Articles | Volume 20, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2645-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2645-2023
Research article
 | 
06 Jul 2023
Research article |  | 06 Jul 2023

Exploring the role of different data types and timescales in the quality of marine biogeochemical model calibration

Iris Kriest, Julia Getzlaff, Angela Landolfi, Volkmar Sauerland, Markus Schartau, and Andreas Oschlies

Related authors

Dual-tracer constraints on the Inverse-Gaussian Transit-time distribution improve the estimation of watermass ages and their temporal trends in the tropical thermocline
Haichao Guo, Wolfgang Koeve, Andreas Oschlies, Yan-Chun He, Tronje Peer Kemena, Lennart Gerke, and Iris Kriest
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2552,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2552, 2024
Short summary
FOCI-MOPS v1 – integration of marine biogeochemistry within the Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure version 1 (FOCI 1) Earth system model
Chia-Te Chien, Jonathan V. Durgadoo, Dana Ehlert, Ivy Frenger, David P. Keller, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, Lavinia Patara, Sebastian Wahl, and Andreas Oschlies
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5987–6024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5987-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5987-2022, 2022
Short summary
A derivative-free optimisation method for global ocean biogeochemical models
Sophy Oliver, Coralia Cartis, Iris Kriest, Simon F. B Tett, and Samar Khatiwala
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3537–3554, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3537-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3537-2022, 2022
Short summary
Zooplankton mortality effects on the plankton community of the northern Humboldt Current System: sensitivity of a regional biogeochemical model
Mariana Hill Cruz, Iris Kriest, Yonss Saranga José, Rainer Kiko, Helena Hauss, and Andreas Oschlies
Biogeosciences, 18, 2891–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2891-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2891-2021, 2021
Short summary
One size fits all? Calibrating an ocean biogeochemistry model for different circulations
Iris Kriest, Paul Kähler, Wolfgang Koeve, Karin Kvale, Volkmar Sauerland, and Andreas Oschlies
Biogeosciences, 17, 3057–3082, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3057-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3057-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Open Ocean
Sedimentary organic matter signature hints at the phytoplankton-driven biological carbon pump in the central Arabian Sea
Medhavi Pandey, Haimanti Biswas, Daniel Birgel, Nicole Burdanowitz, and Birgit Gaye
Biogeosciences, 21, 4681–4698, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4681-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4681-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hydrological cycle amplification imposes spatial patterns on the climate change response of ocean pH and carbonate chemistry
Allison Hogikyan and Laure Resplandy
Biogeosciences, 21, 4621–4636, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4621-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4621-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing the tropical Atlantic biogeochemical processes in the Norwegian Earth System Model
Shunya Koseki, Lander R. Crespo, Jerry Tjiputra, Filippa Fransner, Noel S. Keenlyside, and David Rivas
Biogeosciences, 21, 4149–4168, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4149-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4149-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evolution of oxygen and stratification and their relationship in the North Pacific Ocean in CMIP6 Earth system models
Lyuba Novi, Annalisa Bracco, Takamitsu Ito, and Yohei Takano
Biogeosciences, 21, 3985–4005, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3985-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3985-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of CMIP6 model performance in simulating historical biogeochemistry across the southern South China Sea
Winfred Marshal, Jing Xiang Chung, Nur Hidayah Roseli, Roswati Md Amin, and Mohd Fadzil Bin Mohd Akhir
Biogeosciences, 21, 4007–4035, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4007-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4007-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arhonditsis, G. B. and Brett, M. T.: Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 271, 13–26, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps271013, 2004. a, b, c
Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015, 2015. a, b, c, d, e
Aumont, O., Maury, O., Lefort, S., and Bopp, L.: Evaluating the Potential Impacts of the Diurnal Vertical Migration by Marine Organisms on Marine Biogeochemistry, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1622–1643, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005886, 2018. a
Bianchi, D., Carozza, D. A., Galbraith, E. D., Guiet, J., and DeVries, T.: Estimating global biomass and biogeochemical cycling of marine fish with and without fishing, Sci. Adv., 7, eabd7554, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd7554, 2021. a
Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M., Halloran, P., Heinze, C., Ilyina, T., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., and Vichi, M.: Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6225–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013, 2013. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Download
Short summary
Global biogeochemical ocean models are often subjectively assessed and tuned against observations. We applied different strategies to calibrate a global model against observations. Although the calibrated models show similar tracer distributions at the surface, they differ in global biogeochemical fluxes, especially in global particle flux. Simulated global volume of oxygen minimum zones varies strongly with calibration strategy and over time, rendering its temporal extrapolation difficult.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint