Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-163-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-163-2015
Research article
 | 
09 Jan 2015
Research article |  | 09 Jan 2015

Deploying four optical UAV-based sensors over grassland: challenges and limitations

S. K. von Bueren, A. Burkart, A. Hueni, U. Rascher, M. P. Tuohy, and I. J. Yule

Related authors

Mapping the spatial distribution of NO2 with in situ and remote sensing instruments during the Munich NO2 imaging campaign
Gerrit Kuhlmann, Ka Lok Chan, Sebastian Donner, Ying Zhu, Marc Schwaerzel, Steffen Dörner, Jia Chen, Andreas Hueni, Duc Hai Nguyen, Alexander Damm, Annette Schütt, Florian Dietrich, Dominik Brunner, Cheng Liu, Brigitte Buchmann, Thomas Wagner, and Mark Wenig
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1609–1629, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1609-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1609-2022, 2022
Short summary
CloudRoots: integration of advanced instrumental techniques and process modelling of sub-hourly and sub-kilometre land–atmosphere interactions
Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, Patrizia Ney, Oscar Hartogensis, Hugo de Boer, Kevin van Diepen, Dzhaner Emin, Geiske de Groot, Anne Klosterhalfen, Matthias Langensiepen, Maria Matveeva, Gabriela Miranda-García, Arnold F. Moene, Uwe Rascher, Thomas Röckmann, Getachew Adnew, Nicolas Brüggemann, Youri Rothfuss, and Alexander Graf
Biogeosciences, 17, 4375–4404, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4375-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4375-2020, 2020
Short summary
QUANTIFYING LODGING PERCENTAGE, LODGING DEVELOPMENT AND LODGING SEVERITY USING A UAV-BASED CANOPY HEIGHT MODEL
N. Wilke, B. Siegmann, F. Frimpong, O. Muller, L. Klingbeil, and U. Rascher
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 649–655, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-649-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-649-2019, 2019
ON THE DERIVATION OF CROP HEIGHTS FROM MULTITEMPORAL UAV BASED IMAGERY
D. Becirevic, L. Klingbeil, A. Honecker, H. Schumann, U. Rascher, J. Léon, and H. Kuhlmann
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 95–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-95-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-95-2019, 2019
EUROSPEC: at the interface between remote-sensing and ecosystem CO2 flux measurements in Europe
A. Porcar-Castell, A. Mac Arthur, M. Rossini, L. Eklundh, J. Pacheco-Labrador, K. Anderson, M. Balzarolo, M. P. Martín, H. Jin, E. Tomelleri, S. Cerasoli, K. Sakowska, A. Hueni, T. Julitta, C. J. Nichol, and L. Vescovo
Biogeosciences, 12, 6103–6124, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6103-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6103-2015, 2015

Related subject area

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function: Terrestrial
Root distributions predict shrub–steppe responses to precipitation intensity
Andrew Kulmatiski, Martin C. Holdrege, Cristina Chirvasă, and Karen H. Beard
Biogeosciences, 21, 131–143, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-131-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-131-2024, 2024
Short summary
Thermophilisation of Afromontane forest stands demonstrated in an elevation gradient experiment
Bonaventure Ntirugulirwa, Etienne Zibera, Nkuba Epaphrodite, Aloysie Manishimwe, Donat Nsabimana, Johan Uddling, and Göran Wallin
Biogeosciences, 20, 5125–5149, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-5125-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-5125-2023, 2023
Short summary
Above-treeline ecosystems facing drought: lessons from the 2022 European summer heat wave
Philippe Choler
Biogeosciences, 20, 4259–4272, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4259-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4259-2023, 2023
Short summary
Canopy gaps and associated losses of biomass – combining UAV imagery and field data in a central Amazon forest
Adriana Simonetti, Raquel Fernandes Araujo, Carlos Henrique Souza Celes, Flávia Ranara da Silva e Silva, Joaquim dos Santos, Niro Higuchi, Susan Trumbore, and Daniel Magnabosco Marra
Biogeosciences, 20, 3651–3666, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3651-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3651-2023, 2023
Short summary
Ideas and perspectives: Beyond model evaluation – combining experiments and models to advance terrestrial ecosystem science
Silvia Caldararu, Victor Rolo, Benjamin D. Stocker, Teresa E. Gimeno, and Richard Nair
Biogeosciences, 20, 3637–3649, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3637-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3637-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Aber, J. S., Aber, S. W., Pavri, F., Volkova, E., and Penner II, R. L.: Small-format aerial photography for assessing change in wetland vegetation, Cheyenne Bottoms, Kansas, Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 109, 47–57, https://doi.org/10.1660/0022-8443(2006)109[47:sapfac]2.0.co;2, 2006.
Baret, F., Guyot, G., and Major, D. J.: TSAVI: A Vegetation Index Which Minimizes Soil Brightness Effects On LAI And APAR Estimation, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1989, IGARSS'89, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, International, 1355–1358, 1989.
Baugh, W. M. and Groeneveld, D. P.: Empirical proof of the empirical line, Int. J. Remote Sens., 29, 665–672, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701352162, 2008.
Bayer, B. E.: Color imaging array, 1976.
Berni, J., Zarco-Tejada, P., Surez, L., González-Dugo, V., and Fereres, E.: Remote sensing of vegetation from uav platforms using lightweight multispectral and thermal imaging sensors, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXVII, 2008.
Download
Short summary
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with optical sensors facilitate non-invasive, real-time vegetation analysis. To guarantee robust scientific analysis, protocols need to be developed and sensors must be compared to state-of-the-art instruments. Here we compare four UAV sensors (RGB, NIR, six-band, spectrometer) to evaluate their applicability for vegetation monitoring. By showing the opportunities and pitfalls of UAV-based sensing, we describe ways to gather sound scientific data.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint