Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1123-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1123-2018
Research article
 | 
23 Feb 2018
Research article |  | 23 Feb 2018

Modelling potential production of macroalgae farms in UK and Dutch coastal waters

Johan van der Molen, Piet Ruardij, Karen Mooney, Philip Kerrison, Nessa E. O'Connor, Emma Gorman, Klaas Timmermans, Serena Wright, Maeve Kelly, Adam D. Hughes, and Elisa Capuzzo

Related authors

Imminent reversal of the residual flow through the Marsdiep tidal inlet into the Dutch Wadden Sea based on multiyear ferry-borne acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) observations
Johan van der Molen, Sjoerd Groeskamp, and Leo R. M. Maas
Ocean Sci., 18, 1805–1816, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1805-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1805-2022, 2022
Short summary
Effects of large-scale floating (solar photovoltaic) platforms on hydrodynamics and primary production in a coastal sea from a water column model
Thodoris Karpouzoglou, Brigitte Vlaswinkel, and Johan van der Molen
Ocean Sci., 16, 195–208, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-195-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-195-2020, 2020
Short summary
Observing and modelling phytoplankton community structure in the North Sea
David A. Ford, Johan van der Molen, Kieran Hyder, John Bacon, Rosa Barciela, Veronique Creach, Robert McEwan, Piet Ruardij, and Rodney Forster
Biogeosciences, 14, 1419–1444, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1419-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1419-2017, 2017
Short summary
Potential environmental impact of tidal energy extraction in the Pentland Firth at large spatial scales: results of a biogeochemical model
Johan van der Molen, Piet Ruardij, and Naomi Greenwood
Biogeosciences, 13, 2593–2609, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2593-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2593-2016, 2016
Short summary
ERSEM 15.06: a generic model for marine biogeochemistry and the ecosystem dynamics of the lower trophic levels
Momme Butenschön, James Clark, John N. Aldridge, Julian Icarus Allen, Yuri Artioli, Jeremy Blackford, Jorn Bruggeman, Pierre Cazenave, Stefano Ciavatta, Susan Kay, Gennadi Lessin, Sonja van Leeuwen, Johan van der Molen, Lee de Mora, Luca Polimene, Sevrine Sailley, Nicholas Stephens, and Ricardo Torres
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1293–1339, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1293-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1293-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Aquatic
Killing the predator: impacts of highest-predator mortality on the global-ocean ecosystem structure
David Talmy, Eric Carr, Harshana Rajakaruna, Selina Våge, and Anne Willem Omta
Biogeosciences, 21, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hydrodynamic and biochemical impacts on the development of hypoxia in the Louisiana–Texas shelf – Part 1: roles of nutrient limitation and plankton community
Yanda Ou and Z. George Xue
Biogeosciences, 21, 2385–2424, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2385-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation of the coupled physical–biogeochemical ocean model NEMO–SCOBI for the North Sea–Baltic Sea system
Itzel Ruvalcaba Baroni, Elin Almroth-Rosell, Lars Axell, Sam T. Fredriksson, Jenny Hieronymus, Magnus Hieronymus, Sandra-Esther Brunnabend, Matthias Gröger, Ivan Kuznetsov, Filippa Fransner, Robinson Hordoir, Saeed Falahat, and Lars Arneborg
Biogeosciences, 21, 2087–2132, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2087-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2087-2024, 2024
Short summary
Investigating ecosystem connections in the shelf sea environment using complex networks
Ieuan Higgs, Jozef Skákala, Ross Bannister, Alberto Carrassi, and Stefano Ciavatta
Biogeosciences, 21, 731–746, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-731-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-731-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global impact of benthic denitrification on marine N2 fixation and primary production simulated by a variable-stoichiometry Earth system model
Na Li, Christopher J. Somes, Angela Landolfi, Chia-Te Chien, Markus Pahlow, and Andreas Oschlies
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-123,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-123, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aldridge, J., van der Molen, J., and Forster, R.: Wider ecological implications of macroalgae cultivation, The Crown Estate, Edinburgh, London, 95 pp., 2012.
Atkinson, M. J. and Smith, S. V.: C : N  P ratios of benthic marine plants, Limnol. Oceanogr., 28, 568–574, 1983.
Balmaseda, M. A., Mogensen, K., and Weaver, A.: Evaluation of the ECMWF Ocean Reanalysis ORAS4, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1132–1161, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2063, 2013.
Baretta, J. W., Ebenhöh, W., and Ruardij, P.: The European Regional Seas Ecosystem Model, a complex marine ecosystem model, Neth. J. Sea Res., 33, 233–246, 1995.
Baretta-Bekker, J. G., Baretta, J. W., and Ebenhöh, W.: Microbial dynamics in the marine ecosystem model ERSEM II with decoupled carbon assimilation and nutrient uptake, J. Sea Res., 38, 195–211, 1997.
Download
Short summary
Macroalgae farming may provide biofuel. Modelled macroalgae production is given for four sites in UK and Dutch waters. Macroalgae growth depended on nutrient concentrations and light levels. Macroalgae carbohydrate content, important for biofuel use, was lower for high nutrient concentrations. The hypothetical large-scale farm off the UK north Norfolk coast gave high, stable yields of macroalgae from year to year with substantial carbohydrate content.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint