Articles | Volume 22, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1475-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1475-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
18 Mar 2025
Research article |
| 18 Mar 2025
| 18 Mar 2025
Nitrogen concentrations in boreal and temperate tree tissues vary with tree age/size, growth rate, and climate
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), KIT-Campus Alpin, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research – Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Kailiang Yu
High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Stefano Manzoni
Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, Sweden
Anatoly Prokushkin
V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Melanie A. Thurner
Institute of Soil Science, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), KIT-Campus Alpin, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research – Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Zhiqiang Wang
Sichuan Zoige Alpine Wetland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China
Institute of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China
Thomas Hickler
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Philipp de Vrese, Tobias Stacke, Veronika Gayler, Helena Bergstedt, Clemens von Baeckmann, Melanie Thurner, Christian Beer, and Victor Brovkin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4031, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4031, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The spatial variability in the land surface properties is often not captured by the resolution of land surface models. To overcome this limitation, most models subdivide the grid cells into fractions with homogeneous characteristics, for which the land processes are calculated separately. In reality, the fractions interact via the lateral exchange of water and heat, and the present manuscript details an approach to include these fluxes in the land component of the ICON modeling framework.
Boris Ťupek, Aleksi Lehtonen, Stefano Manzoni, Elisa Bruni, Petr Baldrian, Etienne Richy, Bartosz Adamczyk, Bertrand Guenet, and Raisa Mäkipää
Biogeosciences, 22, 5497–5510, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-5497-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-5497-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We explored soil microbial respiration (Rh) kinetics of low-dose and long-term N fertilization in N-limited boreal forest in connection with CH4 and N2O fluxes and soil and tree C sinks. The insights show that N fertilization affects C retention in boreal forest soils by modifying Rh sensitivities to soil temperature and moisture. The key findings reveal that N-enriched soils exhibited reduced sensitivity of Rh to moisture, which contributed to enhanced soil C sequestration on an annual level.
Melanie A. Thurner, Xavier Rodriguez-Lloveras, and Christian Beer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2548, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2548, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Soil texture varies over centimeters, which is overseen by large-scale models, likely causing simulation errors. We developed a 2-dimesional geophysical soil model (DynSoM-2D) with a resolution of 10 cm and ran it with different setups at a permafrost-affected site. Using high-resolution input, DynSoM-2D simulates a warmer soil, which thaws deeper and has an extended snow-free period in summer. These changes can impact ecosystem dynamics, but have little effect on yearly soil-air heat exchange.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Tatiana Reichert, Laynara F. Lugli, Erica McGale, Kerstin Pierick, João Paulo Darela-Filho, Liam Langan, Jürgen Homeier, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Biogeosciences, 22, 2707–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2707-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2707-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how plant roots with different forms and functions rely on fungal partnerships for nutrient uptake. This relationship was integrated into a vegetation model and was tested in a tropical forest in Ecuador. The model accurately predicted root traits and showed that without fungi, biomass decreased by up to 80 %. The findings highlight the critical role of fungi in ecosystem processes and suggest that root–fungal interactions should be considered in vegetation models.
Xiankun Li, Marleen Pallandt, Dilip Naidu, Johannes Rousk, Gustaf Hugelius, and Stefano Manzoni
Biogeosciences, 22, 2691–2705, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2691-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2691-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
While laboratory studies have identified many drivers and their effects on the carbon emission pulse after rewetting of dry soils, a validation with field data is still missing. Here, we show that the carbon emission pulse in the laboratory and in the field increases with soil organic carbon and temperature, but their trends with pre-rewetting dryness and moisture increment at rewetting differ. We conclude that the laboratory findings can be partially validated.
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, Simon Treu, Christian Otto, Jan Volkholz, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Stefanie Heinicke, Colin Jones, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Ryan Heneghan, Derek P. Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Dánnell Quesada Chacón, Kerry Emanuel, Chia-Ying Lee, Suzana J. Camargo, Jonas Jägermeyr, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Lisa Novak, Inga J. Sauer, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, Michel Bechtold, Robert Reinecke, Inge de Graaf, Jed O. Kaplan, Alexander Koch, and Matthieu Lengaigne
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2103, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the experiments and data sets necessary to run historic and future impact projections, and the underlying assumptions of future climate change as defined by the 3rd round of the ISIMIP Project (Inter-sectoral Impactmodel Intercomparison Project, isimip.org). ISIMIP provides a framework for cross-sectorally consistent climate impact simulations to contribute to a comprehensive and consistent picture of the world under different climate-change scenarios.
Friedrich J. Bohn, Ana Bastos, Romina Martin, Anja Rammig, Niak Sian Koh, Giles B. Sioen, Bram Buscher, Louise Carver, Fabrice DeClerck, Moritz Drupp, Robert Fletcher, Matthew Forrest, Alexandros Gasparatos, Alex Godoy-Faúndez, Gregor Hagedorn, Martin C. Hänsel, Jessica Hetzer, Thomas Hickler, Cornelia B. Krug, Stasja Koot, Xiuzhen Li, Amy Luers, Shelby Matevich, H. Damon Matthews, Ina C. Meier, Mirco Migliavacca, Awaz Mohamed, Sungmin O, David Obura, Ben Orlove, Rene Orth, Laura Pereira, Markus Reichstein, Lerato Thakholi, Peter H. Verburg, and Yuki Yoshida
Biogeosciences, 22, 2425–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2425-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2425-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
An interdisciplinary collaboration of 36 international researchers from 35 institutions highlights recent findings in biosphere research. Within eight themes, they discuss issues arising from climate change and other anthropogenic stressors and highlight the co-benefits of nature-based solutions and ecosystem services. Based on an analysis of these eight topics, we have synthesized four overarching insights.
Daniel Escobar, Stefano Manzoni, Jeimar Tapasco, Patrik Vestin, and Salim Belyazid
Biogeosciences, 22, 2023–2047, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2023-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2023-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied carbon dynamics in afforested, drained peatlands using the ForSAFE-Peat model over two forest rotations. Our simulations showed that, while trees store carbon, significant soil carbon losses occur, particularly early on, indicating that forest growth may not fully offset these losses once carbon time dynamics are considered. This emphasises the need to consider both soil and harvested wood products when evaluating the climate impact of such systems.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Matthew Forrest, David Warlind, João Paulo Darela Filho, Katrin Fleischer, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2249–2274, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study maps global nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability and how they changed from 1901 to 2018. We find that tropical regions are mostly P-limited, while temperate and boreal areas face N limitations. Over time, P limitation increased, especially in the tropics, while N limitation decreased. These shifts are key to understanding global plant growth and carbon storage, highlighting the importance of including P dynamics in ecosystem models.
Daniela Guasconi, Sara A. O. Cousins, Stefano Manzoni, Nina Roth, and Gustaf Hugelius
SOIL, 11, 233–246, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-233-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-233-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the effects of experimental drought and soil amendment on soil and vegetation carbon pools at different soil depths. Drought consistently reduced soil moisture and aboveground biomass, while compost increased total soil carbon content and aboveground biomass, and effects were more pronounced in the topsoil. Root biomass was not significantly affected by the treatments. The contrasting response of roots and shoots improves our understanding of ecosystem carbon dynamics.
Ryan Vella, Matthew Forrest, Andrea Pozzer, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Thomas Hickler, Jos Lelieveld, and Holger Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 243–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how land cover changes influence biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) emissions and atmospheric states. Using a coupled chemistry–climate–vegetation model, we compare present-day land cover (deforested for crops and grazing) with natural vegetation and an extreme reforestation scenario. We find that vegetation changes significantly impact global BVOC emissions and organic aerosols but have a relatively small effect on total aerosols, clouds, and radiative effects.
Matthew Forrest, Jessica Hetzer, Maik Billing, Simon P. K. Bowring, Eric Kosczor, Luke Oberhagemann, Oliver Perkins, Dan Warren, Fátima Arrogante-Funes, Kirsten Thonicke, and Thomas Hickler
Biogeosciences, 21, 5539–5560, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5539-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is causing an increase in extreme wildfires in Europe, but drivers of fire are not well understood, especially across different land cover types. We used statistical models with satellite data, climate data, and socioeconomic data to determine what affects burning in cropland and non-cropland areas of Europe. We found different drivers of burning in cropland burning vs. non-cropland to the point that some variables, e.g. population density, had the complete opposite effects.
Blessing Kavhu, Matthew Forrest, and Thomas Hickler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3595, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3595, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a model to predict global wildfire patterns by examining weather, vegetation, and human activities. This tool helps forecast seasonal fire risks across diverse regions and focuses on seasonal changes, unlike existing models. Its simplicity makes it valuable for climate and fire management planning, as well as for use in global climate studies, helping communities better prepare for and adapt to rising wildfire threats.
Stefano Manzoni and M. Francesca Cotrufo
Biogeosciences, 21, 4077–4098, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4077-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4077-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Organic carbon and nitrogen are stabilized in soils via microbial assimilation and stabilization of necromass (in vivo pathway) or via adsorption of the products of extracellular decomposition (ex vivo pathway). Here we use a diagnostic model to quantify which stabilization pathway is prevalent using data on residue-derived carbon and nitrogen incorporation in mineral-associated organic matter. We find that the in vivo pathway is dominant in fine-textured soils with low organic matter content.
Erik Schwarz, Samia Ghersheen, Salim Belyazid, and Stefano Manzoni
Biogeosciences, 21, 3441–3461, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3441-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3441-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The occurrence of unstable equilibrium points (EPs) could impede the applicability of microbial-explicit soil organic carbon models. For archetypal model versions we identify when instability can occur and describe mathematical conditions to avoid such unstable EPs. We discuss implications for further model development, highlighting the important role of considering basic ecological principles to ensure biologically meaningful models.
Boris Ťupek, Aleksi Lehtonen, Alla Yurova, Rose Abramoff, Bertrand Guenet, Elisa Bruni, Samuli Launiainen, Mikko Peltoniemi, Shoji Hashimoto, Xianglin Tian, Juha Heikkinen, Kari Minkkinen, and Raisa Mäkipää
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5349–5367, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5349-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5349-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Updating the Yasso07 soil C model's dependency on decomposition with a hump-shaped Ricker moisture function improved modelled soil organic C (SOC) stocks in a catena of mineral and organic soils in boreal forest. The Ricker function, set to peak at a rate of 1 and calibrated against SOC and CO2 data using a Bayesian approach, showed a maximum in well-drained soils. Using SOC and CO2 data together with the moisture only from the topsoil humus was crucial for accurate model estimates.
Dana A. Lapides, W. Jesse Hahm, Matthew Forrest, Daniella M. Rempe, Thomas Hickler, and David N. Dralle
Biogeosciences, 21, 1801–1826, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1801-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1801-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Water stored in weathered bedrock is rarely incorporated into vegetation and Earth system models despite increasing recognition of its importance. Here, we add a weathered bedrock component to a widely used vegetation model. Using a case study of two sites in California and model runs across the United States, we show that more accurately representing subsurface water storage and hydrology increases summer plant water use so that it better matches patterns in distributed data products.
Melanie A. Thurner, Silvia Caldararu, Jan Engel, Anja Rammig, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 21, 1391–1410, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1391-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1391-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Due to their crucial role in terrestrial ecosystems, we implemented mycorrhizal fungi into the QUINCY terrestrial biosphere model. Fungi interact with mineral and organic soil to support plant N uptake and, thus, plant growth. Our results suggest that the effect of mycorrhizal interactions on simulated ecosystem dynamics is minor under constant environmental conditions but necessary to reproduce and understand observed patterns under changing conditions, such as rising atmospheric CO2.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Ryan Vella, Andrea Pozzer, Matthew Forrest, Jos Lelieveld, Thomas Hickler, and Holger Tost
Biogeosciences, 20, 4391–4412, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4391-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4391-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the effect of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) emissions from plants. ENSO events can cause a significant increase in these emissions, which have a long-term impact on the Earth's atmosphere. Persistent ENSO conditions can cause long-term changes in vegetation, resulting in even higher BVOC emissions. We link ENSO-induced emission anomalies with driving atmospheric and vegetational variables.
Kailiang Yu, Johan van den Hoogen, Zhiqiang Wang, Colin Averill, Devin Routh, Gabriel Reuben Smith, Rebecca E. Drenovsky, Kate M. Scow, Fei Mo, Mark P. Waldrop, Yuanhe Yang, Weize Tang, Franciska T. De Vries, Richard D. Bardgett, Peter Manning, Felipe Bastida, Sara G. Baer, Elizabeth M. Bach, Carlos García, Qingkui Wang, Linna Ma, Baodong Chen, Xianjing He, Sven Teurlincx, Amber Heijboer, James A. Bradley, and Thomas W. Crowther
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4339–4350, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4339-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4339-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We used a global-scale dataset for the surface topsoil (>3000 distinct observations of abundance of soil fungi versus bacteria) to generate the first quantitative map of soil fungal proportion across terrestrial ecosystems. We reveal striking latitudinal trends. Fungi dominated in regions with low mean annual temperature (MAT) and net primary productivity (NPP) and bacteria dominated in regions with high MAT and NPP.
Stefano Manzoni, Simone Fatichi, Xue Feng, Gabriel G. Katul, Danielle Way, and Giulia Vico
Biogeosciences, 19, 4387–4414, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4387-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4387-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) causes leaves to close their stomata (through which water evaporates) but also promotes leaf growth. Even if individual leaves save water, how much will be consumed by a whole plant with possibly more leaves? Using different mathematical models, we show that plant stands that are not very dense and can grow more leaves will benefit from higher CO2 by photosynthesizing more while adjusting their stomata to consume similar amounts of water.
Angelica Feurdean, Roxana Grindean, Gabriela Florescu, Ioan Tanţău, Eva M. Niedermeyer, Andrei-Cosmin Diaconu, Simon M. Hutchinson, Anne Brigitte Nielsen, Tiberiu Sava, Andrei Panait, Mihaly Braun, and Thomas Hickler
Biogeosciences, 18, 1081–1103, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1081-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1081-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Here we used multi-proxy analyses from Lake Oltina (Romania) and quantitatively examine the past 6000 years of the forest steppe in the lower Danube Plain, one of the oldest areas of human occupation in southeastern Europe. We found the greatest tree cover between 6000 and 2500 cal yr BP. Forest loss was under way by 2500 yr BP, falling to ~20 % tree cover linked to clearance for agriculture. The weak signs of forest recovery over the past 2500 years highlight recurring anthropogenic pressure.
Cited articles
Arora, V. K., Katavouta, A., Williams, R. G., Jones, C. D., Brovkin, V., Friedlingstein, P., Schwinger, J., Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Cadule, P., Chamberlain, M. A., Christian, J. R., Delire, C., Fisher, R. A., Hajima, T., Ilyina, T., Joetzjer, E., Kawamiya, M., Koven, C. D., Krasting, J. P., Law, R. M., Lawrence, D. M., Lenton, A., Lindsay, K., Pongratz, J., Raddatz, T., Séférian, R., Tachiiri, K., Tjiputra, J. F., Wiltshire, A., Wu, T., and Ziehn, T.: Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 17, 4173–4222, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020, 2020.
Augusto, L., Meredieu, C., Bert, D., Trichet, P., Porté, A., Bosc, A., Lagane, F., Loustau, D., Pellerin, S., Danjon, F., Ranger, J., and Gelpe, J.: Improving models of forest nutrient export with equations that predict the nutrient concentration of tree compartments, Ann. For. Sci., 65, 808–808, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008059, 2008.
Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D., and Pitelka, L. F.: Allocating Resources to Reproduction and Defense: New assessments of the costs and benefits of allocation patterns in plants are relating ecological roles to resource use, BioScience, 37, 58–67, https://doi.org/10.2307/1310178, 1987.
Beer, C., Lucht, W., Gerten, D., Thonicke, K., and Schmullius, C.: Effects of soil freezing and thawing on vegetation carbon density in Siberia: A modeling analysis with the Lund-Potsdam-Jena Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (LPJ-DGVM), Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 21, GB1012, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gb002760, 2007.
Bosc, A., De Grandcourt, A., and Loustau, D.: Variability of stem and branch maintenance respiration in a Pinus pinaster tree, Tree Physiol., 23, 227–236, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.4.227, 2003.
Bruelheide, H., Dengler, J., Purschke, O., et al.: Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 1906–1917, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0699-8, 2018.
Brun, P., Zimmermann, N. E., Hari, C., Pellissier, L., and Karger, D. N.: Global climate-related predictors at kilometer resolution for the past and future, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5573–5603, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5573-2022, 2022.
Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R.: Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection, Sociol. Methods Res., 33, 261–304, https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644, 2004.
Butler, E. E., Datta, A., Flores-Moreno, H., Chen, M., Wythers, K. R., Fazayeli, F., Banerjee, A., Atkin, O. K., Kattge, J., Amiaud, B., Blonder, B., Boenisch, G., Bond-Lamberty, B., Brown, K. A., Byun, C., Campetella, G., Cerabolini, B. E. L., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Craine, J. M., Craven, D., de Vries, F. T., Diaz, S., Domingues, T. F., Forey, E., Gonzalez-Melo, A., Gross, N., Han, W., Hattingh, W. N., Hickler, T., Jansen, S., Kramer, K., Kraft, N. J. B., Kurokawa, H., Laughlin, D. C., Meir, P., Minden, V., Niinemets, U., Onoda, Y., Penuelas, J., Read, Q., Sack, L., Schamp, B., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Spasojevic, M. J., Sosinski, E., Thornton, P. E., Valladares, F., van Bodegom, P. M., Williams, M., Wirth, C., and Reich, P. B.: Mapping local and global variability in plant trait distributions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, E10937–E10946, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708984114, 2017.
Ceccon, C., Tagliavini, M., Schmitt, A. O., and Eissenstat, D. M.: Untangling the effects of root age and tissue nitrogen on root respiration in Populus tremuloides at different nitrogen supply, Tree Physiol., 36, 618–627, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw022, 2016.
Ceschia, E., Damesin, C., Lebaube, S., Pontailler, J.-Y., and Dufrene, E.: Spatial and seasonal variations in stem respiration of beech trees (Fagus sylvatica), Ann. For. Sci., 59, 801–812, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2002078, 2002.
Chapin, F. S.: Integrated Responses of Plants to Stress: A centralized system of physiological responses, BioScience, 41, 29–36, https://doi.org/10.2307/1311538, 1991.
Chapin, F. S., Schulze, E.-D., and Mooney, H. A.: The Ecology and Economics of Storage in Plants, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 21, 423–447, 1990.
Chapin, F. S., Autumn, K., and Pugnaire, F.: Evolution of Suites of Traits in Response to Environmental Stress, Am. Nat., 142, S78–S92, https://doi.org/10.1086/285524, 1993.
Damesin, C.: Respiration and photosynthesis characteristics of current-year stems of Fagus sylvatica: from the seasonal pattern to an annual balance, New Phytol., 158, 465–475, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00756.x, 2003.
Dong, N., Prentice, I. C., Wright, I. J., Wang, H., Atkin, O. K., Bloomfield, K. J., Domingues, T. F., Gleason, S. M., Maire, V., Onoda, Y., Poorter, H., and Smith, N. G.: Leaf nitrogen from the perspective of optimal plant function, J. Ecol., 110, 2585–2602, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13967, 2022.
Du, E., Terrer, C., Pellegrini, A. F. A., Ahlström, A., van Lissa, C. J., Zhao, X., Xia, N., Wu, X., and Jackson, R. B.: Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation, Nat. Geosci., 13, 221–226, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0530-4, 2020.
Fagerland, M. W.: t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies – a paradox of statistical practice?, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 78, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-78, 2012.
Falster, D. S., Duursma, R. A., Ishihara, M. I., et al.: BAAD: a biomass and allometry database for woody plants, Ecology, 96, 1445, https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1889.1, 2015.
Feng, Z., Brumme, R., Xu, Y. J., and Lamersdorf, N.: Tracing the fate of mineral N compounds under high ambient N deposition in a Norway spruce forest at Solling/Germany, Forest Ecol. Manag., 255, 2061–2073, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.049, 2008.
Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., et al.: Global Carbon Budget 2023, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, 2023.
Hanewinkel, M., Cullmann, D. A., Schelhaas, M.-J., Nabuurs, G.-J., and Zimmermann, N. E.: Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 203–207, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1687, 2013.
Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J.: Generalized additive models, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1990.
Haxeltine, A. and Prentice, I. C.: A General Model for the Light-Use Efficiency of Primary Production, Funct. Ecol., 10, 551–561, https://doi.org/10.2307/2390165, 1996.
Hendricks, J. J., Aber, J. D., Nadelhoffer, K. J., and Hallett, R. D.: Nitrogen Controls on Fine Root Substrate Quality in Temperate Forest Ecosystems, Ecosystems, 3, 57–69, https://doi.org/10.1007/s100210000010, 2000.
Herms, D. A. and Mattson, W. J.: The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend, The Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 283–335, 1992.
Hickler, T., Rammig, A., and Werner, C.: Modelling CO2 Impacts on Forest Productivity, Current Forestry Reports, 1, 69–80, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0014-8, 2015.
Hickler, T., Vohland, K., Feehan, J., Miller, P. A., Smith, B., Costa, L., Giesecke, T., Fronzek, S., Carter, T. R., Cramer, W., Kühn, I., and Sykes, M. T.: Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 21, 50-63, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x, 2012.
Iversen, C. M., McCormack, M. L., Powell, A. S., Blackwood, C. B., Freschet, G. T., Kattge, J., Roumet, C., Stover, D. B., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., van Bodegom, P. M., and Violle, C.: A global Fine-Root Ecology Database to address below-ground challenges in plant ecology, New Phytol., 215, 15–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14486, 2017.
Joswig, J. S., Wirth, C., Schuman, M. C., Kattge, J., Reu, B., Wright, I. J., Sippel, S. D., Rüger, N., Richter, R., Schaepman, M. E., van Bodegom, P. M., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Díaz, S., Hattingh, W. N., Kramer, K., Lens, F., Niinemets, Ü., Reich, P. B., Reichstein, M., Römermann, C., Schrodt, F., Anand, M., Bahn, M., Byun, C., Campetella, G., Cerabolini, B. E. L., Craine, J. M., Gonzalez-Melo, A., Gutiérrez, A. G., He, T., Higuchi, P., Jactel, H., Kraft, N. J. B., Minden, V., Onipchenko, V., Peñuelas, J., Pillar, V. D., Sosinski, Ê., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Weiher, E., and Mahecha, M. D.: Climatic and soil factors explain the two-dimensional spectrum of global plant trait variation, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 6, 36–50, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01616-8, 2022.
Kattge, J., Bönisch, G., Diaz, S., et al.: TRY plant trait database - enhanced coverage, open access, Glob. Chang. Biol., 26, 119–188, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14904, 2020.
Kou-Giesbrecht, S., Arora, V. K., Seiler, C., Arneth, A., Falk, S., Jain, A. K., Joos, F., Kennedy, D., Knauer, J., Sitch, S., O'Sullivan, M., Pan, N., Sun, Q., Tian, H., Vuichard, N., and Zaehle, S.: Evaluating nitrogen cycling in terrestrial biosphere models: a disconnect between the carbon and nitrogen cycles, Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 767–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, 2023.
Lambers, H. and Poorter, H.: Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences, Adv. Ecol. Res., 23, 187–261, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60148-8, 1992.
Larjavaara, M., Berninger, F., Palviainen, M., Prokushkin, A., and Wallenius, T.: Post-fire carbon and nitrogen accumulation and succession in Central Siberia, Sci. Rep., 7, 12776, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13039-2, 2017.
Laughlin, D. C., Fulé, P. Z., Huffman, D. W., Crouse, J., and Laliberté, E.: Climatic constraints on trait-based forest assembly, J. Ecol., 99, 1489–1499, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01885.x, 2011.
LeBauer, D. S. and Treseder, K. K.: Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed, Ecology, 89, 371–379, https://doi.org/10.1890/06-2057.1, 2008.
Liu, B., He, J., Zeng, F., Lei, J., and Arndt, S. K.: Life span and structure of ephemeral root modules of different functional groups from a desert system, New Phytol., 211, 103–112, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13880, 2016.
Loehle, C.: Tree life history strategies: the role of defenses, Can. J. Forest Res., 18, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.1139/x88-032, 1988.
Luo, Y., Su, B., Currie, W. S., Dukes, J. S., Finzi, A., Hartwig, U., Hungate, B., McMurtrie, R. E., Oren, R., Parton, W. J., Pataki, D. E., Shaw, R. M., Zak, D. R., and Field, C. B.: Progressive Nitrogen Limitation of Ecosystem Responses to Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, BioScience, 54, 731–739, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0731:Pnloer]2.0.Co;2, 2004.
Magill, A. H., Aber, J. D., Hendricks, J. J., Bowden, R. D., Melillo, J. M., and Steudler, P. A.: Biogeochemical Response of Forest Ecosystems to Simulated Chronic Nitrogen Deposition, Ecol. Appl., 7, 402–415, https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0402:BROFET]2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Manzoni, S., Čapek, P., Porada, P., Thurner, M., Winterdahl, M., Beer, C., Brüchert, V., Frouz, J., Herrmann, A. M., Lindahl, B. D., Lyon, S. W., Šantrůčková, H., Vico, G., and Way, D.: Reviews and syntheses: Carbon use efficiency from organisms to ecosystems – definitions, theories, and empirical evidence, Biogeosciences, 15, 5929–5949, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5929-2018, 2018.
Martin, A. R., Gezahegn, S., and Thomas, S. C.: Variation in carbon and nitrogen concentration among major woody tissue types in temperate trees, Can. J. Forest Res., 45, 744–757, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0024, 2015.
Maynard, D. S., Bialic-Murphy, L., Zohner, C. M., Averill, C., van den Hoogen, J., Ma, H., Mo, L., Smith, G. R., Acosta, A. T. R., Aubin, I., Berenguer, E., Boonman, C. C. F., Catford, J. A., Cerabolini, B. E. L., Dias, A. S., González-Melo, A., Hietz, P., Lusk, C. H., Mori, A. S., Niinemets, Ü., Pillar, V. D., Pinho, B. X., Rosell, J. A., Schurr, F. M., Sheremetev, S. N., da Silva, A. C., Sosinski, Ê., van Bodegom, P. M., Weiher, E., Bönisch, G., Kattge, J., and Crowther, T. W.: Global relationships in tree functional traits, Nat. Commun., 13, 3185, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30888-2, 2022.
Meerts, P.: Mineral nutrient concentrations in sapwood and heartwood: a literature review, Ann. For. Sci., 59, 713–722, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2002059, 2002.
Mei, L., Xiong, Y., Gu, J., Wang, Z., and Guo, D.: Whole-tree dynamics of non-structural carbohydrate and nitrogen pools across different seasons and in response to girdling in two temperate trees, Oecologia, 177, 333–344, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3186-1, 2015.
Meir, P., Kruijt, B., Broadmeadow, M., Barbosa, E., Kull, O., Carswell, F., Nobre, A., and Jarvis, P. G.: Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area, Plant Cell Environ., 25, 343–357, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00811.x, 2002.
Merrill, W. and Cowling, E. B.: Role of nitrogen in wood deterioration: amounts and distribution of nitrogen in tree stems, Can. J. Bot., 44, 1555–1580, https://doi.org/10.1139/b66-168, 1966.
Meyerholt, J. and Zaehle, S.: The role of stoichiometric flexibility in modelling forest ecosystem responses to nitrogen fertilization, New Phytol., 208, 1042–1055, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13547, 2015.
Moreno-Martínez, Á., Camps-Valls, G., Kattge, J., Robinson, N., Reichstein, M., van Bodegom, P., Kramer, K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Reich, P., Bahn, M., Niinemets, Ü., Peñuelas, J., Craine, J. M., Cerabolini, B. E. L., Minden, V., Laughlin, D. C., Sack, L., Allred, B., Baraloto, C., Byun, C., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., and Running, S. W.: A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data, Remote Sens. Environ., 218, 69–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.09.006, 2018.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – a discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, 1970.
Norby, R. J., Warren, J. M., Iversen, C. M., Medlyn, B. E., and McMurtrie, R. E.: CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 19368–19373, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006463107, 2010.
Oren, R., Werk, K. S., Schulze, E. D., Meyer, J., Schneider, B. U., and Schramel, P.: Performance of Two Picea abies (L.) Karst. Stands at Different Stages of Decline. VI. Nutrient Concentration, Oecologia, 77, 151–162, 1988.
Ostonen, I., Truu, M., Helmisaari, H. S., Lukac, M., Borken, W., Vanguelova, E., Godbold, D. L., Lohmus, K., Zang, U., Tedersoo, L., Preem, J. K., Rosenvald, K., Aosaar, J., Armolaitis, K., Frey, J., Kabral, N., Kukumagi, M., Leppalammi-Kujansuu, J., Lindroos, A. J., Merila, P., Napa, U., Nojd, P., Parts, K., Uri, V., Varik, M., and Truu, J.: Adaptive root foraging strategies along a boreal-temperate forest gradient, New Phytol., 215, 977–991, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14643, 2017.
Parton, W., Silver, W. L., Burke, I. C., Grassens, L., Harmon, M. E., Currie, W. S., King, J. Y., Adair, E. C., Brandt, L. A., Hart, S. C., and Fasth, B.: Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition, Science, 315, 361–364, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134853, 2007.
Ponette, Q., Ranger, J., Ottorini, J.-M., and Ulrich, E.: Aboveground biomass and nutrient content of five Douglas-fir stands in France, Forest Ecol. Manag., 142, 109–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00345-5, 2001.
Poorter, H., Remkes, C., and Lambers, H.: Carbon and Nitrogen Economy of 24 Wild Species Differing in Relative Growth Rate, Plant Physiol., 94, 621–627, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.621, 1990.
Pregitzer, K. S., Zak, D. R., Curtis, P. S., Kubiske, M. E., Teeri, J. A., and Vogel, C. S.: Atmospheric CO2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots, New Phytol., 129, 579–585, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03025.x, 1995.
Prokushkin, A., Hagedorn, F., Pokrovsky, O., Viers, J., Kirdyanov, A., Masyagina, O., Prokushkina, M., and McDowell, W.: Permafrost Regime Affects the Nutritional Status and Productivity of Larches in Central Siberia, Forests, 9, 314, https://doi.org/10.3390/f9060314, 2018.
Pruyn, M. L., Gartner, B. L., and Harmon, M. E.: Storage versus substrate limitation to bole respiratory potential in two coniferous tree species of contrasting sapwood width, J. Exp. Bot., 56, 2637–2649, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri257, 2005.
Ranger, J., Marques, R., Colin-Belgrand, M., Flammang, N., and Gelhaye, D.: The dynamics of biomass and nutrient accumulation in a Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) stand studied using a chronosequence approach, Forest Ecol. Manag., 72, 167–183, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)03469-D, 1995.
Reich, P. B.: The world-wide “fast-slow” plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto, J. Ecol., 102, 275–301, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12211, 2014.
Reich, P. B. and Oleksyn, J.: Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 11001–11006, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403588101, 2004.
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., and Ellsworth, D. S.: Leaf Life-Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems, Ecol. Monogr., 62, 365–392, https://doi.org/10.2307/2937116, 1992.
Reich, P. B., Tjoelker, M. G., Machado, J. L., and Oleksyn, J.: Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants, Nature, 439, 457–461, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04282, 2006b.
Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E., Lee, T., Ellsworth, D. S., West, J. B., Tilman, D., Knops, J. M., Naeem, S., and Trost, J.: Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2, Nature, 440, 922–925, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04486, 2006a.
Ryan, M. G.: Effects of Climate Change on Plant Respiration, Ecol. Appl., 1, 157–167, https://doi.org/10.2307/1941808, 1991.
Schepaschenko, D., Shvidenko, A., Usoltsev, V., Lakyda, P., Luo, Y., Vasylyshyn, R., Lakyda, I., Myklush, Y., See, L., McCallum, I., Fritz, S., Kraxner, F., and Obersteiner, M.: A dataset of forest biomass structure for Eurasia, Sci. Data, 4, 170070, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.70, 2017.
Schowalter, T. D. and Morrell, J. J.: Nutritional Quality of Douglas-Fir Wood: Effect of Vertical and Horizontal Position on Nutrient Levels, Wood and Fiber Science, 34, 158–164, 2002.
Schulze, E.-D., Kelliher, F. M., Körner, C., Lloyd, J., and Leuning, R.: Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: a global ecology scaling exercise, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 25, 629–662, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.003213, 1994.
Schulze, E. D., Schulze, W., Koch, H., Arneth, A., Bauer, G., Kelliher, F. M., Hollinger, D. Y., Vygodskaya, N. N., Kusnetsova, W. A., Sogatchev, A., Ziegler, W., Kobak, K. I., and Issajev, A.: Aboveground biomass and nitrogen nutrition in a chronosequence of pristine Dahurian Larix stands in eastern Siberia, Can. J. Forest Res., 25, 943–960, https://doi.org/10.1139/x95-103, 1995.
Schwede, D. B., Simpson, D., Tan, J., Fu, J. S., Dentener, F., Du, E., and deVries, W.: Spatial variation of modelled total, dry and wet nitrogen deposition to forests at global scale, Environ. Pollut., 243, 1287–1301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.084, 2018.
Shuman, J. K., Shugart, H. H., and O'Halloran, T. L.: Sensitivity of Siberian larch forests to climate change, Global Change Biol., 17, 2370–2384, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02417.x, 2011.
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., Thonicke, K., and Venevsky, S.: Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Global Change Biol., 9, 161–185, 2003.
Sprugel, D. G.: Density, Biomass, Productivity, and Nutrient-Cycling Changes During Stand Development in Wave-Regenerated Balsam Fir Forests, Ecol. Monogr., 54, 165–186, https://doi.org/10.2307/1942660, 1984.
Steppe, K., Niinemets, Ü., and Teskey, R. O.: Tree Size- and Age-Related Changes in Leaf Physiology and Their Influence on Carbon Gain, in: Size- and Age-Related Changes in Tree Structure and Function, Tree Physiol., 235–253, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1242-3_9, 2011.
Sun, Y., Wang, M., Mur, L. A. J., Shen, Q., and Guo, S.: Unravelling the Roles of Nitrogen Nutrition in Plant Disease Defences, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21, 572, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020572, 2020.
Tang, Z., Xu, W., Zhou, G., Bai, Y., Li, J., Tang, X., Chen, D., Liu, Q., Ma, W., Xiong, G., He, H., He, N., Guo, Y., Guo, Q., Zhu, J., Han, W., Hu, H., Fang, J., and Xie, Z.: Patterns of plant carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentration in relation to productivity in China's terrestrial ecosystems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 4033–4038, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700295114, 2018.
Tateno, R. and Takeda, H.: Nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency above and below ground along a topographic gradient of soil nitrogen availability, Oecologia, 163, 793–804, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1561-0, 2010.
Terrer, C., Jackson, R. B., Prentice, I. C., Keenan, T. F., Kaiser, C., Vicca, S., Fisher, J. B., Reich, P. B., Stocker, B. D., Hungate, B. A., Peñuelas, J., McCallum, I., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Cernusak, L. A., Talhelm, A. F., Van Sundert, K., Piao, S., Newton, P. C. D., Hovenden, M. J., Blumenthal, D. M., Liu, Y. Y., Müller, C., Winter, K., Field, C. B., Viechtbauer, W., Van Lissa, C. J., Hoosbeek, M. R., Watanabe, M., Koike, T., Leshyk, V. O., Polley, H. W., and Franklin, O.: Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2 fertilization of global plant biomass, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 684–689, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0545-2, 2019.
Thurner, M., Beer, C., Santoro, M., Carvalhais, N., Wutzler, T., Schepaschenko, D., Shvidenko, A., Kompter, E., Ahrens, B., Levick, S. R., and Schmullius, C.: Carbon stock and density of northern boreal and temperate forests, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 23, 297–310, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12125, 2014.
Thurner, M., Beer, C., Crowther, T., Falster, D., Manzoni, S., Prokushkin, A., Schulze, E. D., and Gillespie, T.: Sapwood biomass carbon in northern boreal and temperate forests, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 28, 640–660, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12883, 2019.
Thurner, M., Yu, K., Manzoni, S., Prokushkin, A., Thurner, M. A., Wang, Z., and Hickler, T.: Nitrogen concentrations in boreal and temperate tree tissues (1.0.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14742947, 2025.
Thurner, M. A., Caldararu, S., Engel, J., Rammig, A., and Zaehle, S.: Modelled forest ecosystem carbon–nitrogen dynamics with integrated mycorrhizal processes under elevated CO2, Biogeosciences, 21, 1391–1410, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1391-2024, 2024.
Ullmann-Zeunert, L., Stanton, M. A., Wielsch, N., Bartram, S., Hummert, C., Svatos, A., Baldwin, I. T., and Groten, K.: Quantification of growth-defense trade-offs in a common currency: nitrogen required for phenolamide biosynthesis is not derived from ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase turnover, Plant J., 75, 417–429, https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12210, 2013.
UNEP: World Atlas of Desertification. United Nations Environment Programme, edited by: Middleton, N. and Thomas D. S. G., Edward Arnold, London, 1992.
Vergutz, L., Manzoni, S., Porporato, A., Novais, R. F., and Jackson, R. B.: Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants, Ecol. Monogr., 82, 205–220, https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0416.1, 2012.
Vose, J. M. and Ryan, M. G.: Seasonal respiration of foliage, fine roots, and woody tissues in relation to growth, tissue N, and photosynthesis, Global Change Biol., 8, 182–193, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00464.x, 2002.
Wang, Z., Yu, K., Lv, S., Niklas, K. J., Mipam, T. D., Crowther, T. W., Umaña, M. N., Zhao, Q., Huang, H., Reich, P. B., and Niu, S.: The scaling of fine root nitrogen versus phosphorus in terrestrial plants: A global synthesis, Funct. Ecol., 33, 2081–2094, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13434, 2019.
Wang, Z., Lv, S., Song, H., Wang, M., Zhao, Q., Huang, H., and Niklas, K. J.: Plant type dominates fine-root
Wang, Z., Huang, H., Yao, B., Deng, J., Ma, Z., and Niklas, K. J.: Divergent scaling of fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus in different root diameters, orders and functional categories: A meta-analysis, Forest Ecol. Manag., 495, 119384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119384, 2021.
Withington, J. M., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., and Eissenstat, D. M.: Comparisons of Structure and Life Span in Roots and Leaves among Temperate Trees, Ecol. Monogr., 76, 381–397, 2006.
Wood, S. N.: Generalized additive models: an introduction with R, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006.
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., and Westoby, M.: Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats, Funct. Ecol., 15, 423–434, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00542.x, 2001.
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., Flexas, J., Garnier, E., Groom, P. K., Gulias, J., Hikosaka, K., Lamont, B. B., Lee, T., Lee, W., Lusk, C., Midgley, J. J., Navas, M.-L., Niinemets, Ü., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., Poorter, H., Poot, P., Prior, L., Pyankov, V. I., Roumet, C., Thomas, S. C., Tjoelker, M. G., Veneklaas, E. J., and Villar, R.: The worldwide leaf economics spectrum, Nature, 428, 821–827, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403, 2004.
Yin, X.: Variation in foliar nitrogen concentration by forest type and climatic gradients in North America, Can. J. Forest Res., 23, 1587–1602, https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-199, 1993.
Yoder, B. J., Ryan, M. G., Waring, R. H., Schoettle, A. W., and Kaufmann, M. R.: Evidence of Reduced Photosynthetic Rates in Old Trees, Forest Sci., 40, 513–527, https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/40.3.513, 1994.
Yuan, Z. Y., Chen, H. Y. H., and Reich, P. B.: Global-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus, Nat. Commun., 2, 344, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1346, 2011.
Short summary
Nitrogen concentrations in tree tissues (leaves, branches, stems, and roots) are related to photosynthesis, growth, and respiration and thus to vegetation carbon uptake. Our novel database allows us to identify the controls of tree tissue nitrogen concentrations in boreal and temperate forests, such as tree age/size, species, and climate. Changes therein will affect tissue nitrogen concentrations and thus also vegetation carbon uptake.
Nitrogen concentrations in tree tissues (leaves, branches, stems, and roots) are related to...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint