Articles | Volume 11, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6999-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6999-2014
Research article
 | 
11 Dec 2014
Research article |  | 11 Dec 2014

Disentangling residence time and temperature sensitivity of microbial decomposition in a global soil carbon model

J.-F. Exbrayat, A. J. Pitman, and G. Abramowitz

Related authors

Reduction of predictive uncertainty in estimating irrigation water requirement through multi-model ensembles and ensemble averaging
S. Multsch, J.-F. Exbrayat, M. Kirby, N. R. Viney, H.-G. Frede, and L. Breuer
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1233–1244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1233-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1233-2015, 2015
Short summary
Response of microbial decomposition to spin-up explains CMIP5 soil carbon range until 2100
J.-F. Exbrayat, A. J. Pitman, and G. Abramowitz
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2683–2692, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2683-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2683-2014, 2014
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Terrestrial
Integration of tree hydraulic processes and functional impairment to capture the drought resilience of a semiarid pine forest
Daniel Nadal-Sala, Rüdiger Grote, David Kraus, Uri Hochberg, Tamir Klein, Yael Wagner, Fedor Tatarinov, Dan Yakir, and Nadine K. Ruehr
Biogeosciences, 21, 2973–2994, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2973-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2973-2024, 2024
Short summary
The effect of temperature on photosystem II efficiency across plant functional types and climate
Patrick Neri, Lianhong Gu, and Yang Song
Biogeosciences, 21, 2731–2758, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2731-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2731-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling microbial carbon fluxes and stocks in global soils from 1901 to 2016
Liyuan He, Jorge L. Mazza Rodrigues, Melanie A. Mayes, Chun-Ta Lai, David A. Lipson, and Xiaofeng Xu
Biogeosciences, 21, 2313–2333, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2313-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2313-2024, 2024
Short summary
Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and vegetation structural changes contributed to gross primary productivity increase more than climate and forest cover changes in subtropical forests of China
Tao Chen, Félicien Meunier, Marc Peaucelle, Guoping Tang, Ye Yuan, and Hans Verbeeck
Biogeosciences, 21, 2253–2272, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2253-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2253-2024, 2024
Short summary
Non-steady-state stomatal conductance modeling and its implications: from leaf to ecosystem
Ke Liu, Yujie Wang, Troy S. Magney, and Christian Frankenberg
Biogeosciences, 21, 1501–1516, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1501-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1501-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahlström, A., Smith, B., Lindström, J., Rummukainen, M., and Uvo, C. B.: GCM characteristics explain the majority of uncertainty in projected 21st century terrestrial ecosystem carbon balance, Biogeosciences, 10, 1517–1528, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1517-2013, 2013.
Allison, S. D., Wallenstein, M. D., and Bradford, M. A.: Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology, Nat. Geosci., 3, 336–340, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo846, 2010.
Anav, A., Friedlingstein, P., Kidston, M., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Cox, P., Jones, C., Jung, M., Myneni, R., and Zhu, Z.: Evaluating the land and ocean components of the global carbon cycle in the CMIP5 Earth systems models, J. Clim., 26, 6801–6843, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00417.1, 2013.
Bauer, J., Weihermüller, L., Huisman, J., Herbst, M., Graf, A., Séquaris, J., and Vereecken, H.: Inverse determination of heterotrophic soil respiration response to temperature and water content under field conditions, Biogeochemistry, 108, 119–134, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9583-1, 2012.
Davidson, E. A. and Janssens, I. A.: Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change, Nature, 440, 165–173, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04514, 2006.
Download
Short summary
We use a reduced complexity soil organic carbon (SOC) model to address the influence of two parameters on the response of SOC stocks to climate change: baseline turnover time (k) and temperature sensitivity of decomposition (Q10). In our model, k determines SOC stocks and the magnitude of the response to climate change (from 1850 to 2100 under RCP 8.5) while Q10 drives its sign. We dismiss unlikely simulations using global SOC data to reduce the uncertainty in projections and parameter values.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint