Articles | Volume 17, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3961-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3961-2020
Research article
 | 
05 Aug 2020
Research article |  | 05 Aug 2020

Understanding the uncertainty in global forest carbon turnover

Thomas A. M. Pugh, Tim Rademacher, Sarah L. Shafer, Jörg Steinkamp, Jonathan Barichivich, Brian Beckage, Vanessa Haverd, Anna Harper, Jens Heinke, Kazuya Nishina, Anja Rammig, Hisashi Sato, Almut Arneth, Stijn Hantson, Thomas Hickler, Markus Kautz, Benjamin Quesada, Benjamin Smith, and Kirsten Thonicke

Related authors

Combining empirical and mechanistic understanding of spruce bark beetle outbreak dynamics in the LPJ-GUESS (v4.1, r13130) vegetation model
Fredrik Lagergren, Anna Maria Jönsson, Mats Lindeskog, and Thomas A. M. Pugh
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-239,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-239, 2025
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Disentangling future effects of climate change and forest disturbance on vegetation composition and land-surface properties of the boreal forest
Lucia S. Layritz, Konstantin Gregor, Andreas Krause, Stefan Kruse, Ben F. Meyer, Tom A. M. Pugh, and Anja Rammig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1028,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1028, 2024
Short summary
Climate change projections of terrestrial primary productivity over the Hindu Kush Himalayan forests
Halima Usman, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Anders Ahlström, and Sofia Baig
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 857–870, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-857-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-857-2021, 2021
Short summary
Potential yield simulated by global gridded crop models: using a process-based emulator to explain their differences
Bruno Ringeval, Christoph Müller, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Nathaniel D. Mueller, Philippe Ciais, Christian Folberth, Wenfeng Liu, Philippe Debaeke, and Sylvain Pellerin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1639–1656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021, 2021
Short summary
The GGCMI Phase 2 emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0)
James A. Franke, Christoph Müller, Joshua Elliott, Alex C. Ruane, Jonas Jägermeyr, Abigail Snyder, Marie Dury, Pete D. Falloon, Christian Folberth, Louis François, Tobias Hank, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Ingrid Jacquemin, Curtis Jones, Michelle Li, Wenfeng Liu, Stefan Olin, Meridel Phillips, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Ashwan Reddy, Karina Williams, Ziwei Wang, Florian Zabel, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3995–4018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3995-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Earth System Science/Response to Global Change: Climate Change
Particle fluxes by subtropical pelagic communities under ocean alkalinity enhancement
Philipp Suessle, Jan Taucher, Silvan Urs Goldenberg, Moritz Baumann, Kristian Spilling, Andrea Noche-Ferreira, Mari Vanharanta, and Ulf Riebesell
Biogeosciences, 22, 71–86, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-71-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-71-2025, 2025
Short summary
Responses of field-grown maize to different soil types, water regimes, and contrasting vapor pressure deficit
Thuy Huu Nguyen, Thomas Gaiser, Jan Vanderborght, Andrea Schnepf, Felix Bauer, Anja Klotzsche, Lena Lärm, Hubert Hüging, and Frank Ewert
Biogeosciences, 21, 5495–5515, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5495-2024, 2024
Short summary
Effect of the 2022 summer drought across forest types in Europe
Mana Gharun, Ankit Shekhar, Jingfeng Xiao, Xing Li, and Nina Buchmann
Biogeosciences, 21, 5481–5494, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5481-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5481-2024, 2024
Short summary
Effect of terrestrial nutrient limitation on the estimation of the remaining carbon budget
Makcim L. De Sisto and Andrew H. MacDougall
Biogeosciences, 21, 4853–4873, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4853-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4853-2024, 2024
Short summary
Projected changes in forest fire season, the number of fires, and burnt area in Fennoscandia by 2100
Outi Kinnunen, Leif Backman, Juha Aalto, Tuula Aalto, and Tiina Markkanen
Biogeosciences, 21, 4739–4763, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4739-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4739-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, H. D., MacAlady, A. K., Breshears, D. D., Allen, C. D., Stephenson, N. L., Saleska, S. R., Huxman, T. E., and McDowell, N. G.: Climate-induced tree mortality: Earth system consequences, Eos, 91, 153–154, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010EO170003, 2010. 
Adams, H. D., Williams, A. P., Xu, C., Rauscher, S. A., Jiang, X., and McDowell, N. G.: Empirical and process-based approaches to climate-induced forest mortality models, Front. Plant Sci., 4, 438, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00438, 2013. 
Ahlström, A., Schurgers, G., Arneth, A., and Smith, B.: Robustness and uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to CMIP5 climate change projections, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 044008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044008, 2012. 
Ahlström, A., Xia, J., Arneth, A., Luo, Y., and Smith, B.: Importance of vegetation dynamics for future terrestrial carbon cycling, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 054019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054019, 2015a. 
Download
Short summary
The length of time that carbon remains in forest biomass is one of the largest uncertainties in the global carbon cycle. Estimates from six contemporary models found this time to range from 12.2 to 23.5 years for the global mean for 1985–2014. Future projections do not give consistent results, but 13 model-based hypotheses are identified, along with recommendations for pragmatic steps to test them using existing and novel observations, which would help to reduce large current uncertainty.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint