Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1883-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1883-2017
Research article
 | 
06 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 06 Apr 2017

Potential sources of variability in mesocosm experiments on the response of phytoplankton to ocean acidification

Maria Moreno de Castro, Markus Schartau, and Kai Wirtz

Related authors

A diffusion-based kernel density estimator (diffKDE, version 1) with optimal bandwidth approximation for the analysis of data in geoscience and ecological research
Maria-Theresia Pelz, Markus Schartau, Christopher J. Somes, Vanessa Lampe, and Thomas Slawig
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6609–6634, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6609-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6609-2023, 2023
Short summary
Exploring the role of different data types and timescales in the quality of marine biogeochemical model calibration
Iris Kriest, Julia Getzlaff, Angela Landolfi, Volkmar Sauerland, Markus Schartau, and Andreas Oschlies
Biogeosciences, 20, 2645–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2645-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2645-2023, 2023
Short summary
Description of a global marine particulate organic carbon-13 isotope data set
Maria-Theresia Verwega, Christopher J. Somes, Markus Schartau, Robyn Elizabeth Tuerena, Anne Lorrain, Andreas Oschlies, and Thomas Slawig
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4861–4880, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4861-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4861-2021, 2021
Short summary
Optimality-based non-Redfield plankton–ecosystem model (OPEM v1.1) in UVic-ESCM 2.9 – Part 2: Sensitivity analysis and model calibration
Chia-Te Chien, Markus Pahlow, Markus Schartau, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4691–4712, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4691-2020, 2020
Short summary
Reanalysis of vertical mixing in mesocosm experiments: PeECE III and KOSMOS 2013
Sabine Mathesius, Julia Getzlaff, Heiner Dietze, Andreas Oschlies, and Markus Schartau
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1775–1787, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1775-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1775-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Aquatic
Killing the predator: impacts of highest-predator mortality on the global-ocean ecosystem structure
David Talmy, Eric Carr, Harshana Rajakaruna, Selina Våge, and Anne Willem Omta
Biogeosciences, 21, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hydrodynamic and biochemical impacts on the development of hypoxia in the Louisiana–Texas shelf – Part 1: roles of nutrient limitation and plankton community
Yanda Ou and Z. George Xue
Biogeosciences, 21, 2385–2424, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2385-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation of the coupled physical–biogeochemical ocean model NEMO–SCOBI for the North Sea–Baltic Sea system
Itzel Ruvalcaba Baroni, Elin Almroth-Rosell, Lars Axell, Sam T. Fredriksson, Jenny Hieronymus, Magnus Hieronymus, Sandra-Esther Brunnabend, Matthias Gröger, Ivan Kuznetsov, Filippa Fransner, Robinson Hordoir, Saeed Falahat, and Lars Arneborg
Biogeosciences, 21, 2087–2132, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2087-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2087-2024, 2024
Short summary
Investigating ecosystem connections in the shelf sea environment using complex networks
Ieuan Higgs, Jozef Skákala, Ross Bannister, Alberto Carrassi, and Stefano Ciavatta
Biogeosciences, 21, 731–746, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-731-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-731-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global impact of benthic denitrification on marine N2 fixation and primary production simulated by a variable-stoichiometry Earth system model
Na Li, Christopher J. Somes, Angela Landolfi, Chia-Te Chien, Markus Pahlow, and Andreas Oschlies
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-123,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-123, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adamson, M. and Morozov, A.: Defining and detecting structural sensitivity in biological models: developing a new framework, J. Math. Biol., 69, 1815–1848, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-014-0753-3, 2014.
Aksnes, D. L. and Egge, J. K.: A theoretical model for nutrient uptake in phytoplankton, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 70, 65–72, 1991.
Antia, N. J., MacAllistel, C. D., Parsons, T. R., Stephens, K., and Strickland, J. D. H.: Further measurements of primary production using a large-volume plastic sphere, Limnol. Oceanogr., 8, 166–173, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1963.8.2.0166, 1963.
Artioli, Y., Blackford, J. C., Nondal, G., Bellerby, R. G. J., Wakelin, S. L., Holt, J. T., Butenschön, M., and Allen, J. I.: Heterogeneity of impacts of high CO2 on the North Western European Shelf, Biogeosciences, 11, 601–612, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-601-2014, 2014.
Biddanda, B. and Benner, R.: Carbon, nitrogen, and carbohydrate fluxes during the production of particulate and dissolved organic matter by marine phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 506–518, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.3.0506, 1997.
Download
Short summary
Observations from different mesocosms exposed to the same treatment level typically show variability that hinders the detection of potential treatments effects. To unearth relevant sources of variability, we developed and performed a data-based model analysis that simulates uncertainty propagation. With this method we investigate the divergence in the outcomes due to the amplification of differences in experimentally unresolved ecological factors within replicates of the same treatment level.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint