Articles | Volume 7, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2311-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2311-2010
04 Aug 2010
 | 04 Aug 2010

An inverse analysis reveals limitations of the soil-CO2 profile method to calculate CO2 production and efflux for well-structured soils

B. Koehler, E. Zehe, M. D. Corre, and E. Veldkamp

Related subject area

Biogeochemistry: Modelling, Terrestrial
Optimizing the terrestrial ecosystem gross primary productivity using carbonyl sulfide (COS) within a two-leaf modeling framework
Huajie Zhu, Xiuli Xing, Mousong Wu, Weimin Ju, and Fei Jiang
Biogeosciences, 21, 3735–3760, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3735-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling integrated soil fertility management for maize production in Kenya using a Bayesian calibration of the DayCent model
Moritz Laub, Magdalena Necpalova, Marijn Van de Broek, Marc Corbeels, Samuel Mathu Ndungu, Monicah Wanjiku Mucheru-Muna, Daniel Mugendi, Rebecca Yegon, Wycliffe Waswa, Bernard Vanlauwe, and Johan Six
Biogeosciences, 21, 3691–3716, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3691-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3691-2024, 2024
Short summary
When and why microbial-explicit soil organic carbon models can be unstable
Erik Schwarz, Samia Ghersheen, Salim Belyazid, and Stefano Manzoni
Biogeosciences, 21, 3441–3461, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3441-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3441-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impacts of modelling prescribed vs. dynamic land cover in a high-CO2 future scenario – greening of the Arctic and Amazonian dieback
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek K. Arora, Christian Seiler, and Libo Wang
Biogeosciences, 21, 3339–3371, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3339-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3339-2024, 2024
Short summary
Climate-based prediction of carbon fluxes from deadwood in Australia
Elizabeth S. Duan, Luciana Chavez Rodriguez, Nicole Hemming-Schroeder, Baptiste Wijas, Habacuc Flores-Moreno, Alexander W. Cheesman, Lucas A. Cernusak, Michael J. Liddell, Paul Eggleton, Amy E. Zanne, and Steven D. Allison
Biogeosciences, 21, 3321–3338, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3321-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3321-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Beven, K. J. and Germann, P. F.: Macropores and water flow in soils, Water Resour. Res., 18, 1311–1325, 1982.
Blake, G. R. and Hartge, K. H.: Bulk density, in: Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, edited by: Klute, A., Agronomy Monograph, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 12 pp., 1986.
Blume, T., Zehe, E., and Bronstert, A.: Investigation of runoff generation in a pristine, poorly gauged catchment in the Chilean Andes II: Qualitative and quantitative use of tracers at three spatial scales, Hydrol. Processes, 22, 3676–3688, 2008.
Campbell, G. S.: Soil physics with BASIC, transport models for soil-plant systems, Developments in Soil Science, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 150 pp., 1985.
Campbell Scientific: CS616 and CS625 water content reflectometers, Instruction manual, 2002–2006.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint