortkamp, M., and Flores, H.: Strong linkage of polar cod (Boreogadus saida) to sea ice algae-produced carbon: evidence from stomach content, fatty acid and stable isotope analyses, Prog. Oceanogr., 152, 62–74, 2017. a
Krumhardt, K. M., Lovenduski, N. S., Long, M. C., Luo, J. Y., Lindsay, K., Yeager, S., and Harrison, C.: Potential predictability of net primary production in the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 34, e2020GB006531, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006531, 2020. a
Lampe, V., Nöthig, E.-M., and Schartau, M.: Spatio-temporal variations in community size structure of Arctic protist plankton in the Fram Strait, Front. Mar. Sci., 7, 579880, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.579880, 2021. a
Lannuzel, D., Tedesco, L., Van Leeuwe, M., Campbell, K., Flores, H., Delille, B., Miller, L., Stefels, J., Assmy, P., Bowman, J., Brown, K., Castellani, G., Chierici, M., Crabeck, O., Damm, E., Else, B., Fransson, A., Fripiat, F., Geilfus, N.-X., and Wongpan, P.: The future of Arctic sea-ice biogeochemistry and ice-associated ecosystems, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 983–992, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00940-4, 2020. a
Large, W. G. and Yeager, S. G.: The global climatology of an interannually varying air – Sea flux data set, Clim. Dynam., 33, 341–364, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3, 2009. a, b, c, d
Leu, E., Søreide, J. E., Hessen, D. O., Falk-Petersen, S., and Berge, J.: Consequences of changing sea-ice cover for primary and secondary producers in the European Arctic shelf seas: timing, quantity, and quality, Prog. Oceanogr., 90, 18–32, 2011. a
Li, J., Matsuoka, A., Pang, X., Massicotte, P., and Babin, M.: Performance of Algorithms for Retrieving Chlorophyll a Concentrations in the Arctic Ocean: Impact on Primary Production Estimates, Remote Sens., 16, 892, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16050892, 2024. a
Li, W. K., McLaughlin, F. A., Lovejoy, C., and Carmack, E. C.: Smallest algae thrive as the Arctic ocean freshens, Science, 326, 539, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1179798, 2009. a
Limoges, A., Weckström, K., Ribeiro, S., Georgiadis, E., Hansen, K. E., Martinez, P., Seidenkrantz, M.-S., Giraudeau, J., Crosta, X., and Massé, G.: Learning from the past: Impact of the Arctic Oscillation on sea ice and marine productivity off northwest Greenland over the last 9,000 years, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 6767–6786, 2020. a
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Boyer, T. P., Zweng, M. M., Garcia, H. E., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Weathers, K. W., Paver, C. R., and Smolyar, I. V.: World ocean atlas 2018, volume 1: Temperature, Report, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 81, 52 pp., https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/woa/WOA18/DOC/woa18_vol1.pdf (last access: March 2023), 2018. a
Long, M. C., Lindsay, K., and Holland, M. M.: Modeling photosynthesis in sea ice-covered waters, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 7, 1189–1206, 2015. a
Long, M. C., Moore, J. K., Lindsay, K., Levy, M., Doney, S. C., Luo, J. Y., Krumhardt, K. M., Letscher, R. T., Grover, M., and Sylvester, Z. T.: Simulations with the marine biogeochemistry library (MARBL), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2021MS002647, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002647, 2021. a, b
Lowry, K. E., Pickart, R. S., Mills, M. M., Brown, Z. W., van Dijken, G. L., Bates, N. R., and Arrigo, K. R.: The influence of winter water on phytoplankton blooms in the Chukchi Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 118, 53–72, 2015. a
Mayorga, E., Seitzinger, S. P., Harrison, J. A., Dumont, E., Beusen, A. H., Bouwman, A., Fekete, B. M., Kroeze, C., and Van Drecht, G.: Global nutrient export from WaterSheds 2 (NEWS 2): model development and implementation, Environ. Modell. Softw., 25, 837–853, 2010. a
Michel, C., Hamilton, J., Hansen, E., Barber, D., Reigstad, M., Iacozza, J., Seuthe, L., and Niemi, A.: Arctic Ocean outflow shelves in the changing Arctic: A review and perspectives, Prog. Oceanogr., 139, 66–88, 2015. a
Mikelsons, K. and Wang, M.: Optimal satellite orbit configuration for global ocean color product coverage, Opt. Express, 27, A445–A457, 2019. a
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., and Lindsay, K.: Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three‐dimensional model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB4028, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002220, 2004. a
Moore, J. K., Lindsay, K., Doney, S. C., Long, M. C., and Misumi, K.: Marine ecosystem dynamics and biogeochemical cycling in the Community Earth System Model [CESM1 (BGC)]: Comparison of the 1990s with the 2090s under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, J. Climate, 26, 9291–9312, 2013. a
Moriarty, R. and O'Brien, T. D.: Distribution of mesozooplankton biomass in the global ocean, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 45–55, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-45-2013, 2013. a
Mundy, C. J., Gosselin, M., Ehn, J., Gratton, Y., Rossnagel, A., Barber, D. G., Martin, J., Tremblay, J.-É., Palmer, M., Arrigo, K. R., Darnis, G., Fortier, L., Else, B., and Papakyriakou, T.: Contribution of under-ice primary production to an ice-edge upwelling phytoplankton bloom in the Canadian Beaufort Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L17601, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038837, 2009. a
Mustapha, S. B., Bélanger, S., and Larouche, P.: Evaluation of ocean color algorithms in the southeastern Beaufort Sea, Canadian Arctic: New parameterization using SeaWiFS, MODIS, and MERIS spectral bands, Can. J. Remote Sens., 38, 535–556, 2012. a
Neeley, A. R., Harris, L. A., and Frey, K. E.: Unraveling phytoplankton community dynamics in the northern Chukchi Sea under sea-ice-covered and sea-ice-free conditions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 7663–7671, 2018. a
Negrete García, G.: gabyneg/arctic_analysis: code for arctic analysis (Version v1), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14004652, 2024. a
Negrete-García, G., Luo, J. Y., Long, M. C., Lindsay, K., Levy, M., and Barton, A. D.: Plankton energy flows using a global size-structured and trait-based model, Prog. Oceanogr., 209, 102898, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102898, 2022a. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x
Negrete-García, G., Luo, J. Y., Long, M. C., Lindsay, K., Levy, M., and Barton, A. D.: Data from: Plankton energy flows using a global size-structured and trait-based model, UC San Diego Library Digital Collections [data set], https://doi.org/10.6075/J0NK3F6D, 2022b. a
Nicolaus, M., Katlein, C., Maslanik, J., and Hendricks, S.: Changes in Arctic sea ice result in increasing light transmittance and absorption, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L24501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053738, 2012. a
Overland, J. E. and Wang, M.: When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2097–2101, 2013. a
Overland, J. E., Wang, M., Walsh, J. E., and Stroeve, J. C.: Future Arctic climate changes: Adaptation and mitigation time scales, Earth's Future, 2, 68–74, 2014. a
Pauly, D. and Christensen, V.: Primary production required to sustain global fisheries, Nature, 374, 255–257, 1995. a
Renaud, P. E., Carroll, M. L., and Ambrose Jr., W. G.: Effects of global warming on Arctic sea-floor communities and its consequences for higher trophic levels, in: Impacts of global warming on polar ecosystems, edited by: Duarte, C. M., Fundación BBVA, Bilbao, ilus., 3 gráf., Bibliografía: 168–175, 2008. a
Rohr, T., Richardson, A. J., Lenton, A., Chamberlain, M. A., and Shadwick, E. H.: Zooplankton grazing is the largest source of uncertainty for marine carbon cycling in CMIP6 models, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 212, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00871-w, 2023. a
Sakshaug, E.: Primary and secondary production in the Arctic Seas, in: The organic carbon cycle in the Arctic Ocean, edited by: Stein, R. and MacDonald, R. W., 57–81, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18912-8_3, 2004. a
Sakshaug, E. and Slagstad, D.: Light and productivity of phytoplankton in polar marine ecosystems: a physiological view, Polar Res., 10, 69–86, 1991. a
San Martin, E., Harris, R. P., and Irigoien, X.: Latitudinal variation in plankton size spectra in the Atlantic Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53, 1560–1572, 2006. a
Schartau, M., Landry, M. R., and Armstrong, R. A.: Density estimation of plankton size spectra: a reanalysis of IronEx II data, J. Plankton Res., 32, 1167–1184, 2010. a
Schmidt, N. M., Mosbacher, J. B., Eitzinger, B., Vesterinen, E. J., and Roslin, T.: High resistance towards herbivore-induced habitat change in a high Arctic arthropod community, Biol. Lett., 14, 20180054, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0054, 2018. a
Serra-Pompei, C., Ward, B. A., Pinti, J., Visser, A. W., Kiørboe, T., and Andersen, K. H.: Linking plankton size spectra and community composition to carbon export and its efficiency, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 36, e2021GB007275, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007275, 2022. a
Serreze, M. C., Holland, M. M., and Stroeve, J.: Perspectives on the Arctic's shrinking sea-ice cover, Science, 315, 1533–1536, 2007. a
Sherr, E. B., Sherr, B. F., Wheeler, P. A., and Thompson, K.: Temporal and spatial variation in stocks of autotrophic and heterotrophic microbes in the upper water column of the central Arctic Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 50, 557–571, 2003. a
Sherr, E. B., Sherr, B. F., and Hartz, A. J.: Microzooplankton grazing impact in the Western Arctic Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 1264–1273, 2009. a
Sherr, E. B., Sherr, B. F., and Ross, C.: Microzooplankton grazing impact in the Bering Sea during spring sea ice conditions, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 94, 57–67, 2013. a
Siegel, D. A., Maritorena, S., Nelson, N. B., Hansell, D. A., and Lorenzi-Kayser, M.: Global distribution and dynamics of colored dissolved and detrital organic materials, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 107, 3228–3249, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC000965, 2002. a
Siegel, D. A., Behrenfeld, M. J., Maritorena, S., McClain, C. R., Antoine, D., Bailey, S. W., Bontempi, P. S., Boss, E. S., Dierssen, H. M., Doney, S. C., Eplee, R. E., Evans, R. H., Feldman, G. C., Fields, E., Franz, B. A., Kuring, N. A., Mengelt, C., Nelson, N. B., Patt, F. S., Robinson, W. D., Sarmiento, J. L., Swan, C. M., Werdell, P. J., Westberry, T. K., Wilding, J. G., and Yoder, J. A.: Regional to global assessments of phytoplankton dynamics from the SeaWiFS mission, Remote Sens. Environ., 135, 77–91, 2013. a
Smith, R., Jones, P., Briegleb, B. P., Bryan, F., Danabasoglu, G., Dennis, J., Dukowicz, J., Eden, C., Fox-Kemper, B., and Gent, P.: The parallel ocean program (POP) reference manual ocean component of the community climate system model (CCSM) and community earth system model (CESM), Los Alamos Technical Report No. LAUR-10-01853, 1–140, https://opensky.ucar.edu/islandora/object/manuscripts:825 (last access: January 2018), 2010. a, b
Song, H., Ji, R., Jin, M., Li, Y., Feng, Z., Varpe, Ø., and Davis, C. S.: Strong and regionally distinct links between ice-retreat timing and phytoplankton production in the Arctic Ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 66, 2498–2508, 2021. a
Stawiarski, B., Buitenhuis, E. T., and Quéré, C. L.: The physiological response of picophytoplankton to temperature and its model representation, Front. Mar. Sci., 3, 164, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00164, 2016. a
Steinacher, M., Joos, F., Frölicher, T. L., Bopp, L., Cadule, P., Cocco, V., Doney, S. C., Gehlen, M., Lindsay, K., Moore, J. K., Schneider, B., and Segschneider, J.: Projected 21st century decrease in marine productivity: a multi-model analysis, Biogeosciences, 7, 979–1005, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-979-2010, 2010. a
Stock, C. A., Dunne, J. P., and John, J. G.: Drivers of trophic amplification of ocean productivity trends in a changing climate, Biogeosciences, 11, 7125–7135, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7125-2014, 2014. a
Tai, T. C., Steiner, N. S., Hoover, C., Cheung, W. W., and Sumaila, U. R.: Evaluating present and future potential of Arctic fisheries in Canada, Mar. Policy, 108, 103637, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103637, 2019. a
Tamelander, T., Renaud, P. E., Hop, H., Carroll, M. L., Ambrose Jr., W. G., and Hobson, K. A.: Trophic relationships and pelagic–benthic coupling during summer in the Barents Sea Marginal Ice Zone, revealed by stable carbon and nitrogen isotope measurements, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 310, 33–46, 2006. a
Tamelander, T., Reigstad, M., Hop, H., Carroll, M. L., and Wassmann, P.: Pelagic and sympagic contribution of organic matter to zooplankton and vertical export in the Barents Sea marginal ice zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55, 2330–2339, 2008. a
remblay, J.-É. and Gagnon, J.: The effects of irradiance and nutrient supply on the productivity of Arctic waters: a perspective on climate change, in: Influence of climate change on the changing Arctic and sub-Arctic conditions, 73–93, Springer, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9460-6_7, 2009. a, b, c
Von Appen, W.-J., Waite, A. M., Bergmann, M., Bienhold, C., Boebel, O., Bracher, A., Cisewski, B., Hagemann, J., Hoppema, M., Iversen, M. H., Konrad, C., Krumpen, T., Lochthofen, N., Metfies, K., Niehoff, B., Nöthig, E., Purser, A., Salter, I., Schaber, M., Scholz, D., Soltwedel, T., Torres-Valdes, S., Wekerle, C., Wenzhöfer, F., Wietz, M., and Boetius, A.: Sea-ice derived meltwater stratification slows the biological carbon pump: results from continuous observations, Nat. Commun., 12, 7309, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26943-z, 2021. a
Wang, Q., Ilicak, M., Gerdes, R., Drange, H., Aksenov, Y., Bailey, D. A., Bentsen, M., Biastoch, A., Bozec, A., Böning, C., Cassou, C., Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Curry, B., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S., Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Fujii, Y., Griffies, S. M., Iovino, D., Jahn, A., Jung, T., Large, W. G., Lee, C., Lique, C., Lu, J., Masina, S., George Nurser, A., Rabe, B., Roth, C., Salas y Mélia, D., Samuels, B. L., Spence, P., Tsujino, H., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A., Wang, X., and Yeager, S. G.: An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part I: Sea ice and solid freshwater, Ocean Model., 99, 110–132, 2016a. a, b
Wang, Q., Ilicak, M., Gerdes, R., Drange, H., Aksenov, Y., Bailey, D. A., Bentsen, M., Biastoch, A., Bozec, A., Böning, C., Caassou, C., Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Curry, B., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S., Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Fujii, Y., Griffies, S. M., Iovino, D., Jahn, A., Jung, T., Large, W. G., Lee, C., Lique, C., Lu, J., Masina, S., Nurser, A. G., Rabe, B., Roth, C., Salas y Mélia, D., Samuels, B. L., Spence, P., Tsujino, H., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A., Wang, X., and Yeager, S. G.: An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part II: Liquid freshwater, Ocean Model., 99, 86–109, 2016b. a, b
Ward, B. A., Dutkiewicz, S., Jahn, O., and Follows, M. J.: A size-structured food-web model for the global ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 57, 1877–1891, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.6.1877, 2012. a
Ward, B. A., Dutkiewicz, S., and Follows, M. J.: Modelling spatial and temporal patterns in size-structured marine plankton communities: top–down and bottom–up controls, J. Plankton Res., 36, 31–47, 2014. a
Wietz, M., Bienhold, C., Metfies, K., Torres-Valdés, S., von Appen, W.-J., Salter, I., and Boetius, A.: The polar night shift: seasonal dynamics and drivers of Arctic Ocean microbiomes revealed by autonomous sampling, ISME Communications, 1, 76, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00074-4, 2021. a
Yang, E. J., Ha, H. K., and Kang, S.-H.: Microzooplankton community structure and grazing impact on major phytoplankton in the Chukchi sea and the western Canada basin, Arctic ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 120, 91–102, 2015. a
Zhuang, Y., Jin, H., Cai, W.-J., Li, H., Jin, M., Qi, D., and Chen, J.: Freshening leads to a three-decade trend of declining nutrients in the western Arctic Ocean, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 054047, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abf58b, 2021. a
Zhulay, I., Iken, K., Renaud, P. E., Kosobokova, K., and Bluhm, B. A.: Reduced efficiency of pelagic–benthic coupling in the Arctic deep sea during lower ice cover, Sci. Rep., 13, 6739, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33854-0, 2023. a
Zweng, M. M., Seidov, D., Boyer, T. P., Locarnini, R. A., Garcia, H. E., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Weathers, K. W., Paver, C. R., Smolyar, I., Reagan, J., Seidov, D., and Zweng, M. M.: World ocean atlas 2018, volume 2: Salinity, Report, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 82, 50 pp., http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/indprod.html (last access: March 2023), 2019. a
Short summary
The Arctic Ocean experiences significant seasonal and year-to-year changes, impacting marine plankton populations. Using a plankton community model, we studied these effects on plankton communities and their influence on fish production. Our findings revealed earlier plankton blooms, shifts towards more carnivorous zooplankton, and increased fishery potential during summertime, especially in warmer years with less ice, highlighting the delicate balance of Arctic ecosystems.
The Arctic Ocean experiences significant seasonal and year-to-year changes, impacting marine...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint