Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1601-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note
| 
28 Mar 2024
Technical note |
| 28 Mar 2024
| 28 Mar 2024
Technical note: A comparison of methods for estimating coccolith mass
Related authors
EGUsphere, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).
Biogeosciences, 18, 2827–2841, 2021
Cited articles
Aloisi, G.: Covariation of metabolic rates and cell size in coccolithophores, Biogeosciences, 12, 4665–4692, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4665-2015, 2015.
Bach, L. T., Bauke, C., Meier, K. J. S., Riebesell, U., and Schulz, K. G.: Influence of changing carbonate chemistry on morphology and weight of coccoliths formed by Emiliania huxleyi, Biogeosciences, 9, 3449–3463, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3449-2012, 2012.
Bach, L. T., Riebesell, U., Gutowska, M. A., Federwisch, L., and Schulz, K. G.: A unifying concept of coccolithophore sensitivity to changing carbonate chemistry embedded in an ecological framework, Prog. Oceanogr., 135, 125–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.04.012, 2015.
Beaufort, L.: Weight estimates of coccoliths using the optical properties (birefringence) of calcite, Micropaleontology, 51, 289–297, https://doi.org/10.2113/gsmicropal.51.4.289, 2005.
Beaufort, L. and Dollfus, D.: Automatic recognition of coccoliths by dynamical neural networks, Mar. Micropaleontol., 51, 57–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2003.09.003, 2004.
