Articles | Volume 12, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6791-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6791-2015
Research article
 | 
27 Nov 2015
Research article |  | 27 Nov 2015

Evaluating sensitivity of silicate mineral dissolution rates to physical weathering using a soil evolution model (SoilGen2.25)

E. Opolot and P. A. Finke

Related authors

Land inclination controls CO2 and N2O fluxes, but not CH4 uptake, in a temperate upland forest soil
Lauren M. Gillespie, Nathalie Y. Triches, Diego Abalos, Peter Finke, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Stephan Glatzel, and Eugenio Díaz-Pinés
SOIL, 9, 517–531, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-517-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-517-2023, 2023
Short summary
Tropical Andosol organic carbon quality and degradability in relation to soil geochemistry as affected by land use
Sastrika Anindita, Peter Finke, and Steven Sleutel
SOIL, 9, 443–459, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-443-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-443-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modelling the effect of catena position and hydrology on soil chemical weathering
Vanesa García-Gamero, Tom Vanwalleghem, Adolfo Peña, Andrea Román-Sánchez, and Peter A. Finke
SOIL, 8, 319–335, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-319-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-319-2022, 2022
Short summary
Sensitivity analysis and calibration of a soil carbon model (SoilGen2) in two contrasting loess forest soils
Y. Y. Yu, P. A. Finke, H. B. Wu, and Z. T. Guo
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 29–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-29-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-29-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Terrestrial
Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework
Huajie Zhu, Xiuli Xing, Mousong Wu, Weimin Ju, and Fei Jiang
Biogeosciences, 21, 3735–3760, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling integrated soil fertility management for maize production in Kenya using a Bayesian calibration of the DayCent model
Moritz Laub, Magdalena Necpalova, Marijn Van de Broek, Marc Corbeels, Samuel Mathu Ndungu, Monicah Wanjiku Mucheru-Muna, Daniel Mugendi, Rebecca Yegon, Wycliffe Waswa, Bernard Vanlauwe, and Johan Six
Biogeosciences, 21, 3691–3716, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3691-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3691-2024, 2024
Short summary
When and why microbial-explicit soil organic carbon models can be unstable
Erik Schwarz, Samia Ghersheen, Salim Belyazid, and Stefano Manzoni
Biogeosciences, 21, 3441–3461, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3441-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3441-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impacts of modelling prescribed vs. dynamic land cover in a high-CO2 future scenario – greening of the Arctic and Amazonian dieback
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek K. Arora, Christian Seiler, and Libo Wang
Biogeosciences, 21, 3339–3371, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3339-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3339-2024, 2024
Short summary
Climate-based prediction of carbon fluxes from deadwood in Australia
Elizabeth S. Duan, Luciana Chavez Rodriguez, Nicole Hemming-Schroeder, Baptiste Wijas, Habacuc Flores-Moreno, Alexander W. Cheesman, Lucas A. Cernusak, Michael J. Liddell, Paul Eggleton, Amy E. Zanne, and Steven D. Allison
Biogeosciences, 21, 3321–3338, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3321-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3321-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, S. P., von Blanckenburg, F., and White, A. F.: Physical and Chemical Controls on the Critical Zone, Elements, 3, 315–319, https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.3.5.315, 2007.
Beaulieu, E., Goddéris, Y., Labat, D., Roelandt, C., Calmels, D., and Gaillardet, J.: Modeling of water-rock interaction in the Mackenzie basin: Competition between sulfuric and carbonic acids, Chem. Geol., 289, 114–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.07.020, 2011.
Blatt, H. and Tracy, R.J.: Petrology: Igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic, 2nd ed. New York, W. H. Freeman, ISBN 0-7167-2438-3, 1996.
Blum, A. E. and Stillings, L. L.: Feldspar dissolution kinetics, in: Chemical Weathering Rates of Silicate Minerals, edited by: White, A. F. and Brantley, S. L., Mineralogical Society of America, 31, 291–351, 1995.
Brady, P. V. and Walther, J.V.: Kinetics of quartz dissolution at low temperatures, Chem. Geol., 82, 253–264, 1990.
Download
Short summary
This study evaluated the sensitivity of silicate mineral dissolution rates to intrinsic and extrinsic factors using a soil evolution model, SoilGen2.25. Modelling results showed a dominant role of pH and a direct effect of soil texture on dissolution rates. Clay migration and plant nutrient recycling influenced the pH and thus the dissolution rates. These results demonstrate the need to couple different soil processes in order to explain differences between lab and field dissolution rates.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint