Articles | Volume 10, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4137-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4137-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
21 Jun 2013
Research article |
| 21 Jun 2013
The Jena Diversity-Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (JeDi-DGVM): a diverse approach to representing terrestrial biogeography and biogeochemistry based on plant functional trade-offs
R. Pavlick
International Max Planck Research School on Earth System Modelling, Hamburg, Germany
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
D. T. Drewry
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
K. Bohn
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
B. Reu
Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
A. Kleidon
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
Related subject area
Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Terrestrial
Effect of land-use legacy on the future carbon sink for the conterminous US
Peatlands and their carbon dynamics in northern high latitudes from 1990 to 2300: a process-based biogeochemistry model analysis
Improved representation of phosphorus exchange on soil mineral surfaces reduces estimates of phosphorus limitation in temperate forest ecosystems
A coupled ground heat flux–surface energy balance model of evaporation using thermal remote sensing observations
Modeling nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soil incubation experiments using CoupModel
Local-scale evaluation of the simulated interactions between energy, water and vegetation in ISBA, ORCHIDEE and a diagnostic model
Implementation and initial calibration of carbon-13 soil organic matter decomposition in the Yasso model
The carbon budget of the managed grasslands of Great Britain – informed by earth observations
Accounting for non-rainfall moisture and temperature improves litter decay model performance in a fog-dominated dryland system
Ideas and perspectives: Allocation of carbon from net primary production in models is inconsistent with observations of the age of respired carbon
Towards an ensemble-based evaluation of land surface models in light of uncertain forcings and observations
Exploring the role of bedrock representation on plant transpiration response during dry periods at four forested sites in Europe
Effects of climate change in European croplands and grasslands: productivity, greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon storage
Assimilation of passive microwave vegetation optical depth in LDAS-Monde: a case study over the continental USA
Global modelling of soil carbonyl sulfide exchanges
Assessing the impacts of agricultural managements on soil carbon stocks, nitrogen loss, and crop production – a modelling study in eastern Africa
The effects of varying drought-heat signatures on terrestrial carbon dynamics and vegetation composition
Resolving temperature limitation on spring productivity in an evergreen conifer forest using a model–data fusion framework
A robust initialization method for accurate soil organic carbon simulations
Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4)
Model simulations of arctic biogeochemistry and permafrost extent are highly sensitive to the implemented snow scheme in LPJ-GUESS
Theoretical insights from upscaling Michaelis–Menten microbial dynamics in biogeochemical models: a dimensionless approach
Estimated effect of the permafrost carbon feedback on the zero emissions commitment to climate change
An improved process-oriented hydro-biogeochemical model for simulating dynamic fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide in alpine ecosystems with seasonally frozen soils
A novel representation of biological nitrogen fixation and competitive dynamics between nitrogen-fixing and non-fixing plants in a land model (GFDL LM4.1-BNF)
Organic phosphorus cycling may control grassland responses to nitrogen deposition: a long-term field manipulation and modelling study
A triple tree-ring constraint for tree growth and physiology in a global land surface model
Simulating shrubs and their energy and carbon dioxide fluxes in Canada's Low Arctic with the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC)
Competing effects of nitrogen deposition and ozone exposure on northern hemispheric terrestrial carbon uptake and storage, 1850–2099
Carbonyl sulfide: comparing a mechanistic representation of the vegetation uptake in a land surface model and the leaf relative uptake approach
Optimal model complexity for terrestrial carbon cycle prediction
CO2 physiological effect can cause rainfall decrease as strong as large-scale deforestation in the Amazon
Plant phenology evaluation of CRESCENDO land surface models – Part 1: Start and end of the growing season
Understanding the effect of fire on vegetation composition and gross primary production in a semi-arid shrubland ecosystem using the Ecosystem Demography (EDv2.2) model
Impacts of fertilization on grassland productivity and water quality across the European Alps under current and warming climate: insights from a mechanistic model
The climate benefit of carbon sequestration
Extending a land-surface model with Sphagnum moss to simulate responses of a northern temperate bog to whole ecosystem warming and elevated CO2
Improving the representation of high-latitude vegetation distribution in dynamic global vegetation models
Robust processing of airborne laser scans to plant area density profiles
Investigating the sensitivity of soil heterotrophic respiration to recent snow cover changes in Alaska using a satellite-based permafrost carbon model
Hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH4 fluxes explained by substrate availability and microbial activity
Modelling the habitat preference of two key Sphagnum species in a poor fen as controlled by capitulum water content
Evaluating two soil carbon models within the global land surface model JSBACH using surface and spaceborne observations of atmospheric CO2
Assessing impacts of selective logging on water, energy, and carbon budgets and ecosystem dynamics in Amazon forests using the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator
Microbial dormancy and its impacts on northern temperate and boreal terrestrial ecosystem carbon budget
Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land cover change and their uncertainty
A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models
Rainfall intensification increases the contribution of rewetting pulses to soil heterotrophic respiration
Wide discrepancies in the magnitude and direction of modeled solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in response to light conditions
Modeling biological nitrogen fixation in global natural terrestrial ecosystems
Benjamin S. Felzer
Biogeosciences, 20, 573–587, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-573-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-573-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The future of the terrestrial carbon sink depends upon the legacy of past land use, which determines the stand age of the forest and nutrient levels in the soil, both of which affect vegetation growth. This study uses a modeling approach to determine the effects of land-use legacy in the conterminous US from 1750 to 2099. Not accounting for land legacy results in a low carbon sink and high biomass, while water variables are not as highly affected.
Bailu Zhao and Qianlai Zhuang
Biogeosciences, 20, 251–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we use a process-based model to simulate the northern peatland's C dynamics in response to future climate change during 1990–2300. Northern peatlands are projected to be a C source under all climate scenarios except for the mildest one before 2100 and C sources under all scenarios afterwards.
We find northern peatlands are a C sink until pan-Arctic annual temperature reaches −2.09 to −2.89 °C. This study emphasizes the vulnerability of northern peatlands to climate change.
Lin Yu, Silvia Caldararu, Bernhard Ahrens, Thomas Wutzler, Marion Schrumpf, Julian Helfenstein, Chiara Pistocchi, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 20, 57–73, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-57-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-57-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we addressed a key weakness in current ecosystem models regarding the phosphorus exchange in the soil and developed a new scheme to describe this process. We showed that the new scheme improved the model performance for plant productivity, soil organic carbon, and soil phosphorus content at five beech forest sites in Germany. We claim that this new model could be used as a better tool to study ecosystems under future climate change, particularly phosphorus-limited systems.
Bimal K. Bhattacharya, Kaniska Mallick, Devansh Desai, Ganapati S. Bhat, Ross Morrison, Jamie R. Clevery, William Woodgate, Jason Beringer, Kerry Cawse-Nicholson, Siyan Ma, Joseph Verfaillie, and Dennis Baldocchi
Biogeosciences, 19, 5521–5551, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5521-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5521-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Evaporation retrieval in heterogeneous ecosystems is challenging due to empirical estimation of ground heat flux and complex parameterizations of conductances. We developed a parameter-sparse coupled ground heat flux-evaporation model and tested it across different limits of water stress and vegetation fraction in the Northern/Southern Hemisphere. The model performed particularly well in the savannas and showed good potential for evaporative stress monitoring from thermal infrared satellites.
Jie Zhang, Wenxin Zhang, Per-Erik Jansson, and Søren O. Petersen
Biogeosciences, 19, 4811–4832, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4811-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4811-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we relied on a properly controlled laboratory experiment to test the model’s capability of simulating the dominant microbial processes and the emissions of one greenhouse gas (nitrous oxide, N2O) from agricultural soils. This study reveals important processes and parameters that regulate N2O emissions in the investigated model framework and also suggests future steps of model development, which have implications on the broader communities of ecosystem modelers.
Jan De Pue, José Miguel Barrios, Liyang Liu, Philippe Ciais, Alirio Arboleda, Rafiq Hamdi, Manuela Balzarolo, Fabienne Maignan, and Françoise Gellens-Meulenberghs
Biogeosciences, 19, 4361–4386, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4361-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4361-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The functioning of ecosystems involves numerous biophysical processes which interact with each other. Land surface models (LSMs) are used to describe these processes and form an essential component of climate models. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of three LSMs and their interactions with soil moisture and vegetation. Though we found room for improvement in the simulation of soil moisture and drought stress, the main cause of errors was related to the simulated growth of vegetation.
Jarmo Mäkelä, Laura Arppe, Hannu Fritze, Jussi Heinonsalo, Kristiina Karhu, Jari Liski, Markku Oinonen, Petra Straková, and Toni Viskari
Biogeosciences, 19, 4305–4313, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4305-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4305-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soils account for the largest share of carbon found in terrestrial ecosystems, and accurate depiction of soil carbon decomposition is essential in understanding how permanent these carbon storages are. We present a straightforward way to include carbon isotope concentrations into soil decomposition and carbon storages for the Yasso model, which enables the model to use 13C as a natural tracer to track changes in the underlying soil organic matter decomposition.
Vasileios Myrgiotis, Thomas Luke Smallman, and Mathew Williams
Biogeosciences, 19, 4147–4170, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4147-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4147-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that livestock grazing and grass cutting can determine whether a grassland is adding (source) or removing (sink) carbon (C) to/from the atmosphere. The annual C balance of 1855 managed grassland fields in Great Britain was quantified for 2017–2018 using process modelling and earth observation data. The examined fields were, on average, small C sinks, but the summer drought of 2018 led to a 9-fold increase in the number of fields that became C sources in 2018 compared to 2017.
J. Robert Logan, Kathe E. Todd-Brown, Kathryn M. Jacobson, Peter J. Jacobson, Roland Vogt, and Sarah E. Evans
Biogeosciences, 19, 4129–4146, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4129-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4129-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding how plants decompose is important for understanding where the atmospheric CO2 they absorb ends up after they die. In forests, decomposition is controlled by rain but not in deserts. We performed a 2.5-year study in one of the driest places on earth (the Namib desert in southern Africa) and found that fog and dew, not rainfall, closely controlled how quickly plants decompose. We also created a model to help predict decomposition in drylands with lots of fog and/or dew.
Carlos A. Sierra, Verónika Ceballos-Núñez, Henrik Hartmann, David Herrera-Ramírez, and Holger Metzler
Biogeosciences, 19, 3727–3738, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3727-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3727-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Empirical work that estimates the age of respired CO2 from vegetation tissue shows that it may take from years to decades to respire previously produced photosynthates. However, many ecosystem models represent respiration processes in a form that cannot reproduce these observations. In this contribution, we attempt to provide compelling evidence, based on recent research, with the aim to promote a change in the predominant paradigm implemented in ecosystem models.
Vivek K. Arora, Christian Seiler, Libo Wang, and Sian Kou-Giesbrecht
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-641, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-641, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The behaviour of natural systems is now very often represented through mathematical models. These models represent our understanding of how the nature works. Of course, the nature doesn't care about our understanding. Since our understanding is not perfect, evaluating models is challenging and there are uncertainties. This manuscript illustrates this uncertainty for land models and argues that evaluating models in the light of uncertainty in various components provides useful information.
César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez, Mauro Sulis, and Stanislaus Schymanski
Biogeosciences, 19, 3395–3423, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3395-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3395-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation relies on soil water reservoirs during dry periods. However, when this source is depleted, the plants may access water stored deeper in the rocks. This rock moisture contribution is usually omitted in large-scale models, which affects modeled plant water use during dry periods. Our study illustrates that including this additional source of water in the Community Land Model improves the model's ability to reproduce observed plant water use at seasonally dry sites.
Marco Carozzi, Raphaël Martin, Katja Klumpp, and Raia Silvia Massad
Biogeosciences, 19, 3021–3050, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Crop and grassland production indicates a strong reduction due to the shortening of the length of the growing cycle associated with rising temperatures. Greenhouse gas emissions will increase exponentially over the century, often exceeding the CO2 accumulation of agro-ecosystems. Water demand will double in the next few decades, whereas the benefits in terms of yield will not fill the gap of C losses due to climate perturbation. Climate change will have a regionally distributed effect in the EU.
Anthony Mucia, Bertrand Bonan, Clément Albergel, Yongjun Zheng, and Jean-Christophe Calvet
Biogeosciences, 19, 2557–2581, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2557-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2557-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, microwave vegetation optical depth data are assimilated in a land surface model in order to analyze leaf area index and root zone soil moisture. The advantage of microwave products is the higher observation frequency. A large variety of independent datasets are used to verify the added value of the assimilation. It is shown that the assimilation is able to improve the representation of soil moisture, vegetation conditions, and terrestrial water and carbon fluxes.
Camille Abadie, Fabienne Maignan, Marine Remaud, Jérôme Ogée, J. Elliott Campbell, Mary E. Whelan, Florian Kitz, Felix M. Spielmann, Georg Wohlfahrt, Richard Wehr, Wu Sun, Nina Raoult, Ulli Seibt, Didier Hauglustaine, Sinikka T. Lennartz, Sauveur Belviso, David Montagne, and Philippe Peylin
Biogeosciences, 19, 2427–2463, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A better constraint of the components of the carbonyl sulfide (COS) global budget is needed to exploit its potential as a proxy of gross primary productivity. In this study, we compare two representations of oxic soil COS fluxes, and we develop an approach to represent anoxic soil COS fluxes in a land surface model. We show the importance of atmospheric COS concentration variations on oxic soil COS fluxes and provide new estimates for oxic and anoxic soil contributions to the COS global budget.
Jianyong Ma, Sam S. Rabin, Peter Anthoni, Anita D. Bayer, Sylvia S. Nyawira, Stefan Olin, Longlong Xia, and Almut Arneth
Biogeosciences, 19, 2145–2169, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2145-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2145-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Improved agricultural management plays a vital role in protecting soils from degradation in eastern Africa. We simulated the impacts of seven management practices on soil carbon pools, nitrogen loss, and crop yield under different climate scenarios in this region. This study highlights the possibilities of conservation agriculture when targeting long-term environmental sustainability and food security in crop ecosystems, particularly for those with poor soil conditions in tropical climates.
Elisabeth Tschumi, Sebastian Lienert, Karin van der Wiel, Fortunat Joos, and Jakob Zscheischler
Biogeosciences, 19, 1979–1993, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1979-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1979-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Droughts and heatwaves are expected to occur more often in the future, but their effects on land vegetation and the carbon cycle are poorly understood. We use six climate scenarios with differing extreme occurrences and a vegetation model to analyse these effects. Tree coverage and associated plant productivity increase under a climate with no extremes. Frequent co-occurring droughts and heatwaves decrease plant productivity more than the combined effects of single droughts or heatwaves.
Stephanie G. Stettz, Nicholas C. Parazoo, A. Anthony Bloom, Peter D. Blanken, David R. Bowling, Sean P. Burns, Cédric Bacour, Fabienne Maignan, Brett Raczka, Alexander J. Norton, Ian Baker, Mathew Williams, Mingjie Shi, Yongguang Zhang, and Bo Qiu
Biogeosciences, 19, 541–558, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-541-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-541-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Uncertainty in the response of photosynthesis to temperature poses a major challenge to predicting the response of forests to climate change. In this paper, we study how photosynthesis in a mountainous evergreen forest is limited by temperature. This study highlights that cold temperature is a key factor that controls spring photosynthesis. Including the cold-temperature limitation in an ecosystem model improved its ability to simulate spring photosynthesis.
Eva Kanari, Lauric Cécillon, François Baudin, Hugues Clivot, Fabien Ferchaud, Sabine Houot, Florent Levavasseur, Bruno Mary, Laure Soucémarianadin, Claire Chenu, and Pierre Barré
Biogeosciences, 19, 375–387, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-375-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-375-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil organic carbon (SOC) is crucial for climate regulation, soil quality, and food security. Predicting its evolution over the next decades is key for appropriate land management policies. However, SOC projections lack accuracy. Here we show for the first time that PARTYSOC, an approach combining thermal analysis and machine learning optimizes the accuracy of SOC model simulations at independent sites. This method can be applied at large scales, improving SOC projections on a continental scale.
Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Ara Cho, Jin Ma, Aleya Kaushik, Katherine D. Haynes, Ian Baker, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Mathijs Groenink, Wouter Peters, John B. Miller, Joseph A. Berry, Jerome Ogée, Laura K. Meredith, Wu Sun, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella, Huilin Chen, Felix M. Spielmann, Georg Wohlfahrt, Max Berkelhammer, Mary E. Whelan, Kadmiel Maseyk, Ulli Seibt, Roisin Commane, Richard Wehr, and Maarten Krol
Biogeosciences, 18, 6547–6565, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The gas carbonyl sulfide (COS) can be used to estimate photosynthesis. To adopt this approach on regional and global scales, we need biosphere models that can simulate COS exchange. So far, such models have not been evaluated against observations. We evaluate the COS biosphere exchange of the SiB4 model against COS flux observations. We find that the model is capable of simulating key processes in COS biosphere exchange. Still, we give recommendations for further improvement of the model.
Alexandra Pongracz, David Wårlind, Paul A. Miller, and Frans-Jan W. Parmentier
Biogeosciences, 18, 5767–5787, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5767-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5767-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that the introduction of a multi-layer snow scheme in the LPJ-GUESS DGVM improved simulations of high-latitude soil temperature dynamics and permafrost extent compared to observations. In addition, these improvements led to shifts in carbon fluxes that contrasted within and outside of the permafrost region. Our results show that a realistic snow scheme is essential to accurately simulate snow–soil–vegetation relationships and carbon–climate feedbacks.
Chris H. Wilson and Stefan Gerber
Biogeosciences, 18, 5669–5679, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5669-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5669-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
To better mitigate against climate change, it is imperative that ecosystem scientists understand how microbes decompose organic carbon in the soil and thereby release it as carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. A major challenge is the high variability across ecosystems in microbial biomass and in the environmental factors like temperature that drive their activity. In this paper, we use math to better understand how this variability impacts carbon dioxide release over large scales.
Andrew H. MacDougall
Biogeosciences, 18, 4937–4952, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4937-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4937-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Permafrost soils hold about twice as much carbon as the atmosphere. As the Earth warms the organic matter in these soils will decay, releasing CO2 and CH4. It is expected that these soils will continue to release carbon to the atmosphere long after man-made emissions of greenhouse gases cease. Here we use a method employing hundreds of slightly varying model versions to estimate how much warming permafrost carbon will cause after human emissions of CO2 end.
Wei Zhang, Zhisheng Yao, Siqi Li, Xunhua Zheng, Han Zhang, Lei Ma, Kai Wang, Rui Wang, Chunyan Liu, Shenghui Han, Jia Deng, and Yong Li
Biogeosciences, 18, 4211–4225, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4211-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4211-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The hydro-biogeochemical model Catchment Nutrient Management Model – DeNitrification-DeComposition (CNMM-DNDC) is improved by incorporating a soil thermal module to simulate the soil thermal regime in the presence of freeze–thaw cycles. The modified model is validated at a seasonally frozen catchment with typical alpine ecosystems (wetland, meadow and forest). The simulated aggregate emissions of methane and nitrous oxide are highest for the wetland, which is dominated by the methane emissions.
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Sergey Malyshev, Isabel Martínez Cano, Stephen W. Pacala, Elena Shevliakova, Thomas A. Bytnerowicz, and Duncan N. L. Menge
Biogeosciences, 18, 4143–4183, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4143-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4143-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Representing biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is an important challenge for land models. We present a novel representation of BNF and updated nitrogen cycling in a land model. It includes a representation of asymbiotic BNF by soil microbes and the competitive dynamics between nitrogen-fixing and non-fixing plants. It improves estimations of major carbon and nitrogen pools and fluxes and their temporal dynamics in comparison to previous representations of BNF in land models.
Christopher R. Taylor, Victoria Janes-Bassett, Gareth K. Phoenix, Ben Keane, Iain P. Hartley, and Jessica A. C. Davies
Biogeosciences, 18, 4021–4037, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4021-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4021-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We used experimental data to model two phosphorus-limited grasslands and investigated their response to nitrogen (N) deposition. Greater uptake of organic P facilitated a positive response to N deposition, stimulating growth and soil carbon storage. Where organic P access was less, N deposition exacerbated P demand and reduced plant C input to the soil. This caused more C to be released into the atmosphere than is taken in, reducing the climate-mitigation capacity of the modelled grassland.
Jonathan Barichivich, Philippe Peylin, Thomas Launois, Valerie Daux, Camille Risi, Jina Jeong, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Biogeosciences, 18, 3781–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3781-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3781-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The width and the chemical signals of tree rings have the potential to test and improve the physiological responses simulated by global land surface models, which are at the core of future climate projections. Here, we demonstrate the novel use of tree-ring width and carbon and oxygen stable isotopes to evaluate the representation of tree growth and physiology in a global land surface model at temporal scales beyond experimentation and direct observation.
Gesa Meyer, Elyn R. Humphreys, Joe R. Melton, Alex J. Cannon, and Peter M. Lafleur
Biogeosciences, 18, 3263–3283, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3263-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3263-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Shrub and sedge plant functional types (PFTs) were incorporated in the land surface component of the Canadian Earth System Model to improve representation of Arctic tundra ecosystems. Evaluated against 14 years of non-winter measurements, the magnitude and seasonality of carbon dioxide and energy fluxes at a Canadian dwarf-shrub tundra site were better captured by the shrub PFTs than by previously used grass and tree PFTs. Model simulations showed the tundra site to be an annual net CO2 source.
Martina Franz and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 18, 3219–3241, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3219-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3219-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The combined effects of ozone and nitrogen deposition on the terrestrial carbon uptake and storage has been unclear. Our simulations, from 1850 to 2099, show that ozone-related damage considerably reduced gross primary production and carbon storage in the past. The growth-stimulating effect induced by nitrogen deposition is offset until the 2050s. Accounting for nitrogen deposition without considering ozone effects might lead to an overestimation of terrestrial carbon uptake and storage.
Fabienne Maignan, Camille Abadie, Marine Remaud, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Róisín Commane, Richard Wehr, J. Elliott Campbell, Sauveur Belviso, Stephen A. Montzka, Nina Raoult, Ulli Seibt, Yoichi P. Shiga, Nicolas Vuichard, Mary E. Whelan, and Philippe Peylin
Biogeosciences, 18, 2917–2955, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2917-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The assimilation of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by continental vegetation has been proposed as a proxy for gross primary production (GPP). Using a land surface and a transport model, we compare a mechanistic representation of the plant COS uptake (Berry et al., 2013) to the classical leaf relative uptake (LRU) approach linking GPP and vegetation COS fluxes. We show that at high temporal resolutions a mechanistic approach is mandatory, but at large scales the LRU approach compares similarly.
Caroline A. Famiglietti, T. Luke Smallman, Paul A. Levine, Sophie Flack-Prain, Gregory R. Quetin, Victoria Meyer, Nicholas C. Parazoo, Stephanie G. Stettz, Yan Yang, Damien Bonal, A. Anthony Bloom, Mathew Williams, and Alexandra G. Konings
Biogeosciences, 18, 2727–2754, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2727-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2727-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Model uncertainty dominates the spread in terrestrial carbon cycle predictions. Efforts to reduce it typically involve adding processes, thereby increasing model complexity. However, if and how model performance scales with complexity is unclear. Using a suite of 16 structurally distinct carbon cycle models, we find that increased complexity only improves skill if parameters are adequately informed. Otherwise, it can degrade skill, and an intermediate-complexity model is optimal.
Gilvan Sampaio, Marília H. Shimizu, Carlos A. Guimarães-Júnior, Felipe Alexandre, Marcelo Guatura, Manoel Cardoso, Tomas F. Domingues, Anja Rammig, Celso von Randow, Luiz F. C. Rezende, and David M. Lapola
Biogeosciences, 18, 2511–2525, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2511-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2511-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of large-scale deforestation and the physiological effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on Amazon rainfall are systematically compared in this study. Our results are remarkable in showing that the two disturbances cause equivalent rainfall decrease, though through different causal mechanisms. These results highlight the importance of not only curbing regional deforestation but also reducing global CO2 emissions to avoid climatic changes in the Amazon.
Daniele Peano, Deborah Hemming, Stefano Materia, Christine Delire, Yuanchao Fan, Emilie Joetzjer, Hanna Lee, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Taejin Park, Philippe Peylin, David Wårlind, Andy Wiltshire, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 18, 2405–2428, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2405-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2405-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Global climate models are the scientist’s tools used for studying past, present, and future climate conditions. This work examines the ability of a group of our tools in reproducing and capturing the right timing and length of the season when plants show their green leaves. This season, indeed, is fundamental for CO2 exchanges between land, atmosphere, and climate. This work shows that discrepancies compared to observations remain, demanding further polishing of these tools.
Karun Pandit, Hamid Dashti, Andrew T. Hudak, Nancy F. Glenn, Alejandro N. Flores, and Douglas J. Shinneman
Biogeosciences, 18, 2027–2045, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2027-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2027-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A dynamic global vegetation model, Ecosystem Demography (EDv2.2), is used to understand spatiotemporal dynamics of a semi-arid shrub ecosystem under alternative fire regimes. Multi-decadal point simulations suggest shrub dominance for a non-fire scenario and a contrasting phase of shrub and C3 grass growth for a fire scenario. Regional gross primary productivity (GPP) simulations indicate moderate agreement with MODIS GPP and a GPP reduction in fire-affected areas before showing some recovery.
Martina Botter, Matthias Zeeman, Paolo Burlando, and Simone Fatichi
Biogeosciences, 18, 1917–1939, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1917-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1917-2021, 2021
Carlos A. Sierra, Susan E. Crow, Martin Heimann, Holger Metzler, and Ernst-Detlef Schulze
Biogeosciences, 18, 1029–1048, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1029-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1029-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The climate benefit of carbon sequestration (CBS) is a metric developed to quantify avoided warming by two separate processes: the amount of carbon drawdown from the atmosphere and the time this carbon is stored in a reservoir. This metric can be useful for quantifying the role of forests and soils for climate change mitigation and to better quantify the benefits of carbon removals by sinks.
Xiaoying Shi, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Peter E. Thornton, Xiaofeng Xu, Fengming Yuan, Richard J. Norby, Anthony P. Walker, Jeffrey M. Warren, Jiafu Mao, Paul J. Hanson, Lin Meng, David Weston, and Natalie A. Griffiths
Biogeosciences, 18, 467–486, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-467-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-467-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Sphagnum mosses are the important species of a wetland ecosystem. To better represent the peatland ecosystem, we introduced the moss species to the land model component (ELM) of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) by developing water content dynamics and nonvascular photosynthetic processes for moss. We tested the model against field observations and used the model to make projections of the site's carbon cycle under warming and atmospheric CO2 concentration scenarios.
Peter Horvath, Hui Tang, Rune Halvorsen, Frode Stordal, Lena Merete Tallaksen, Terje Koren Berntsen, and Anders Bryn
Biogeosciences, 18, 95–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-95-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-95-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated the performance of three methods for representing vegetation cover. Remote sensing provided the best match to a reference dataset, closely followed by distribution modelling (DM), whereas the dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) in CLM4.5BGCDV deviated strongly from the reference. Sensitivity tests show that use of threshold values for predictors identified by DM may improve DGVM performance. The results highlight the potential of using DM in the development of DGVMs.
Johan Arnqvist, Julia Freier, and Ebba Dellwik
Biogeosciences, 17, 5939–5952, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5939-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5939-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Data generated by airborne laser scans enable the characterization of surface vegetation for any application that might need it, such as forest management, modeling for numerical weather prediction, or wind energy estimation. In this work we present a new algorithm for calculating the vegetation density using data from airborne laser scans. The new routine is more robust than earlier methods, and an implementation in popular programming languages accompanies the article to support new users.
Yonghong Yi, John S. Kimball, Jennifer D. Watts, Susan M. Natali, Donatella Zona, Junjie Liu, Masahito Ueyama, Hideki Kobayashi, Walter Oechel, and Charles E. Miller
Biogeosciences, 17, 5861–5882, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5861-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5861-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a 1 km satellite-data-driven permafrost carbon model to evaluate soil respiration sensitivity to recent snow cover changes in Alaska. Results show earlier snowmelt enhances growing-season soil respiration and reduces annual carbon uptake, while early cold-season soil respiration is linked to the number of snow-free days after the land surface freezes. Our results also show nonnegligible influences of subgrid variability in surface conditions on model-simulated CO2 seasonal cycles.
Kuang-Yu Chang, William J. Riley, Patrick M. Crill, Robert F. Grant, and Scott R. Saleska
Biogeosciences, 17, 5849–5860, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5849-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5849-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Methane (CH4) is a strong greenhouse gas that can accelerate climate change and offset mitigation efforts. A key assumption embedded in many large-scale climate models is that ecosystem CH4 emissions can be estimated by fixed temperature relations. Here, we demonstrate that CH4 emissions cannot be parameterized by emergent temperature response alone due to variability driven by microbial and abiotic interactions. We also provide mechanistic understanding for observed CH4 emission hysteresis.
Jinnan Gong, Nigel Roulet, Steve Frolking, Heli Peltola, Anna M. Laine, Nicola Kokkonen, and Eeva-Stiina Tuittila
Biogeosciences, 17, 5693–5719, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5693-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5693-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, which combined a field and lab experiment with modelling, we developed a process-based model for simulating dynamics within peatland moss communities. The model is useful because Sphagnum mosses are key engineers in peatlands; their response to changes in climate via altered hydrology controls the feedback of peatland biogeochemistry to climate. Our work showed that moss capitulum traits related to water retention are the mechanism controlling moss layer dynamics in peatlands.
Tea Thum, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Aki Tsuruta, Tuula Aalto, Edward J. Dlugokencky, Jari Liski, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Tiina Markkanen, Julia Pongratz, Yukio Yoshida, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 17, 5721–5743, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5721-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5721-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Global vegetation models are important tools in estimating the impacts of global climate change. The fate of soil carbon is of the upmost importance as its emissions will enhance the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. To evaluate the skill of global vegetation models to model the soil carbon and its responses to environmental factors, it is important to use different data sources. We evaluated two different soil carbon models by using atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations.
Maoyi Huang, Yi Xu, Marcos Longo, Michael Keller, Ryan G. Knox, Charles D. Koven, and Rosie A. Fisher
Biogeosciences, 17, 4999–5023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4999-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4999-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) is enhanced to mimic the ecological, biophysical, and biogeochemical processes following a logging event. The model can specify the timing and aerial extent of logging events; determine the survivorship of cohorts in the disturbed forest; and modifying the biomass, coarse woody debris, and litter pools. This study lays the foundation to simulate land use change and forest degradation in FATES as part of an Earth system model.
Junrong Zha and Qianla Zhuang
Biogeosciences, 17, 4591–4610, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4591-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4591-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study incorporated microbial dormancy into a detailed microbe-based biogeochemistry model to examine the fate of Arctic carbon budgets under changing climate conditions. Compared with the model without microbial dormancy, the new model estimated a much higher carbon accumulation in the region during the last and current century. This study highlights the importance of the representation of microbial dormancy in earth system models to adequately quantify the carbon dynamics in the Arctic.
Thomas Gasser, Léa Crepin, Yann Quilcaille, Richard A. Houghton, Philippe Ciais, and Michael Obersteiner
Biogeosciences, 17, 4075–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4075-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4075-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We combine several lines of evidence to provide a robust estimate of historical CO2 emissions from land use change. Our novel approach leads to reduced uncertainty and identifies key remaining sources of uncertainty and discrepancy.
We also quantify the carbon removal by natural ecosystems that would have occurred if these ecosystems had not been destroyed (mostly via deforestation). Over the last decade, this foregone carbon sink amounted to about 50 % of the actual emissions.
Hua W. Xie, Adriana L. Romero-Olivares, Michele Guindani, and Steven D. Allison
Biogeosciences, 17, 4043–4057, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4043-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4043-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Soil biogeochemical models (SBMs) are needed to predict future soil CO2 emissions levels, but we presently lack statistically rigorous frameworks for assessing the predictive utility of SBMs. In this study, we demonstrate one possible approach to evaluating SBMs by comparing the fits of two models to soil CO2 respiration data with recently developed Bayesian statistical goodness-of-fit metrics. Our results demonstrate that our approach is a viable one for continued development and refinement.
Stefano Manzoni, Arjun Chakrawal, Thomas Fischer, Joshua P. Schimel, Amilcare Porporato, and Giulia Vico
Biogeosciences, 17, 4007–4023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4007-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4007-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Carbon dioxide is produced by soil microbes through respiration, which is particularly fast when soils are moistened by rain. Will respiration increase with future more intense rains and longer dry spells? With a mathematical model, we show that wetter conditions increase respiration. In contrast, if rainfall totals stay the same, but rain comes all at once after long dry spells, the average respiration will not change, but the contribution of the respiration bursts after rain will increase.
Nicholas C. Parazoo, Troy Magney, Alex Norton, Brett Raczka, Cédric Bacour, Fabienne Maignan, Ian Baker, Yongguang Zhang, Bo Qiu, Mingjie Shi, Natasha MacBean, Dave R. Bowling, Sean P. Burns, Peter D. Blanken, Jochen Stutz, Katja Grossmann, and Christian Frankenberg
Biogeosciences, 17, 3733–3755, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3733-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3733-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provide a global measure of photosynthetic change. This enables scientists to better track carbon cycle responses to environmental change and tune biochemical processes in vegetation models for an improved simulation of future change. We use tower-instrumented SIF measurements and controlled model experiments to assess the state of the art in terrestrial biosphere SIF modeling and find a wide range of sensitivities to light.
Tong Yu and Qianlai Zhuang
Biogeosciences, 17, 3643–3657, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3643-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3643-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) plays an important role in the global nitrogen cycle. However, the fixation rate has usually been measured or estimated at a particular observational site. This study develops a BNF model considering the symbiotic relationship between legume plants and bacteria. The model is extensively calibrated with site-level observational data and then extrapolated to the global terrestrial ecosystems to quantify the fixation rate in the 1990s.
Cited articles
Ackerly, D. and Cornwell, W. K.: A~trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components, Ecol. Lett., 10, 135–145, 2007.
Ainsworth, E. A. and Long, S. P.: What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A~meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2, New Phytol., 165, 351–372, 2004.
Alton, P. B.: How useful are plant functional types in global simulations of the carbon, water, and energy cycles?,~J. Geophys. Res., 116, 1–13, 2011.
Alvarado, V. and Bradford, K.: A~hydrothermal time model explains the cardinal temperatures for seed germination, Plant Cell Environ., 25, 1061–1069, 2002.
Angert, A., Biraud, S., Bonfils, C., Buermann, W. and Fung, I.: CO2 seasonality indicates origins of post-Pinatubo sink, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L11103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019760, 2004.
Arora, V. and Boer, G.: Simulating competition and coexistence between plant functional types in a dynamic vegetation model, Earth Interact., 10, 1–30, 2006.
Asner, G. P. and Alencar, A.: Drought impacts on the Amazon forest: the remote sensing perspective, New Phytol., 187, 569–578, 2010.
Axelsson, E. and Axelsson, B.: Changes in carbon allocation patterns in spruce and pine trees following irrigation and fertilization, Tree Physiol., 2, 189–204, 1986.
Baas-Becking, L.: Geobiologie of Inleiding tot de Milieukunde, van Stockum and Zoon, The Hague, the Netherlands, 1934.
Baker, D., Law, R., Gurney, K., Rayner, P., Peylin, P., Denning, A., Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y., Ciais, P., Fung, I., Heimann, M., John, J., Maki, T., Maksyutov, S., Masarie, K., Prather, M., Pak, B., Taguchi, S., and Zhu, Z.: TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO2 fluxes, 1988–2003, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002439, 2006.
Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais, N., Rodenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D. D., Bonan, G., Bondeau, A., Cescatti, A., Lasslop, G., Lindroth, A., Lomas, M., Luyssaert, S., Margolis, H., Oleson, K. W., Roupsard, O., Veenendaal, E., Viovy, N., Williams, C., Woodward, F. I., and Papale, D.: Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate, Science, 329, 834–838, 2010.
Bloom, A. J., Chapin, F. S. I., and Mooney, H.: Resource limitation in plants – an~economic analogy, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16, 363–392, 1985.
Bohn, K., Dyke, J. G., Pavlick, R., Reineking, B., Reu, B., and Kleidon, A.: The relative importance of seed competition, resource competition and perturbations on community structure, Biogeosciences, 8, 1107–1120, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1107-2011, 2011.
Bonan, G. and Levis, S.: Evaluating aspects of the community land and atmosphere models (CLM3 and CAM3) using a dynamic global vegetation model,~J. Climate, 19, 2290–2301, 2006.
Bonan, G., Levis, S., Kergoat, L., and Oleson, K. W.: Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: an~integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1–18, 2002.
Box, E.: Plant functional types and climate at the global scale,~J. Veg. Sci., 7, 309–320, 1996.
Braakhekke, M. C., Beer, C., Hoosbeek, M. R., Reichstein, M., Kruijt, B., Schrumpf, M., and Kabat, P.: SOMPROF: A vertically explicit soil organic matter model, Ecol. Model., 222, 1712–1730, 2011.
Bruggeman, J. and Kooijman, S.: A biodiversity-inspired approach to aquatic ecosystem modeling, Limnol. Oceanogr., 52, 1533–1544, 2007.
Brutsaert, W.: Evaporation into the Atmosphere, Theory, History, and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1982.
Cannell, M. G. R.: World Forest Biomass and Primary Production Data, Academic Press, London, UK, 1982.
Cannell, M. G. R. and Thornley, J.: Temperature and CO2 responses of leaf and canopy photosynthesis: a clarification using the non-rectangular hyperbola model of photosynthesis, Ann. Bot.-London, 82, 883–892, 1998.
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S., and Naeem, S.: Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity, Nature, 486, 59–67, 2012.
Cavender-Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., and Kembel, S. W.: The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology, Ecol. Lett., 12, 693–715, 2009.
Chapin, F. S. I., BretHarte, M., Hobbie, S., and Zhong, H.: Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change,~J. Veg. Sci., 7, 347–358, 1996.
Chave, J., Coomes, D., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L., Swenson, N. G., and Zanne, A. E.: Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum, Ecol. Lett., 12, 351–366, 2009.
Cohen, D.: A~general model of optimal reproduction in a randomly varying environment,~J. Ecol., 56, 219–228, 1968.
Cornwell, W. K. and Ackerly, D.: Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California, Ecol. Monogr., 79, 109–126, 2009.
Cox, P.: Description of the TRIFFID Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, Hadley Centre, Bracknell, UK, 2001.
Cox, P., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A., and Totterdell, I. J.: Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model, Nature, 408, 184–187, 2000.
Cramer, W., Bondeau, A., Woodward, F. I., Prentice, I. C., Betts, R. A., Brovkin, V., Cox, P., Fisher, V., Foley, J. A., Friend, A. D., Kucharik, C., Lomas, M. R., Ramankutty, N., Sitch, S., Smith, B., White, A., and Young-Molling, C.: Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models, Glob. Change Biol., 7, 357–373, 2001.
Denman, K., Brasseur, G., Chidthaisong, A., Ciais, P., Cox, P., Dickinson, R., Hauglustaine, D., Heinze, C., Holland, E., Jacob, D., Lohnmann, U., Ramachandran, S., da Silva Dias, P., Wofsy, S. C., and Zhang, X.: Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2007.
Díaz, S. and Cabido, M.: Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes, Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 646–655, 2001.
Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F. S., and Tilman, D.: Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being, PLoS Biol., 4, 1300–1305, 2006.
Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., de Bello, F., Quetier, F., Grigulis, K., and Robson, T. M.: Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 104, 20684–20689, 2007.
Doney, S., Lindsay, K., Fung, I., and John, J.: Natural variability in a stable, 1000-yr global coupled climate–carbon cycle simulation,~J. Climate, 19, 3033–3054, 2006.
Drewry, D., Kumar, P., Long, S., Bernacchi, C., Liang, X., and Sivapalan, M.: Ecohydrological responses of dense canopies to environmental variability: 1. interplay between vertical structure and photosynthetic pathway,~J. Geophys. Res., 115, G04022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001340, 2010.
Dunne, K. and Willmott, C.: Global distribution of plant extractable water capacity of soil, Int.~J. Climatol., 16, 841–859, 1996.
Dutkiewicz, S., Follows, M. J., and Bragg, J. G.: Modeling the coupling of ocean ecology and biogeochemistry, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB4017, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003405, 2009.
Elser, J. J., Bracken, M. E. S., Cleland, E. E., Gruner, D. S., Harpole, W. S., Hillebrand, H., Ngai, J. T., Seabloom, E. W., Shurin, J. B., and Smith, J. E.: Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems, Ecol. Lett., 10, 1135–1142, 2007.
Ezoe, H.: Optimal dispersal range and seed size in a stable environment,~J. Theor. Biol., 190, 287–293, 1998.
Falge, E., Baldocchi, D. D., Tenhunen, J., Aubinet, M., Bakwin, P., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Burba, G., Clement, R., Davis, K. J., Elbers, J. A., Goldstein, A. H., Grelle, A., Granier, A., Guomundsson, J., Hollinger, D., Kowalski, A. S., Katul, G., Law, B. E., Malhi, Y., Meyers, T., Monson, R. K., Munger, J. W., Oechel, W., Paw U, K. T., Pilegaard, K., Rannik, Ü., Rebmann, C., Suyker, A., Valentini, R., Wilson, K., and Wofsy, S.: Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 113, 53–74, 2002.
Falster, D. S., Brännström, Å., Dieckmann, U., and Westoby, M.: Influence of four major plant traits on average height, leaf-area cover, net primary productivity, and biomass density in single-species forests: a theoretical investigation,~J. Ecol., 99, 148–164, 2010.
Figueira, A. M. E. S., Miller, S. D., de Sousa, C. A. D., Menton, M. C., Maia, A. R., da Rocha, H. R., and Goulden, M. L.: Effects of selective logging on tropical forest tree growth,~J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, G00B05, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000577, 2008.
Fisher, J., Sitch, S., Malhi, Y., and Fisher, R.: Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: a mechanistic, globally applicable model of plant nitrogen uptake, retranslocation, and fixation, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 187, 666–681, 2010.
Fisher, R., Williams, M., Lola da Costa, A., Malhi, Y., Lola da Costa, R. F., Almeida, S., and Meir, P.: The response of an Eastern Amazonian rain forest to drought stress: results and modelling analyses from a throughfall exclusion experiment, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 2361–2378, 2007.
Fisher, R., McDowell, N., Purves, D., Moorcroft, P., Sitch, S., Cox, P., Huntingford, C., Meir, P., and Woodward, F. I.: Assessing uncertainties in a second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale limitations, New Phytol., 187, 666–681, 2010.
Foley, J. A., Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N., Levis, S., Pollard, D., Sitch, S., and Haxeltine, A.: An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 603–628, 1996.
Foley, J. A., Levis, S., Costa, M., Cramer, W., and Pollard, D.: Incorporating dynamic vegetation cover within global climate models, Ecol. Appl., 10, 1620–1632, 2000.
Foley, J. A., Defries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., Helkowski, J. H., Holloway, T., Howard, E. A., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J. A., Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P. K.: Global consequences of land use, Science, 309, 570–574, 2005.
Follows, M. J. and Dutkiewicz, S.: Modeling diverse communities of marine microbes, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 3, 427–451, 2011.
Follows, M. J., Dutkiewicz, S., Grant, S., and Chisholm, S. W.: Emergent biogeography of microbial communities in a model ocean, Science, 315, 1843–1846, 2007.
France, K. E. and Duffy, J. E.: Diversity and dispersal interactively affect predictability of ecosystem function, Nature, 441, 1139–1143, 2006.
Franklin, O.: Optimal nitrogen allocation controls tree responses to elevated CO2, New Phytol., 174, 811–822, 2007.
Franklin, O., Johansson, J., Dewar, R. C., Dieckmann, U., McMurtrie, R. E., Brännström, A., and Dybzinski, R.: Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles, Tree Physiol., 32, 648-666, 2012.
Freschet, G. T., Dias, A. T. C., Ackerly, D., Aerts, R., Van Bodegom, P. M., Cornwell, W. K., Dong, M., Kurokawa, H., Liu, G., Onipchenko, V. G., Ordoñez, J. C., Peltzer, D. A., Richardson, S. J., Shidakov, I. I., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Tao, J., and Cornelissen, J. H. C.: Global to community scale differences in the prevalence of convergent over divergent leaf trait distributions in plant assemblages, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 20, 755–765, 2011.
Friedlingstein, P., Joel, G., Field, C. B., and Fung, I. Y.: Toward an allocation scheme for global terrestrial carbon models, Glob. Change Biol., 5, 755–770, 1999.
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R. A., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., Bala, G., John, J., Jones, C., Joos, F., Kato, T., Kawamiya, M., Knorr, W., Lindsay, K., Matthews, H. D., Raddatz, T., Rayner, P., Reick, C., Roeckner, E., Schnitzler, K. G., Schnur, R., Strassmann, K., Weaver, A. J., Yoshikawa, C., and Zeng, N.: Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C 4MIP model intercomparison,~J. Climate, 19, 3337–3353, 2006.
Friend, A., Stevens, A., Knox, R., and Cannell, M.: A~process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v3.0), Ecol. Model., 95, 249–287, 1997.
Fung, I. Y., Doney, S., Lindsay, K., and John, J.: Evolution of carbon sinks in a changing climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 11201–11206, 2005.
Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billes, G., Navas, M., Roumet, C., Debussche, M., Laurent, G., Blanchard, A., Aubry, D., Bellmann, A., Neill, C., and Toussaint, J.: Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession, Ecology, 85, 2630–2637, 2004.
Grime, J. P.: Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects,~J. Ecol., 86, 902–910, 1998.
Groenendijk, M., Dolman, A. J., van der Molen, M. K., Leuning, R., Arneth, A., Delpierre, N., Gash, J. H. C., Lindroth, A., Richardson, A. D., and Verbeeck, H.: Assessing parameter variability in a photosynthesis model within and between plant functional types using global fluxnet eddy covariance data, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 22–38, 2011.
Gu, L., Baldocchi, D. D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W., Michalsky, J., Urbanski, S., and Boden, T.: Response of a deciduous forest to the Mount Pinatubo eruption: enhanced photosynthesis, Science, 299, 2035–2038, 2003.
Gurney, K., Law, R., Denning, A., Rayner, P., Pak, B., Baker, D., Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y., Ciais, P., Fung, I., Heimann, M., John, J., Maki, T., Maksyutov, S., Peylin, P., Prather, M., and Taguchi, S.: Transcom 3 inversion intercomparison: model mean results for the estimation of seasonal carbon sources and sinks, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB1010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002111, 2004.
Haddeland, I., Clark, D. B., Franssen, W., Ludwig, F., Voß, F., Arnell, N. W., Bertrand, N., Best, M., Folwell, S., Gerten, D., Gomes, S., Gosling, S. N., Hagemann, S., Hanasaki, N., Harding, R., Heinke, J., Kabat, P., Koirala, S., Oki, T., Polcher, J., Stacke, T., Viterbo, P., Weedon, G. P., and Yeh, P.: Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: setup and first results,~J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 869–884, 2011.
Hagemann, S. and Dümenil, L.: A~parametrization of the lateral waterflow for the global scale, Clim. Dynam., 14, 17–31, 1997.
Hall, C., Stanford, J., and Hauer, F.: The distribution and abundance of organisms as a consequence of energy balances along multiple environmental gradients, Oikos, 65, 377–390, 1992.
Harrison, S. P., Prentice, I. C., Barboni, D., Kohfeld, K. E., Ni, J., and Sutra, J.-P.: Ecophysiological and bioclimatic foundations for a global plant functional classification,~J. Veg. Sci., 21, 300–317, 2010.
Hartmann, D. L.: Global Physical Climatology, International Geophysics Series, 1st edn., Academic Press, San Francisco, 1994.
Heinsch, F., Zhao, M., Running, S. W., Kimball, J. S., Nemani, R. R., Davis, K. J., Bolstad, P. V., Cook, B. D., Desai, A. R., Ricciuto, D. M., Law, B. E., Oechel, W. C., Kwon, H., Luo, H., Wofsy, S. C., Dunn, A. L., Munger, J. W., Baldocchi, D. D., Xu, L., Hollinger, D. Y., Richardson, A. D., Stoy, P. C., Siqueira, M. B. S., Monson, R. K., Burns, S. P., and Flanagan, L. B.: Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations, IEEE~T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1908–1925, 2006.
Hickler, T., Prentice, I. C., Smith, B., Sykes, M. T., and Zaehle, S.: Implementing plant hydraulic architecture within the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 15, 567–577, 2006.
Hickler, T., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Mjöfors, K., Miller, P., Arneth, A., and Sykes, M. T.: CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests, Glob. Change Biol., 14, 1531–1542, 2008.
Hollinger, D. Y., Ollinger, S. V., Richardson, A. D., Meyers, T. P., Dail, D. B., Martin, M. E., Scott, N. A., Arkebauer, T. J., Baldocchi, D. D., Clark, K. L., Curtis, P. S., Davis, K. J., Desai, A. R., Dragoni, D., Goulden, M. L., Gu, L., Katul, G. G., Pallardy, S. G., Paw U, K. T., Schmid, H. P., Stoy, P. C., Sukyer, A. E., and Verma, S. B.: Albedo estimates for land surface models and support for a new paradigm based on foliage nitrogen concentration, Glob. Change Biol., 16, 696–710, 2010.
Houghton, R. A., Hall, F., and Goetz, S. J.: Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle,~J. Geophys. Res., 114, G00E03, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG000935, 2009.
Hubbell, S. P.: Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest, Science, 203, 1299–1309, 1979.
Hubbell, S. P.: A~unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs, Coral Reefs, 16, 9–21, 1997.
Ito, A.: A~historical meta-analysis of global terrestrial net primary productivity: are estimates converging?, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 3161–3175, 2011.
Ives, A. R. and Carpenter, S. R.: Stability and diversity of ecosystems, Science, 317, 58–62, 2007.
Jackson, S. and Williams, J.: Modern analogs in quaternary paleoecology: here today, gone yesterday, gone tomorrow?, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 32, 495–537, 2004.
Johnson, I. R. and Thornley, J. H. M.: A~model of instantaneous and daily canopy photosynthesis,~J. Theor. Biol., 107, 531–545, 1984.
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., and Bondeau, A.: Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model, Biogeosciences, 6, 2001–2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2001-2009, 2009.
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Ciais, P., Seneviratne, S. I., Sheffield, J., Goulden, M. L., Bonan, G., Cescatti, A., Chen, J., de Jeu, R., Dolman, A. J., Eugster, W., Gerten, D., Gianelle, D., Gobron, N., Heinke, J., Kimball, J., Law, B. E., Montagnani, L., Mu, Q., Mueller, B., Oleson, K. W., Papale, D., Richardson, A. D., Roupsard, O., Running, S., Tomelleri, E., Viovy, N., Weber, U., Williams, C., Wood, E. F., Zaehle, S., and Zhang, K.: Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply, Nature, 467, 951–954, 2010.
Kaduk, J. and Heimann, M.: Assessing the climate sensitivity of the global terrestrial carbon cycle model SILVAN, Phys. Chem. Earth, 21, 529–535, 1996.
Kattge, J., Knorr, W., Raddatz, T. J., and Wirth, C.: Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global-scale terrestrial biosphere models, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 976–991, 2009.
Kazakou, E., Vile, D., Shipley, B., Gallet, C., and Garnier, E.: Co-variations in litter decomposition, leaf traits and plant growth in species from a mediterranean old-field succession, Funct. Ecol., 20, 21–30, 2006.
Kleidon, A. and Mooney, H.: A~global distribution of biodiversity inferred from climatic constraints: results from a process-based modelling study, Glob. Change Biol., 6, 507–523, 2000.
Kleidon, A., Fraedrich, K., and Low, C.: Multiple steady-states in the terrestrial atmosphere-biosphere system: a result of a discrete vegetation classification?, Biogeosciences, 4, 707–714, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-707-2007, 2007.
Kleidon, A., Adams, J., Pavlick, R., and Reu, B.: Simulated geographic variations of plant species richness, evenness and abundance using climatic constraints on plant functional diversity, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 1, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014007, 2009.
Kleinen, T., Brovkin, V., and Schuldt, R. J.: A~dynamic model of wetland extent and peat accumulation: results for the Holocene, Biogeosciences, 9, 235–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-235-2012, 2012.
Knorr, W. and Heimann, M.: Impact of drought stress and other factors on seasonal land biosphere CO2 exchange studied through an atmospheric tracer transport model, Tellus B, 47, 471–489, 1995.
Kraft, N. J. B., Valencia, R., and Ackerly, D.: Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest, Science, 322, 580–582, 2008.
Kraft, N. J. B., Comita, L. S., Chase, J. M., Sanders, N. J., Swenson, N. G., Crist, T. O., Stegen, J. C., Vellend, M., Boyle, B., Anderson, M. J., Cornell, H. V., Davies, K. F., Freestone, A. L., Inouye, B. D., Harrison, S. P., and Myers, J. A.: Disentangling the drivers of diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients, Science, 333, 1755–1758, 2011.
Kreft, H. and Jetz, W.: Global patterns and determinants of vascular plant diversity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 104, 5925–5930, 2007.
Krinner, G., Viovy, N., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Ogée, J., Polcher, J., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Sitch, S., and Prentice, I. C.: A~dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, 1–33, 2005.
Laughlin, D., Fulé, P., Huffman, D., Crouse, J., and Laliberté, E.: Climatic constraints on trait-based forest assembly,~J. Ecol., 99, 1489–1499, 2011.
LeBauer, D. S. and Treseder, K. K.: Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed, Ecology, 89, 371–379, 2008.
Lee, E.: Impacts of meteorology-driven seed dispersal on plant migration: implications for future vegetation structure under changing climates, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2011.
Lee, J.-E., Oliveira, R. S., Dawson, T. E., and Fung, I.: Root functioning modifies seasonal climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 17576–17581, 2005.
Levis, S.: Modeling vegetation and land use in models of the Earth System, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, Climate Change, 1, 840–856, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.83, 2010.
Liang, M. and Xie, Z.: Improving the vegetation dynamic simulation in a land surface model by using a statistical-dynamic canopy interception scheme, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 25, 610–618, 2008.
Litchman, E., Klausmeier, C. A., Schofield, O. M., and Falkowski, P. G.: The role of functional traits and trade-offs in structuring phytoplankton communities: scaling from cellular to ecosystem level, Ecol. Lett., 10, 1170–1181, 2007.
Litton, C. M. and Giardina, C.: Below-ground carbon flux and partitioning: global patterns and response to temperature, Funct. Ecol., 22, 941–954, 2008.
Litton, C. M., Raich, J. W., and Ryan, M. G.: Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 2089–2109, 2007.
Loarie, S. R., Duffy, P. B., Hamilton, H., Asner, G. P., Field, C. B., and Ackerly, D.: The velocity of climate change, Nature, 462, 1052–1055, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08649, 2009.
Loehle, C.: Height growth rate trade-offs determine northern and southern range limits for trees,~J. Biogeogr., 25, 735–742, 1998.
Loreau, M.: Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges, Science, 294, 804–808, 2001.
Luo, Y. Q., Randerson, J. T., Abramowitz, G., Bacour, C., Blyth, E., Carvalhais, N., Ciais, P., Dalmonech, D., Fisher, J. B., Fisher, R., Friedlingstein, P., Hibbard, K., Hoffman, F., Huntzinger, D., Jones, C. D., Koven, C., Lawrence, D., Li, D. J., Mahecha, M., Niu, S. L., Norby, R., Piao, S. L., Qi, X., Peylin, P., Prentice, I. C., Riley, W., Reichstein, M., Schwalm, C., Wang, Y. P., Xia, J. Y., Zaehle, S., and Zhou, X. H.: A framework for benchmarking land models, Biogeosciences, 9, 3857–3874, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3857-2012, 2012.
Luyssaert, S., Inglima, I., Jung, M., Richardson, A. D., Reichsteins, M., Papale, D., Piao, S. L., Schulzes, E. D., Wingate, L., Matteucci, G., Aragao, L., Aubinet, M., Beers, C., Bernhoffer, C., Black, K. G., Bonal, D., Bonnefond, J. M., Chambers, J., Ciais, P., Cook, B., Davis, K. J., Dolman, A. J., Gielen, B., Goulden, M., Grace, J., Granier, A., Grelle, A., Griffis, T., Gruenwald, T., Guidolotti, G., Hanson, P. J., Harding, R., Hollinger, D. Y., Hutyra, L. R., Kolar, P., Kruijt, B., Kutsch, W., Lagergren, F., Laurila, T., Law, B. E., Le Maire, G., Lindroth, A., Loustau, D., Malhi, Y., Mateus, J., Migliavacca, M., Misson, L., Montagnani, L., Moncrieff, J., Moors, E., Munger, J. W., Nikinmaa, E., Ollinger, S. V., Pita, G., Rebmann, C., Roupsard, O., Saigusa, N., Sanz, M. J., Seufert, G., Sierra, C., Smith, M. L., Tang, J., Valentini, R., Vesala, T., and Janssens, I. A.: CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 2509–2537, 2007.
Mahecha, M. D., Reichstein, M., Carvalhais, N., Lasslop, G., Lange, H., Seneviratne, S. I., Vargas, R., Ammann, C., Arain, M. A., Cescatti, A., Janssens, I. A., Migliavacca, M., Montagnani, L., and Richardson, A. D.: Global convergence in the temperature sensitivity of respiration at ecosystem level, Science, 329, 838–840, 2010.
Malcolm, J., Markham, A., Neilson, R., and Garaci, M.: Estimated migration rates under scenarios of global climate change,~J. Biogeogr., 29, 835–849, 2002.
Malhi, Y., Aragao, L. E. O. C., Metcalfe, D. B., Paiva, R., Quesada, C. A., Almeida, S., Anderson, L., Brando, P., Chambers, J. Q., da Costa, A. C. L., Hutyra, L. R., Oliveira, P., Patiño, S., Pyle, E. H., Robertson, A. L., and Teixeira, L. M.: Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 1255–1274, 2009.
Malhi, Y., Doughty, C., and Galbraith, D.: The allocation of ecosystem net primary productivity in tropical forests, Philos.~T.~R. Soc. B, 366, 3225–3245, 2011.
Marks, C. O.: The causes of variation in tree seedling traits: the roles of environmental selection versus chance, Evolution, 61, 455–469, 2007.
Marks, C. O. and Lechowicz, M. J.: A~holistic tree seedling model for the investigation of functional trait diversity, Ecol. Model., 193, 141–181, 2006.
Masarie, K. A. and Tans, P. P.: Extension and integration of atmospheric carbon dioxide data into a globally consistent measurement record,~J. Geophys. Res., 100, 11593–11610, 1995.
McCann, K. S.: The diversity–stability debate, Nature, 405, 228–233, 2000.
McCree, K.: An equation for the rate of respiration of white clover plants grown under controlled conditions, in: Productivity of Photosynthetic Systems; Models and Methods, edited by: Setlik,~I., PUDOC, Wageningen, 221–229, 1970.
McGill, B. J., Enquist, B. J., Weiher, E., and Westoby, M.: Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits, Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 178–185, 2006.
McGill, B. J., Etienne, R. S., Gray, J. S., Alonso, D., Anderson, M. J., Benecha, H. K., Dornelas, M., Enquist, B. J., Green, J. L., He, F., Hurlbert, A. H., Magurran, A. E., Marquet, P. A., Maurer, B. A., Ostling, A., Soykan, C. U., Ugland, K. I., and White, E. P.: Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework, Ecol. Lett., 10, 995–1015, 2007.
McKay, M., Conover, W., and Bechman, R.: A~comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239–245, 1979.
Medvigy, D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W., Hollinger, D. Y., and Moorcroft, P. R.: Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: ecosystem demography model version 2,~J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 114, G01002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000812, 2009.
Mercado, L. M., Bellouin, N., Sitch, S., Boucher, O., Huntingford, C., Wild, M., and Cox, P.: Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink, Nature, 458, 1014–1017, 2009.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington DC, 2005.
Monsi, M. and Saeki, T.: Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion, Jpn.~J. Bot., 14, 22–52, 1953.
Moorcroft, P., Hurtt, G., and Pacala, S.: A~method for scaling vegetation dynamics: the ecosystem demography model (ED), Ecol. Monogr., 71, 557–585, 2001.
Myneni, R., Hoffman, S., Knyazikhin, Y., Privette, J. L., Glassy, J., Tian, Y., Wang, Y., Song, X., Zhang, Y., Smith, G., Lotsch, A., Friedl, M., Morisette, J., Votava, P., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S.: Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 214–231, 2002.
Myneni, R. B., Yang, W., Nemani, R. R., Huete, A. R., Dickinson, R. E., Knyazikhin, Y., Didan, K., Fu, R., Negrón Juárez, R. I., Saatchi, S. S., Hashimoto, H., Ichii, K., Shabanov, N. V., Tan, B., Ratana, P., Privette, J. L., Morisette, J. T., Vermote, E. F., Roy, D. P., Wolfe, R. E., Friedl, M. A., Running, S. W., Votava, P., El-Saleous, N., Devadiga, S., Su, Y., and Salomonson, V. V.: Large seasonal swings in leaf area of Amazon rainforests, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 4820–4823, 2007.
Neilson, R., Pitelka, L., Solomon, A., Nathan, R., Midgley, G., Fragoso, J., Lischke, H., and Thompson, K.: Forecasting regional to global plant migration in response to climate change, Bioscience, 55, 749–759, 2005.
Norby, R., DeLucia, E., Gielen, B., Calfapietra, C., Giardina, C., King, J., Ledford, J., McCarthy, H., Moore, D., and Ceulemans, R.: Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 18052, 2005.
Ollinger, S. V., Richardson, A. D., Martin, M. E., Hollinger, D. Y., Frolking, S. E., Reich, P. B., Plourde, L. C., Katul, G. G., Munger, J. W., Oren, R., Smith, M. L., U, K. T. P., Bolstad, P. V., Cook, B. D., Day, M. C., Martin, T. A., Monson, R. K., and Schmid, H. P.: Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: functional relations and potential climate feedbacks, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 19336–19341, 2008.
Olson, R. J., Scurlock, J. M. O., Prince, S. D., Zheng, D. L., and Johnson, K. R.: NPP Multi-Biome: NPP and Driver Data for Ecosystem Model-Data Intercomparison. Data set., Tech. rep., Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center for Biogeochemical Dynamics, Oak Ridge, TN USA, 2001.
O'Malley, M. A.: The nineteenth century roots of "everything is everywhere", Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 5, 647–651, 2007.
Page, S. E., Siegert, F., Rieley, J. O., Boehm, H.-D. V., Jaya, A., and Limin, S.: The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997, Nature, 420, 61–65, 2002.
Pielou, E. C.: The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections,~J. Theor. Biol., 13, 131–144, 1966.
Potter, C., Randerson, J., Field, C., Matson, P., Vitousek, P., Mooney, H., and Klooster, S.: Terrestrial ecosystem production – a process model-based on global satellite and surface data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 7, 811–841, 1993.
Prentice, I. C., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., Harrison, S. P., Hickler, T., Lucht, W., Sitch, S., Smith, B., and Sykes, M. T.: Dynamic global vegetation modeling: quantifying terrestrial ecosystem responses to large-scale environmental change, in: Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World, edited by: Canadell,~J.~G., Pataki,~D.~E., and Pitelka,~L.~F., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 175–192, 2007.
Priestley, C. and Taylor, R.: On the assessment of surface heat-flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Mon. Weather Rev., 100, 81–89, 1972.
Prieto, I., Armas, C., and Pugnaire, F. I.: Water release through plant roots: new insights into its consequences at the plant and ecosystem level, New Phytol., 193, 830–841, 2012.
Proulx, R., Wirth, C., Voigt, W., Weigelt, A., Roscher, C., Attinger, S., Baade, J., Barnard, R. L., Buchmann, N., Buscot, F., Eisenhauer, N., Fischer, M., Gleixner, G., Halle, S., Hildebrandt, A., Kowalski, E., Kuu, A., Lange, M., Milcu, A., Niklaus, P. A., Oelmann, Y., Rosenkranz, S., Sabais, A., Scherber, C., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Scheu, S., Schulze, E.-D., Schumacher, J., Schwichtenberg, G., Soussana, J.-F., Temperton, V. M., Weisser, W. W., Wilcke, W., and Schmid, B.: Diversity promotes temporal stability across levels of ecosystem organization in experimental grasslands, PLoS one, 5, e13382, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013382, 2010.
Purves, D. and Pacala, S.: Predictive models of forest dynamics, Science, 320, 1452–1453, 2008.
Qian, T., Dai, A., Trenberth, K. E., and Oleson, K. W.: Simulation of global land surface conditions from 1948 to 2004. Part I: forcing data and evaluations, J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 953–975, 2006.
Quesada, C. A., Lloyd, J., Anderson, L. O., Fyllas, N. M., Schwarz, M., and Czimczik, C. I.: Soils of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites, Biogeosciences, 8, 1415–1440, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1415-2011, 2011.
Quetier, F., Thebault, A., and Lavorel, S.: Plant traits in a state and transition framework as markers of ecosystem response to land-use change, Ecol. Monogr., 77, 33–52, 2007.
Quillet, A., Peng, C., and Garneau, M.: Toward dynamic global vegetation models for simulating vegetation-climate interactions and feedbacks: recent developments, limitations, and future challenges, Environ. Rev., 18, 333–353, 2010.
Raddatz, T. J., Reick, C. H., Knorr, W., Kattge, J., Roeckner, E., Schnur, R., Schnitzler, K. G., Wetzel, P., and Jungclaus, J.: Will the tropical land biosphere dominate the climate–carbon cycle feedback during the twenty-first century?, Clim. Dynam., 29, 565–574, 2007.
Randerson, J. T., Hoffman, F. M., Thornton, P. E., Mahowald, N. M., Lindsay, K., Leee, Y.-H., Nevison, C. D., Doney, S., Bonan, G., Stoeckli, R., Covey, C., Running, S. W., and Fung, I. Y.: Systematic assessment of terrestrial biogeochemistry in coupled climate-carbon models, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 2462–2484, 2009.
Reich, P. B., and Oleksyn, J.: Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 11001–11006, 2004.
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., and Ellsworth, D. S.: From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 13730–13734, 1997.
Reich, P. B., Walters, M., Ellsworth, D., Vose, J., Volin, J., Gresham, C., and Bowman, W.: Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: a test across biomes and functional groups, Oecologia, 114, 471–482, 1998.
Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E., Lee, T., Ellsworth, D. S., West, J. B., Tilman, D., Knops, J. M. H., Naeem, S., and Trost, J.: Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2, Nature, 440, 922–925, 2006.
Reich, P. B., Wright, I. J., and Lusk, C. H.: Predicting leaf physiology from simple plant and climate attributes: a global GLOPNET analysis, Ecol. Appl., 17, 1982–1988, 2007.
Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M., and Woodward, G.: Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research, Trends Ecol. Evol., 24, 505–514, 2009.
Reu, B., Proulx, R., Bohn, K., Dyke, J. G., Kleidon, A., Pavlick, R., and Schmidtlein, S.: The role of climate and plant functional trade-offs in shaping global biome and biodiversity patterns, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 20, 570–581, 2010.
Reu, B., Zaehle, S., Proulx, R., Bohn, K., Kleidon, A., Pavlick, R., and Schmidtlein, S.: The role of plant functional trade-offs for biodiversity changes and biome shifts under scenarios of global climatic change, Biogeosciences, 8, 1255–1266, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1255-2011, 2011.
Reu, B., Zaehle, S., Bohn, K., Pavlick, R., Schmidtlein, S. Williams, J. W., and Kleidon, A.: No-analogue vegetation types do not correspond to no-analogue climates in scenarios of global warming, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., accepted, 2013.
Robock, A.: The seasonal cycle of snow cover, sea ice and surface albedo, Mon. Weather Rev., 108, 267–285, 1980.
Roeckner, E., Arpe, K., Bengtsson, L., Christoph, M., Claussen, M., Dümenil, L., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: The Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM-4: Model Description and Simulation of Present-Day Climate, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany, 1996.
Ryan, M.: A~simple method for estimating gross carbon budgets for vegetation in forest ecosystems, Tree Physiol., 9, 255–266, 1991.
Ryu, Y., Baldocchi, D., Kobayashi, H., van Ingen, C., Li, J., Black, T. A., Beringer, J., van Gorsel, E., Knohl, A., Law, B. E., and Roupsard, O.: Integration of MODIS land and atmosphere products with a coupled-process model to estimate gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration from 1\;km to global, Global Biogeochem., 25, GB4017, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004053, 2011.
Saatchi, S. S., Houghton, R. A., Alvala, R. C. D. S., Soares, J. V., and Yu, Y.: Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon Basin, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 816–837, 2007.
Saatchi, S. S., Harris, N. L., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E. T., Salas, W., and Morel, A.: Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 9899–9904, 2011.
Samanta, A., Ganguly, S., Hashimoto, H., Devadiga, S., Vermote, E., Knyazikhin, Y., Nemani, R. R., and Myneni, R.: Amazon forests did not green-up during the 2005 drought, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L05401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL042154, 2010.
Scheiter, S. and Higgins, S. L.: Impacts of climate change on the vegetation of Africa: an adaptive dynamic vegetation modelling approach, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 2224–2246, 2009.
Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., and Kira, T.: A~quantitative analysis of plant form – the pipe model theory, 1. basic analysis, Jpn.~J. Ecol., 14, 97–105, 1964.
Shipley, B., Lechowicz, M., Wright, I. J., and Reich, P. B.: Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum, Ecology, 87, 535–541, 2006a.
Shipley, B., Vile, D., and Garnier, E.: From plant traits to plant communities: a statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity, Science, 314, 812–814, 2006b.
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., Thonicke, K., and Venevsky, S.: Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 161–185, 2003.
Sitch, S., Huntingford, C., Gedney, N., Levy, P. E., Lomas, M., Piao, S. L., Betts, R. A., Ciais, P., Cox, P., Friedlingstein, P., Jones, C. D., Prentice, I. C., and Woodward, F. I.: Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), Glob. Change Biol., 14, 2015–2039, 2008.
Smith, T. and Huston, M.: A~theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities, Plant Ecol., 83, 49–69, 1989.
Sonnier, G., Shipley, B., and Navas, M.-L.: Plant traits, species pools and the prediction of relative abundance in plant communities: a maximum entropy approach,~J. Veg. Sci., 21, 318–331, 2010.
Stoeckli, R., Lawrence, D. M., Niu, G. Y., Oleson, K. W., Thornton, P. E., Yang, Z. L., Bonan, G., Denning, A. S., and Running, S. W.: Use of FLUXNET in the community land model development,~J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, G01025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000562, 2008.
Swenson, N. G. and Weiser, M.: Plant geography upon the basis of functional traits: an~example from Eastern North American trees, Ecology, 91, 2234–2241, 2010.
Taylor, K.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram,~J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 7183–7192, 2001.
Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., and Cramer, W.: The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 10, 661–677, 2008.
Thornley, J.: Respiration, growth and maintenance in plants, Nature, 227, 304–305, 1970.
Thornton, P. E., Lamarque, J.-F., Rosenbloom, N. A., and Mahowald, N. M.: Influence of carbon-nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB4018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002868, 2007.
Thum, T., Räisänen, P., Sevanto, S., Tuomi, M., Reick, C., Vesala, T., Raddatz, T., Aalto, T., Järvinen, H., Altimir, N., Pilegaard, K., Nagy, Z., Rambal, S., and Liski, J.: Soil carbon model alternatives for ECHAM5/JSBACH climate model: evaluation and impacts on global carbon cycle estimates,~J. Geophys. Res., 116, G02028, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001612, 2011.
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., and Knops, J. M. H.: Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment, Nature, 441, 629–632, 2006.
Van Bodegom, P. M., Douma, B., Witte, F. M., Ordoñez, J. C., Bartholomeus, R. P., and Aerts, R.: Going beyond limitations of plant functional types when predicting global ecosystem–atmosphere fluxes: exploring the merits of traits-based approaches, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 21, 625–636, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00717.x, 2011.
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., and Arellano Jr., A. F.: Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3423–3441, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3423-2006, 2006.
van der Werf, G. R., Dempewolf, J., Trigg, S. N., Randerson, J. T., Kasibhatla, P. S., Giglio, L., Murdiyarso, D., Peters, W., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Dolman, A. J., and DeFries, R. S.: Climate regulation of fire emissions and deforestation in equatorial Asia, P. Nal. Acad. Sci., 105, 20350–20355, 2008.
Verheijen, L. M., Brovkin, V., Aerts, R., Bönisch, G., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Kattge, J., Reich, P. B., Wright, I. J., and van Bodegom, P. M.: Impacts of trait variation through observed trait-climate relationships on performance of a representative Earth System model: a conceptual analysis, Biogeosciences Discuss., 9, 18907–18950, https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-9-18907-2012, 2012.
Vieira, S., de Camargo, P. B., Selhorst, D., da Silva, R., Hutyra, L., Chambers, J. Q., Brown, I. F., Higuchi, N., dos Santos, J., Wofsy, S. C., Trumbore, S. E., and Martinelli, L. A.: Forest structure and carbon dynamics in Amazonian tropical rain forests, Oecologia, 140, 468–479, 2004.
Vile, D., Shipley, B., and Garnier, E.: Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundance, Ecol. Lett., 9, 1061–1067, 2006.
Wang, A. and Price, D. T.: Estimating global distribution of boreal, temperate, and tropical tree plant functional types using clustering techniques,~J. Geophys. Res., 112, G01024, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000252, 2007.
Webb, C. T., Hoeting, J. A., Ames, G. M., Pyne, M. I., and LeRoy Poff, N.: A~structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology, Ecol. Lett., 13, 267–283, 2010.
Westoby, M. and Wright, I. J.: Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits, Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 261–268, 2006.
Westoby, M., Falster, D., Moles, A., Vesk, P., and Wright, I. J.: Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 33, 125–159, 2002.
Wigmosta, M., Vail, L., and Lettenmaier, D.: A~distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain, Water Resour. Res., 30, 1665–1679, 1994.
Williams, J. W. and Jackson, S. T.: Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises, Front. Ecol. Environ., 5, 475–482, 2007.
Wolf, A., Field, C. B., and Berry, J. A.: Allometric growth and allocation in forests: a perspective from FLUXNET, Ecol. Appl., 21, 1546–1556, 2011.
Woodward, F. I., Lomas, M. R., Betts, R. A., Wagner, A., Mulligan, M., and Hewitt, C. N.: Vegetation-climate feedbacks in a greenhouse world, Philos.~T.~R. Soc. B, 353, 29–39, 1998.
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Falster, D. S., Garnier, E., Hikosaka, K., Lamont, B. B., Lee, W., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., Poorter, H., Villar, R., Warton, D. I., and Westoby, M.: Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships, New Phytol., 166, 485–496, 2005.
Zaehle, S. and Friend, A. D.: Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN land surface model: 1. model description, site-scale evaluation, and sensitivity to parameter estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1005, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003521, 2010.
Zaehle, S., Friend, A. D., Friedlingstein, P., Dentener, F., Peylin, P., and Schulz, M.: Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN land surface model: 2. role of the nitrogen cycle in the historical terrestrial carbon balance, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003522, 2010.
Zhao, M., Heinsch, F., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S.: Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set, Remote Sens. Environ., 95, 164–176, 2005.
Zhao, M., Running, S. W., and Nemani, R. R.: Sensitivity of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) terrestrial primary production to the accuracy of meteorological reanalyses,~J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 111, G01002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JG000004, 2006.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint