Articles | Volume 19, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5125-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5125-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
10 Nov 2022
Research article |
| 10 Nov 2022
| 10 Nov 2022
Management-induced changes in soil organic carbon on global croplands
Kristine Karstens
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Department of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
Benjamin Leon Bodirsky
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
World Vegetable Center, P.O. Box 42, Shanhua, Tainan 74199, Taiwan
Jan Philipp Dietrich
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Marta Dondini
Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Jens Heinke
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Matthias Kuhnert
Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Christoph Müller
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Susanne Rolinski
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Pete Smith
Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Isabelle Weindl
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Hermann Lotze-Campen
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Department of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
Alexander Popp
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Related authors
Edna Johanna Molina Bacca, Miodrag Stevanović, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Jonathan Cornelis Doelman, Louise Parsons Chini, Jan Volkholz, Katja Frieler, Christopher Paul Oliver Reyer, George Hurtt, Florian Humpenöder, Kristine Karstens, Jens Heinke, Christoph Müller, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Elke Stehfest, and Alexander Popp
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 753–801, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-753-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-753-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Land-use change projections are vital for impact studies. This study compares updated land-use model projections, including CO2 fertilization among other upgrades, from the MAgPIE and IMAGE models under three scenarios, highlighting differences, uncertainty hotspots, and harmonization effects. Key findings include reduced bioenergy crop demand projections and differences in grassland area allocation and sizes, with socioeconomic–climate scenarios' largest effect on variance starting in 2030.
Heindriken Dahlmann, Lauren S. Andersen, Sibyll Schaphoff, Fabian Stenzel, Johanna Braun, Christoph Müller, and Dieter Gerten
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3817, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3817, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Green water stress can negatively affect agricultural production and is often alleviated through irrigation. In this global modelling study, we investigate where and to what extent the implementation of irrigation helps to decrease green water stress but in the same time leads to an increase in blue water scarcity. Our findings highlight the need to consider both water stresses together, along with their dynamic interactions for sustainable water management.
Lily-belle Sweet, Christoph Müller, Jonas Jägermeyr, and Jakob Zscheischler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3006, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3006, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a method to identify climate drivers of an impact, such as agricultural yield failure, from high-resolution weather data. The approach systematically generates, selects and combines predictors that generalise across different environments. Tested on crop model simulations, the identified drivers are used to create parsimonious models that achieve high predictive performance over long time horizons, offering a more interpretable alternative to black-box models.
Edna Johanna Molina Bacca, Miodrag Stevanović, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Jonathan Cornelis Doelman, Louise Parsons Chini, Jan Volkholz, Katja Frieler, Christopher Paul Oliver Reyer, George Hurtt, Florian Humpenöder, Kristine Karstens, Jens Heinke, Christoph Müller, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Elke Stehfest, and Alexander Popp
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 753–801, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-753-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-753-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Land-use change projections are vital for impact studies. This study compares updated land-use model projections, including CO2 fertilization among other upgrades, from the MAgPIE and IMAGE models under three scenarios, highlighting differences, uncertainty hotspots, and harmonization effects. Key findings include reduced bioenergy crop demand projections and differences in grassland area allocation and sizes, with socioeconomic–climate scenarios' largest effect on variance starting in 2030.
Marie Brunel, Stephen Wirth, Markus Drüke, Kirsten Thonicke, Henrique Barbosa, Jens Heinke, and Susanne Rolinski
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-922, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-922, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Farmers often use fire to clear dead pasture biomass, impacting vegetation and soil nutrients. This study integrates fire management into a DGVM to assess its effects, focusing on Brazil. The results show that combining grazing and fire management reduces vegetation carbon and soil nitrogen over time. The research highlights the need to include these practices in models to improve pasture management assessments and calls for better data on fire usage and its long-term effects.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Carla F. Berghoff, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Patricia Cadule, Katie Campbell, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Thomas Colligan, Jeanne Decayeux, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Carolina Duran Rojas, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Amanda R. Fay, Richard A. Feely, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Xin Lan, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Zhu Liu, Junjie Liu, Lei Ma, Shamil Maksyutov, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, Eric J. Morgan, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Craig Neill, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nützel, Lea Olivier, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Olivier Torres, Etienne Tourigny, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido van der Werf, Rik Wanninkhof, Xuhui Wang, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Zhen Yu, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Ning Zeng, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 965–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2024 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2024). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Elena Xoplaki, Florian Ellsäßer, Jens Grieger, Katrin M. Nissen, Joaquim G. Pinto, Markus Augenstein, Ting-Chen Chen, Hendrik Feldmann, Petra Friederichs, Daniel Gliksman, Laura Goulier, Karsten Haustein, Jens Heinke, Lisa Jach, Florian Knutzen, Stefan Kollet, Jürg Luterbacher, Niklas Luther, Susanna Mohr, Christoph Mudersbach, Christoph Müller, Efi Rousi, Felix Simon, Laura Suarez-Gutierrez, Svenja Szemkus, Sara M. Vallejo-Bernal, Odysseas Vlachopoulos, and Frederik Wolf
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 541–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-541-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-541-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Europe frequently experiences compound events, with major impacts. We investigate these events’ interactions, characteristics, and changes over time, focusing on socio-economic impacts in Germany and central Europe. Highlighting 2018’s extreme events, this study reveals impacts on water, agriculture, and forests and stresses the need for impact-focused definitions and better future risk quantification to support adaptation planning.
Peter M. Kopittke, Ram C. Dalal, Brigid A. McKenna, Pete Smith, Peng Wang, Zhe Weng, Frederik J. T. van der Bom, and Neal W. Menzies
SOIL, 10, 873–885, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-873-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-873-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Soil produces 98.8 % of the calories consumed by humans, but the contribution that the anthropogenic use of soil makes to global warming is not clear. We show that soil has contributed 15 % of the total global warming caused by well-mixed greenhouse gases. Thus, our finding that soil is a substantial contributor to global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions represents a "wicked problem" – how do we continue to increase food production from soil whilst also decreasing emissions?
Stephen Björn Wirth, Johanna Braun, Jens Heinke, Sebastian Ostberg, Susanne Rolinski, Sibyll Schaphoff, Fabian Stenzel, Werner von Bloh, Friedhelm Taube, and Christoph Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7889–7914, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7889-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7889-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new approach to modelling biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in the Lund–Potsdam–Jena managed Land dynamic global vegetation model. While in the original approach BNF depended on actual evapotranspiration, the new approach considers soil water content and temperature, vertical root distribution, the nitrogen (N) deficit and carbon (C) costs. The new approach improved simulated BNF compared to the scientific literature and the model ability to project future C and N cycle dynamics.
Felix Jäger, Jonas Schwaab, Yann Quilcaille, Michael Windisch, Jonathan Doelman, Stefan Frank, Mykola Gusti, Petr Havlik, Florian Humpenöder, Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Christoph Müller, Kanishka Balu Narayan, Ryan Sebastian Padrón, Alexander Popp, Detlef van Vuuren, Michael Wögerer, and Sonia Isabelle Seneviratne
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1055–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1055-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1055-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change mitigation strategies developed with socioeconomic models rely on the widespread (re)planting of trees to limit global warming below 2°. However, most of these models neglect climate-driven shifts in forest damage like fires. By assessing existing mitigation scenarios, we show the exposure of projected forestation areas to fire-promoting weather conditions. Our study highlights the problem of ignoring climate-driven shifts in forest damage and ways to address it.
Fabian Stenzel, Johanna Braun, Jannes Breier, Karlheinz Erb, Dieter Gerten, Jens Heinke, Sarah Matej, Sebastian Ostberg, Sibyll Schaphoff, and Wolfgang Lucht
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3235–3258, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3235-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3235-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We provide an R package to compute two biosphere integrity metrics that can be applied to simulations of vegetation growth from the dynamic global vegetation model LPJmL. The pressure metric BioCol indicates that we humans modify and extract > 20 % of the potential preindustrial natural biomass production. The ecosystems state metric EcoRisk shows a high risk of ecosystem destabilization in many regions as a result of climate change and land, water, and fertilizer use.
Stephen Björn Wirth, Arne Poyda, Friedhelm Taube, Britta Tietjen, Christoph Müller, Kirsten Thonicke, Anja Linstädter, Kai Behn, Sibyll Schaphoff, Werner von Bloh, and Susanne Rolinski
Biogeosciences, 21, 381–410, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-381-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-381-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), the role of functional diversity in forage supply and soil organic carbon storage of grasslands is not explicitly taken into account. We introduced functional diversity into the Lund Potsdam Jena managed Land (LPJmL) DGVM using CSR theory. The new model reproduced well-known trade-offs between plant traits and can be used to quantify the role of functional diversity in climate change mitigation using different functional diversity scenarios.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Weihang Liu, Tao Ye, Christoph Müller, Jonas Jägermeyr, James A. Franke, Haynes Stephens, and Shuo Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7203–7221, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7203-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7203-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a machine-learning-based crop model emulator with the inputs and outputs of multiple global gridded crop model ensemble simulations to capture the year-to-year variation of crop yield under future climate change. The emulator can reproduce the year-to-year variation of simulated yield given by the crop models under CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen perturbations. Developing this emulator can provide a tool to project future climate change impact in a simple way.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Bertrand Decharme, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Patricia Cadule, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Thi-Tuyet-Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Xinyu Dou, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Thomas Gasser, Josefine Ghattas, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Fortunat Joos, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Xin Lan, Nathalie Lefèvre, Hongmei Li, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Lei Ma, Greg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Gesa Meyer, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin M. O'Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Melf Paulsen, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Carter M. Powis, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Erik van Ooijen, Rik Wanninkhof, Michio Watanabe, Cathy Wimart-Rousseau, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2023 describes the methodology, main results, and data sets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2023). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Matthew J. McGrath, Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Philippe Peylin, Robbie M. Andrew, Bradley Matthews, Frank Dentener, Juraj Balkovič, Vladislav Bastrikov, Meike Becker, Gregoire Broquet, Philippe Ciais, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Giacomo Grassi, Ian Harris, Matthew Jones, Jürgen Knauer, Matthias Kuhnert, Guillaume Monteil, Saqr Munassar, Paul I. Palmer, Glen P. Peters, Chunjing Qiu, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Oksana Tarasova, Matteo Vizzarri, Karina Winkler, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Antoine Berchet, Peter Briggs, Patrick Brockmann, Frédéric Chevallier, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Stijn N. C. Dellaert, Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon, Sara Filipek, Pierre Friedlingstein, Richard Fuchs, Michael Gauss, Christoph Gerbig, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Richard A. Houghton, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Ronny Lauerwald, Bas Lerink, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Géraud Moulas, Marilena Muntean, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Aurélie Paquirissamy, Lucia Perugini, Wouter Peters, Roberto Pilli, Julia Pongratz, Pierre Regnier, Marko Scholze, Yusuf Serengil, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Rona L. Thompson, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, and Sophia Walther
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4295–4370, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate estimation of fluxes of carbon dioxide from the land surface is essential for understanding future impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the climate system. A wide variety of methods currently exist to estimate these sources and sinks. We are continuing work to develop annual comparisons of these diverse methods in order to clarify what they all actually calculate and to resolve apparent disagreement, in addition to highlighting opportunities for increased understanding.
Sebastian Ostberg, Christoph Müller, Jens Heinke, and Sibyll Schaphoff
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3375–3406, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3375-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3375-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new toolbox for generating input datasets for terrestrial ecosystem models from diverse and partially conflicting data sources. The toolbox documents the sources and processing of data and is designed to make inconsistencies between source datasets transparent so that users can make their own decisions on how to resolve these should they not be content with our default assumptions. As an example, we use the toolbox to create input datasets at two different spatial resolutions.
Jens Heinke, Susanne Rolinski, and Christoph Müller
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2455–2475, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2455-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2455-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a livestock module for the global vegetation model LPJmL5.0 to simulate the impact of grazing dairy cattle on carbon and nitrogen cycles in grasslands. A novelty of the approach is that it accounts for the effect of feed quality on feed uptake and feed utilization by animals. The portioning of dietary nitrogen into milk, feces, and urine shows very good agreement with estimates obtained from animal trials.
Efi Rousi, Andreas H. Fink, Lauren S. Andersen, Florian N. Becker, Goratz Beobide-Arsuaga, Marcus Breil, Giacomo Cozzi, Jens Heinke, Lisa Jach, Deborah Niermann, Dragan Petrovic, Andy Richling, Johannes Riebold, Stella Steidl, Laura Suarez-Gutierrez, Jordis S. Tradowsky, Dim Coumou, André Düsterhus, Florian Ellsäßer, Georgios Fragkoulidis, Daniel Gliksman, Dörthe Handorf, Karsten Haustein, Kai Kornhuber, Harald Kunstmann, Joaquim G. Pinto, Kirsten Warrach-Sagi, and Elena Xoplaki
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1699–1718, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1699-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1699-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive, multi-faceted analysis of the 2018 extreme summer in terms of heat and drought in central and northern Europe, with a particular focus on Germany. A combination of favorable large-scale conditions and locally dry soils were related with the intensity and persistence of the events. We also showed that such extremes have become more likely due to anthropogenic climate change and might occur almost every year under +2 °C of global warming.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Chunjing Qiu, Matthew J. McGrath, Philippe Peylin, Glen P. Peters, Philippe Ciais, Rona L. Thompson, Aki Tsuruta, Dominik Brunner, Matthias Kuhnert, Bradley Matthews, Paul I. Palmer, Oksana Tarasova, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, David Bastviken, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Wilfried Winiwarter, Giuseppe Etiope, Tuula Aalto, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Vladislav Bastrikov, Antoine Berchet, Patrick Brockmann, Giancarlo Ciotoli, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Frank Dentener, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Sander Houweling, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Massaer Kouyate, Adrian Leip, Antti Leppänen, Emanuele Lugato, Manon Maisonnier, Alistair J. Manning, Tiina Markkanen, Joe McNorton, Marilena Muntean, Gabriel D. Oreggioni, Prabir K. Patra, Lucia Perugini, Isabelle Pison, Maarit T. Raivonen, Marielle Saunois, Arjo J. Segers, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Hanqin Tian, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, Guido R. van der Werf, Chris Wilson, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1197–1268, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study updates the state-of-the-art scientific overview of CH4 and N2O emissions in the EU27 and UK in Petrescu et al. (2021a). Yearly updates are needed to improve the different respective approaches and to inform on the development of formal verification systems. It integrates the most recent emission inventories, process-based model and regional/global inversions, comparing them with UNFCCC national GHG inventories, in support to policy to facilitate real-time verification procedures.
Vera Porwollik, Susanne Rolinski, Jens Heinke, Werner von Bloh, Sibyll Schaphoff, and Christoph Müller
Biogeosciences, 19, 957–977, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-957-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-957-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The study assesses impacts of grass cover crop cultivation on cropland during main-crop off-season periods applying the global vegetation model LPJmL (V.5.0-tillage-cc). Compared to simulated bare-soil fallowing practices, cover crops led to increased soil carbon content and reduced nitrogen leaching rates on the majority of global cropland. Yield responses of main crops following cover crops vary with location, duration of altered management, crop type, water regime, and tillage practice.
Lavinia Baumstark, Nico Bauer, Falk Benke, Christoph Bertram, Stephen Bi, Chen Chris Gong, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Alois Dirnaichner, Anastasis Giannousakis, Jérôme Hilaire, David Klein, Johannes Koch, Marian Leimbach, Antoine Levesque, Silvia Madeddu, Aman Malik, Anne Merfort, Leon Merfort, Adrian Odenweller, Michaja Pehl, Robert C. Pietzcker, Franziska Piontek, Sebastian Rauner, Renato Rodrigues, Marianna Rottoli, Felix Schreyer, Anselm Schultes, Bjoern Soergel, Dominika Soergel, Jessica Strefler, Falko Ueckerdt, Elmar Kriegler, and Gunnar Luderer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6571–6603, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6571-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6571-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the new and open-source version 2.1 of the REgional Model of INvestments and Development (REMIND) with the aim of improving code documentation and transparency. REMIND is an integrated assessment model (IAM) of the energy-economic system. By answering questions like
Can the world keep global warming below 2 °C?and, if so,
Under what socio-economic conditions and applying what technological options?, it is the goal of REMIND to explore consistent transformation pathways.
Abhijeet Mishra, Florian Humpenöder, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Brent Sohngen, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Hermann Lotze-Campen, and Alexander Popp
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6467–6494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6467-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6467-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Timber plantations are an increasingly important source of roundwood production, next to harvest from natural forests. However, timber plantations are currently underrepresented in global land-use models. Here, we include timber production and plantations in the MAgPIE modeling framework. This allows one to capture the competition for land between agriculture and forestry. We show that increasing timber plantations in the coming decades partly compete with cropland for limited land resources.
Tobias Herzfeld, Jens Heinke, Susanne Rolinski, and Christoph Müller
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1037–1055, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1037-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1037-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Soil organic carbon sequestration on cropland has been proposed as a climate change mitigation strategy. We simulate different agricultural management practices under climate change scenarios using a global biophysical model. We find that at the global aggregated level, agricultural management practices are not capable of enhancing total carbon storage in the soil, yet for some climate regions, we find that there is potential to enhance the carbon content in cropland soils.
José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, Alex B. McBratney, and Pete Smith
SOIL Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-73, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-2021-73, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Soil organic carbon sequestration is considered an attractive technology to partially mitigate climate change. Here, we show how the SOC storage potential varies globally. The estimated additional SOC storage potential in the topsoil of global croplands (29–67 Pg C) equates to only 2 to 5 years of emissions offsetting and 32 % of agriculture's 92 Pg historical carbon debt. Since SOC is temperature-dependent, this potential is likely to reduce by 18 % by 2040 due to climate change.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Chunjing Qiu, Philippe Ciais, Rona L. Thompson, Philippe Peylin, Matthew J. McGrath, Efisio Solazzo, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Francesco N. Tubiello, Peter Bergamaschi, Dominik Brunner, Glen P. Peters, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, David Bastviken, Aki Tsuruta, Wilfried Winiwarter, Prabir K. Patra, Matthias Kuhnert, Gabriel D. Oreggioni, Monica Crippa, Marielle Saunois, Lucia Perugini, Tiina Markkanen, Tuula Aalto, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Hanqin Tian, Yuanzhi Yao, Chris Wilson, Giulia Conchedda, Dirk Günther, Adrian Leip, Pete Smith, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Antti Leppänen, Alistair J. Manning, Joe McNorton, Patrick Brockmann, and Albertus Johannes Dolman
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2307–2362, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study is topical and provides a state-of-the-art scientific overview of data availability from bottom-up and top-down CH4 and N2O emissions in the EU27 and UK. The data integrate recent emission inventories with process-based model data and regional/global inversions for the European domain, aiming at reconciling them with official country-level UNFCCC national GHG inventories in support to policy and to facilitate real-time verification procedures.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Matthew J. McGrath, Robbie M. Andrew, Philippe Peylin, Glen P. Peters, Philippe Ciais, Gregoire Broquet, Francesco N. Tubiello, Christoph Gerbig, Julia Pongratz, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Giacomo Grassi, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, Matthias Kuhnert, Juraj Balkovič, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Hugo A. C. Denier van der
Gon, Efisio Solazzo, Chunjing Qiu, Roberto Pilli, Igor B. Konovalov, Richard A. Houghton, Dirk Günther, Lucia Perugini, Monica Crippa, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Pete Smith, Saqr Munassar, Rona L. Thompson, Giulia Conchedda, Guillaume Monteil, Marko Scholze, Ute Karstens, Patrick Brockmann, and Albertus Johannes Dolman
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2363–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study is topical and provides a state-of-the-art scientific overview of data availability from bottom-up and top-down CO2 fossil emissions and CO2 land fluxes in the EU27+UK. The data integrate recent emission inventories with ecosystem data, land carbon models and regional/global inversions for the European domain, aiming at reconciling CO2 estimates with official country-level UNFCCC national GHG inventories in support to policy and facilitating real-time verification procedures.
Yvonne Jans, Werner von Bloh, Sibyll Schaphoff, and Christoph Müller
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2027–2044, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2027-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2027-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Growth of and irrigation water demand on cotton may be challenged by future climate change. To analyze the global cotton production and irrigation water consumption under spatially varying present and future climatic conditions, we use the global terrestrial biosphere model LPJmL. Our simulation results suggest that the beneficial effects of elevated [CO2] on cotton yields overcompensate yield losses from direct climate change impacts, i.e., without the beneficial effect of [CO2] fertilization.
Bruno Ringeval, Christoph Müller, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Nathaniel D. Mueller, Philippe Ciais, Christian Folberth, Wenfeng Liu, Philippe Debaeke, and Sylvain Pellerin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1639–1656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We assess how and why global gridded crop models (GGCMs) differ in their simulation of potential yield. We build a GCCM emulator based on generic formalism and fit its parameters against aboveground biomass and yield at harvest simulated by eight GGCMs. Despite huge differences between GGCMs, we show that the calibration of a few key parameters allows the emulator to reproduce the GGCM simulations. Our simple but mechanistic model could help to improve the global simulation of potential yield.
George C. Hurtt, Louise Chini, Ritvik Sahajpal, Steve Frolking, Benjamin L. Bodirsky, Katherine Calvin, Jonathan C. Doelman, Justin Fisk, Shinichiro Fujimori, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Tomoko Hasegawa, Peter Havlik, Andreas Heinimann, Florian Humpenöder, Johan Jungclaus, Jed O. Kaplan, Jennifer Kennedy, Tamás Krisztin, David Lawrence, Peter Lawrence, Lei Ma, Ole Mertz, Julia Pongratz, Alexander Popp, Benjamin Poulter, Keywan Riahi, Elena Shevliakova, Elke Stehfest, Peter Thornton, Francesco N. Tubiello, Detlef P. van Vuuren, and Xin Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5425–5464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To estimate the effects of human land use activities on the carbon–climate system, a new set of global gridded land use forcing datasets was developed to link historical land use data to eight future scenarios in a standard format required by climate models. This new generation of land use harmonization (LUH2) includes updated inputs, higher spatial resolution, more detailed land use transitions, and the addition of important agricultural management layers; it will be used for CMIP6 simulations.
James A. Franke, Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Alex C. Ruane, Jonas Jägermeyr, Abigail Snyder, Marie Dury, Pete D. Falloon, Christian Folberth, Louis François, Tobias Hank, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Ingrid Jacquemin, Curtis Jones, Michelle Li, Wenfeng Liu, Stefan Olin, Meridel Phillips, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Ashwan Reddy, Karina Williams, Ziwei Wang, Florian Zabel, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3995–4018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Improving our understanding of the impacts of climate change on crop yields will be critical for global food security in the next century. The models often used to study the how climate change may impact agriculture are complex and costly to run. In this work, we describe a set of global crop model emulators (simplified models) developed under the Agricultural Model Intercomparison Project. Crop model emulators make agricultural simulations more accessible to policy or decision makers.
Cited articles
Alcántara, V., Don, A., Well, R., and Nieder, R.: Deep Ploughing Increases
Agricultural Soil Organic Matter Stocks, Glob. Change Biol., 22,
2939–2956, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13289, 2016. a
Bastos, A., Hartung, K., Nützel, T. B., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Houghton, R. A., and Pongratz, J.: Comparison of uncertainties in land-use change fluxes from bookkeeping model parameterisation, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 745–762, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-745-2021, 2021. a, b
Batjes, N.: Total Carbon and Nitrogen in the Soils of the World, Eur.
J. Soil Sci., 47, 151–163,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x, 1996. a, b
Batjes, N. H.: Harmonized Soil Property Values for Broad-Scale Modelling
(WISE30sec) with Estimates of Global Soil Carbon Stocks, Geoderma, 269,
61–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.034, 2016. a, b, c
Betts, R. A., Golding, N., Gonzalez, P., Gornall, J., Kahana, R., Kay, G., Mitchell, L., and Wiltshire, A.: Climate and land use change impacts on global terrestrial ecosystems and river flows in the HadGEM2-ES Earth system model using the representative concentration pathways, Biogeosciences, 12, 1317–1338, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1317-2015, 2015. a
Bodirsky, B. L., Popp, A., Weindl, I., Dietrich, J. P., Rolinski, S., Scheiffele, L., Schmitz, C., and Lotze-Campen, H.: N2O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle – current state and future scenarios, Biogeosciences, 9, 4169–4197, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4169-2012, 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f
Bodirsky, B. L., Karstens, K., Baumstark, L., Weindl, I., Wang, X., Mishra, A., Wirth, S., Stevanovic, M., Steinmetz, N., Kreidenweis, U., Rodrigues, R., Popov, R., Humpenoeder, F., Giannousakis, A., Levesque, A., Klein, D., Araujo, E., Beier, F., Oeser, J., Pehl, M., Leip, D., Crawford, M., Molina Bacca, E., von Jeetze, P., Martinelli, E., Schreyer, F., Soergel, B., Führlich, P., and Dietrich, J. P.: mrcommons: MadRat commons Input Data Library (1.7.14), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7234094, 2022a. a, b, c, d
Bodirsky, B. L., Wirth, S., Karstens, K., Humpenoeder, F., Stevanovic, M., Mishra, A., Biewald, A., Weindl, I., Beier, F., Chen, D., Crawford, M., Molina Bacca, E., Kreidenweis, U., W. Yalew, A. W., Humpenoeder, F., von Jeetze, P., Wang, X., Dietrich, J. P., and Alves, M.: mrvalidation: madrat data preparation for validation purposes (2.36.8), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7234083, 2022b. a
Bondeau, A., Smith, P. C., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Cramer, W.,
Gerten, D., Lotze-Campen, H., Müller, C., Reichstein, M., and Smith,
B.: Modelling the Role of Agriculture for the 20th Century Global Terrestrial
Carbon Balance, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 679–706,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x, 2007. a
Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Fleischer, L. R., Lugato, E., Ballabio, C.,
Alewell, C., Meusburger, K., Modugno, S., Schütt, B., Ferro, V., Bagarello,
V., Oost, K. V., Montanarella, L., and Panagos, P.: An assessment of the
global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion, Nat.
Commun., 8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02142-7, 2017. a
Brenzinger, K., Drost, S. M., Korthals, G., and Bodelier, P. L. E.: Organic
Residue Amendments to Modulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions From
Agricultural Soils, Front. Microbiol., 9, 3035,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03035, 2018. a
Brovkin, V., van Bodegom, P. M., Kleinen, T., Wirth, C., Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., and Kattge, J.: Plant-driven variation in decomposition rates improves projections of global litter stock distribution, Biogeosciences, 9, 565–576, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-565-2012, 2012. a, b
Carre, F., Hiederer, R., Blujdea, V., and Koeble, R.: Background Guide for the
Calculation of Land Carbon Stocks in the Biofuels Sustainability Scheme :
Drawing on the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories., Reference reports, Publications Office of the European
Union, https://doi.org/10.2788/34463, 2010. a
Coleman, K., Jenkinson, D. S., Crocker, G. J., Grace, P. R., Klír, J.,
Körschens, M., Poulton, P. R., and Richter, D. D.: Simulating Trends in
Soil Organic Carbon in Long-Term Experiments Using RothC-26.3, Geoderma,
81, 29–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00079-7, 1997. a
Dangal, S. R. S., Schwalm, C., Cavigelli, M. A., Gollany, H. T., Jin, V. L.,
and Sanderman, J.: Improving Soil Carbon Estimates by Linking
Conceptual Pools Against Measurable Carbon Fractions in the
DAYCENT Model Version 4.5, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 14, e2021MS002622, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002622, 2022. a
Del Grosso, S., Parton, W., Mosier, A., Hartman, M., Brenner, J., Ojima, D.,
and Schimel, D.: Simulated Interaction of Carbon Dynamics and
Nitrogen Trace Gas Fluxes Using the DAYCENT Model, CRC Press, 303–332,
https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367801373, 2001. a
Dietrich, J. P., Baumstark, L., Wirth, S., Giannousakis, A., Rodrigues, R., Bodirsky, B. L., Kreidenweis, U., Klein, D., and Führlich, P.: madrat: May All Data be Reproducible and Transparent (MADRaT)* (1.17.11), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7234107, 2022. a, b
Doetterl, S., Berhe, A. A., Nadeu, E., Wang, Z., Sommer, M., and Fiener, P.:
Erosion, Deposition and Soil Carbon: A Review of Process-Level Controls,
Experimental Tools and Models to Address C Cycling in Dynamic Landscapes,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 154, 102–122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.12.005,
2016. a
Don, A., Schumacher, J., and Freibauer, A.: Impact of Tropical Land-Use Change
on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks – a Meta-Analysis, Glob. Change
Biol., 17, 1658–1670, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x, 2011. a
Elliott, J., Glotter, M., Ruane, A. C., Boote, K. J., Hatfield, J. L., Jones,
J. W., Rosenzweig, C., Smith, L. A., and Foster, I.: Characterizing
agricultural impacts of recent large-scale US droughts and changing
technology and management, Agr. Syst., 159, 275–281,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.07.012, 2018. a, b
FAO: AQUASTAT Core Database, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, https://www.fao.org/aquastat/en/databases/maindatabase/, last access: 14 January 2020. a
Forster, P., Huppmann, D., Kriegler, E., Mundaca, L., Smith, C., Rogelj, J.,
and Séférian, R.: Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5 ∘C in the Context
of Sustainable Development Supplementary Material, in: Global Warming of
1.5 ∘C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 ∘C
above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission
pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat
of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, edited by:
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J.,
Shukla, P. R., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W., Péan, C., Pidcock, R., Connors, S.,
Matthews, J. B. R., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis, M. I., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T., Tignor, M., and
Waterfield, T., https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15 (last access: 21 October 2022), 2018. a
Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., Le Quéré, C., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Arneth, A., Arora, V., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Benoit-Cattin, A., Bittig, H. C., Bopp, L., Bultan, S., Chandra, N., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Evans, W., Florentie, L., Forster, P. M., Gasser, T., Gehlen, M., Gilfillan, D., Gkritzalis, T., Gregor, L., Gruber, N., Harris, I., Hartung, K., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Joetzjer, E., Kadono, K., Kato, E., Kitidis, V., Korsbakken, J. I., Landschützer, P., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Liu, Z., Lombardozzi, D., Marland, G., Metzl, N., Munro, D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I., Niwa, Y., O'Brien, K., Ono, T., Palmer, P. I., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Resplandy, L., Robertson, E., Rödenbeck, C., Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Skjelvan, I., Smith, A. J. P., Sutton, A. J., Tanhua, T., Tans, P. P., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., van der Werf, G., Vuichard, N., Walker, A. P., Wanninkhof, R., Watson, A. J., Willis, D., Wiltshire, A. J., Yuan, W., Yue, X., and Zaehle, S.: Global Carbon Budget 2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3269–3340, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d
Fujisaki, K., Perrin, A.-S., Desjardins, T., Bernoux, M., Balbino, L. C., and
Brossard, M.: From Forest to Cropland and Pasture Systems: A Critical Review
of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Changes in Amazonia, Glob. Change Biol.,
21, 2773–2786, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12906, 2015. a
Gasser, T., Crepin, L., Quilcaille, Y., Houghton, R. A., Ciais, P., and Obersteiner, M.: Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land cover change and their uncertainty, Biogeosciences, 17, 4075–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4075-2020, 2020. a
Guo, L., Deng, M., Yang, S., Liu, W., Wang, X., Wang, J., and Liu, L.: The
coordination between leaf and fine root litter decomposition and the
difference in their controlling factors, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 30,
2286–2296, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13384, 2021. a, b
Hansis, E., Davis, S. J., and Pongratz, J.: Relevance of Methodological Choices
for Accounting of Land Use Change Carbon Fluxes, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 29, 1230–1246, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004997, 2015. a, b
Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P., and Lister, D.: Version 4 of the CRU
TS Monthly High-Resolution Gridded Multivariate Climate Dataset, Sci.
Data, 7, 109, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3, 2020. a, b
Hengl, T., de Jesus, J. M., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Gonzalez, M. R., Kilibarda,
M., Blagotic, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X.,
Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M. A., Vargas, R., MacMillan, R. A.,
Batjes, N. H., Leenaars, J. G. B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., and
Kempen, B.: SoilGrids250m: Global Gridded Soil Information Based on
Machine Learning, Plos One, 12, e0169748,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748, 2017. a, b, c, d, e
Herzfeld, T., Heinke, J., Rolinski, S., and Müller, C.: Soil organic carbon dynamics from agricultural management practices under climate change, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1037–1055, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1037-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d
Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Pongratz, J., van der Werf, G. R., DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., Le Quéré, C., and Ramankutty, N.: Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change, Biogeosciences, 9, 5125–5142, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5125-2012, 2012. a
Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., Bodirsky, B. L., Weindl, I., Biewald, A.,
Lotze-Campen, H., Dietrich, J. P., Klein, D., Kreidenweis, U., Müller,
C., Rolinski, S., and Stevanovic, M.: Large-Scale Bioenergy Production: How
to Resolve Sustainability Trade-Offs?, Environ. Res. Lett., 13,
024011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9e3b, 2018. a
Hurtt, G. C., Chini, L., Sahajpal, R., Frolking, S., Bodirsky, B. L., Calvin, K., Doelman, J. C., Fisk, J., Fujimori, S., Klein Goldewijk, K., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Heinimann, A., Humpenöder, F., Jungclaus, J., Kaplan, J. O., Kennedy, J., Krisztin, T., Lawrence, D., Lawrence, P., Ma, L., Mertz, O., Pongratz, J., Popp, A., Poulter, B., Riahi, K., Shevliakova, E., Stehfest, E., Thornton, P., Tubiello, F. N., van Vuuren, D. P., and Zhang, X.: Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5425–5464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d
Iizumi, T., Kim, W., and Nishimori, M.: Modeling the Global Sowing and
Harvesting Windows of Major Crops Around the Year 2000, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 99–112,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001477, 2019. a
IPCC: 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, edited by: Calvo Buendia, E., Tanabe, K., Kranjc, A., Baasansuren, J., Fukuda, M., Ngarize, S., Osako, A., Pyrozhenko, Y., Shermanau, P., and Federici, S., IPCC, Switzerland, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y
Ito, A., Hajima, T., Lawrence, D. M., Brovkin, V., Delire, C., Guenet, B.,
Jones, C. D., Malyshev, S., Materia, S., McDermid, S. P., Peano, D.,
Pongratz, J., Robertson, E., Shevliakova, E., Vuichard, N., Wårlind, D.,
Wiltshire, A., and Ziehn, T.: Soil carbon sequestration simulated in
CMIP6-LUMIP models: implications for climatic mitigation, Environ.
Res. Lett., 15, 124061, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc912, 2020. a, b
Jägermeyr, J., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Schaphoff, S., Kummu, M., and Lucht, W.: Water savings potentials of irrigation systems: global simulation of processes and linkages, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3073–3091, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3073-2015, 2015. a
Jain, N., Bhatia, A., and Pathak, H.: Emission of Air Pollutants from
Crop Residue Burning in India, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 14,
422–430, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.01.0031, 2014. a
Janzen, H. H.: The Soil Carbon Dilemma: Shall We Hoard It or Use It?, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 38, 419–424, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.10.008,
2006. a
Karstens, K.: Model output data of the paper: “Management induced changes of soil organic carbon on global croplands”, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6330102, 2022. a, b, c, d
Karstens, K. and Dietrich, J. P.: mrsoil: MadRat Soil Organic Carbon Budget Library (1.17.11), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6330155, 2022. a, b, c, d
Karstens, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Dietrich, J. P., Dondini, M., Heinke, J., Kuhnert, M., Müller, C., Rolinski, S., Smith, P., Weindl, I., Lotze-Campen, H., and Popp, A.: Manuscript and output processing of the paper: “Management-induced changes in soil organic carbon on global croplands”, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7234651, 2022. a
Keel, S. G., Leifeld, J., Mayer, J., Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., and Olesen, J. E.:
Large Uncertainty in Soil Carbon Modelling Related to Method of Calculation
of Plant Carbon Input in Agricultural Systems, Eur. J. Soil
Sci., 68, 953–963, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12454, 2017. a, b
Lal, R.: World Cropland Soils as a Source or Sink for Atmospheric Carbon, Adv. Agron.,
71, 145–191, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71014-0,
2001. a
Lindeskog, M., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Waha, K., Seaquist, J., Olin, S., and Smith, B.: Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem carbon cycling in Africa, Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 385–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-385-2013, 2013. a
Lorenz, K. and Lal, R.: Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Agroforestry
Systems. A Review, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 34, 443–454,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0212-y, 2014. a
Lutz, F., Herzfeld, T., Heinke, J., Rolinski, S., Schaphoff, S., von Bloh, W., Stoorvogel, J. J., and Müller, C.: Simulating the effect of tillage practices with the global ecosystem model LPJmL (version 5.0-tillage), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2419–2440, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2419-2019, 2019. a, b
Minasny, B., Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., Angers, D. A., Arrouays, D.,
Chambers, A., Chaplot, V., Chen, Z.-S., Cheng, K., Das, B. S., Field, D. J.,
Gimona, A., Hedley, C. B., Hong, S. Y., Mandal, B., Marchant, B. P., Martin,
M., McConkey, B. G., Mulder, V. L., O'Rourke, S., Richer-de-Forges, A. C.,
Odeh, I., Padarian, J., Paustian, K., Pan, G., Poggio, L., Savin, I.,
Stolbovoy, V., Stockmann, U., Sulaeman, Y., Tsui, C.-C., Vågen, T.-G.,
van Wesemael, B., and Winowiecki, L.: Soil Carbon 4 per Mille, Geoderma,
292, 59–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002, 2017. a, b, c
Minoli, S., Egli, D. B., Rolinski, S., and Müller, C.: Modelling Cropping
Periods of Grain Crops at the Global Scale, Global Planet. Change, 174,
35–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.12.013, 2019. a
Morais, T. G., Teixeira, R. F. M., and Domingos, T.: Detailed Global Modelling
of Soil Organic Carbon in Cropland, Grassland and Forest Soils, Plos One, 14,
e0222604, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222604, 2019. a
Ogle, S. M., Alsaker, C., Baldock, J., Bernoux, M., Breidt, F. J., McConkey,
B., Regina, K., and Vazquez-Amabile, G. G.: Climate and Soil
Characteristics Determine Where No-Till Management Can Store
Carbon in Soils and Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Sci.
Rep.-UK, 9, 11665, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47861-7, 2019. a
Parton, W., Schimel, D., Cole, C., and Ojima, D.: Analysis of Factors
Controlling Soil Organic-Matter Levels in Great-Plains
Grasslands, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 1173–1179,
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x, 1987. a
Pellegrini, P. and Fernández, R. J.: Crop Intensification, Land
Use, and on-Farm Energy-Use Efficiency during the Worldwide Spread of the
Green Revolution, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115,
2335–2340, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717072115, 2018. a
Poeplau, C. and Don, A.: Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils via
Cultivation of Cover Crops – A Meta-Analysis, Agr.
Ecosyst. Environ., 200, 33–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024,
2015. a
Pongratz, J., Reick, C. H., Houghton, R. A., and House, J. I.: Terminology as a key uncertainty in net land use and land cover change carbon flux estimates, Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 177–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-177-2014, 2014. a
Popp, A., Calvin, K., Fujimori, S., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., Stehfest,
E., Bodirsky, B. L., Dietrich, J. P., Doelmann, J. C., Gusti, M., Hasegawa,
T., Kyle, P., Obersteiner, M., Tabeau, A., Takahashi, K., Valin, H.,
Waldhoff, S., Weindl, I., Wise, M., Kriegler, E., Lotze-Campen, H., Fricko,
O., Riahi, K., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Land-Use Futures in the Shared
Socio-Economic Pathways, Glob. Environ. Change, 42, 331–345,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002, 2016. a, b
Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., and Döll, P.:
MIRCA2000 – Global Monthly Irrigated and Rainfed Crop Areas
around the Year 2000: A New High-Resolution Data Set for Agricultural and
Hydrological Modeling, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1011,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003435, 2010. a
Porwollik, V., Rolinski, S., Heinke, J., and Müller, C.: Generating a rule-based global gridded tillage dataset, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 823–843, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-823-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d
Porwollik, V., Rolinski, S., Heinke, J., von Bloh, W., Schaphoff, S., and Müller, C.: The role of cover crops for cropland soil carbon, nitrogen leaching, and agricultural yields – a global simulation study with LPJmL (V. 5.0-tillage-cc), Biogeosciences, 19, 957–977, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-957-2022, 2022. a
Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Jat, M. L., Gerard, B. G., Palm, C. A.,
Sanchez, P. A., and Cassman, K. G.: Limited Potential of No-till Agriculture
for Climate Change Mitigation, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 678–683,
https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2292, 2014. a
Prestele, R., Hirsch, A. L., Davin, E. L., Seneviratne, S. I., and Verburg,
P. H.: A Spatially Explicit Representation of Conservation Agriculture for
Application in Global Change Studies, Glob. Change Biol., 24, 4038–4053,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14307, 2018. a
Pugh, T. A. M., Arneth, A., Olin, S., Ahlström, A., Bayer, A. D.,
Goldewijk, K. K., Lindeskog, M., and Schurgers, G.: Simulated Carbon
Emissions from Land-Use Change Are Substantially Enhanced by Accounting for
Agricultural Management, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 124008,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124008, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Rahman, M. M., Tsukamoto, J., Rahman, M. M., Yoneyama, A., and Mostafa, K. M.:
Lignin and its effects on litter decomposition in forest ecosystems,
Chem. Ecol., 29, 540–553, https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2013.790380,
2013. a, b
Rammig, A., Heinke, J., Hofhansl, F., Verbeeck, H., Baker, T. R., Christoffersen, B., Ciais, P., De Deurwaerder, H., Fleischer, K., Galbraith, D., Guimberteau, M., Huth, A., Johnson, M., Krujit, B., Langerwisch, F., Meir, P., Papastefanou, P., Sampaio, G., Thonicke, K., von Randow, C., Zang, C., and Rödig, E.: A generic pixel-to-point comparison for simulated large-scale ecosystem properties and ground-based observations: an example from the Amazon region, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 5203–5215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-5203-2018, 2018. a, b
Ray, D. K., Ramankutty, N., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., and Foley, J. A.:
Recent Patterns of Crop Yield Growth and Stagnation, Nat. Commun.,
3, 1293, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2296, 2012. a
Robinson, T. P., Wint, G. R. W., Conchedda, G., Boeckel, T. P. V., Ercoli, V.,
Palamara, E., Cinardi, G., D'Aietti, L., Hay, S. I., and Gilbert, M.: Mapping
the Global Distribution of Livestock, Plos One, 9, e96084,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096084, 2014. a, b
Rogelj, J., Popp, A., Calvin, K. V., Luderer, G., Emmerling, J., Gernaat, D.,
Fujimori, S., Strefler, J., Hasegawa, T., Marangoni, G., Krey, V., Kriegler,
E., Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Doelman, J., Drouet, L., Edmonds, J.,
Fricko, O., Harmsen, M., Havlík, P., Humpenöder, F., Stehfest, E.,
and Tavoni, M.: Scenarios towards Limiting Global Mean Temperature Increase
below 1.5 ∘C, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 325–332,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3, 2018. a
Rudel, T. K., Schneider, L., Uriarte, M., Turner, B. L., DeFries, R., Lawrence,
D., Geoghegan, J., Hecht, S., Ickowitz, A., Lambin, E. F., Birkenholtz, T.,
Baptista, S., and Grau, R.: Agricultural Intensification and Changes in
Cultivated Areas, 1970–2005, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 106, 20675–20680, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812540106, 2009. a
Schaphoff, S., Forkel, M., Müller, C., Knauer, J., von Bloh, W., Gerten, D., Jägermeyr, J., Lucht, W., Rammig, A., Thonicke, K., and Waha, K.: LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 2: Model evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1377–1403, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1377-2018, 2018a. a, b, c, d
Schaphoff, S., von Bloh, W., Rammig, A., Thonicke, K., Biemans, H., Forkel, M., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Jägermeyr, J., Knauer, J., Langerwisch, F., Lucht, W., Müller, C., Rolinski, S., and Waha, K.: LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 1: Model description, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1343–1375, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1343-2018, 2018b. a, b, c, d, e
Smil, V.: Crop Residues: Agriculture's Largest Harvest: Crop
Residues Incorporate More than Half of the World's Agricultural Phytomass,
BioScience, 49, 299–308, https://doi.org/10.2307/1313613, 1999a. a
Smil, V.: Nitrogen in Crop Production: An Account of Global Flows, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 647–662, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900015,
1999b. a
Smith, J., Gottschalk, P., Bellarby, J., Chapman, S., Lilly, A., Towers, W.,
Bell, J., Coleman, K., Nayak, D., Richards, M., Hillier, J., Flynn, H.,
Wattenbach, M., Aitkenhead, M., Yeluripati, J., Farmer, J., Milne, R.,
Thomson, A., Evans, C., Whitmore, A., Falloon, P., and Smith, P.: Estimating
Changes in Scottish Soil Carbon Stocks Using ECOSSE. I. Model
Description and Uncertainties, Clim. Res., 45, 179–192,
https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00899, 2010. a
Smith, P.: Soil Carbon Sequestration and Biochar as Negative Emission
Technologies, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 1315–1324,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13178, 2016. a
Smith, P., Soussana, J.-F., Angers, D., Schipper, L., Chenu, C., Rasse, D. P.,
Batjes, N. H., van Egmond, F., McNeill, S., Kuhnert, M., Arias-Navarro,
C., Olesen, J. E., Chirinda, N., Fornara, D., Wollenberg, E.,
Alvaro-Fuentes, J., Sanz-Cobena, A., and Klumpp, K.: How to Measure,
Report and Verify Soil Carbon Change to Realize the Potential of Soil Carbon
Sequestration for Atmospheric Greenhouse Gas Removal, Glob. Change Biol.,
26, 219–241, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14815, 2020. a
Soergel, B., Kriegler, E., Weindl, I., Rauner, S., Dirnaichner, A., Ruhe, C., Hofmann, M., Bauer, N., Bertram, C., Bodirsky, B. L., Leimbach, M., Leininger, J., Levesque, A., Luderer, G., Pehl, M., Wingens, C., Baumstark, L., Beier, F., Dietrich, J. P., Humpenoeder, F., von Jeetze, P., Klein, D., Koch, J., Pietzcker, R., Strefler, J., Lotze-Campen, H., and Popp, A.: A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 656–664, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3, 2021. a
Strassmann, K. M., Joos, F., and Fischer, G.: Simulating Effects of Land Use
Changes on Carbon Fluxes: Past Contributions to Atmospheric CO2 Increases
and Future Commitments Due to Losses of Terrestrial Sink Capacity, Tellus B, 60, 583–603,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00340.x, 2008. a
Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., Christensen, B. T., Hutchings, N. J., Vejlin, J.,
Kätterer, T., Glendining, M., and Olesen, J. E.: C-TOOL: A Simple
Model for Simulating Whole-Profile Carbon Storage in Temperate Agricultural
Soils, Ecol. Model., 292, 11–25,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.016, 2014. a
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017, 2017. a
von Bloh, W., Schaphoff, S., Müller, C., Rolinski, S., Waha, K., and Zaehle, S.: Implementing the nitrogen cycle into the dynamic global vegetation, hydrology, and crop growth model LPJmL (version 5.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2789–2812, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2789-2018, 2018. a, b
Waha, K., Dietrich, J. P., Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., Thornton, P. K.,
Bondeau, A., and Herrero, M.: Multiple Cropping Systems of the World and the
Potential for Increasing Cropping Intensity, Global Environ. Change, 64,
102131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102131, 2020. a
Wang, Z., Hoffmann, T., Six, J., Kaplan, J., Govers, G., Doetterl, S., and
Oost, K.: Human-Induced Erosion Has Offset One-Third of Carbon Emissions from
Land Cover Change, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 345–349, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3263,
2017. a
Weindl, I., Popp, A., Bodirsky, B. L., Rolinski, S., Lotze-Campen, H.,
Biewald, A., Humpenöder, F., Dietrich, J. P., and Stevanović, M.:
Livestock and Human Use of Land: Productivity Trends and Dietary Choices
as Drivers of Future Land and Carbon Dynamics, Global Planet. Change,
159, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f
Williams, T. O., Fernández-Rivera, S., and Kelley, T. G.: The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors on the Availability and Utilization of Crop Residues as Animal Feeds, CAB International in association with the ICRISAT and ILRI, http://oar.icrisat.org/8754 (last access: 24 October 2022), 1997.
a
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J., and Joseph,
S.: Sustainable Biochar to Mitigate Global Climate Change, Nat.
Commun., 1, 56, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053, 2010. a
Zhang, B., Tian, H., Lu, C., Dangal, S. R. S., Yang, J., and Pan, S.: Global manure nitrogen production and application in cropland during 1860–2014: a 5 arcmin gridded global dataset for Earth system modeling, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 667–678, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-667-2017, 2017. a
Zhang, H., Lauerwald, R., Regnier, P., Ciais, P., Yuan, W., Naipal, V., Guenet,
B., Van Oost, K., and Camino-Serrano, M.: Simulating Erosion-Induced
Soil and Carbon Delivery From Uplands to Rivers in a Global
Land Surface Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12,
e2020MS002121, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002121, 2020. a
Short summary
Soil organic carbon (SOC) has been depleted by anthropogenic land cover change and agricultural management. While SOC models often simulate detailed biochemical processes, the management decisions are still little investigated at the global scale. We estimate that soils have lost around 26 GtC relative to a counterfactual natural state in 1975. Yet, since 1975, SOC has been increasing again by 4 GtC due to a higher productivity, recycling of crop residues and manure, and no-tillage practices.
Soil organic carbon (SOC) has been depleted by anthropogenic land cover change and agricultural...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint