Articles | Volume 19, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1853-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1853-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
01 Apr 2022
Research article |
| 01 Apr 2022
| 01 Apr 2022
Water uptake patterns of pea and barley responded to drought but not to cropping systems
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Valentin H. Klaus
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Raphaël Wittwer
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland
Yujie Liu
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Marcel G. A. van der Heijden
Department of Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
Anna K. Gilgen
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Nina Buchmann
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Related authors
Qing Sun and Édouard Davin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5196, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5196, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a process-based reconstruction of how peatlands and their carbon stocks changed over the past three centuries in Switzerland. Combining historical records with peatland modelling, we traced where peat carbon remains today. Most peat carbon is currently stored outside intact peatlands, showing the opportunities to reduce future carbon losses extend beyond the small fraction of remaining near-natural peatlands.
Xiaoying Shi, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Yaoping Wang, Joe R. Melton, Fortunat Joos, Yiqi Luo, Xiaofeng Xu, Dafeng Hui, Qianlai Zhuang, Chunjing Qiu, Hongxing He, Siya Shao, Xingjie Lu, Yongjiu Dai, Akihiko Ito, Qing Sun, Nitin Chaudhary, Ayesha Hussain, Mousong Wu, Jian Zhou, Jingwei Zhang, Ye Yuan, Rachael H. Turton, Eleanor J. Burke, Jiafu Mao, Yuefeng Hao, Natalie A. Griffiths, Verity Salmon, Paul J. Hanson, Melanie A. Mayes, and Peter E. Thornton
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5193, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5193, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Northern peatlands store vast amounts of carbon, but their response to climate change remains uncertain. We compared 15 ecosystem models with observations from a long-term warming and elevated carbon dioxide experiment in Minnesota. Models differed widely in their carbon responses, reflecting differences in ecosystem processes and model parameters. The results identify priorities for improving peatland models and projections of future carbon–climate feedbacks.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Kjetil Aas, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Nicolas Bellouin, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Carla F. Berghoff, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Nathan O. Collier, Thomas H. Colligan, Margot Cronin, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Matt P. Enright, Kazutaka Enyo, Michael Erb, Wiley Evans, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Filippa Fransner, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Jefferson Goncalves De Souza, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Bertrand Guenet, Özgür Gürses, Kirsty Harrington, Ian Harris, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Akihiko Ito, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Steve D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Yawen Kong, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Charles Koven, Taro Kunimitsu, Xin Lan, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhu Liu, Claire Lo Monaco, Lei Ma, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Joe R. Melton, Natalie Monacci, Erwan Monier, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Jens D. Müller, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Lorna R. Nayagam, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nutzel, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Naiqing Pan, Sudhanshu Pandey, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Pierre Regnier, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Ingunn Skjelvan, T. Luke Smallman, Victoria Spada, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Didier Swingedouw, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Xiangjun Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Erik van Ooijen, Guido R. van der Werf, Sebastiaan J. van de Velde, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 3211–3288, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3211-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3211-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2025 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2025). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Konstantin Gregor, Benjamin F. Meyer, Tillmann Gaida, Victor Justo Vasquez, Karina Bett-Williams, Matthew Forrest, João P. Darela-Filho, Sam Rabin, Marcos Longo, Joe R. Melton, Johan Nord, Peter Anthoni, Vladislav Bastrikov, Thomas Colligan, Christine Delire, Michael C. Dietze, George Hurtt, Akihiko Ito, Lasse T. Keetz, Jürgen Knauer, Johannes Köster, Tzu-Shun Lin, Lei Ma, Marie Minvielle, Stefan Olin, Sebastian Ostberg, Hao Shi, Reiner Schnur, Qing Sun, Peter E. Thornton, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2407–2436, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2407-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2407-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientific models are crucial for understanding Earth’s processes. However, they sometimes do not adhere to highest software quality standards, and scientific results are often hard to reproduce due to the complexity of the workflows. Here we gather the expertise of 20 modeling groups and software engineers to define best practices for making geoscientific models maintainable, usable, and reproducible. We conclude with an open-source example serving as a reference for modeling communities.
Rubaya Pervin, Scott Robeson, Mallory Barnes, Stephen Sitch, Anthony Walker, Ben Poulter, Fabienne Maignan, Qing Sun, Thomas Colligan, Sönke Zaehle, Kashif Mahmud, Peter Anthoni, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Vladislav Bastrikov, Liam Bogucki, Bertrand Decharme, Christine Delire, Stefanie Falk, Akihiko Ito, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Michael O’Sullivan, Wenping Yuan, and Natasha MacBean
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Drylands contribute more than a third of the global vegetation productivity. Yet, these regions are not well represented in global vegetation models. Here, we tested how well 15 global models capture annual changes in dryland vegetation productivity. Models that didn’t have vegetation change over time or fire have lower variability in vegetation productivity. Models need better representation of grass cover types and their coverage. Our work highlights where and how these models need to improve.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Carla F. Berghoff, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Patricia Cadule, Katie Campbell, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Thomas Colligan, Jeanne Decayeux, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Carolina Duran Rojas, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Amanda R. Fay, Richard A. Feely, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Xin Lan, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Zhu Liu, Junjie Liu, Lei Ma, Shamil Maksyutov, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, Eric J. Morgan, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Craig Neill, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nützel, Lea Olivier, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Olivier Torres, Etienne Tourigny, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido van der Werf, Rik Wanninkhof, Xuhui Wang, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Zhen Yu, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Ning Zeng, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 965–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2024 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2024). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Zhen Zhang, Benjamin Poulter, Joe R. Melton, William J. Riley, George H. Allen, David J. Beerling, Philippe Bousquet, Josep G. Canadell, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Philippe Ciais, Nicola Gedney, Peter O. Hopcroft, Akihiko Ito, Robert B. Jackson, Atul K. Jain, Katherine Jensen, Fortunat Joos, Thomas Kleinen, Sara H. Knox, Tingting Li, Xin Li, Xiangyu Liu, Kyle McDonald, Gavin McNicol, Paul A. Miller, Jurek Müller, Prabir K. Patra, Changhui Peng, Shushi Peng, Zhangcai Qin, Ryan M. Riggs, Marielle Saunois, Qing Sun, Hanqin Tian, Xiaoming Xu, Yuanzhi Yao, Yi Xi, Wenxin Zhang, Qing Zhu, Qiuan Zhu, and Qianlai Zhuang
Biogeosciences, 22, 305–321, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-305-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-305-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses global methane emissions from wetlands between 2000 and 2020 using multiple models. We found that wetland emissions increased by 6–7 Tg CH4 yr-1 in the 2010s compared to the 2000s. Rising temperatures primarily drove this increase, while changes in precipitation and CO2 levels also played roles. Our findings highlight the importance of wetlands in the global methane budget and the need for continuous monitoring to understand their impact on climate change.
Hanqin Tian, Naiqing Pan, Rona L. Thompson, Josep G. Canadell, Parvadha Suntharalingam, Pierre Regnier, Eric A. Davidson, Michael Prather, Philippe Ciais, Marilena Muntean, Shufen Pan, Wilfried Winiwarter, Sönke Zaehle, Feng Zhou, Robert B. Jackson, Hermann W. Bange, Sarah Berthet, Zihao Bian, Daniele Bianchi, Alexander F. Bouwman, Erik T. Buitenhuis, Geoffrey Dutton, Minpeng Hu, Akihiko Ito, Atul K. Jain, Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes, Fortunat Joos, Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Paul B. Krummel, Xin Lan, Angela Landolfi, Ronny Lauerwald, Ya Li, Chaoqun Lu, Taylor Maavara, Manfredi Manizza, Dylan B. Millet, Jens Mühle, Prabir K. Patra, Glen P. Peters, Xiaoyu Qin, Peter Raymond, Laure Resplandy, Judith A. Rosentreter, Hao Shi, Qing Sun, Daniele Tonina, Francesco N. Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Junjie Wang, Kelley C. Wells, Luke M. Western, Chris Wilson, Jia Yang, Yuanzhi Yao, Yongfa You, and Qing Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2543–2604, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas 273 times more potent than carbon dioxide, have increased by 25 % since the preindustrial period, with the highest observed growth rate in 2020 and 2021. This rapid growth rate has primarily been due to a 40 % increase in anthropogenic emissions since 1980. Observed atmospheric N2O concentrations in recent years have exceeded the worst-case climate scenario, underscoring the importance of reducing anthropogenic N2O emissions.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Bertrand Decharme, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Patricia Cadule, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Thi-Tuyet-Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Xinyu Dou, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Thomas Gasser, Josefine Ghattas, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Fortunat Joos, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Xin Lan, Nathalie Lefèvre, Hongmei Li, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Lei Ma, Greg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Gesa Meyer, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin M. O'Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Melf Paulsen, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Carter M. Powis, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Erik van Ooijen, Rik Wanninkhof, Michio Watanabe, Cathy Wimart-Rousseau, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2023 describes the methodology, main results, and data sets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2023). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek K. Arora, Christian Seiler, Almut Arneth, Stefanie Falk, Atul K. Jain, Fortunat Joos, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Stephen Sitch, Michael O'Sullivan, Naiqing Pan, Qing Sun, Hanqin Tian, Nicolas Vuichard, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 767–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrogen (N) is an essential limiting nutrient to terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration. We evaluate N cycling in an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models. We find that variability in N processes across models is large. Models tended to overestimate C storage per unit N in vegetation and soil, which could have consequences for projecting the future terrestrial C sink. However, N cycling measurements are highly uncertain, and more are necessary to guide the development of N cycling in models.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Luke Gregor, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Ramdane Alkama, Almut Arneth, Vivek K. Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Lucas Gloege, Giacomo Grassi, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Annika Jersild, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Keith Lindsay, Junjie Liu, Zhu Liu, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Matthew J. McGrath, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O'Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Naiqing Pan, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Carmen Rodriguez, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Jamie D. Shutler, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Xiangjun Tian, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Chris Whitehead, Anna Willstrand Wranne, Rebecca Wright, Wenping Yuan, Chao Yue, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4811–4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2022 describes the datasets and methodology used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, the land ecosystems, and the ocean. These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Qing Sun and Édouard Davin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5196, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5196, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a process-based reconstruction of how peatlands and their carbon stocks changed over the past three centuries in Switzerland. Combining historical records with peatland modelling, we traced where peat carbon remains today. Most peat carbon is currently stored outside intact peatlands, showing the opportunities to reduce future carbon losses extend beyond the small fraction of remaining near-natural peatlands.
Sarah Maxwell, Fabio Turco, Yi Wang, Lukas Hörtnagl, Nina Buchmann, and Flavian Tschurr
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5253, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5253, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
To understand what shapes crop growth under climate change, we analyzed 20 years of field data from a Swiss farm. We found that light, temperature, and nitrogen fertilizer strongly drive carbon fluxes in winter wheat, barley, and rapeseed. Interestingly, two decades of rising heat occurred post-harvest, allowing crops to escape adverse summer conditions. Ultimately, this shows that long-term observations integrating farm management with climate data are essential for evaluating crop resilience.
Xiaoying Shi, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Yaoping Wang, Joe R. Melton, Fortunat Joos, Yiqi Luo, Xiaofeng Xu, Dafeng Hui, Qianlai Zhuang, Chunjing Qiu, Hongxing He, Siya Shao, Xingjie Lu, Yongjiu Dai, Akihiko Ito, Qing Sun, Nitin Chaudhary, Ayesha Hussain, Mousong Wu, Jian Zhou, Jingwei Zhang, Ye Yuan, Rachael H. Turton, Eleanor J. Burke, Jiafu Mao, Yuefeng Hao, Natalie A. Griffiths, Verity Salmon, Paul J. Hanson, Melanie A. Mayes, and Peter E. Thornton
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5193, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5193, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Northern peatlands store vast amounts of carbon, but their response to climate change remains uncertain. We compared 15 ecosystem models with observations from a long-term warming and elevated carbon dioxide experiment in Minnesota. Models differed widely in their carbon responses, reflecting differences in ecosystem processes and model parameters. The results identify priorities for improving peatland models and projections of future carbon–climate feedbacks.
Jize Jiang, Lenny H. E. Winkel, Andrea Stenke, Magdalena Necpalova, Moritz Laub, Iris Feigenwinter, Nina Buchmann, and Johan Six
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4445, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4445, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how fertiliser management and a warming climate affect nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils in Switzerland over the past fourty years. Using computer simulations and nationwide data, we found that lower fertiliser use reduced emissions, but rising temperatures cancelled part of these mitigations. The results show a trade-off between mitigation actions and environmental-driven feedback, highlighting future efforts must also account for the effects of a changing climate.
Yelyzaveta Shpilkina, Martti Vasar, Sergio Asensio, Victoria Ochoa, Beatriz Gozalo, Kolja Enste, Martin Zobel, Francesco de Bello, Marcel van der Heijden, Fernando T. Maestre, and Lena Neuenkamp
Web Ecol., 26, 119–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/we-26-119-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/we-26-119-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Our greenhouse study shows arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi drive robust root growth, while grasses boost aboveground yield. Crucially, commercial treatments can reduce fungal diversity, whereas forbs thrive with more diverse fungal communities. This research is vital for sustainable agriculture, proving that simply adding fungi is not enough. We must understand these specific interactions to truly enhance soil biodiversity and ecosystem health.
Aolin Jia, Helge Aasen, Lukas Hörtnagl, Iris Feigenwinter, Sélène Ledain, Thomas Lauber, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Flavian Tschurr, Lorenz Allemann, Fabio Turco, and Nina Buchmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3522, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3522, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Farm management affects how fields exchange water and greenhouse gases with the air, but records of mowing, harvest, and bare soil periods are often incomplete. We used satellite observations and field measurements from Swiss grasslands and croplands to test whether these actions can be tracked from space. The satellite information improved daily estimates of water use and greenhouse gas exchange, especially carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane, supporting agricultural climate monitoring.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Kjetil Aas, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Nicolas Bellouin, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Carla F. Berghoff, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Nathan O. Collier, Thomas H. Colligan, Margot Cronin, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Matt P. Enright, Kazutaka Enyo, Michael Erb, Wiley Evans, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Filippa Fransner, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Jefferson Goncalves De Souza, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Bertrand Guenet, Özgür Gürses, Kirsty Harrington, Ian Harris, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Akihiko Ito, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Steve D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Yawen Kong, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Charles Koven, Taro Kunimitsu, Xin Lan, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhu Liu, Claire Lo Monaco, Lei Ma, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Joe R. Melton, Natalie Monacci, Erwan Monier, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Jens D. Müller, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Lorna R. Nayagam, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nutzel, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Naiqing Pan, Sudhanshu Pandey, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Pierre Regnier, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Ingunn Skjelvan, T. Luke Smallman, Victoria Spada, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Didier Swingedouw, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Xiangjun Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Erik van Ooijen, Guido R. van der Werf, Sebastiaan J. van de Velde, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 3211–3288, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3211-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3211-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2025 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2025). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Konstantin Gregor, Benjamin F. Meyer, Tillmann Gaida, Victor Justo Vasquez, Karina Bett-Williams, Matthew Forrest, João P. Darela-Filho, Sam Rabin, Marcos Longo, Joe R. Melton, Johan Nord, Peter Anthoni, Vladislav Bastrikov, Thomas Colligan, Christine Delire, Michael C. Dietze, George Hurtt, Akihiko Ito, Lasse T. Keetz, Jürgen Knauer, Johannes Köster, Tzu-Shun Lin, Lei Ma, Marie Minvielle, Stefan Olin, Sebastian Ostberg, Hao Shi, Reiner Schnur, Qing Sun, Peter E. Thornton, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2407–2436, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2407-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2407-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientific models are crucial for understanding Earth’s processes. However, they sometimes do not adhere to highest software quality standards, and scientific results are often hard to reproduce due to the complexity of the workflows. Here we gather the expertise of 20 modeling groups and software engineers to define best practices for making geoscientific models maintainable, usable, and reproducible. We conclude with an open-source example serving as a reference for modeling communities.
Yi Wang, Iris Feigenwinter, Lukas Hörtnagl, Anna K. Gilgen, and Nina Buchmann
Biogeosciences, 23, 1625–1652, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1625-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1625-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Analyzing 20 years (2005–2024) of CO2 flux, meteorological, and agricultural management data from an intensively managed grassland in Switzerland using machine learning, we identified drivers of ecosystem productivity (gross primary production (GPP)), respiration (ecosystem respiration (Reco)) and their changes over time. Moreover, we showed how agricultural management interacted and could partly offset negative impacts of extreme events on GPP. Our findings offer observational evidence to inform climate adaptation strategies in grasslands.
Fabio Turco, Iris Feigenwinter, Lorenz Allemann, Lukas Hörtnagl, Frank Liebisch, and Nina Buchmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-27, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-27, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrous oxide emissions over winter wheat peaked during crop establishment and in early spring when wet soil and high nitrogen levels met low plant uptake. Our study found that strong plant growth suppressed these emissions by uptaking excess nitrogen. Stable isotope analysis indicated denitrification as the dominant emission source. Our findings indicate that synchronizing fertilizer inputs with crop demand, promoting rapid early crop growth, and improving soil drainage can mitigate emissions.
Rubaya Pervin, Scott Robeson, Mallory Barnes, Stephen Sitch, Anthony Walker, Ben Poulter, Fabienne Maignan, Qing Sun, Thomas Colligan, Sönke Zaehle, Kashif Mahmud, Peter Anthoni, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Vladislav Bastrikov, Liam Bogucki, Bertrand Decharme, Christine Delire, Stefanie Falk, Akihiko Ito, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Michael O’Sullivan, Wenping Yuan, and Natasha MacBean
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Drylands contribute more than a third of the global vegetation productivity. Yet, these regions are not well represented in global vegetation models. Here, we tested how well 15 global models capture annual changes in dryland vegetation productivity. Models that didn’t have vegetation change over time or fire have lower variability in vegetation productivity. Models need better representation of grass cover types and their coverage. Our work highlights where and how these models need to improve.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Carla F. Berghoff, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Patricia Cadule, Katie Campbell, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Thomas Colligan, Jeanne Decayeux, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Carolina Duran Rojas, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Amanda R. Fay, Richard A. Feely, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Xin Lan, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Zhu Liu, Junjie Liu, Lei Ma, Shamil Maksyutov, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, Eric J. Morgan, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Craig Neill, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nützel, Lea Olivier, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Olivier Torres, Etienne Tourigny, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido van der Werf, Rik Wanninkhof, Xuhui Wang, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Zhen Yu, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Ning Zeng, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 965–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2024 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2024). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Mana Gharun, Ankit Shekhar, Lukas Hörtnagl, Luana Krebs, Nicola Arriga, Mirco Migliavacca, Marilyn Roland, Bert Gielen, Leonardo Montagnani, Enrico Tomelleri, Ladislav Šigut, Matthias Peichl, Peng Zhao, Marius Schmidt, Thomas Grünwald, Mika Korkiakoski, Annalea Lohila, and Nina Buchmann
Biogeosciences, 22, 1393–1411, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1393-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1393-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The effect of winter warming on forest CO2 fluxes has rarely been investigated. We tested the effect of the warm winter of 2020 on the forest CO2 fluxes across 14 sites in Europe and found that the net ecosystem productivity (NEP) across most sites declined during the warm winter due to increased respiration fluxes.
Zhen Zhang, Benjamin Poulter, Joe R. Melton, William J. Riley, George H. Allen, David J. Beerling, Philippe Bousquet, Josep G. Canadell, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Philippe Ciais, Nicola Gedney, Peter O. Hopcroft, Akihiko Ito, Robert B. Jackson, Atul K. Jain, Katherine Jensen, Fortunat Joos, Thomas Kleinen, Sara H. Knox, Tingting Li, Xin Li, Xiangyu Liu, Kyle McDonald, Gavin McNicol, Paul A. Miller, Jurek Müller, Prabir K. Patra, Changhui Peng, Shushi Peng, Zhangcai Qin, Ryan M. Riggs, Marielle Saunois, Qing Sun, Hanqin Tian, Xiaoming Xu, Yuanzhi Yao, Yi Xi, Wenxin Zhang, Qing Zhu, Qiuan Zhu, and Qianlai Zhuang
Biogeosciences, 22, 305–321, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-305-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-305-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses global methane emissions from wetlands between 2000 and 2020 using multiple models. We found that wetland emissions increased by 6–7 Tg CH4 yr-1 in the 2010s compared to the 2000s. Rising temperatures primarily drove this increase, while changes in precipitation and CO2 levels also played roles. Our findings highlight the importance of wetlands in the global methane budget and the need for continuous monitoring to understand their impact on climate change.
Mana Gharun, Ankit Shekhar, Jingfeng Xiao, Xing Li, and Nina Buchmann
Biogeosciences, 21, 5481–5494, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5481-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5481-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In 2022, Europe's forests faced unprecedented dry conditions. Our study aimed to understand how different forest types respond to extreme drought. Using meteorological data and satellite imagery, we compared 2022 with two previous extreme years, 2003 and 2018. Despite less severe drought in 2022, forests showed a 30 % greater decline in photosynthesis compared to 2018 and 60 % more than 2003. This suggests an alarming level of vulnerability of forests across Europe to more frequent droughts.
Jacob A. Nelson, Sophia Walther, Fabian Gans, Basil Kraft, Ulrich Weber, Kimberly Novick, Nina Buchmann, Mirco Migliavacca, Georg Wohlfahrt, Ladislav Šigut, Andreas Ibrom, Dario Papale, Mathias Göckede, Gregory Duveiller, Alexander Knohl, Lukas Hörtnagl, Russell L. Scott, Jiří Dušek, Weijie Zhang, Zayd Mahmoud Hamdi, Markus Reichstein, Sergio Aranda-Barranco, Jonas Ardö, Maarten Op de Beeck, Dave Billesbach, David Bowling, Rosvel Bracho, Christian Brümmer, Gustau Camps-Valls, Shiping Chen, Jamie Rose Cleverly, Ankur Desai, Gang Dong, Tarek S. El-Madany, Eugenie Susanne Euskirchen, Iris Feigenwinter, Marta Galvagno, Giacomo A. Gerosa, Bert Gielen, Ignacio Goded, Sarah Goslee, Christopher Michael Gough, Bernard Heinesch, Kazuhito Ichii, Marcin Antoni Jackowicz-Korczynski, Anne Klosterhalfen, Sara Knox, Hideki Kobayashi, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Mika Korkiakoski, Ivan Mammarella, Mana Gharun, Riccardo Marzuoli, Roser Matamala, Stefan Metzger, Leonardo Montagnani, Giacomo Nicolini, Thomas O'Halloran, Jean-Marc Ourcival, Matthias Peichl, Elise Pendall, Borja Ruiz Reverter, Marilyn Roland, Simone Sabbatini, Torsten Sachs, Marius Schmidt, Christopher R. Schwalm, Ankit Shekhar, Richard Silberstein, Maria Lucia Silveira, Donatella Spano, Torbern Tagesson, Gianluca Tramontana, Carlo Trotta, Fabio Turco, Timo Vesala, Caroline Vincke, Domenico Vitale, Enrique R. Vivoni, Yi Wang, William Woodgate, Enrico A. Yepez, Junhui Zhang, Donatella Zona, and Martin Jung
Biogeosciences, 21, 5079–5115, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The movement of water, carbon, and energy from the Earth's surface to the atmosphere, or flux, is an important process to understand because it impacts our lives. Here, we outline a method called FLUXCOM-X to estimate global water and CO2 fluxes based on direct measurements from sites around the world. We go on to demonstrate how these new estimates of net CO2 uptake/loss, gross CO2 uptake, total water evaporation, and transpiration from plants compare to previous and independent estimates.
Liliana Scapucci, Ankit Shekhar, Sergio Aranda-Barranco, Anastasiia Bolshakova, Lukas Hörtnagl, Mana Gharun, and Nina Buchmann
Biogeosciences, 21, 3571–3592, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3571-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3571-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Forests face increased exposure to “compound soil and atmospheric drought” (CSAD) events due to global warming. We examined the impacts and drivers of CO2 fluxes during CSAD events at multiple layers of a deciduous forest over 18 years. Results showed reduced net ecosystem productivity and forest-floor respiration during CSAD events, mainly driven by soil and atmospheric drought. This unpredictability in forest CO2 fluxes jeopardises reforestation projects aimed at mitigating CO2 emissions.
Hanqin Tian, Naiqing Pan, Rona L. Thompson, Josep G. Canadell, Parvadha Suntharalingam, Pierre Regnier, Eric A. Davidson, Michael Prather, Philippe Ciais, Marilena Muntean, Shufen Pan, Wilfried Winiwarter, Sönke Zaehle, Feng Zhou, Robert B. Jackson, Hermann W. Bange, Sarah Berthet, Zihao Bian, Daniele Bianchi, Alexander F. Bouwman, Erik T. Buitenhuis, Geoffrey Dutton, Minpeng Hu, Akihiko Ito, Atul K. Jain, Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes, Fortunat Joos, Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Paul B. Krummel, Xin Lan, Angela Landolfi, Ronny Lauerwald, Ya Li, Chaoqun Lu, Taylor Maavara, Manfredi Manizza, Dylan B. Millet, Jens Mühle, Prabir K. Patra, Glen P. Peters, Xiaoyu Qin, Peter Raymond, Laure Resplandy, Judith A. Rosentreter, Hao Shi, Qing Sun, Daniele Tonina, Francesco N. Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Junjie Wang, Kelley C. Wells, Luke M. Western, Chris Wilson, Jia Yang, Yuanzhi Yao, Yongfa You, and Qing Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2543–2604, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas 273 times more potent than carbon dioxide, have increased by 25 % since the preindustrial period, with the highest observed growth rate in 2020 and 2021. This rapid growth rate has primarily been due to a 40 % increase in anthropogenic emissions since 1980. Observed atmospheric N2O concentrations in recent years have exceeded the worst-case climate scenario, underscoring the importance of reducing anthropogenic N2O emissions.
Luana Krebs, Susanne Burri, Iris Feigenwinter, Mana Gharun, Philip Meier, and Nina Buchmann
Biogeosciences, 21, 2005–2028, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2005-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores year-round forest-floor greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes in a Swiss spruce forest. Soil temperature and snow depth affected forest-floor respiration, while CH4 uptake was linked to snow cover. Negligible N2O fluxes were observed. In 2022, a warm year, CO2 emissions notably increased. The study suggests rising forest-floor GHG emissions due to climate change, impacting carbon sink behavior. Thus, for future forest management, continuous year-round GHG flux measurements are crucial.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Bertrand Decharme, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Patricia Cadule, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Thi-Tuyet-Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Xinyu Dou, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Thomas Gasser, Josefine Ghattas, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Fortunat Joos, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Xin Lan, Nathalie Lefèvre, Hongmei Li, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Lei Ma, Greg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Gesa Meyer, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin M. O'Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Melf Paulsen, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Carter M. Powis, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Erik van Ooijen, Rik Wanninkhof, Michio Watanabe, Cathy Wimart-Rousseau, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2023 describes the methodology, main results, and data sets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2023). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek K. Arora, Christian Seiler, Almut Arneth, Stefanie Falk, Atul K. Jain, Fortunat Joos, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Stephen Sitch, Michael O'Sullivan, Naiqing Pan, Qing Sun, Hanqin Tian, Nicolas Vuichard, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 767–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrogen (N) is an essential limiting nutrient to terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration. We evaluate N cycling in an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models. We find that variability in N processes across models is large. Models tended to overestimate C storage per unit N in vegetation and soil, which could have consequences for projecting the future terrestrial C sink. However, N cycling measurements are highly uncertain, and more are necessary to guide the development of N cycling in models.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Luke Gregor, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Ramdane Alkama, Almut Arneth, Vivek K. Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Lucas Gloege, Giacomo Grassi, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Annika Jersild, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Keith Lindsay, Junjie Liu, Zhu Liu, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Matthew J. McGrath, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O'Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Naiqing Pan, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Carmen Rodriguez, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Jamie D. Shutler, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Xiangjun Tian, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Chris Whitehead, Anna Willstrand Wranne, Rebecca Wright, Wenping Yuan, Chao Yue, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4811–4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2022 describes the datasets and methodology used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, the land ecosystems, and the ocean. These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Andreas Riedl, Yafei Li, Jon Eugster, Nina Buchmann, and Werner Eugster
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 91–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-91-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-91-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of this study was to develop a high-accuracy micro-lysimeter system for the quantification of non-rainfall water inputs that overcomes existing drawbacks. The micro-lysimeter system had a high accuracy and allowed us to quantify and distinguish between different types of non-rainfall water inputs, like dew and fog. Non-rainfall water inputs occurred frequently in a Swiss Alpine grassland ecosystem. These water inputs can be an important water source for grasslands during dry periods.
Cited articles
Adams, M. A., Buchmann, N., Sprent, J., Buckley, T. N., and Turnbull, T. L.: Crops, nitrogen, water: Are legumes friend, foe, or misunderstood ally?, Trends Plant Sci., 23, 539–550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.009, 2018.
Araki, H. and Iijima, M.: Stable isotope analysis of water extraction from subsoil in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by drought and soil compaction, Plant Soil, 270, 147–157, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-1304-2, 2005.
Bachmann, D., Gockele, A., Ravenek, J. M., Roscher, C., Strecker, T., Weigelt, A., and Buchmann, N.: No evidence of complementary water use along a plant species richness gradient in temperate experimental grasslands, Plos One, 10, e0116367, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116367, 2015.
Barnard, R. L., de Bello, F., Gilgen, A. K., and Buchmann, N.: The δ18O of root crown water best reflects source water δ18O in different types of herbaceous species, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 20, 3799–3802, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2778, 2006.
Barry, K. E., van Ruijven, J., Mommer, L., Bai, Y. F., Beierkuhnlein, C., Buchmann, N., de Kroon, H., Ebeling, A., Eisenhauer, N., Guimaraes-Steinicke, C., Hildebrandt, A., Isbell, F., Milcu, A., Nesshover, C., Reich, P. B., Roscher, C., Sauheitl, L., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmid, B., Tilman, D., von Felten, S., and Weigelt, A.: Limited evidence for spatial resource partitioning across temperate grassland biodiversity experiments, Ecology, 101, e02905, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2905, 2020.
Benjamin, J. G. and Nielsen, D. C.: Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea, Field Crops Res., 97, 248–253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.10.005, 2006.
Berry, Z. C., Emery, N. C., Gotsch, S. G., and Goldsmith, G. R.: Foliar water uptake: Processes, pathways, and integration into plant water budgets, Plant Cell Environ., 42, 410–423, 2019.
Borrell, A. K., van Oosterom, E. J., Mullet, J. E., George-Jaeggli, B., Jordan, D. R., Klein, P. E., and Hammer, G. L.: Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns, New Phytol., 203, 817–830, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12869, 2014.
Bot, A. and Benites, J.: The importance of soil organic matter: Key to drought-resistant soil and sustained food production, Food & Agriculture Organization, ISBN 92-5-105366-9, ISSN 0253-2050, 2005.
Boyer, J. S. and Rao, I. M.: Magnesium and the acclimation of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials, Plant Physiol., 74, 161–166, 1984.
Caldwell, M. M., Dawson, T. E., and Richards, J. H.: Hydraulic lift: Consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants, Oecologia, 113, 151–161, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050363, 1998.
Canadell, J., Jackson, R. B., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., and Schulze, E. D.: Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale, Oecologia, 108, 583–595, https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00329030, 1996.
Carvalho, P., Azam-Ali, S., and Foulkes, M. J.: Quantifying relationships between rooting traits and water uptake under drought in Mediterranean barley and durum wheat, J. Integ. Plant Biol., 56, 455–469, 2014.
Choudhary, M., Ghasal, P. C., Kumar, S., Yadav, R., Singh, S., Meena, V. S., and Bisht, J. K.: Conservation agriculture and climate change: an overview, in: Conservation Agriculture, edited by: Bisht, J., Meena, V., Mishra, P., and Pattanayak, A., Springer, 1–37, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_1, 2016.
Cochard, H.: Xylem embolism and drought-induced stomatal closure in maize, Planta, 215, 466–471, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-002-0766-9, 2002.
Colombi, T., Walder, F., Büchi, L., Sommer, M., Liu, K., Six, J., van der Heijden, M. G. A., Charles, R., and Keller, T.: On-farm study reveals positive relationship between gas transport capacity and organic carbon content in arable soil, SOIL, 5, 91–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-91-2019, 2019.
Concha, C. and Doerner, P.: The impact of the rhizobia-legume symbiosis on host root system architecture, J. Exp. Bot., 71, 3902–3921, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa198, 2020.
Craig, H.: Isotopic variations in meteoric waters, Science, 133, 1702–1703, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3465.1702, 1961.
Craig, H. and Gordon, L. I.: Deuterium and oxygen 18 variation in the ocean and the marine atmosphere, in: Stable Isotopes in Oceanographic Studies and Paleotemperatures, edited by: Tongiorgi, E., Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Laboratorio di Geologia Nucleare, Pisa, Italy, 9–130, 1965.
Dansgaard, W.: Stable isotopes in precipitation, Tellus, 16, 436–468, 1964.
Dawson, T. E. and Ehleringer, J. R.: Streamside trees that do not use stream water, Nature, 350, 335–337, https://doi.org/10.1038/350335a0, 1991.
Dennert, F., Imperiali, N., Staub, C., Schneider, J., Laessle, T., Zhang, T., Wittwer, R., van der Heijden, M. G., Smits, T. H. M., Schlaeppi, K., Keel, C., and Maurhofer, M.: Conservation tillage and organic farming induce minor variations in Pseudomonas abundance, their antimicrobial function and soil disease resistance, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 94, fiy075, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3904, 2018.
Dietrich, D., Pang, L., Kobayashi, A., Fozard, J. A., Boudolf, V., Bhosale, R., Antoni, R., Nguyen, T., Hiratsuka, S., Fujii, N., Miyazawa, Y., Bae, T. W., Wells, D. M., Owen, M. R., Band, L. R., Dyson, R. J., Jensen, O. E., King, J. R., Tracy, S. R., Sturrock, C. J., Mooney, S. J., Roberts, J. A., Bhalerao, R. P., Dinneny, J. R., Rodriguez, P. L., Nagatani, A., Hosokawa, Y., Baskin, T. I., Pridmore, T. P., De Veylder, L., Takahashi, H., and Bennett, M. J.: Root hydrotropism is controlled via a cortex-specific growth mechanism, Nat. Plants, 3, 17057, https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.57, 2017.
Ding, Y. L., Nie, Y. P., Chen, H. S., Wang, K. L., and Querejeta, J. I.: Water uptake depth is coordinated with leaf water potential, water-use efficiency and drought vulnerability in karst vegetation, New Phytol., 229, 1339–1353, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16971, 2021.
Dixon, P. M.: Should blocks be fixed or random?, Statistics Conference Proceedings, Presentations and Posters, 6, https://doi.org/10.4148/2475-7772.1474, 2016.
Ehleringer, J. R. and Osmond, C. B.: Stable isotopes, in: Plant Physiological Ecology, edited by: Pearcy, R. W., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., and Rundel, P. W., Chapman & Hall, Heidelberg, Germany, 281–300, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2221-1_13, 1989.
FAO: The impact of disasters and crises on agriculture and food security, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, https://doi.org/10.4060/cb3673en, 2018.
FAO. Proactive approaches to drought preparedness – Where are we now and where do we go from here? Rome, http://www.fao.org/3/ca5794en/ca5794en.pdf (last access: 20 March 2022), 2019.
Gat, J. R.: The isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen, in: Isotope Hydrology: A Study of the Water Cycle, edited by: Kwang Wei, T., Environmental Science and Management, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 9–21, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.24.1.225, 2010.
Gehre, M., Geilmann, H., Richter, J., Werner, R. A., and Brand, W. A.: Continuous flow
Gilliland, T. J. and Johnston, J.: Barley pea mixtures as cover crops for grass re-seeds, Grass Forage Sci., 47, 1–7, 1992.
Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., and Paoletti, M. G.: Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional vs. organic agriculture, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 30, 95–124, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554355, 2011.
Gonfiantini, R., Gratziu, S., and Tongiorgi, E.: Oxygen isotopic composition of water in leaves, in: Isotopes and Radiation in Soil-Plant Nutrition Studies, edited by: IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 405–410, 1965.
Grossiord, C., Sevanto, S., Bonal, D., Borrego, I., Dawson, T. E., Ryan, M., Wang, W. Z., and McDowell, N. G.: Prolonged warming and drought modify belowground interactions for water among coexisting plants, Tree Physiol., 39, 55–63, https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpy080, 2019.
Guderle, M., Bachmann, D., Milcu, A., Gockele, A., Bechmann, M., Fischer, C., Roscher, C., Landais, D., Ravel, O., Devidal, S., Roy, J., Gessler, A., Buchmann, N., Weigelt, A., and Hildebrandt, A.: Dynamic niche partitioning in root water uptake facilitates efficient water use in more diverse grassland plant communities, Funct. Ecol., 32, 214–227, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12948, 2018.
Hobbs, P. R., Sayre, K., and Gupta, R.: The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 363, 543–555, 2008.
Hoekstra, N. J., Finn, J. A., Hofer, D., and Lüscher, A.: The effect of drought and interspecific interactions on depth of water uptake in deep- and shallow-rooting grassland species as determined by δ18O natural abundance, Biogeosciences, 11, 4493–4506, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4493-2014, 2014.
Hofer, D., Suter, M., Haughey, E., Finn, J. A., Hoekstra, N. J., Buchmann, N., and Luscher, A.: Yield of temperate forage grassland species is either largely resistant or resilient to experimental summer drought, J. Appl. Ecol., 53, 1023–1034, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12694, 2016.
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., and Westfall, P.: Simultaneous inference in general parametric models, Biometrical J., 50, 346–363, 2008.
IAEA/WMO: Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation, The GNIP Database, https://nucleus.iaea.org/wiser (last access: 10 January 2021), 2020.
IPCC: Climate change and land. An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, in press, 2019.
Kashiwagi, J., Krishnamurthy, L., Crouch, J. H., and Serraj, R.: Variability of root length density and its contributions to seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought stress, Field Crops Res., 95, 171–181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.02.012, 2006.
Kumar, J., Basu, P. S., Srivastava, E., Chaturvedi, S. K., Nadarajan, N., and Kumar, S.: Phenotyping of traits imparting drought tolerance in lentil, Crop Pasture Sci., 63, 547–554, 2012.
Kundel, D., Bodenhausen, N., Jorgensen, H. B., Truu, J., Birkhofer, K., Hedlund, K., Mader, P., and Fliessbach, A.: Effects of simulated drought on biological soil quality, microbial diversity and yields under long-term conventional and organic agriculture, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 96, fiaa205, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa205, 2020.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., and Christensen, R. H. B.: lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models, J. Stat. Softw., 82, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13, 2017.
Loaiza Puerta, V., Pereira, E. I. P., Wittwer, R., Heijden, M. V. D., and Six, J.: Improvement of soil structure through organic crop management, conservation tillage and grass-clover ley, Soil Till. Res., 180, 1–9, 2018.
Ma, Y. and Song, X. F.: Using stable isotopes to determine seasonal variations in water uptake of summer maize under different fertilization treatments, Sci. Total Environ., 550, 471–483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.148, 2016.
Ma, Y. and Song, X. F.: Seasonal variations in water uptake patterns of winter wheat under different irrigation and fertilization treatments, Water, 10, 1633, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111633, 2018.
Martin, R. J. and Jamieson, P. D.: Effect of timing and intensity of drought on the growth and yield of field peas (Pisum sativum L), New Zeal. J. Crop Hort., 24, 167–174, https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.1996.9513949, 1996.
MeteoSwiss: the Swiss Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, IDAWEB, https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/home.html?tab=overview, last access: 15 March 2020.
Nippert, J. B. and Knapp, A. K.: Linking water uptake with rooting patterns in grassland species, Oecologia, 153, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0745-8, 2007.
Ortiz-Bobea, A., Ault, T. R., Carrillo, C. M., Chambers, R. G., and Lobell, D. B.: Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 306–312, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1, 2021.
Parnell, A. C.: simmr: A stable isotope mixing model: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=simmr (last access: 1 March 2021), 2020.
Parnell, A. C., Phillips, D. L., Bearhop, S., Semmens, B. X., Ward, E. J., Moore, J. W., Jackson, A. L., Grey, J., Kelly, D. J., and Inger, R.: Bayesian stable isotope mixing models, Environmetrics, 24, 387–399, 2013.
Penna, D., Hopp, L., Scandellari, F., Allen, S. T., Benettin, P., Beyer, M., Geris, J., Klaus, J., Marshall, J. D., Schwendenmann, L., Volkmann, T. H. M., von Freyberg, J., Amin, A., Ceperley, N., Engel, M., Frentress, J., Giambastiani, Y., McDonnell, J. J., Zuecco, G., Llorens, P., Siegwolf, R. T. W., Dawson, T. E., and Kirchner, J. W.: Ideas and perspectives: Tracing terrestrial ecosystem water fluxes using hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes – challenges and opportunities from an interdisciplinary perspective, Biogeosciences, 15, 6399–6415, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-6399-2018, 2018.
Penna, D., Geris, J., Hopp, L., and Scandellari, F.: Water sources for root water uptake: Using stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen as a research tool in agricultural and agroforestry systems, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 291, 106790, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106790, 2020.
Prechsl, U. E., Gilgen, A. K., Kahmen, A., and Buchmann, N.: Reliability and quality of water isotope data collected with a lowbudget rain collector, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 28, 879–885, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6852, 2014.
Prechsl, U. E., Burri, S., Gilgen, A. K., Kahmen, A., and Buchmann, N.: No shift to a deeper water uptake depth in response to summer drought of two lowland and sub-alpine C3-grasslands in Switzerland, Oecologia, 177, 97–111, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3092-6, 2015.
Purushothaman, R., Krishnamurthy, L., Upadhyaya, H. D., Vadez, V., and Varshney, R. K.: Genotypic variation in soil water use and root distribution and their implications for drought tolerance in chickpea, Funct. Plant Biol., 44, 235–252, https://doi.org/10.1071/Fp16154, 2017.
Querejeta, J. I., Ren, W., and Prieto, I.: Vertical decoupling of soil nutrients and water under climate warming reduces plant cumulative nutrient uptake, water-use efficiency and productivity, New Phytol., 230, 1378–1393, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17258, 2021.
Rasmussen, C. R., Thorup-Kristensen, K., and Dresboll, D. B.: Uptake of subsoil water below 2 m fails to alleviate drought response in deep-rooted Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.), Plant Soil, 446, 275–290, 2020.
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 20 March 2022), 2020.
Rothfuss, Y. and Javaux, M.: Reviews and syntheses: Isotopic approaches to quantify root water uptake: a review and comparison of methods, Biogeosciences, 14, 2199–2224, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2199-2017, 2017.
Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., Clark, D. B., Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Fekete, B. M., Colon-Gonzalez, F. J., Gosling, S. N., Kim, H., Liu, X. C., Masaki, Y., Portmann, F. T., Satoh, Y., Stacke, T., Tang, Q. H., Wada, Y., Wisser, D., Albrecht, T., Frieler, K., Piontek, F., Warszawski, L., and Kabat, P.: Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3245–3250, 2014.
Schluter, S., Grossmann, C., Diel, J., Wu, G. M., Tischer, S., Deubel, A., and Rucknagel, J.: Long-term effects of conventional and reduced tillage on soil structure, soil ecological and soil hydraulic properties, Geoderma, 332, 10–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.001, 2018.
Seitz, S., Goebes, P., Puerta, V. L., Pereira, E. I. P., Wittwer, R., Six, J., van der Heijden, M. G. A., and Scholten, T.: Conservation tillage and organic farming reduce soil erosion, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 39, 4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0545-z, 2019.
Silvertown, J., Araya, Y., and Gowing, D.: Hydrological niches in terrestrial plant communities: A review, J. Ecol., 103, 93–108, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12332, 2015.
Kanton Zürich: Soil map of the agricultural areas: http://maps.zh.ch/?topic=BoKaZH, last access: 25 November 2020.
Sprenger, M., Leistert, H., Gimbel, K., and Weiler, M.: Illuminating hydrological processes at the soil-vegetation-atmosphere interface with water stable isotopes, Rev. Geophys., 54, 674–704, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000515, 2016.
Sun, Q: Water uptake patterns of pea and barley responded to drought but not to cropping systems, ETH Zurich Research Collection [data set], https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000533193, 2022.
Sun, Q., Gilgen, A. K., Signarbieux, C., Klaus, V. H., and Buchmann, N.: Cropping systems alter hydraulic traits of barley but not pea grown in mixture, Plant Cell Environ., 44, 2912–2924, https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14054, 2021.
Swiss Federal Council: Verordnung über die Direktzahlungen an die Landwirtschaft (Direktzahlungsverordnung, DZV) vom 23. Oktober 2013 (Stand am 1 Januar 2021) [Swiss council regulation no. 910.13: Ordinance on Direct Payments of 23 October 2013 (as of 1 January 2021)], https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2013/765/de, last access: 19 February 2021.
Teasdale, J. R., Coffman, C. B., and Mangum, R. W.: Potential long-term benefits of no-tillage and organic cropping systems for grain production and soil improvement, Agron. J., 99, 1297–1305, 2007.
Thorup-Kristensen, K., Halberg, N., Nicolaisen, M., Olesen, J. E., Crews, T. E., Hinsinger, P., Kirkegaard, J., Pierret, A., and Dresboll, D. B.: Digging deeper for agricultural resources, the value of deep rooting, Trends Plant Sci., 25, 406–417, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.007, 2020.
von Freyberg, J., Allen, S. T., Grossiord, C., Dawson, T. E., and Royles, J.: Plant and root-zone water isotopes are difficult to measure, explain, and predict: Some practical recommendations for determining plant water sources, Methods Ecol. Evol., 11, 1352–1367, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13461, 2020.
Wahdan, S. F. M., Reitz, T., Heintz-Buschart, A., Schadler, M., Roscher, C., Breitkreuz, C., Schnabel, B., Purahong, W., and Buscot, F.: Organic agricultural practice enhances arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in correspondence to soil warming and altered precipitation patterns, Environ. Microbiol., 23, 6163–6176, 2021.
Wang, L. X., Caylor, K. K., Villegas, J. C., Barron-Gafford, G. A., Breshears, D. D., and Huxman, T. E.: Partitioning evapotranspiration across gradients of woody plant cover: Assessment of a stable isotope technique, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L09401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl043228, 2010.
Wang, L. X., Manzoni, S., Ravi, S., Riveros-Iregui, D., and Caylor, K.: Dynamic interactions of ecohydrological and biogeochemical processes in water-limited systems, Ecosphere, 6, 133, https://doi.org/10.1890/Es15-00122.1, 2015.
Werner, R. A., Bruch, B. A., and Brand, W. A.: ConFlo III – An interface for high precision δ13C and δ15N analysis with an extended dynamic range, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 13, 1237–1241, 1999.
Whitmore, A. P. and Whalley, W. R.: Physical effects of soil drying on roots and crop growth, J. Exp. Bot., 60, 2845–2857, 2009.
Wittwer, R. A., Dorn, B., Jossi, W., and van der Heijden, M. G. A.: Cover crops support ecological intensification of arable cropping systems, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 41911, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41911, 2017.
Wu, H. W., Li, X. Y., Li, J., Jiang, Z. Y., Chen, H. Y., Ma, Y. J., and Huang, Y. M.: Differential soil moisture pulse uptake by coexisting plants in an alpine Achnatherum splendens grassland community, Environ. Earth Sci., 75, 914, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5694-2, 2016.
Wu, H. W., Li, J., Zhang, C. C., He, B., Zhang, H. X., Wu, X. C., and Li, X. Y.: Determining root water uptake of two alpine crops in a rainfed cropland in the Qinghai Lake watershed: first assessment using stable isotopes analysis, Field Crops Res., 215, 113–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.011, 2018.
Zegada-Lizarazu, W. and Iijima, M.: Hydrogen stable isotope analysis of water acquisition ability of deep roots and hydraulic lift in sixteen food crop species, Plant Prod. Sci., 7, 427–434, 2004.
Zegada-Lizarazu, W., Kanyomeka, L., Izumi, Y., and Iijima, M.: Pearl millet developed deep roots and changed water sources by competition with intercropped cowpea in the semiarid environment of northern Namibia, Plant Prod. Sci., 9, 355–363, 2006.
Zimmermann, U., Ehhalt, D., and Münnich, K. O.: Soil-water movement and evapotranspiration: Changes in the isotopic composition of the water, Isotopes in hydrology, Proceedings of a symposium, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 38061083, International Nuclear, Vol. 38, 1967.
Short summary
Drought is one of the biggest challenges for future food production globally. During a simulated drought, pea and barley mainly relied on water from shallow soil depths, independent of different cropping systems.
Drought is one of the biggest challenges for future food production globally. During a simulated...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint