Articles | Volume 19, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1067-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1067-2022
Research article
 | 
18 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 18 Feb 2022

Assessing the spatial and temporal variability of greenhouse gas emissions from different configurations of on-site wastewater treatment system using discrete and continuous gas flux measurement

Jan Knappe, Celia Somlai, and Laurence W. Gill

Related authors

Reviews and Syntheses: Evaluating the Potential Application of Ecohydrological Models for Northern Peatland Restoration: A Scoping Review
Mariana P. Silva, Mark G. Healy, and Laurence Gill
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-167,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-167, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for BG
Short summary
Variations in land types detected using methane retrieved from space-borne sensor
Saheba Bhatnagar, Mahesh Kumar Sha, Laurence Gill, Bavo Langerock, and Bidisha Ghosh
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2022-88,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2022-88, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Impacts of climate change on groundwater flooding and ecohydrology in lowland karst
Patrick Morrissey, Paul Nolan, Ted McCormack, Paul Johnston, Owen Naughton, Saheba Bhatnagar, and Laurence Gill
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1923–1941, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1923-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1923-2021, 2021
Short summary
Carbon balance of a restored and cutover raised bog: implications for restoration and comparison to global trends
Michael M. Swenson, Shane Regan, Dirk T. H. Bremmers, Jenna Lawless, Matthew Saunders, and Laurence W. Gill
Biogeosciences, 16, 713–731, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-713-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-713-2019, 2019
Short summary
Monitoring environmental supporting conditions of a raised bog using remote sensing techniques
Saheba Bhatnagar, Bidisha Ghosh, Shane Regan, Owen Naughton, Paul Johnston, and Laurence Gill
Proc. IAHS, 380, 9–15, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-380-9-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-380-9-2018, 2018

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Greenhouse Gases
Timescale dependence of airborne fraction and underlying climate–carbon-cycle feedbacks for weak perturbations in CMIP5 models
Guilherme L. Torres Mendonça, Julia Pongratz, and Christian H. Reick
Biogeosciences, 21, 1923–1960, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1923-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1923-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: Preventing CO2 overestimation from mercuric or copper(II) chloride preservation of dissolved greenhouse gases in freshwater samples
François Clayer, Jan Erik Thrane, Kuria Ndungu, Andrew King, Peter Dörsch, and Thomas Rohrlack
Biogeosciences, 21, 1903–1921, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1903-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring temporal and spatial variation of nitrous oxide flux using several years of peatland forest automatic chamber data
Helena Rautakoski, Mika Korkiakoski, Jarmo Mäkelä, Markku Koskinen, Kari Minkkinen, Mika Aurela, Paavo Ojanen, and Annalea Lohila
Biogeosciences, 21, 1867–1886, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Diurnal versus spatial variability of greenhouse gas emissions from an anthropogenically modified lowland river in Germany
Matthias Koschorreck, Norbert Kamjunke, Uta Koedel, Michael Rode, Claudia Schuetze, and Ingeborg Bussmann
Biogeosciences, 21, 1613–1628, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1613-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Regional assessment and uncertainty analysis of carbon and nitrogen balances at cropland scale using the ecosystem model LandscapeDNDC
Odysseas Sifounakis, Edwin Haas, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, and Maria P. Papadopoulou
Biogeosciences, 21, 1563–1581, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1563-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1563-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration – guidelines for computing crop water requirements, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 1998. 
Ambus, P. and Christensen, S.: Spatial and seasonal nitrous oxide and methane fluxes in Danish forest-, grassland-, and agroecosystems, J. Environ Qual., 24, 993–1001, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1995.00472425002400050031x, 1995. 
Anderson, F. L., Cooper, J. A., and Amador, J. A.: Laboratory-scale evaluation of the effects of water-filled pore space on emissions of CO2, CH4, N2O, and N2 from soil-based wastewater treatment, Water Air Soil Poll., 230, 245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4294-7, 2019. 
Banjanovic, E. S. and Osborne, J. W.: Confidence intervals for effect sizes: applying bootstrap resampling, Prac. Assess. Res. Eval., 21, 5, https://doi.org/10.7275/dz3r-8n08, 2016. 
Bastviken, D., Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Crill, P. M., and Enrich-Prast, A.: Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink, Science, 331, 50, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196808, 2011. 
Download
Short summary
Two domestic on-site wastewater treatment systems have been monitored for greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide) emissions coming from the process units, soil and vent pipes. This has enabled the net greenhouse gas per person to be quantified for the first time, as well as the impact of pre-treatment on the effluent before being discharged to soil. These decentralised wastewater treatment systems serve approx. 20 % of the population in both Europe and the United States.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint