Articles | Volume 21, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3373-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3373-2024
Research article
 | 
24 Jul 2024
Research article |  | 24 Jul 2024

The biological and preformed carbon pumps in perpetually slower and warmer oceans

Benoît Pasquier, Mark Holzer, and Matthew A. Chamberlain

Related authors

Optimal parameters for the ocean's nutrient, carbon, and oxygen cycles compensate for circulation biases but replumb the biological pump
Benoît Pasquier, Mark Holzer, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Richard J. Matear, Nathaniel L. Bindoff, and François W. Primeau
Biogeosciences, 20, 2985–3009, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2985-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2985-2023, 2023
Short summary
GNOM v1.0: an optimized steady-state model of the modern marine neodymium cycle
Benoît Pasquier, Sophia K. V. Hines, Hengdi Liang, Yingzhe Wu, Steven L. Goldstein, and Seth G. John
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4625–4656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4625-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4625-2022, 2022
Short summary
The number of past and future regenerations of iron in the ocean
and its intrinsic fertilization efficiency
Benoît Pasquier and Mark Holzer
Biogeosciences, 15, 7177–7203, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-7177-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-7177-2018, 2018
Short summary
Inverse-model estimates of the ocean's coupled phosphorus, silicon, and iron cycles
Benoît Pasquier and Mark Holzer
Biogeosciences, 14, 4125–4159, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4125-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4125-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Earth System Science/Response to Global Change: Climate Change
The Southern Ocean as the climate's freight train – driving ongoing global warming under zero-emission scenarios with ACCESS-ESM1.5
Matthew A. Chamberlain, Tilo Ziehn, and Rachel M. Law
Biogeosciences, 21, 3053–3073, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3053-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3053-2024, 2024
Short summary
Mapping the future afforestation distribution of China constrained by a national afforestation plan and climate change
Shuaifeng Song, Xuezhen Zhang, and Xiaodong Yan
Biogeosciences, 21, 2839–2858, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2839-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2839-2024, 2024
Short summary
Southern Ocean phytoplankton under climate change: a shifting balance of bottom-up and top-down control
Tianfei Xue, Jens Terhaar, A. E. Friederike Prowe, Thomas L. Frölicher, Andreas Oschlies, and Ivy Frenger
Biogeosciences, 21, 2473–2491, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2473-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2473-2024, 2024
Short summary
Coherency and time lag analyses between MODIS vegetation indices and climate across forests and grasslands in the European temperate zone
Kinga Kulesza and Agata Hościło
Biogeosciences, 21, 2509–2527, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2509-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2509-2024, 2024
Short summary
Direct foliar phosphorus uptake from wildfire ash
Anton Lokshin, Daniel Palchan, and Avner Gross
Biogeosciences, 21, 2355–2365, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2355-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2355-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arias, P., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J., Naik, V., Palmer, M., Plattner, G.-K., Rogelj, J., Rojas, M., Sillmann, J., Storelvmo, T., Thorne, P., Trewin, B., Achuta Rao, K., Adhikary, B., Allan, R., Armour, K., Bala, G., Barimalala, R., Berger, S., Canadell, J., Cassou, C., Cherchi, A., Collins, W., Collins, W., Connors, S., Corti, S., Cruz, F., Dentener, F., Dereczynski, C., Di Luca, A., Diongue Niang, A., Doblas-Reyes, F., Dosio, A., Douville, H., Engelbrecht, F., Eyring, V., Fischer, E., Forster, P., Fox-Kemper, B., Fuglestvedt, J., Fyfe, J., Gillett, N., Goldfarb, L., Gorodetskaya, I., Gutierrez, J., Hamdi, R., Hawkins, E., Hewitt, H., Hope, P., Islam, A., Jones, C., Kaufman, D., Kopp, R., Kosaka, Y., Kossin, J., Krakovska, S., Lee, J.-Y., Li, J., Mauritsen, T., Maycock, T., Meinshausen, M., Min, S.-K., Monteiro, P., Ngo-Duc, T., Otto, F., Pinto, I., Pirani, A., Raghavan, K., Ranasinghe, R., Ruane, A., Ruiz, L., Sallée, J.-B., Samset, B., Sathyendranath, S., Seneviratne, S., Sörensson, A., Szopa, S., Takayabu, I., Tréguier, A.-M., van den Hurk, B., Vautard, R., von Schuckmann, K., Zaehle, S., Zhang, X., and Zickfeld, K.: echnical Summary, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002, pp. 33–144, 2021. a, b
Arora, V. K., Katavouta, A., Williams, R. G., Jones, C. D., Brovkin, V., Friedlingstein, P., Schwinger, J., Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Cadule, P., Chamberlain, M. A., Christian, J. R., Delire, C., Fisher, R. A., Hajima, T., Ilyina, T., Joetzjer, E., Kawamiya, M., Koven, C. D., Krasting, J. P., Law, R. M., Lawrence, D. M., Lenton, A., Lindsay, K., Pongratz, J., Raddatz, T., Séférian, R., Tachiiri, K., Tjiputra, J. F., Wiltshire, A., Wu, T., and Ziehn, T.: Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 17, 4173–4222, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020, 2020. a
Bao, Y. and Li, Y.: Simulations of Dissolved Oxygen Concentration in CMIP5 Earth System Models, Acta Oceanol. Sin., 35, 28–37, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0959-x, 2016. a
Bardin, A., Primeau, F. W., and Lindsay, K.: An offline implicit solver for simulating prebomb radiocarbon, Ocean Model., 73, 45–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.09.008, 2014. a
Bernardello, R., Marinov, I., Palter, J. B., Galbraith, E. D., and Sarmiento, J. L.: Impact of Weddell Sea deep convection on natural and anthropogenic carbon in a climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 7262–7269, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061313, 2014. a
Download
Short summary
How do perpetually slower and warmer oceans sequester carbon? Compared to the preindustrial state, we find that biological productivity declines despite warming-stimulated growth because of a lower nutrient supply from depth. This throttles the biological carbon pump, which still sequesters more carbon because it takes longer to return to the surface. The deep ocean is isolated from the surface, allowing more carbon from the atmosphere to pass through the ocean without contributing to biology.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint