Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-163-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-163-2015
Research article
 | 
09 Jan 2015
Research article |  | 09 Jan 2015

Deploying four optical UAV-based sensors over grassland: challenges and limitations

S. K. von Bueren, A. Burkart, A. Hueni, U. Rascher, M. P. Tuohy, and I. J. Yule

Related authors

Mapping the spatial distribution of NO2 with in situ and remote sensing instruments during the Munich NO2 imaging campaign
Gerrit Kuhlmann, Ka Lok Chan, Sebastian Donner, Ying Zhu, Marc Schwaerzel, Steffen Dörner, Jia Chen, Andreas Hueni, Duc Hai Nguyen, Alexander Damm, Annette Schütt, Florian Dietrich, Dominik Brunner, Cheng Liu, Brigitte Buchmann, Thomas Wagner, and Mark Wenig
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1609–1629, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1609-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1609-2022, 2022
Short summary
CloudRoots: integration of advanced instrumental techniques and process modelling of sub-hourly and sub-kilometre land–atmosphere interactions
Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, Patrizia Ney, Oscar Hartogensis, Hugo de Boer, Kevin van Diepen, Dzhaner Emin, Geiske de Groot, Anne Klosterhalfen, Matthias Langensiepen, Maria Matveeva, Gabriela Miranda-García, Arnold F. Moene, Uwe Rascher, Thomas Röckmann, Getachew Adnew, Nicolas Brüggemann, Youri Rothfuss, and Alexander Graf
Biogeosciences, 17, 4375–4404, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4375-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4375-2020, 2020
Short summary
QUANTIFYING LODGING PERCENTAGE, LODGING DEVELOPMENT AND LODGING SEVERITY USING A UAV-BASED CANOPY HEIGHT MODEL
N. Wilke, B. Siegmann, F. Frimpong, O. Muller, L. Klingbeil, and U. Rascher
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 649–655, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-649-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-649-2019, 2019
ON THE DERIVATION OF CROP HEIGHTS FROM MULTITEMPORAL UAV BASED IMAGERY
D. Becirevic, L. Klingbeil, A. Honecker, H. Schumann, U. Rascher, J. Léon, and H. Kuhlmann
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 95–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-95-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-95-2019, 2019
EUROSPEC: at the interface between remote-sensing and ecosystem CO2 flux measurements in Europe
A. Porcar-Castell, A. Mac Arthur, M. Rossini, L. Eklundh, J. Pacheco-Labrador, K. Anderson, M. Balzarolo, M. P. Martín, H. Jin, E. Tomelleri, S. Cerasoli, K. Sakowska, A. Hueni, T. Julitta, C. J. Nichol, and L. Vescovo
Biogeosciences, 12, 6103–6124, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6103-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6103-2015, 2015

Related subject area

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function: Terrestrial
Linking geomorphological processes and wildlife microhabitat selection: nesting birds select refuges generated by permafrost degradation in the Arctic
Madeleine-Zoé Corbeil-Robitaille, Éliane Duchesne, Daniel Fortier, Christophe Kinnard, and Joël Bêty
Biogeosciences, 21, 3401–3423, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3401-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3401-2024, 2024
Short summary
Distinguishing mature and immature trees allows estimating forest carbon uptake from stand structure
Samuel M. Fischer, Xugao Wang, and Andreas Huth
Biogeosciences, 21, 3305–3319, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3305-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3305-2024, 2024
Short summary
“Blooming” of litter-mixing effects: the role of flower and leaf litter interactions on decomposition in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems
Mery Ingrid Guimarães de Alencar, Rafael D. Guariento, Bertrand Guenet, Luciana S. Carneiro, Eduardo L. Voigt, and Adriano Caliman
Biogeosciences, 21, 3165–3182, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3165-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3165-2024, 2024
Short summary
From simple labels to semantic image segmentation: leveraging citizen science plant photographs for tree species mapping in drone imagery
Salim Soltani, Olga Ferlian, Nico Eisenhauer, Hannes Feilhauer, and Teja Kattenborn
Biogeosciences, 21, 2909–2935, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2909-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2909-2024, 2024
Short summary
Plant functional traits modulate the effects of soil acidification on above- and belowground biomass
Xue Feng, Ruzhen Wang, Tianpeng Li, Jiangping Cai, Heyong Liu, Hui Li, and Yong Jiang
Biogeosciences, 21, 2641–2653, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2641-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aber, J. S., Aber, S. W., Pavri, F., Volkova, E., and Penner II, R. L.: Small-format aerial photography for assessing change in wetland vegetation, Cheyenne Bottoms, Kansas, Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 109, 47–57, https://doi.org/10.1660/0022-8443(2006)109[47:sapfac]2.0.co;2, 2006.
Baret, F., Guyot, G., and Major, D. J.: TSAVI: A Vegetation Index Which Minimizes Soil Brightness Effects On LAI And APAR Estimation, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1989, IGARSS'89, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, International, 1355–1358, 1989.
Baugh, W. M. and Groeneveld, D. P.: Empirical proof of the empirical line, Int. J. Remote Sens., 29, 665–672, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701352162, 2008.
Bayer, B. E.: Color imaging array, 1976.
Berni, J., Zarco-Tejada, P., Surez, L., González-Dugo, V., and Fereres, E.: Remote sensing of vegetation from uav platforms using lightweight multispectral and thermal imaging sensors, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXVII, 2008.
Download
Short summary
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with optical sensors facilitate non-invasive, real-time vegetation analysis. To guarantee robust scientific analysis, protocols need to be developed and sensors must be compared to state-of-the-art instruments. Here we compare four UAV sensors (RGB, NIR, six-band, spectrometer) to evaluate their applicability for vegetation monitoring. By showing the opportunities and pitfalls of UAV-based sensing, we describe ways to gather sound scientific data.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint