Articles | Volume 17, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5513-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5513-2020
Research article
 | 
14 Nov 2020
Research article |  | 14 Nov 2020

N2O isotope approaches for source partitioning of N2O production and estimation of N2O reduction – validation with the 15N gas-flux method in laboratory and field studies

Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Maciej Piotr Lewicki, and Reinhard Well

Related authors

Simultaneous measurement of greenhouse gases (CH4, CO2 and N2O) at atmospheric levels using a gas chromatography system
Michal Bucha, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, and Piotr Wójtowicz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2125,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2125, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: A Bayesian mixing model to unravel isotopic data and quantify trace gas production and consumption pathways for time series data – Time-resolved FRactionation And Mixing Evaluation (TimeFRAME)
Eliza Harris, Philipp Fischer, Maciej P. Lewicki, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Stephen J. Harris, and Fernando Perez-Cruz
Biogeosciences, 21, 3641–3663, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3641-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparing modified substrate-induced respiration with selective inhibition (SIRIN) and N2O isotope approaches to estimate fungal contribution to denitrification in three arable soils under anoxic conditions
Lena Rohe, Traute-Heidi Anderson, Heinz Flessa, Anette Goeske, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Nicole Wrage-Mönnig, and Reinhard Well
Biogeosciences, 18, 4629–4650, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4629-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4629-2021, 2021
Short summary
The 15N gas-flux method to determine N2 flux: a comparison of different tracer addition approaches
Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak and Reinhard Well
SOIL, 6, 145–152, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-145-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-145-2020, 2020
Short summary
Underestimation of denitrification rates from field application of the 15N gas flux method and its correction by gas diffusion modelling
Reinhard Well, Martin Maier, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Jan-Reent Köster, and Nicolas Ruoss
Biogeosciences, 16, 2233–2246, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2233-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2233-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Stable Isotopes & Other Tracers
Bias in calculating gross nitrification rates in forested catchments using the triple oxygen isotopic composition (Δ17O) of stream nitrate
Weitian Ding, Urumu Tsunogai, and Fumiko Nakagawa
Biogeosciences, 21, 4717–4722, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4717-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4717-2024, 2024
Short summary
Position-specific kinetic isotope effects for nitrous oxide: a new expansion of the Rayleigh model
Elise D. Rivett, Wenjuan Ma, Nathaniel E. Ostrom, and Eric L. Hegg
Biogeosciences, 21, 4549–4567, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4549-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4549-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: A Bayesian mixing model to unravel isotopic data and quantify trace gas production and consumption pathways for time series data – Time-resolved FRactionation And Mixing Evaluation (TimeFRAME)
Eliza Harris, Philipp Fischer, Maciej P. Lewicki, Dominika Lewicka-Szczebak, Stephen J. Harris, and Fernando Perez-Cruz
Biogeosciences, 21, 3641–3663, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3641-2024, 2024
Short summary
No increase is detected and modeled for the seasonal cycle amplitude of δ13C of atmospheric carbon dioxide
Fortunat Joos, Sebastian Lienert, and Sönke Zaehle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1972,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1972, 2024
Short summary
Separating above-canopy CO2 and O2 measurements into their atmospheric and biospheric signatures
Kim A. P. Faassen, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, Raquel González-Armas, Bert G. Heusinkveld, Ivan Mammarella, Wouter Peters, and Ingrid T. Luijkx
Biogeosciences, 21, 3015–3039, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3015-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3015-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aulakh, M. S., Doran, J. W., and Mosier, A. R.: Field-Evaluation of 4 Methods for Measuring Denitrification, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55, 1332–1338, 1991. 
Baily, A., Watson, C. J., Laughlin, R., Matthews, D., McGeough, K., and Jordan, P.: Use of the 15N gas flux method to measure the source and level of N2O and N2 emissions from grazed grassland, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 94, 287–298, 2012. 
Barford, C. C., Montoya, J. P., Altabet, M. A., and Mitchell, R.: Steady-state nitrogen isotope effects of N2 and N2O production in Paracoccus denitrificans, Appl. Environ. Microb., 65, 989–994, 1999. 
Baumgärtel, B. and Benke, M.: Düngeempfehlungen Stickstoff: Getreide, Raps, Hackfrüchte, Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen – Geschäftsbereich Landwirtschaft, Hannover, 2009. 
Bergsma, T. T., Ostrom, N. E., Emmons, M., and Robertson, G. P.: Measuring simultaneous fluxes from soil of N2O and N2 in the field using the 15N-Gas “nonequilihrium” technique, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4307–4312, 2001. 
Download
Short summary
We present the first validation of N2O isotopic approaches for estimating N2O source pathways and N2O reduction. These approaches are widely used for tracing soil nitrogen cycling, but the results of these estimations are very uncertain. Here we report the results from parallel treatments allowing for precise validation of these approaches, and we propose the best strategies for results interpretation, including the new idea of an isotope model integrating three isotopic signatures of N2O.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint