Articles | Volume 13, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5277-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5277-2016
Research article
 | 
22 Sep 2016
Research article |  | 22 Sep 2016

Modelling long-term impacts of mountain pine beetle outbreaks on merchantable biomass, ecosystem carbon, albedo, and radiative forcing

Jean-Sébastien Landry, Lael Parrott, David T. Price, Navin Ramankutty, and H. Damon Matthews

Related authors

Non-deforestation fire vs. fossil fuel combustion: the source of CO2 emissions affects the global carbon cycle and climate responses
Jean-Sébastien Landry and H. Damon Matthews
Biogeosciences, 13, 2137–2149, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2137-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2137-2016, 2016
Short summary
Implementation of a Marauding Insect Module (MIM, version 1.0) in the Integrated BIosphere Simulator (IBIS, version 2.6b4) dynamic vegetation–land surface model
Jean-Sébastien Landry, David T. Price, Navin Ramankutty, Lael Parrott, and H. Damon Matthews
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1243–1261, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1243-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1243-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Terrestrial
Understanding and simulating cropland and non-cropland burning in Europe using the BASE (Burnt Area Simulator for Europe) model
Matthew Forrest, Jessica Hetzer, Maik Billing, Simon P. K. Bowring, Eric Kosczor, Luke Oberhagemann, Oliver Perkins, Dan Warren, Fátima Arrogante-Funes, Kirsten Thonicke, and Thomas Hickler
Biogeosciences, 21, 5539–5560, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5539-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Representation of the terrestrial carbon cycle in CMIP6
Bettina K. Gier, Manuel Schlund, Pierre Friedlingstein, Chris D. Jones, Colin Jones, Sönke Zaehle, and Veronika Eyring
Biogeosciences, 21, 5321–5360, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5321-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5321-2024, 2024
Short summary
Does dynamically modeled leaf area improve predictions of land surface water and carbon fluxes? Insights into dynamic vegetation modules
Sven Armin Westermann, Anke Hildebrandt, Souhail Bousetta, and Stephan Thober
Biogeosciences, 21, 5277–5303, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5277-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5277-2024, 2024
Short summary
Observational benchmarks inform representation of soil organic carbon dynamics in land surface models
Kamal Nyaupane, Umakant Mishra, Feng Tao, Kyongmin Yeo, William J. Riley, Forrest M. Hoffman, and Sagar Gautam
Biogeosciences, 21, 5173–5183, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5173-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5173-2024, 2024
Short summary
X-BASE: the first terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework, FLUXCOM-X
Jacob A. Nelson, Sophia Walther, Fabian Gans, Basil Kraft, Ulrich Weber, Kimberly Novick, Nina Buchmann, Mirco Migliavacca, Georg Wohlfahrt, Ladislav Šigut, Andreas Ibrom, Dario Papale, Mathias Göckede, Gregory Duveiller, Alexander Knohl, Lukas Hörtnagl, Russell L. Scott, Weijie Zhang, Zayd Mahmoud Hamdi, Markus Reichstein, Sergio Aranda-Barranco, Jonas Ardö, Maarten Op de Beeck, Dave Billesbach, David Bowling, Rosvel Bracho, Christian Brümmer, Gustau Camps-Valls, Shiping Chen, Jamie Rose Cleverly, Ankur Desai, Gang Dong, Tarek S. El-Madany, Eugenie Susanne Euskirchen, Iris Feigenwinter, Marta Galvagno, Giacomo A. Gerosa, Bert Gielen, Ignacio Goded, Sarah Goslee, Christopher Michael Gough, Bernard Heinesch, Kazuhito Ichii, Marcin Antoni Jackowicz-Korczynski, Anne Klosterhalfen, Sara Knox, Hideki Kobayashi, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Mika Korkiakoski, Ivan Mammarella, Mana Gharun, Riccardo Marzuoli, Roser Matamala, Stefan Metzger, Leonardo Montagnani, Giacomo Nicolini, Thomas O'Halloran, Jean-Marc Ourcival, Matthias Peichl, Elise Pendall, Borja Ruiz Reverter, Marilyn Roland, Simone Sabbatini, Torsten Sachs, Marius Schmidt, Christopher R. Schwalm, Ankit Shekhar, Richard Silberstein, Maria Lucia Silveira, Donatella Spano, Torbern Tagesson, Gianluca Tramontana, Carlo Trotta, Fabio Turco, Timo Vesala, Caroline Vincke, Domenico Vitale, Enrique R. Vivoni, Yi Wang, William Woodgate, Enrico A. Yepez, Junhui Zhang, Donatella Zona, and Martin Jung
Biogeosciences, 21, 5079–5115, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Albani, M., Moorcroft, P. M., Ellison, A. M., Orwig, D. A., and Foster, D. R.: Predicting the impact of hemlock woolly adelgid on carbon dynamics of eastern United States forests, Can. J. Forest Res., 40, 119–133, 2010.
Alfaro, R. I., van Akker, L., and Hawkes, B.: Characteristics of forest legacies following two mountain pine beetle outbreaks in British Columbia, Canada, Can. J. Forest Res., 45, 1387–1396, 2015.
Amoroso, M. M., Coates, K. D., and Astrup, R.: Stand recovery and self-organization following large-scale mountain pine beetle induced canopy mortality in northern forests, Forest Ecol. Manag., 310, 300–311, 2013.
Arneth, A. and Niinemets, U.: Induced BVOCs: how to bug our models?, Trends Plant Sci., 15, 118–125, 2010.
Arora, V. K., Peng, Y., Kurz, W. A., Fyfe, J. C., Hawkins, B., and Werner, A. T.: Potential near-future carbon uptake overcomes losses from a large insect outbreak in British Columbia, Canada, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2590–2598, 2016.
Download
Short summary
We simulated mountain pine beetle (MPB) outbreaks under four scenarios for the presence and growth release strength of non-attacked vegetation, and found that: (1) impacts on ecosystem carbon and radiative forcing varied greatly across the four scenarios; (2) the global climatic impact from the current outbreak in British Columbia, Canada, seemed smaller than one month of anthropogenic CO2 emissions; and (3) MPB-killed dead standing trees might hasten post-outbreak vegetation recovery.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint