Articles | Volume 21, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3761-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3761-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Shoulder season controls on methane emissions from a boreal peatland
Katharina Jentzsch
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany
Institute of Environmental Science and Geography, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Elisa Männistö
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
Maija E. Marushchak
Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
Aino Korrensalo
Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
Natural Resources Institute Finland, Joensuu, Finland
Lona van Delden
Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany
Eeva-Stiina Tuittila
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
Christian Knoblauch
Institute of Soil Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Claire C. Treat
Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany
Editorial note: the abstract was adjusted on 29 August 2024. The following sentence in the second paragraph was corrected:
Thirdly, accumulation of methane in the pore water partly delayed the emission of methane produced in summer and winter to the shoulder seasons.
Related authors
Katharina Jentzsch, Lona van Delden, Matthias Fuchs, and Claire C. Treat
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2331–2372, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2331-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2331-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Methane is a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming, but we do not fully understand how much is released from natural sources like wetlands. To measure methane over large areas, many measurements are needed, often from small chambers that are placed on the ground. However, different researchers use different measurement setups, making it hard to combine data. We surveyed 36 researchers about their methods, summarized the responses, and identified ways to make the data more comparable.
Katharina Jentzsch, Julia Boike, and Thomas Foken
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7291–7296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7291-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7291-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Very small CO2 fluxes are measured at night in Arctic regions. If the sensible heat flux is not close to zero under these conditions, the WPL correction will take values on the order of the flux. A special quality control is proposed for these cases.
Fabian Seemann, Michael Zech, Maren Jenrich, Guido Grosse, Benjamin M. Jones, Claire Treat, Lutz Schirrmeister, Susanne Liebner, and Jens Strauss
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3727, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3727, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic coastal landscapes, like those in northernmost Alaska, often contain saline sediments that are more prone to thawing. We studied six sediment cores to understand how thawing and salinity affect organic carbon breakdown and land change. Our results show that salinity speeds up organic matter loss when permafrost thaws. This highlights the overlooked risk of salinity in shaping Arctic landscapes and carbon release as the climate continues to warm.
Nathalie Ylenia Triches, Jan Engel, Abdullah Bolek, Timo Vesala, Maija E. Marushchak, Anna-Maria Virkkala, Martin Heimann, and Mathias Göckede
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3407–3424, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3407-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3407-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes from a nutrient-poor sub-Arctic peatland. N2O is a potent greenhouse gas; understanding its fluxes is essential for addressing global warming. Using a new instrument and flux chambers, we introduce a system to reliably detect low N2O fluxes and provide recommendations on chamber closure times and flux calculation methods to better quantify N2O fluxes. We encourage researchers to further investigate N2O fluxes in low-nutrient environments.
Qing Ying, Benjamin Poulter, Jennifer D. Watts, Kyle A. Arndt, Anna-Maria Virkkala, Lori Bruhwiler, Youmi Oh, Brendan M. Rogers, Susan M. Natali, Hilary Sullivan, Amanda Armstrong, Eric J. Ward, Luke D. Schiferl, Clayton D. Elder, Olli Peltola, Annett Bartsch, Ankur R. Desai, Eugénie Euskirchen, Mathias Göckede, Bernhard Lehner, Mats B. Nilsson, Matthias Peichl, Oliver Sonnentag, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Torsten Sachs, Aram Kalhori, Masahito Ueyama, and Zhen Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2507–2534, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2507-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2507-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present daily methane (CH4) fluxes of northern wetlands at 10 km resolution during 2016–2022 (WetCH4) derived from a novel machine learning framework. We estimated an average annual CH4 emission of 22.8 ± 2.4 Tg CH4 yr−1 (15.7–51.6 Tg CH4 yr−1). Emissions were intensified in 2016, 2020, and 2022, with the largest interannual variation coming from Western Siberia. Continued, all-season tower observations and improved soil moisture products are needed for future improvement of CH4 upscaling.
Katharina Jentzsch, Lona van Delden, Matthias Fuchs, and Claire C. Treat
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2331–2372, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2331-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2331-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Methane is a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming, but we do not fully understand how much is released from natural sources like wetlands. To measure methane over large areas, many measurements are needed, often from small chambers that are placed on the ground. However, different researchers use different measurement setups, making it hard to combine data. We surveyed 36 researchers about their methods, summarized the responses, and identified ways to make the data more comparable.
Mélissa Laurent, Mackenzie R. Baysinger, Jörg Schaller, Matthias Lück, Mathias Hoffmann, Torben Windirsch, Ruth H. Ellerbrock, Jens Strauss, and Claire C. Treat
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1792, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1792, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Palsas are peat permafrost mounds underlain by ice-rich permafrost. Due to climate change, they could disappeare by the end of the century. When palsas thaw, changes occur in hydrological conditions affecting the carbon (C) cycle. In our study, we simulated permafrost thaw under different water treatments using 1-meter soil columns from a palsa. We measured CH4 and CO2 emissions for 3-month incubation. Our results show that following thaw, flooding the cores leads to increased CO2 emissions.
Maren Jenrich, Juliane Wolter, Susanne Liebner, Christian Knoblauch, Guido Grosse, Fiona Giebeler, Dustin Whalen, and Jens Strauss
Biogeosciences, 22, 2069–2086, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2069-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2069-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate warming in the Arctic is causing the erosion of permafrost coasts and the transformation of permafrost lakes into lagoons. To understand how this affects greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, we studied carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄) production in lagoons with varying sea connections. Younger lagoons produce more CH₄, while CO₂ increases under more marine conditions. Flooding of permafrost lowlands due to rising sea levels may lead to higher GHG emissions from Arctic coasts in future.
Anna-Maria Virkkala, Pekka Niittynen, Julia Kemppinen, Maija E. Marushchak, Carolina Voigt, Geert Hensgens, Johanna Kerttula, Konsta Happonen, Vilna Tyystjärvi, Christina Biasi, Jenni Hultman, Janne Rinne, and Miska Luoto
Biogeosciences, 21, 335–355, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-335-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-335-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes of CO2, CH4, and N2O are important for climate feedbacks. We combined extensive in situ measurements and remote sensing data to develop machine-learning models to predict GHG fluxes at a 2 m resolution across a tundra landscape. The analysis revealed that the system was a net GHG sink and showed widespread CH4 uptake in upland vegetation types, almost surpassing the high wetland CH4 emissions at the landscape scale.
Mélissa Laurent, Matthias Fuchs, Tanja Herbst, Alexandra Runge, Susanne Liebner, and Claire C. Treat
Biogeosciences, 20, 2049–2064, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2049-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2049-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigated the effect of different parameters (temperature, landscape position) on the production of greenhouse gases during a 1-year permafrost thaw experiment. For very similar carbon and nitrogen contents, our results show a strong heterogeneity in CH4 production, as well as in microbial abundance. According to our study, these differences are mainly due to the landscape position and the hydrological conditions established as a result of the topography.
Lejish Vettikkat, Pasi Miettinen, Angela Buchholz, Pekka Rantala, Hao Yu, Simon Schallhart, Tuukka Petäjä, Roger Seco, Elisa Männistö, Markku Kulmala, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Alex B. Guenther, and Siegfried Schobesberger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2683–2698, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2683-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2683-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wetlands cover a substantial fraction of the land mass in the northern latitudes, from northern Europe to Siberia and Canada. Yet, their isoprene and terpene emissions remain understudied. Here, we used a state-of-the-art measurement technique to quantify ecosystem-scale emissions from a boreal wetland during an unusually warm spring/summer. We found that the emissions from this wetland were (a) higher and (b) even more strongly dependent on temperature than commonly thought.
Niek Jesse Speetjens, George Tanski, Victoria Martin, Julia Wagner, Andreas Richter, Gustaf Hugelius, Chris Boucher, Rachele Lodi, Christian Knoblauch, Boris P. Koch, Urban Wünsch, Hugues Lantuit, and Jorien E. Vonk
Biogeosciences, 19, 3073–3097, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change and warming in the Arctic exceed global averages. As a result, permanently frozen soils (permafrost) which store vast quantities of carbon in the form of dead plant material (organic matter) are thawing. Our study shows that as permafrost landscapes degrade, high concentrations of organic matter are released. Partly, this organic matter is degraded rapidly upon release, while another significant fraction enters stream networks and enters the Arctic Ocean.
Jenie Gil, Maija E. Marushchak, Tobias Rütting, Elizabeth M. Baggs, Tibisay Pérez, Alexander Novakovskiy, Tatiana Trubnikova, Dmitry Kaverin, Pertti J. Martikainen, and Christina Biasi
Biogeosciences, 19, 2683–2698, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2683-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2683-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
N2O emissions from permafrost soils represent up to 11.6 % of total N2O emissions from natural soils, and their contribution to the global N2O budget will likely increase due to climate change. A better understanding of N2O production from permafrost soil is needed to evaluate the role of arctic ecosystems in the global N2O budget. By studying microbial N2O production processes in N2O hotspots in permafrost peatlands, we identified denitrification as the dominant source of N2O in these surfaces.
Anna-Maria Virkkala, Susan M. Natali, Brendan M. Rogers, Jennifer D. Watts, Kathleen Savage, Sara June Connon, Marguerite Mauritz, Edward A. G. Schuur, Darcy Peter, Christina Minions, Julia Nojeim, Roisin Commane, Craig A. Emmerton, Mathias Goeckede, Manuel Helbig, David Holl, Hiroki Iwata, Hideki Kobayashi, Pasi Kolari, Efrén López-Blanco, Maija E. Marushchak, Mikhail Mastepanov, Lutz Merbold, Frans-Jan W. Parmentier, Matthias Peichl, Torsten Sachs, Oliver Sonnentag, Masahito Ueyama, Carolina Voigt, Mika Aurela, Julia Boike, Gerardo Celis, Namyi Chae, Torben R. Christensen, M. Syndonia Bret-Harte, Sigrid Dengel, Han Dolman, Colin W. Edgar, Bo Elberling, Eugenie Euskirchen, Achim Grelle, Juha Hatakka, Elyn Humphreys, Järvi Järveoja, Ayumi Kotani, Lars Kutzbach, Tuomas Laurila, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Yojiro Matsuura, Gesa Meyer, Mats B. Nilsson, Steven F. Oberbauer, Sang-Jong Park, Roman Petrov, Anatoly S. Prokushkin, Christopher Schulze, Vincent L. St. Louis, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Juha-Pekka Tuovinen, William Quinton, Andrej Varlagin, Donatella Zona, and Viacheslav I. Zyryanov
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 179–208, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-179-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-179-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The effects of climate warming on carbon cycling across the Arctic–boreal zone (ABZ) remain poorly understood due to the relatively limited distribution of ABZ flux sites. Fortunately, this flux network is constantly increasing, but new measurements are published in various platforms, making it challenging to understand the ABZ carbon cycle as a whole. Here, we compiled a new database of Arctic–boreal CO2 fluxes to help facilitate large-scale assessments of the ABZ carbon cycle.
Katharina Jentzsch, Julia Boike, and Thomas Foken
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7291–7296, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7291-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7291-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Very small CO2 fluxes are measured at night in Arctic regions. If the sensible heat flux is not close to zero under these conditions, the WPL correction will take values on the order of the flux. A special quality control is proposed for these cases.
David Olefeldt, Mikael Hovemyr, McKenzie A. Kuhn, David Bastviken, Theodore J. Bohn, John Connolly, Patrick Crill, Eugénie S. Euskirchen, Sarah A. Finkelstein, Hélène Genet, Guido Grosse, Lorna I. Harris, Liam Heffernan, Manuel Helbig, Gustaf Hugelius, Ryan Hutchins, Sari Juutinen, Mark J. Lara, Avni Malhotra, Kristen Manies, A. David McGuire, Susan M. Natali, Jonathan A. O'Donnell, Frans-Jan W. Parmentier, Aleksi Räsänen, Christina Schädel, Oliver Sonnentag, Maria Strack, Suzanne E. Tank, Claire Treat, Ruth K. Varner, Tarmo Virtanen, Rebecca K. Warren, and Jennifer D. Watts
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 5127–5149, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5127-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5127-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Wetlands, lakes, and rivers are important sources of the greenhouse gas methane to the atmosphere. To understand current and future methane emissions from northern regions, we need maps that show the extent and distribution of specific types of wetlands, lakes, and rivers. The Boreal–Arctic Wetland and Lake Dataset (BAWLD) provides maps of five wetland types, seven lake types, and three river types for northern regions and will improve our ability to predict future methane emissions.
Claude-Michel Nzotungicimpaye, Kirsten Zickfeld, Andrew H. MacDougall, Joe R. Melton, Claire C. Treat, Michael Eby, and Lance F. W. Lesack
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6215–6240, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6215-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6215-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we describe a new wetland methane model (WETMETH) developed for use in Earth system models. WETMETH consists of simple formulations to represent methane production and oxidation in wetlands. We also present an evaluation of the model performance as embedded in the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model (UVic ESCM). WETMETH is capable of reproducing mean annual methane emissions consistent with present-day estimates from the regional to the global scale.
Pavel Alekseychik, Aino Korrensalo, Ivan Mammarella, Samuli Launiainen, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Ilkka Korpela, and Timo Vesala
Biogeosciences, 18, 4681–4704, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4681-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4681-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Bogs of northern Eurasia represent a major type of peatland ecosystem and contain vast amounts of carbon, but carbon balance monitoring studies on bogs are scarce. The current project explores 6 years of carbon balance data obtained using the state-of-the-art eddy-covariance technique at a Finnish bog Siikaneva. The results reveal relatively low interannual variability indicative of ecosystem resilience to both cool and hot summers and provide new insights into the seasonal course of C fluxes.
Kyle B. Delwiche, Sara Helen Knox, Avni Malhotra, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Gavin McNicol, Sarah Feron, Zutao Ouyang, Dario Papale, Carlo Trotta, Eleonora Canfora, You-Wei Cheah, Danielle Christianson, Ma. Carmelita R. Alberto, Pavel Alekseychik, Mika Aurela, Dennis Baldocchi, Sheel Bansal, David P. Billesbach, Gil Bohrer, Rosvel Bracho, Nina Buchmann, David I. Campbell, Gerardo Celis, Jiquan Chen, Weinan Chen, Housen Chu, Higo J. Dalmagro, Sigrid Dengel, Ankur R. Desai, Matteo Detto, Han Dolman, Elke Eichelmann, Eugenie Euskirchen, Daniela Famulari, Kathrin Fuchs, Mathias Goeckede, Sébastien Gogo, Mangaliso J. Gondwe, Jordan P. Goodrich, Pia Gottschalk, Scott L. Graham, Martin Heimann, Manuel Helbig, Carole Helfter, Kyle S. Hemes, Takashi Hirano, David Hollinger, Lukas Hörtnagl, Hiroki Iwata, Adrien Jacotot, Gerald Jurasinski, Minseok Kang, Kuno Kasak, John King, Janina Klatt, Franziska Koebsch, Ken W. Krauss, Derrick Y. F. Lai, Annalea Lohila, Ivan Mammarella, Luca Belelli Marchesini, Giovanni Manca, Jaclyn Hatala Matthes, Trofim Maximov, Lutz Merbold, Bhaskar Mitra, Timothy H. Morin, Eiko Nemitz, Mats B. Nilsson, Shuli Niu, Walter C. Oechel, Patricia Y. Oikawa, Keisuke Ono, Matthias Peichl, Olli Peltola, Michele L. Reba, Andrew D. Richardson, William Riley, Benjamin R. K. Runkle, Youngryel Ryu, Torsten Sachs, Ayaka Sakabe, Camilo Rey Sanchez, Edward A. Schuur, Karina V. R. Schäfer, Oliver Sonnentag, Jed P. Sparks, Ellen Stuart-Haëntjens, Cove Sturtevant, Ryan C. Sullivan, Daphne J. Szutu, Jonathan E. Thom, Margaret S. Torn, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Jessica Turner, Masahito Ueyama, Alex C. Valach, Rodrigo Vargas, Andrej Varlagin, Alma Vazquez-Lule, Joseph G. Verfaillie, Timo Vesala, George L. Vourlitis, Eric J. Ward, Christian Wille, Georg Wohlfahrt, Guan Xhuan Wong, Zhen Zhang, Donatella Zona, Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Benjamin Poulter, and Robert B. Jackson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3607–3689, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3607-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Methane is an important greenhouse gas, yet we lack knowledge about its global emissions and drivers. We present FLUXNET-CH4, a new global collection of methane measurements and a critical resource for the research community. We use FLUXNET-CH4 data to quantify the seasonality of methane emissions from freshwater wetlands, finding that methane seasonality varies strongly with latitude. Our new database and analysis will improve wetland model accuracy and inform greenhouse gas budgets.
Elisa Vainio, Olli Peltola, Ville Kasurinen, Antti-Jussi Kieloaho, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, and Mari Pihlatie
Biogeosciences, 18, 2003–2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2003-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2003-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We studied forest floor methane exchange over an area of 10 ha in a boreal pine forest. The results demonstrate high spatial variability in soil moisture and consequently in the methane flux. We detected wet patches emitting high amounts of methane in the early summer; however, these patches turned to methane uptake in the autumn. We concluded that the small-scale spatial variability of the boreal forest methane flux highlights the importance of soil chamber placement in similar studies.
Hui Zhang, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Aino Korrensalo, Aleksi Räsänen, Tarmo Virtanen, Mika Aurela, Timo Penttilä, Tuomas Laurila, Stephanie Gerin, Viivi Lindholm, and Annalea Lohila
Biogeosciences, 17, 6247–6270, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6247-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6247-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We studied the impact of a stream on peatland microhabitats and CH4 emissions in a northern boreal fen. We found that there were higher water levels, lower peat temperatures, and greater oxygen concentrations close to the stream; these supported the highest biomass production but resulted in the lowest CH4 emissions. Further from the stream, the conditions were drier and CH4 emissions were also low. CH4 emissions were highest at an intermediate distance from the stream.
Jinnan Gong, Nigel Roulet, Steve Frolking, Heli Peltola, Anna M. Laine, Nicola Kokkonen, and Eeva-Stiina Tuittila
Biogeosciences, 17, 5693–5719, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5693-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5693-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, which combined a field and lab experiment with modelling, we developed a process-based model for simulating dynamics within peatland moss communities. The model is useful because Sphagnum mosses are key engineers in peatlands; their response to changes in climate via altered hydrology controls the feedback of peatland biogeochemistry to climate. Our work showed that moss capitulum traits related to water retention are the mechanism controlling moss layer dynamics in peatlands.
Cited articles
Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L., and Jalas, J.: Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe, Ann. Bot. Fenn., 5, 169–211, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23724233 (last access: 14 August 2024), 1968. a
Alekseychik, P., Korrensalo, A., Mammarella, I., Launiainen, S., Tuittila, E.-S., Korpela, I., and Vesala, T.: Carbon balance of a Finnish bog: temporal variability and limiting factors based on 6 years of eddy-covariance data, Biogeosciences, 18, 4681–4704, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4681-2021, 2021. a
Alekseychik, P., Kolari, P., Rinne, J., Haapanala, S., Laakso, H., Taipale, R., Matilainen, T., Salminen, T., Levula, J., and Tuittila, E.-S.: SMEAR II Siikaneva 1 wetland meteorology and soil, University of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, https://doi.org/10.23729/08d89ada-d152-4c8b-8db4-ae8a8f17f825, 2023. a
Alm, J., Saarnio, S., Nykänen, H., Silvola, J., and Martikainen, P.: Winter CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes on some natural and drained boreal peatlands, Biogeochemistry, 44, 163–186, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992977, 1999. a
Blanc-Betes, E., Welker, J. M., Sturchio, N. C., Chanton, J. P., and Gonzalez-Meler, M. A.: Winter precipitation and snow accumulation drive the methane sink or source strength of Arctic tussock tundra, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 2818–2833, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13242, 2016. a, b
Bu, X., Krause, S. M., Gu, X., Tian, J., and Zhou, X.: Ethylene rather than acetylene inhibits soil methane oxidation rates in a subtropical evergreen forest, Soil Biol. Biochem., 135, 10–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.001, 2019. a
Cabral, A. R., Capanema, M. A., Gebert, J., Moreira, J. F., and Jugnia, L. B.: Quantifying microbial methane oxidation efficiencies in two experimental landfill biocovers using stable isotopes, Water Air Soil Poll., 209, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0188-4, 2010. a
Chan, A. and Parkin, T.: Evaluation of potential inhibitors of methanogenesis and methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 1581–1590, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00071-7, 2000. a
Chanton, J. P.: Effects of vegetation on methane flux, reservoir, and isotopic composition, in: Trace Gas Emissions by Plants, edited by: Sharkey, T. D., Holland, E. A., and Mooney, H. A., Academic Press, San Diego, USA (CA), 65–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-639010-0.50008-X, 1991. a
Chanton, J. P., Martens, C. S., and Kelley, C. A.: Gas transport from methane-saturated, tidal freshwater and wetland sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 807–819, https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1989.34.5.0807, 1989. a
Chanton, J. P., Powelson, D. K., Abichou, T., Fields, D., and Green, R.: Effect of temperature and oxidation rate on carbon-isotope fractionation during methane oxidation by landfill cover materials, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7818–7823, https://doi.org/10.1021/es801221y, 2008. a
Corbett, J. E., Tfaily, M. M., Burdige, D. J., Cooper, W. T., Glaser, P. H., and Chanton, J. P.: Partitioning pathways of CO2 production in peatlands with stable carbon isotopes, Biogeochemistry, 114, 327–340, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9813-1, 2013. a, b
Corbett, J. E., Tfaily, M. M., Burdige, D. J., Glaser, P. H., and Chanton, J. P.: The relative importance of methanogenesis in the decomposition of organic matter in northern peatlands, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 120, 280–293, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002797, 2015. a
Dinsmore, K. J., Skiba, U. M., Billett, M. F., and Rees, R. M.: Effect of water table on greenhouse gas emissions from peatland mesocosms, Plant Soil, 318, 229–242, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9832-9, 2009. a
Dise, N. B., Gorham, E., and Verry, E. S.: Environmental factors controlling methane emissions from peatlands in northern Minnesota, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 10583–10594, 1993. a
Docherty, H., Galindo, A., Sanz, E., and Vega, C.: Investigation of the salting out of methane from aqueous electrolyte solutions using computer simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 8993–9000, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0678249, 2007. a
Dorodnikov, M., Knorr, K.-H., Kuzyakov, Y., and Wilmking, M.: Plant-mediated CH4 transport and contribution of photosynthates to methanogenesis at a boreal mire: a 14C pulse-labeling study, Biogeosciences, 8, 2365–2375, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2365-2011, 2011. a, b
Finnish Meteorological Institute: Download observations, https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/download-observations (last access: 15 August 2023), 2023a. a
Finnish Meteorological Institute: Seasons in Finland, https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/seasons-in-finland (last access: 16 August 2023), 2023b. a
Forbrich, I., Kutzbach, L., Hormann, A., and Wilmking, M.: A comparison of linear and exponential regression for estimating diffusive CH4 fluxes by closed-chambers in peatlands, Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 507–515, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.12.004, 2010. a, b
Frenzel, P. and Rudolph, J.: Methane emission from a wetland plant: the role of CH4 oxidation in Eriophorum, Plant Soil, 202, 27–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004348929219, 1998. a
Friborg, T., Christensen, T., and Søgaard, H.: Rapid response of greenhouse gas emission to early spring thaw in a subarctic mire as shown by micrometeorological techniques, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 3061–3064, https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03024, 1997. a
Galera, L. d. A., Eckhardt, T., Beer, C., Pfeiffer, E.-M., and Knoblauch, C.: Ratio of in situ CO2 to CH4 production and its environmental controls in polygonal tundra soils of Samoylov Island, Northeastern Siberia, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 128, e2022JG006956, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006956, 2023. a
Gebert, J. and Streese-Kleeberg, J.: Coupling Stable Isotope Analysis with Gas Push-Pull Tests to Derive In Situ Values for the Fractionation Factor αox Associated with the Microbial Oxidation of Methane in Soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 81, 1107–1114, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.11.0387, 2017. a
Guo, G.-J. and Rodger, P. M.: Solubility of aqueous methane under metastable conditions: Implications for gas hydrate nucleation, J. Phys. Chem. B, 117, 6498–6504, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3117215, 2013. a
Hanson, R. S. and Hanson, T. E.: Methanotrophic bacteria, Microbiol. Rev., 60, 439–471, https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.60.2.439-471.1996, 1996. a
Henneberg, A., Brix, H., and Sorrell, B. K.: The interactive effect of Juncus effusus and water table position on mesocosm methanogenesis and methane emissions, Plant Soil, 400, 45–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2707-y, 2016. a
Hoffmann, M., Schulz-Hanke, M., Garcia Alba, J., Jurisch, N., Hagemann, U., Sachs, T., Sommer, M., and Augustin, J.: A simple calculation algorithm to separate high-resolution CH4 flux measurements into ebullition- and diffusion-derived components, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 109–118, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-109-2017, 2017. a
Hutchinson, G. and Mosier, A.: Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 45, 311–316, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500020017x, 1981. a
Ito, A., Li, T., Qin, Z., Melton, J., Tian, H., Kleinen, T., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Joos, F., Ciais, P., Hopcroft, P. O., Beerling, D. J., Liu, X., Zhuang, Q., Zhu, Q., Peng, C., Chang, K.-Y., Fluet-Chouinard, E., McNicol, G., Patra, P., Poulter, B., Sitch, S., Riley, W., and Zhu, Q.: Cold-season methane fluxes simulated by GCP-CH4 Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103037, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103037, 2023. a
Jentzsch, K., Männistö, E., Marushchak, M. E., Korrensalo, A., van Delden, L., Tuittila, E.-S., and Treat, C. C.: Seasonal chamber measurements of CH4 fluxes and their isotopic composition along with environmental conditions at vegetation removal experiments in hollows at Siikaneva bog, Finland, in 2021 and 2022, PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.965402, 2024. a
Joabsson, A., Christensen, T. R., and Wallén, B.: Vascular plant controls on methane emissions from northern peatforming wetlands, Trend. Ecol. Evol., 14, 385–388, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01649-3, 1999. a, b
Keeling, C. D.: The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 13, 322–334, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(58)90033-4, 1958. a
Keeling, C. D.: The concentration and isotopic abundances of carbon dioxide in rural and marine air, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 24, 277–298, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(61)90023-0, 1961. a
King, S. L., Quay, P. D., and Lansdown, J. M.: The 13C/12C kinetic isotope effect for soil oxidation of methane at ambient atmospheric concentrations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 94, 18273–18277, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD15p18273, 1989. a
Kip, N., Van Winden, J. F., Pan, Y., Bodrossy, L., Reichart, G.-J., Smolders, A. J., Jetten, M. S., Damsté, J. S. S., and Op den Camp, H. J.: Global prevalence of methane oxidation by symbiotic bacteria in peat-moss ecosystems, Nat. Geosci., 3, 617–621, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo939, 2010. a, b, c, d, e
Kirschke, S., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Bergamaschi, P., Bergmann, D., Blake, D. R., Bruhwiler, L., Cameron-Smith, P., Castaldi, S., Chevallier, F., Feng, L., Fraser, A., Heimann, M., Hodson, E. L., Houweling, S., Josse, B., Fraser, P. J., Krummel, P. B., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfeld, R. L., Le Quéré, C., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Palmer, P. I., Pison, I., Plummer, D., Poulter, B., Prinn, R. G., Rigby, M., Ringeval, B., Santini, M., Schmidt, M., Shindell, D. T., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, L. P., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., van der Werf, G. R., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., Weiss, R. F., Williams, J. E., and Zeng, G.: Three decades of global methane sources and sinks, Nat. Geosci., 6, 813–823, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1955, 2013. a
Knoblauch, C., Spott, O., Evgrafova, S., Kutzbach, L., and Pfeiffer, E.-M.: Regulation of methane production, oxidation, and emission by vascular plants and bryophytes in ponds of the northeast Siberian polygonal tundra, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120, 2525–2541, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003053, 2015. a, b
Korrensalo, A., Kettunen, L., Laiho, R., Alekseychik, P., Vesala, T., Mammarella, I., and Tuittila, E.-S.: Boreal bog plant communities along a water table gradient differ in their standing biomass but not their biomass production, J. Veg. Sci., 29, 136–146, https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12602, 2018a. a, b, c
Korrensalo, A., Mammarella, I., Alekseychik, P., Vesala, T., and Tuittila, E.: Plant mediated methane efflux from a boreal peatland complex, Plant Soil, 471, 375–392, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05180-9, 2022. a, b, c, d
Kotiaho, M., Fritze, H., Merilä, P., Tuomivirta, T., Väliranta, M., Korhola, A., Karofeld, E., and Tuittila, E.-S.: Actinobacteria community structure in the peat profile of boreal bogs follows a variation in the microtopographical gradient similar to vegetation, Plant Soil, 369, 103–114, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1546-3, 2013. a
Kuhn, M., Varner, R., Bastviken, D., Crill, P., MacIntyre, S., Turetsky, M., Anthony, K., McGuire, D., and Olefeldt, D.: BAWLD-CH4: Methane fluxes from boreal and arctic ecosystems, Arctic Data Center, https://doi.org/10.18739/A2DN3ZX1R [data set], 2021. a
Kutzbach, L., Wagner, D., and Pfeiffer, E.-M.: Effect of microrelief and vegetation on methane emission from wet polygonal tundra, Lena Delta, Northern Siberia, Biogeochemistry, 69, 341–362, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOG.0000031053.81520.db, 2004. a, b
Lai, D.: Methane dynamics in northern peatlands: a review, Pedosphere, 19, 409–421, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(09)00003-4, 2009. a
Laine, A., Wilson, D., Kiely, G., and Byrne, K. A.: Methane flux dynamics in an Irish lowland blanket bog, Plant Soil, 299, 181–193, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9374-6, 2007. a
Larmola, T., Tuittila, E.-S., Tiirola, M., Nykänen, H., Martikainen, P. J., Yrjälä, K., Tuomivirta, T., and Fritze, H.: The role of Sphagnum mosses in the methane cycling of a boreal mire, Ecology, 91, 2356–2365, https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1343.1, 2010. a, b, c, d
Lide, D. R. and Frederikse, H. P. R. (Eds.): CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 76th Edn., CRC press Inc., Boca Raton, USA (FL), ISBN 978-0849304767, 1995. a
Liebner, S., Zeyer, J., Wagner, D., Schubert, C., Pfeiffer, E.-M., and Knoblauch, C.: Methane oxidation associated with submerged brown mosses reduces methane emissions from Siberian polygonal tundra, J. Ecol., 99, 914–922, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01823.x, 2011. a, b, c
Liptay, K., Chanton, J., Czepiel, P., and Mosher, B.: Use of stable isotopes to determine methane oxidation in landfill cover soils, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 8243–8250, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02630, 1998. a
Männistö, E., Korrensalo, A., Alekseychik, P., Mammarella, I., Peltola, O., Vesala, T., and Tuittila, E.-S.: Multi-year methane ebullition measurements from water and bare peat surfaces of a patterned boreal bog, Biogeosciences, 16, 2409–2421, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2409-2019, 2019. a
Melton, J. R., Wania, R., Hodson, E. L., Poulter, B., Ringeval, B., Spahni, R., Bohn, T., Avis, C. A., Beerling, D. J., Chen, G., Eliseev, A. V., Denisov, S. N., Hopcroft, P. O., Lettenmaier, D. P., Riley, W. J., Singarayer, J. S., Subin, Z. M., Tian, H., Zürcher, S., Brovkin, V., van Bodegom, P. M., Kleinen, T., Yu, Z. C., and Kaplan, J. O.: Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP), Biogeosciences, 10, 753–788, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-753-2013, 2013. a
Moore, T. and Knowles, R.: Methane emissions from fen, bog and swamp peatlands in Quebec, Biogeochemistry, 11, 45–61, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00000851, 1990. a
Moore, T. and Roulet, N.: Methane flux: water table relations in northern wetlands, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 587–590, https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL00208, 1993. a
Moore, T., Roulet, N., and Knowles, R.: Spatial and temporal variations of methane flux from subarctic/northern boreal fens, Global Biogeochem. Cyc., 4, 29–46, https://doi.org/10.1029/GB004i001p00029, 1990. a
Neubauer, S. C.: Global warming potential is not an ecosystem property, Ecosystems, 24, 2079–2089, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00631-x, 2021. a
Noyce, G. L., Varner, R. K., Bubier, J. L., and Frolking, S.: Effect of Carex rostrata on seasonal and interannual variability in peatland methane emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 24–34, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002474, 2014. a, b
Op de Beeck, M., Sabbatini, S., and Papale, D.: ICOS Ecosystem Instructions for Ancillary Vegetation Measurements in Mires (Version 20200316), ICOS Ecosystem Thematic Centre, https://doi.org/10.18160/6mkw-3s2r, 2017. a
Pedersen, A., Petersen, S., and Schelde, K.: A comprehensive approach to soil-atmosphere trace-gas flux estimation with static chambers, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 61, 888–902, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01291.x, 2010. a
Perryman, C. R., McCalley, C. K., Shorter, J. H., Perry, A. L., White, N., Dziurzynski, A., and Varner, R. K.: Effect of Drought and Heavy Precipitation on CH4 Emissions and δ13C–CH4 in a Northern Temperate Peatland, Ecosystems, 27, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-023-00868-8, 2023. a, b
Pirk, N., Mastepanov, M., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Lund, M., Crill, P., and Christensen, T. R.: Calculations of automatic chamber flux measurements of methane and carbon dioxide using short time series of concentrations, Biogeosciences, 13, 903–912, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-903-2016, 2016. a
Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Peregon, A., Saunois, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Brovkin, V., Jones, C. D., Joos, F., Gedney, N., Ito, A., Kleinen, T., Koven, C. D., McDonald, K., Melton, J. R., Peng, C., Peng, S., Prigent, C., Schroeder, R., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Spahni, R., Tian, H., Taylor, L., Viovy, N., Wilton, D., Wiltshire, A., Xu, X., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: Global wetland contribution to 2000–2012 atmospheric methane growth rate dynamics, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 094013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8391, 2017. a
Riutta, T., Korrensalo, A., Laine, A. M., Laine, J., and Tuittila, E.-S.: Interacting effects of vegetation components and water level on methane dynamics in a boreal fen, Biogeosciences, 17, 727–740, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-727-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d
Roslev, P. and King, G. M.: Regulation of methane oxidation in a freshwater wetland by water table changes and anoxia, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 19, 105–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-6496(95)00084-4, 1996. a, b, c, d
Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., Castaldi, S., Chandra, N., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P. M., Covey, K., Curry, C. L., Etiope, G., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Hegglin, M. I., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Hugelius, G., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Jensen, K. M., Joos, F., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Laruelle, G. G., Liu, L., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., McNorton, J., Miller, P. A., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Naik, V., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., O'Doherty, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Regnier, P., Riley, W. J., Rosentreter, J. A., Segers, A., Simpson, I. J., Shi, H., Smith, S. J., Steele, L. P., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Tubiello, F. N., Tsuruta, A., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weber, T. S., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R. F., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Yin, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d
Schimel, J. P.: Plant transport and methane production as controls on methane flux from arctic wet meadow tundra, Biogeochemistry, 28, 183–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186458, 1995. a, b
Segers, R.: Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes, Biogeochemistry, 41, 23–51, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005929032764, 1998. a
Ström, L. and Christensen, T. R.: Below ground carbon turnover and greenhouse gas exchanges in a sub-arctic wetland, Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 1689–1698, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.01.019, 2007. a
Ström, L., Ekberg, A., Mastepanov, M., and Røjle Christensen, T.: The effect of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from a tundra wetland, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 1185–1192, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00655.x, 2003. a
Ström, L., Mastepanov, M., and Christensen, T. R.: Species-specific effects of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from wetlands, Biogeochemistry, 75, 65–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-6124-1, 2005. a
Ström, L., Tagesson, T., Mastepanov, M., and Christensen, T. R.: Presence of Eriophorum scheuchzeri enhances substrate availability and methane emission in an Arctic wetland, Soil Biol. Biochem., 45, 61–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.005, 2012. a
Taylor, M., Bradford, M., Arnold, W., Takahashi, D., Colgan, T., Davis, V., Losos, D., Peccia, J., and Raymond, P.: Quantifying the effects sizes of common controls on methane emissions from an ombrotrophic peat bog, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 128, e2022JG007271, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG007271, 2023. a
Tokida, T., Mizoguchi, M., Miyazaki, T., Kagemoto, A., Nagata, O., and Hatano, R.: Episodic release of methane bubbles from peatland during spring thaw, Chemosphere, 70, 165–171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.042, 2007. a
Treat, C. C., Bloom, A. A., and Marushchak, M. E.: Nongrowing season methane emissions – a significant component of annual emissions across northern ecosystems, Glob. Change Biol., 24, 3331–3343, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14137, 2018. a
Turetsky, M. R., Kotowska, A., Bubier, J., Dise, N. B., Crill, P., Hornibrook, E. R., Minkkinen, K., Moore, T. R., Myers-Smith, I. H., Nykänen, H., Olefeldt, D., Rinne, J., Saarnio, S., Shurpali, N., Tuittila, E.-S., Waddington, J. M., White, J. R., Wickland, K. P., and Wilmking, M.: A synthesis of methane emissions from 71 northern, temperate, and subtropical wetlands, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 2183–2197, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12580, 2014. a
van den Berg, M., van den Elzen, E., Ingwersen, J., Kosten, S., Lamers, L. P., and Streck, T.: Contribution of plant-induced pressurized flow to CH4 emission from a Phragmites fen, Sci. Rep., 10, 12304, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69034-7, 2020. a
Van Der Nat, F.-J. W. and Middelburg, J. J.: Effects of two common macrophytes on methane dynamics in freshwater sediments, Biogeochemistry, 43, 79–104, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006076527187, 1998. a
Van Der Nat, F.-F. W., Middelburg, J. J., Van Meteren, D., and Wielemakers, A.: Diel methane emission patterns from Scirpus lacustris and Phragmites australis, Biogeochemistry, 41, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005933100905, 1998. a
Waddington, J. and Roulet, N.: Atmosphere-wetland carbon exchanges: Scale dependency of CO2 and CH4 exchange on the developmental topography of a peatland, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 233–245, https://doi.org/10.1029/95GB03871, 1996. a
Waddington, J., Roulet, N., and Swanson, R.: Water table control of CH4 emission enhancement by vascular plants in boreal peatlands, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 22775–22785, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02014, 1996. a
Whalen, S. and Reeburgh, W.: Moisture and temperature sensitivity of CH4 oxidation in boreal soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 28, 1271–1281, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00139-3, 1996. a, b
Whiticar, M. J.: Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane, Chem. Geol., 161, 291–314, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00092-3, 1999. a, b, c
Whiting, G. J. and Chanton, J. P.: Plant-dependent CH4 emission in a subarctic Canadian fen, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 6, 225–231, https://doi.org/10.1029/92GB00710, 1992. a, b, c
Whiting, G. J. and Chanton, J. P.: Control of the diurnal pattern of methane emission from emergent aquatic macrophytes by gas transport mechanisms, Aquat. Bot., 54, 237–253, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(96)01048-0, 1996. a
Wilson, D., Alm, J., Riutta, T., Laine, J., Byrne, K. A., Farrell, E. P., and Tuittila, E.-S.: A high resolution green area index for modelling the seasonal dynamics of CO2 exchange in peatland vascular plant communities, Plant Ecol., 190, 37–51, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9189-1, 2007. a, b
Wilson, J. O., Crill, P. M., Bartlett, K. B., Sebacher, D. I., Harriss, R. C., and Sass, R. L.: Seasonal variation of methane emissions from a temperate swamp, Biogeochemistry, 8, 55–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180167, 1989. a
Zhang, L., Dumont, M. G., Bodelier, P. L., Adams, J. M., He, D., and Chu, H.: DNA stable-isotope probing highlights the effects of temperature on functionally active methanotrophs in natural wetlands, Soil Biol. Biochem., 149, 107954, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107954, 2020. a, b
Zona, D., Gioli, B., Commane, R., Lindaas, J., Wofsy, S. C., Miller, C. E., Dinardo, S. J., Dengel, S., Sweeney, C., Karion, A., Chang, R. Y.-W., Henderson, J. M., Murphy, P. C., Goodrich, J. P., Moreaux, V., Liljedahl, A., Watts, J. D., Kimball, J. S., Lipson, D. A., and Oechel, W. C.: Cold season emissions dominate the Arctic tundra methane budget, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 40–45, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516017113, 2016. a
Download
Please read the editorial note first before accessing the article.
- Article
(1832 KB) - Full-text XML
Short summary
During cold seasons, methane release from northern wetlands is important but often underestimated. We studied a boreal bog to understand methane emissions in spring and fall. At cold temperatures, methane release decreases due to lower production rates, but efficient methane transport through plant structures, decaying plants, and the release of methane stored in the pore water keep emissions ongoing. Understanding these seasonal processes can improve models for methane release in cold climates.
During cold seasons, methane release from northern wetlands is important but often...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint